cover
Contact Name
Fuad Mustafid
Contact Email
fuad.mustafid@uin-suka.ac.id
Phone
+6281328769779
Journal Mail Official
asy.syirah@uin-suka.ac.id
Editorial Address
-
Location
Kab. sleman,
Daerah istimewa yogyakarta
INDONESIA
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum
ISSN : 08548722     EISSN : 24430757     DOI : 10.14421/ajish
Core Subject : Religion, Social,
2nd Floor Room 205 Faculty of Sharia and Law, State Islamic University (UIN) Sunan Kalijaga, Marsda Adisucipto St., Yogyakarta 55281
Arjuna Subject : -
Articles 609 Documents
Prophetic Practice and Legal Significance: Al-Ghazālī’s Critique of Textualism in al-Mankhūl Abdurrahman, Landy Trisna; Anshori, Ahmad Yani
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 57 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v57i2.1338

Abstract

The methodological framework proposed by al-Ghazali in al-Mankhūl min Ta’līqātil Uṣūl offers a balanced perspective on the Prophet’s conduct by classifying his actions according to the objectives of the Sharia (maqāṣid ash-Sharia), contextual indicators (qarīnah), and their relation to local custom (‘urf). This classification enables a clear distinction between actions that are normatively binding and those that reflect the socio-cultural practices of the 7th-century Prophetic era. Such an approach avoids the extremes of literalism, which absolutizes all Prophetic behavior as obligatory, and relativism, which dismisses the normative dimension of the Sharia by reducing the Prophet’s conduct to mere socio-cultural products. The analysis is reinforced by an in-depth discussion of the roles of ‘urf and maṣlaḥah as instruments that bridge the textual tradition with social realities. ‘Urf helps identify local and temporal elements within the Prophet’s actions, while maṣlaḥah ensures that legal adaptations remain oriented toward recognized benefits under the Sharia. This study adopts a qualitative, library-based research method, examining al-Mankhūl both textually and contextually, and reassessing the connection between al-Ghazali’s methodological framework and the practice of legal derivation (istinbāṭ al-ḥukm). The critique of textualism and hadith-centrism underscores the urgency of this approach, as both tendencies risk neglecting social context and the aims of public welfare. The findings show that al-Ghazali’s methodology integrates theological, legal-theoretical, and jurisprudential dimensions into a unified epistemic structure, paving the way for an Islamic legal methodology that is more responsive to contemporary social dynamics while maintaining normative legitimacy, and is relevant for the development of fatwas and religious policy.Kerangka metodologis yang ditawarkan al-Ghazali dalam al-Mankhūl min Ta’līqātil Uṣūl memberikan cara pandang yang proporsional terhadap perilaku Nabi dengan mengklasifikasikan tindakan-tindakannya berdasarkan tujuan-tujuan syariat, qarīnah (keterikatan) konteks, serta keterkaitannya dengan ‘urf (lokalitas). Melalui klasifikasi ini, dimungkinkan pemisahan antara tindakan yang bersifat normatif mengikat dan tindakan yang merefleksikan kebiasaan sosial-budaya pada masa Kenabian (Abad 7 Masehi), sehingga terhindar dari jebakan literalisme yang memutlakkan seluruh perilaku Nabi menjadi wajib diikuti, atau bahkan relativisme yang menanggalkan dimensi normatif syariat – karena anggapan perilaku Nabi adalah sebatas produk sosial-budaya. Analisis ini diperkuat dengan pembahasan mendalam mengenai peran ‘urf dan maṣlaḥah sebagai instrumen yang menjembatani teks dengan realitas sosial. ‘Urf membantu mengenali unsur-unsur lokal dan temporal dalam perilaku Nabi, sedangkan maṣlaḥah memastikan bahwa adaptasi hukum tetap berorientasi pada kemaslahatan yang diakomodir oleh syariat. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif berbasis studi kepustakaan, dengan menelaah al-Mankhūl secara tekstual dan kontekstual, serta meninjau ulang keterkaitan antara kerangka metodologis al-Ghazali dengan praktik istinbat hukum. Kritik terhadap tekstualisme dan hadisisme menegaskan urgensi pendekatan ini, mengingat keduanya berpotensi mengabaikan konteks sosial dan tujuan kemaslahatan. Temuan dalam artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa metodologi al-Ghazali merekatkan dimensi teologis, usul fikih, dan fiqih dalam satu kesatuan epistemik, membuka ruang bagi metodologi hukum Islam yang lebih adaptif terhadap dinamika sosial kontemporer tanpa kehilangan legitimasi normatifnya, serta relevan bagi pengembangan fatwa dan kebijakan keagamaan.
Revisiting Remissions Policy for Corruption Offenders: A Siyāsah Tasyrī'iyyah Analysis of Law No. 22 of 2022 Nimah, Rodhotun; Kamsi, Kamsi; Tahir, Achmad
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 57 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v57i2.1354

Abstract

Law No. 22 of 2022 on Corrections is a legal reform that replaces Law No. 12 of 1995. Before the enactment of this law, correctional regulations were governed by several rules, including Government Regulation No. 99 of 2012, Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 3 of 2018, and Ministry of Law and Human Rights Regulation No. 7 of 2022. However, in practice, Law No. 22 of 2022 still leaves unresolved issues of inconsistency with the principles and objectives of the state, particularly regarding the substance of granting remission to corrupt prisoners. This article examines these regulations from the perspective of siyāsah tasyrī’iyyah and assesses their relevance to anti-corruption efforts. The research uses a normative legal method with a legislative approach, utilizing the theory of siyāsah tasyrī’iyyah and legislative theory. The research results indicate that the rules on remission for corrupt prisoners only partially fulfill the principles of siyāsah tasyrī’iyyah, namely the principle of gradualism in enacting laws and simplifying regulations. Meanwhile, the principles of ease, public interest, and justice have not been realized. Based on Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution, human rights can indeed be restricted by law, so the restriction of remission for corrupt prisoners is considered valid. Therefore, Article 10 of Law No. 22 of 2022 must be revised. Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 tentang Pemasyarakatan hadir sebagai pembaruan hukum yang menggantikan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 1995. Sebelum lahirnya undang-undang tersebut, aturan pemasyarakatan ditetapkan melalui beberapa regulasi, antara lain PP Nomor 99 Tahun 2012, Permenkumham Nomor 3 Tahun 2018, dan Permenkumham Nomor 7 Tahun 2022. Namun, dalam praktiknya, Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 2022 masih menyisakan problem ketidaksesuaian dengan asas dan tujuan negara, terutama terkait substansi pemberian remisi bagi narapidana korupsi. Artikel ini membahas pengaturan tersebut dalam perspektif siyāsah tasyrī’iyyah dan menelaah relevansinya terhadap upaya pemberantasan korupsi. Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, serta memanfaatkan teori siyāsah tasyrī’iyyah dan teori legislasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aturan remisi bagi narapidana korupsi hanya memenuhi sebagian prinsip siyāsah tasyrī’iyyah, yaitu prinsip berangsur-angsur dalam penetapan hukum dan prinsip penyederhanaan peraturan. Sementara prinsip kemudahan, kemaslahatan, dan keadilan belum terwujud. Berdasarkan Pasal 28 UUD 1945, hak asasi manusia memang dapat dibatasi oleh undang-undang, sehingga pembatasan remisi bagi narapidana korupsi dinilai sah. Oleh karena itu, Pasal 10 UU No. 22 Tahun 2022 dipandang perlu untuk direvisi.
Presidential Emergency Legislation in Indonesia: A Comparative Study of Fast-Track Mechanisms in Ecuador and Colombia Maslul, Syaifullahil
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 58 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v58i1.1434

Abstract

This research analyzes the presidential authority to issue Government Regulations in Lieu of Law (Perpu) during urgent conditions in Indonesia and explores the potential institutionalization of fast-track legislation as a more accountable alternative. Using statutory and conceptual approaches, the study identifies five fundamental problems with the current Perpu mechanism: disruption of legislative processes, judicial review conflicts, unlimited and subjective content scope, lack of legislative discussion, and unclear nomenclature. These issues risk executive overreach and weaken the principle of separation of powers. The research then compares Indonesia’s system with fast-track legislative mechanisms in Ecuador and Colombia. Both countries empower the president to expedite urgent bills with a 30-day legislative response period; Ecuador limits this to economic matters and grants the president authority to enact bills if the legislature fails to act, while Colombia has no such clear consequence. Based on this comparison, the study advocates abolishing the president’s authority to issue Perpu and replacing it with a formal fast-track legislative process involving the House of Representatives. This approach preserves democratic accountability, ensures legal certainty, restores separation of powers, and prevents unilateral executive actions prone to arbitrariness. The research concludes that amending Article 22 of the 1945 Constitution to institutionalize fast-track legislation offers a constitutionally sound and transparent solution to urgent legislative needs in Indonesia.
Contesting the Boundaries of Sharia Compliance: Legalizing Income Smoothing in Indonesian Islamic Banking Fakhrina, Agus; Arwani, Agus; Hamid, Abdul; Adeel, Nazia
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 59 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v59i1.1502

Abstract

Economic pressures have prompted Islamic banks to implement income smoothing techniques when distributing returns on third-party funds, raising questions about the legitimacy of these practices from an Islamic legal perspective. This paper aims to examine the income smoothing guidelines issued by the National Sharia Council of the Indonesian Ulema Council and their impact on the distribution of third-party fund returns by Islamic banks. The primary data source for this research is a fatwa from the National Sharia Council, accessible on its official website. Employing Islamic legal discourse, this study finds that the income smoothing method for distributing third-party fund returns is approved by the National Sharia Council as a form of ḥīlah (a legal stratagem used to provide solutions and alleviate difficulties) to regulate profit recognition and reporting. This approval is grounded in istiḥsān (legal preference), which considers customary law (al-‘urf) and public interest (maṣlaḥah) as key justifications. Practically, this approval enables Islamic banks to remain competitive with conventional banks while also raising public awareness that there is little difference between Islamic and conventional banking.
Institutional Ijtihād and Socio-Legal Adaptation: The Formulation of Waṣiyah Wājibah in Indonesia’s Compilation of Islamic Law Achmad Roziqi; Ramadhan, M. Rizki Syahrul; Ananda Prayogi; Falah, Fajrul
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 59 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v59i1.1517

Abstract

Studies of Islamic law in Indonesia have generally framed wasiat wājibah (mandatory will) merely as a normative innovation, without providing a comprehensive account of the epistemic processes and socio-cultural dialectics underpinning its formulation. This article examines the rationale behind wasiat wājibah in the drafting process as a form of institutional ijtihād (reasoning) responsive to the plural realities of Indonesian Muslim society. Employing a library-based method within a socio-legal framework, the study analyzes the Compilation of Islamic Law (KHI) alongside its official preparatory documents, legal periodicals, judicial decisions, and relevant regulations from other Muslim-majority jurisdictions. The findings reveal that the construction of wasiat wājibah under Article 209 of the KHI—which grants rights to adopted children and adoptive parents—emerged from an interplay among textual sources of the Sharīʿah (Islamic law), local ʿurf (custom) practices, and the maqāṣid al-sharīʿah (objectives of Islamic law) framework. This construction synthesizes naṣṣ (Qurʾān and hadith), customary adoption traditions, the views of Ibn Ḥazm, and legal precedents from Egypt and Morocco, as reflected in each stage of the KHI’s formulation. The study argues that wasiat wājibah functions as a legal instrument that is adaptive, progressive, and responsive to the demands of substantive justice in Indonesia’s plural Muslim society. It further recommends developing wasiat wājibah models to accommodate marginalized groups excluded from inheritance distribution while preserving the integrity of the foundational principles of the Sharīʿah.
Examining the Impact of Early Marriage Hadith on Marriage Laws in Indonesia Luthfi, A Hashfi; Hamdani, Nabhan; Ruhiat, Andri; Adlimah, Annilta Manzilah; Solahuddin, Ahmad
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 57 No 1 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v57i1.1590

Abstract

This research aims to investigate the impact of the hadith narrating the marriage between Prophet Muhammad and Aishah on early marriage laws in Indonesia. The hadith has been a subject of debate regarding its influence on the prevalence and acceptance of early marriage practices. Through a hermeneutics analysis within the Indonesian context, this study examines the interpretations and implications of the hadith, exploring how it has shaped societal attitudes and influenced the formulation of early marriage laws. The research argues that the marriage between the Prophet and Aishah was a “product of time”, rather than an inherent Islamic principle. It posits that Islamic principles can be contextualized across space and time, while product of time are influenced by specific values and circumstances. The study contends that the underlying Islamic principle behind marriage is to enhance the welfare and well-being of women in various aspects of life. The Prophet aimed to improve the status of women by emphasizing the institution of marriage as a means of protection. In contrast, early marriage undermines women’s opportunities for education and independent living. By comparing these perspectives, the study highlights that marriage practices are influenced by historical contexts, while the true Islamic principle seeks to elevate and empower women in social, economic, and educational spheres. The findings of this research contribute to a nuanced understanding of the relationship between religious teachings, cultural practices, and legal frameworks surrounding early marriage in Indonesia.
The State of Aceh Before The Earthquake Driven Tsunami: Some Preliminary Research Notes Iis, EM Yusuf
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 45 No 1 (2011)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v45i1.1

Abstract

This article would like to give a concise background of Aceh for The BRR’s [Badan Rekonstruksi dan Rehabilitasi, The  Agency  for  Reconstruction  and  Rehabilitation]  Proposal for  Transformation  and  Sustainable  Development  which  is framed,  bringing  together  the  goals  and  aspirations  of  many groups  and  sectors  from  Aceh  society  just  in  time  of  Islamic Sharia  law  initiated.  In  initiating  this  process,  it  assumed an enormous  challenge,  to  seek  a  national  consensus  in  a  local government  where  the  imposition  of  ideas  has  prevailed  over dialogue  and  negotiation,  frequently  leading  to  force  and violence.  Aceh  and  Nias  Reconstruction  and  Rehabilitation Agency – BRR is the sole agent for redevelopment of Aceh and Nias  and  without  any  public  hearing  or  consultation,  they  are conducting  many  project  of  development  in  the  aftermath  of tsunami disaster in the region.
Efektifitas ‘Uq?bat dalam Qanun No. 14/ 2003 dan DQHR Tentang Khalwatdan Ikhtilath Danial, Danial
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 45 No 1 (2011)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v45i1.2

Abstract

Salah  satu  bentuk  hukuman  yang  terkandung dalam Qanun nomor 14/ 2003 tentang khalwat dan DQHR tentang  Khalwat  dan  Ikhtilath  adalah  cambuk.  Bentuk hukuman  ini  belum  pernah  dikenal  dalam  peraturan perundang-undangan,  khususnya  pidana  yang  berlaku  di Indonesia.  Karena  Qanun  setingkat  dengan  Peraturan Daerah  dan  berada  di  bawah  Undang-undang.  Di  sisi  lain, hukum meterial di bidang pidana yang ingin dilaksanakan di Aceh adalah hukum pidana Islam. Akan tetapi, lembaga atau penegak  hukumnya  masih  berdasarkan  undang-undang nasional  yang  juga  berlaku  bagi  semua  daerah  lain  di Indonesia.  Pertanyaannya  adalah  pertama,  apakah  ketentuan bentuk  'uq?bat tersebut  sesuai  dengan  hirarki  dan  asas peraturan perundang-undangan  yang  berlaku  di  Indonesia. Kedua,  bagaimana  pula  efektifitas  penegak  hukum  dalam melaksanakan  isi  qanun  dimaksud?  Kedua  persoalan  inilah yang menjadi fokus bahasan dalam tulisan ini.
Epistemologi Ushul Fiqh: Antara Pembaharuan dan Pemberdayaan Mekanisme Istinbath al-Ahkam A. Yasid, A. Yasid
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 45 No 1 (2011)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v45i1.3

Abstract

Epistemologi  ushul  fiqh  merupakan  teori  ilmu  hukum yang  dibangun  untuk  mengkreasi  diktum-diktum  fiqh  yang  amat diperlulan untuk  tatakelola  kehidupan  ummat  manusia  sehari-hari. Epistemologi ini mula-mula dibangun oleh al-Syafi’I pada abadke-2 hijriyah  untuk  merespons  alotnya  perdebatan  hukum  antara kalangan  ahl  al-ra’y dan  ahl  al-hadith  saat  itu.  Dengan  hadirnya epistemologi ini maka setiap perdebatan menyangkut hukum  dalam Islam  bisa  dibingkai  secara  akademik  karena  dapat  merujuk  pada kajian  teori  tertentu.  Struktur  ilmu  ushul  fiqh  memadukan unsur teks normatif berupa wahyu verbal di satu pihak dan logika formal di  pihak  lain.  Dengan  struktur  seperti  ini  tidak  sedikit  kalangan menganggap bahwa ilmu ini merupakan falsafah Islam faktual yang berfungsi  mengawasi  kehidupan  manusia  yang  senantiasa beraktivitas  di  muka  bumi.  Tujuan  ilmu  ushul  fiqh  adalah memunculkun  ketentuan  hukum  agar  manusia  tidak  menyimpang dari fitrahnya dan terseret ke dalam berbagai ketimpangan. Karena itu, pemberdayaan ilmu ini secara optimal dan proporsional diyakini dapat  memaksimalkan  proses  istinbath  al-ahkam yang  dapat berimplikasi pada dinamika hukum Islam sesuai tingkat perubahan masyarakat.
IstishabSebagai Dasar Penetapan Hukum Islam: Sebuah Tinjauan Historis Saidurrahman, Saidurrahman
Asy-Syir'ah: Jurnal Ilmu Syari'ah dan Hukum Vol 45 No 1 (2011)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/ajish.v45i1.4

Abstract

Syariat Islam adalah  penutup  semua risalah samawiyah,  yang membawa petunjuk dan tuntunan Allah untuk ummat manusia dalam wujudnya yang lengkap dan final. Dengan posisi seperti ini, maka Allah pun mewujudkan format Syariat Islam sebagai syariat yangabadi dan komperhensif.  Hal  itu  dibuktikan  dengan  adanya  prinsip-prinsip  dan kaidah-kaidah  hukum  dalam  Islam  yang  membuatnya  dapat memberikan jawaban terhadap hajat kebutuhan manusia yang berubah dari  waktu  ke  waktu,  seiring  dengan  perkembangan  zaman.  Secara kongkrit  hal  itu  ditunjukkan  dengan  adanya  dua  hal  penting  dalam hukum Islam: (1) nash-nash yang menetapkan hukum-hukum yang tak akan  berubah  sepanjang  zaman  dan  (2)  pembukaan  jalan  bagi  para mujtahid  untuk  melakukan  ijtihad  dalam  hal-hal  yang  tidak  dijelaskan secara  sharih  dalam  nash-nash  tersebut.  Jika  kita  berbicara  tentang ijtihad, maka sisi  ra’yu  (logika-logika yang benar) adalah hal yang tidak dapat dilepaskan darinya. Karena itu, dalam Ushul Fiqih –sebuah ilmu yang “mengatur” proses ijtihad- dikenal beberapa landasan penetapan hukum  yang  berlandaskan  pada  penggunaan  kemampuan  ra’yu  para fuqaha. Salah satunya adalah  istishhab  yang akan dibahas dan diuraikan dalam tulisan ini.