Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.115
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam MUSLIM HERITAGE: JURNAL DIALOG ISLAM DENGAN REALITAS Al-Ihkam: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Jurnal Psikologi Integratif Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu'ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif Bidayah: Studi Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman Al-Majaalis : Jurnal Dirasat Islamiyah Studia Philosophica et Theologica Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmu Ushuluddin, Adab dan Dakwah Ulumuna Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an,Tafsirdan Pemikiran Islam Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Ushuluddin Muslim Heritage Qurthuba: The Journal of History and Islamic Civilization An-Nur International Journal of Islamic Thought AIJQH
Imam Ghazali Said
UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
DIFFERENTIATING THE HADITHS ON TABARRUK AT THE TOMB OF THE PROPHET AMONG SUNNIS IN THE BOOK OF MAFĀHIM AND AL-TABARRUK Prayogi, Ananda; Verawati, Sellyana; Said, Imam Ghazali; Bustomi, Achmad Wahid
Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies Vol 6, No 2 (2025): Nabawi: Journal of Hadith Studies
Publisher : LP2M Ma'had Aly Hasyim Asy'ari Pesantren Tebuireng

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55987/njhs.v6i2.293

Abstract

Among Sunni Muslims—particularly between traditionalist and reformist circles—the practice of tabarruk at the Prophet’s tomb has remained a persistent source of controversy. The differing views, as seen between Nahdlatul Ulama and Wahhabi groups, reflect deeper tensions in understanding the legitimacy of such a practice. This issue is worth examining, as it highlights how variations in the interpretation of hadith shape religious perspectives within the Muslim community.This article aims to identify the differences in the use of hadith concerning tabarruk at the Prophet’s tomb by two prominent scholars: Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ʿAlawī al-Mālikī, representing the Sunni traditionalist perspective, and ʿAlī ibn Nāfiʿ al-ʿIlyānī, representing the Sunni reformist view. The study analyzes the hadiths each scholar employs as evidence, taking into account their authenticity, authority, interpretation, and the contextual factors underlying their differing positions.Using the methods of hadith criticism and ijmālī (holistic) understanding, this article reveals fundamental differences in their reasoning regarding tabarruk. The divergence lies not only in their choice of hadiths but also in how each relates the practice to societal behavior—whether deemed excessive or overly restrictive. Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ʿAlawī al-Mālikī argues that people are too quick to prohibit tabarruk, whereas ʿAlī ibn Nāfiʿ al-ʿIlyānī contends that the public tends to overindulge in it. In terms of validity, both hadiths used are authentic: the one cited by Sayyid Muḥammad is mauqūf al-sanad but marfūʿ al-ḥukm, while that cited by Shaykh ʿAlī ibn Nāfiʿ is marfūʿ. Both therefore carry equal argumentative strength.{Di kalangan Muslim Sunnī, khususnya antara kalangan tradisionalis dan reformis, praktik tabarruk dengan makam Nabi telah menjadi sumber kontroversi yang terus berlanjut. Perbedaan pandangan ini, seperti yang terlihat antara kelompok Nahdlatul Ulama dan Wahhabi, mencerminkan ketegangan dalam pemahaman terhadap praktik tersebut. Isu ini menjadi relevan untuk diteliti mengingat pentingnya memahami bagaimana perbedaan interpretasi hadis memengaruhi pandangan keagamaan di kalangan umat Islam. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi perbedaan penggunaan hadis tentang tabarruk dengan makam Nabi oleh dua tokoh besar, yaitu Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ’Alawī al-Mālikī yang mewakili perspektif Sunnī tradisionalis, dan ‘Ali ibn Nafi’ al-‘Ilyani yang mewakili Sunnī reformis. Penelitian ini menganalisis hadis-hadis yang mereka gunakan sebagai dalil, dengan mempertimbangkan aspek kesahihan, kehujahan, pemahaman mereka, serta faktor yang melatarbelakangi perbedaan ini. Dengan pendekatan kritik hadis dan pemahaman ijmālī, artikel ini mengungkapkan perbedaan mendasar dalam pendalilan kedua tokoh ini terhadap tabarruk dengan makam Nabi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan ini tidak hanya terletak pada pemilihan hadis, tetapi juga pada cara keduanya menghubungkan praktik ini dengan respons terhadap perilaku masyarakat, yang dianggap berlebihan atau sebaliknya. Di satu sisi, Sayyid Muḥammad ibn ’Alawī al-Mālikī memandang masyarakat terlalu mudah mengharamkan tabarruk makam Nabi, sementara di sisi lain, ‘Ali ibn Nafi’ al-‘Ilyani menganggap masyarakat berlebihan dalam mempraktikkannya. Dari sisi validitas, kedua hadis yang digunakan adalah sahih, Hadis yang digunakan oleh Sayyid Muḥammad berstatus mauqūf al-sanad namun marfū‘ al-ḥukm, sedangkan hadis yang digunakan Syaikh ‘Alī ibn Nāfi’ berstatus marfū‘. Keduanya memiliki kekuatan argumentatif yang seimbang.}
Rethinking Javanese Sufism: From Ascetic Protest to Institutional Power Said, Imam Ghazali; Maram, Ahmad Nabilul; Muhdi, Muhdi
Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 15 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2025.15.1.113-147

Abstract

This article re-examines Javanese Sufism through the lenses of hierarchy, determinism, and free will, adding an explicit economic-political dimension often absent from earlier studies. Drawing on participant observations in three pesantren, semi-structured interviews, and textual analysis of classical and Javanese scholarship, the analysis showed how charismatic teachers and guides converted spiritual authority into material patronage networks, while disciples negotiated between Jabarī rhetoric and pragmatic agency. Two ideal types emerged: an ascetic current that framed free will as self-discipline and distance from power and a common, devotional current that sacralized the submission of the self through collective dhikr and pilgrimage economies. These two approaches can explain Sufism’s success in spreading Islam in Java and its current traction among economically marginal groups. By linking doctrinal debate with money flow, the study extends current scholarship on religion and social change and provides a framework for assessing governance and accountability in Sufi institutions. Sufi institutions are advised to adopt transparent budget disclosure and participatory decision-making so that charismatic authority is balanced by measurable good governance safeguards.
Teodemokrasi dalam Konsepsi Negara Islam: (Studi Komparasi Pemikiran Abu al-A’la Maududi dan Ayatullah Khomeini) Wafa Ilmi, Vika; Imam Ghazali Said; Zainal Fanani
Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Ta’wiluna: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an, Tafsir dan Pemikiran Islam
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Penerbitan dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (LP3M) IAIFA Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58401/takwiluna.v6i1.1967

Abstract

This research examines the thoughts of Abu al-A'la al-Maududi and Ayatollah Khomeini on theodemocracy in the Islamic state through a comparative study. Using a qualitative approach and literature research method, this study analyzes their primary works, particularly al-Hukumah al-Islamiyah, along with relevant secondary sources. The findings show that despite coming from different madhhab backgrounds - Sunni and Shia - both figures share fundamental views on the unity of Islam and state, as well as criticism of the secular Western democratic system. However, significant differences exist in their interpretation of theodemocracy, especially regarding state leadership. Maududi developed al-Hakimiyah al-Ilahiyah emphasizing collective sovereignty of the ummah, while Khomeini's Wilayah al-Faqih places ulama as the highest authority. These differences reflect in their proposed state structures: Maududi advocated classical trias politica, while Khomeini developed a system with Faqih as supreme supervisor. This research reveals that successful implementation of Islamic state concepts depends not only on ideological strength but also on compatibility with local socio-cultural and political contexts, as evidenced in Pakistan and Iran's experiences.
Doubts on the Hadith of Al-Thaqalayn in Sunni and Shia Perspective Rizaka, Maghza; Pratama, Ferdy; Said, Imam Ghazali
Jurnal Ilmiah Al-Mu'ashirah: Media Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Al-Hadits Multi Perspektif Vol. 21 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : South East Asia Regional Intellectual Forum of Qoran Hadith (SEARFIQH)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22373/jim.v21i2.24745

Abstract

The Hadith of al-Thaqalayn is one of the most significant hadiths in Islamic literature, particularly within Sunni and Shia traditions. This hadith states that the Prophet Muhammad (SAW) left behind two important things: the Qur'an and the Ahlul Bayt. This study examines various versions of the Hadith of al-Thaqalayn to determine its authenticity, interpretation, and implications for leadership in Islam. By comparing primary sources such as Ṣaḥīḥ Muslim and Uṣūl al-Kāfī, along with secondary literature, this research employs content analysis to identify textual variations, address doubts, and assess scholarly criticism of the Hadith of al-Thaqalayn. The findings reveal that despite differences in interpretation, both Sunni and Shia traditions emphasize the importance of adhering to the Qur'an and the Sunnah as the primary guides. The study also highlights the complexity of assessing the reliability of hadiths, demonstrating that even though some chains of transmission may be considered weak, the core message of adhering to the Qur'an and the teachings of the Prophet Muhammad remains vital. Additionally, the analysis discusses theological debates regarding the role of the Ahlul Bayt and provides a more comprehensive understanding of the Hadith of al-Thaqalayn within the context of Islamic scholarly tradition.
Co-Authors Achmad Zainulloh Hamid Achmad Zuhdi Dh Afifah, Alvin Ahmad Nabilul Maram Arofah, Fajriyatul Bustomi, Achmad Wahid Faiqotus Silvia Imam Ibnu Hajar Imam, Mohammad Fuyudun Ni'am Khoshyatulloh, Arfedin Hamas Kruja, Genti Maram, Ahmad Nabilul Mas'ud, Marwan Mas'ud Mohammed Alghiffar Alwalid Muayyad, Shobikul Muhdi Muhdi Nur Kholis Nyong Eka Teguh Iman Santosa Pratama, Ferdy Prayogi, Ananda Rizaka, Maghza Roihana Purnamasari, Umi Nashiroh Rustriningsih Silvia, Faiqotus Subahri, Bambang Suhandoko, Suhandoko Syafiq Mughni Titik TriwulanTutik Verawati, Sellyana Wafa Ilmi, Vika Zahri, Ahmad Fauzan Zainal Fanani