Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PIHAK PEMBELI DALAM HAL TERJADI PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM TERKAIT SENGKETA JUAL BELI TANAH (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR : 121/PDT.G/2017/PN.BDG.) Inten Rosita; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 2, No 2 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v2i2.6594

Abstract

Tort is every thing that causes detriment to other people, requires the guilty one who causes detriment to pay compensation. Tort recognizes two concepts of compensation, those are material compensation and immaterial compensation.  The civil code manage the immaterial compensation which can only be given in particular things, such as the matter of death, seriously injured, and humiliation. In the decision of the Bandung district court number :121/PDT.G/2017/PN.BDG. the case of the act tort  which relates to the land sale and purchase dispute, the judges granted the immaterial and moral compensation in the amount of two billion rupiah. Due to Hanny Untar proved for doing tort that she has pressured the Notary Euis Komala, S.H. to make a statement.The author use normative legal research and uses interview data as supporting data. The research reveal that the decision of the Bandung District Court number : 121/PDT.G/2017/PN.BDG. About the immaterial and moral compensation which caused by tort, because of doing defamation with inaccurate police report. Due to the judges consideration, the police report is not a form af tort, that everyone has the right to make a police report which is protected by law.
AKIBAT HUKUM PEMBATALAN AKTA PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELIi (PPJB) YANG DiKERJAKAN OLEH DEBITUR TANPA MEMENUHI PRESTASI DALAM PERJANJIAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR: 571/PDT/2017/PT.BDG) Sesa Merindah Putri; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5274

Abstract

The agreement is an event in which a person pledges to another person to know where two people promise to do one thing. to be able to make an agreement then it must fulfill the legal requirements of an agreement set forth in article 1320 of the law of civil law. upon fulfillment of the parties may enter into a sale and purchase agreement where prior to the sale and purchase of the parties entered into a preliminary agreement which is commonly referred to as the sale and purchase agreement. in the execution of the sale and purchase agreement of the parties sometimes does not conform to what is entered into in the agreement, so the agreement can be canceled by the party. the factor is affecting  cancellation of  deed and sale and purchase agreement are the sale price agreed upon in the agreement not being repaid by the buyer until the agreed period of time.
ANALISIS PEMBUKTIAN PERJANJIAN SEWA MENYEWA GUDANG SECARA LISAN DALAM PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 2368 K/PDT/2019 Kenny Joshua; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 4, No 2 (2021): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v4i2.13593

Abstract

Whereas in the lease agreement, both oral & written, there are elements that must be carried out by the respective parties that bind themselves to one another, where if one of the parties does not fulfill its obligations as agreed in the beginning, then the act will cause default. This thesis discusses the warehouse lease agreement which was carried out verbally that occurred in Mempawah City. Making a verbal agreement is a habit of the people in the area because they prioritize their trust in each other. The problem raised in this thesis is the proof of the warehouse lease agreement which is carried out orally. In the court of first instance and the appeal level the oral agreement was declared invalid and could not be proven. Then in the Decision of the Supreme Court Court Number 2368 K / Pdt / 2019, then the oral agreement was declared valid and the defendant was declared default. The form of research in this thesis is normative legal research with qualitative and descriptive methods. This study concludes that an oral agreement based on the concept of contract law adopted by Indonesia is indeed valid and binding once there is an agreement so that the oral agreement in the case can be said to be valid. Meanwhile, the statu
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KREDITUR DALAM HAL DEBITOR MENYEWAKAN OBJEK JAMINAN FIDUSIA KEPADA PIHAK KE TIGA (ANALISIS KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1271 K/PDT/2016) Delvina Alodia; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2218

Abstract

Fiduciaire Eigendomsoverdracht or as otherwise known as Fiduciary Transfer of Ownership or Fiduciary Security, is a type of security that has now been used by many people and cannot be denied its importance in the world of private law. In Fiduciary Security, the objects will which remain in control of the person or entity which provides a fiduciary security over the objects (Fiduciary Provider). That is why this security is used to give the fiduciary beneficiary a form of legal certainty and to secure repayment of certain debt. But in reality, there are still many problems concerning this such as the fiduciary beneficiary who doesn’t register the object at the Fiduciary Registration Office, the fiduciary provider doesn’t pay their debts or they may have rented or possibly sold the objects. In this situation, the fiduciary beneficiary faces an immense loss. This journal focuses on the problem where the fiduciary provider has rented the object to another party without the fiduciary beneficiary’s knowledge and what legal protection does the fiduciary beneficiary has concerning this situation. The research method this journal uses is a normative method with the usage of secondary data and qualitative analization. The results of this research is to give a picture of the preventive and repressive legal protection for the fiduciary beneficiary in regards to the fiduciary provider having sold the object without the fiduciary beneficiary’s knowledge.
PELAKSANAAN PEMUNGUTAN PAJAK BUMI DAN BANGUNAN APARTEMEN BERDASARKAN PERATURAN GUBERNUR DKI JAKARTA NOMOR 132 TAHUN 2018 TENTANG PEMBINAAN PENGELOLAAN RUMAH SUSUN MILIK Hasita Zhafirah Saraswati; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 3, No 1 (2020): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v3i1.8896

Abstract

Land and Building Tax (PBB) is a tax that is imposed on each building that is or is an object of tax. The land and building tax on apartments is regulated in DKI Jakarta Governor Regulation No. 132 of 2018, in Article 88 it is explained that the land and building tax is the cost of the apartment units that must be paid personally by the owner or occupant of the apartment. This thesis research uses a qualitative approach and descriptive type. The research data collection technique was carried out by interviewing competent lecturers in tax law. The results obtained are the collection of land and apartment building tax based on the DKI Jakarta governor's regulation, which is paid personally by the owner or occupant of the apartment after the issuance of the tax notification letter (SPPT) by the relevant agency. In the land and building tax collection activities, of course there is a need for cooperation and communication between the taxpayer, the government, and also the management so that the land tax collection and apartment construction runs well so that there are no deficiencies in its implementation.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP JABATAN NOTARIS ATAS DUGAAN PELANGGARAN KODE ETIK DALAM PENGURUSAN HARTA WARIS (STUDI PUTUSAN MAJELIS PENGAWAS PUSAT NOTARIS NOMOR 03/MPPN/VIII/2016) Michael Amsal Sumitro; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 1 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i1.2240

Abstract

Notary Is a Public Official granted authority by the State in making an Authentic Deed. On that basis, it is necessary to have legal protection for a Notary if in conducting his / her position of office sued on the alleged violation of code of ethics as it happened in Decision of Supervisory Board of Notary Center Number 03/MPPN/VIII/2016. Notary LIS is sued with alleged violation of code of ethics on the management of the heirs but the allegations according to the judges in both MPW and MPPN the action does not violate the code of ethics. Based on the analysis result that referring to Article 9 paragraph (7) Notary Code of Ethics, the legal protection of the notary's office on the alleged violation of the code of ethics in the management of the permanent inheritance shall be entitled to the protection of a good name through a letter issued by the Notary Publicity Council. The qualification of a notary act can be regarded as a violation of the code of ethics only stipulated in the provisions of Article 4 of the Code of Ethics of 2015. Notary LIS is in fact violating Article 52 UUJN because in carrying out the task of handling of inheritance based on an oral testament there is still family relation. However, the MPPN is not careful that such action is not a violation of UUJN.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK MILIK ATAS TANAH DALAM HAL TERJADI GUGATAN OLEH PIHAK LAIN (STUDI PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO. 1820 K/PDT/2017) Novia Gunawan; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 2, No 1 (2019): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v2i1.5265

Abstract

Land is the surface of the earth that has various kinds of rights, one of which is land ownership rights. Land rights are rights granted by the State so that they can be granted by Indonesian citizens by way of land registration. Land registration is carried out to provide legal certainty and protection for every landowner. Although a land registration application has been made, when the petition is still submitted to a land dispute, such as an overlapping certificate, or a counterfeit certificate. Supreme Court Decision No. 1820 K / Pdt / 2017, namely the issuance of two certificates of ownership on the same land. By looking at the buying and selling procedures carried out by the parties to the Decision of the Supreme Court No. 1820 / K / Pdt / 2017, the sale and purchase has been validly carried out between the parties, then guarantees the law for Yuni and others who make the same policy only by submitting a claim to the district court where the land is located, and also as the land owner from payment of land proposal before buying and transferring land disputes by checking land certificates to the National Land Agency.
TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS DALAM MEBUAT PPJB NOMOR 32 (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR ; 28/PDT.G/2015/PN.BGR) Ling Fransiska; Endang Pandamdari
Jurnal Hukum Adigama Vol 1, No 2 (2018): Jurnal Hukum Adigama
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Tarumanagara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/adigama.v1i2.2746

Abstract

Notary is a public official who makes an authentic Deed. In the implementation of the PPJB notary has fulfilled the legally binding of an agreement. However in the practice of making a PPJB Deed by a Notary List which is not based on existing facts, there has been no payment paid by the buyer but in PPJB the payment has been paid in full. The problem of this thesis is how the notary accountability in the making of PPJB no 32 (study decision number: 28 / PDT.G / 2015 / PN.BGR). The research method used is normative law research by using secondary data then analyzed qualitatively. The results of the investigation indicate that the Notary is negligent in making the deed so that the deed is degraded into a deed under the hand because the deed is assessed as having juridical defect and disadvantage one of the parties concerned. The notary may be liable for materially and materially in accordance with the law, UUJN and Code of Ethics.
KEDUDUKAN PENYEWA TANAH DALAM PERJANJIAN SEWA MENYEWA TANPA JANGKA WAKTU Endang Pandamdari; Aldi Pidano
Era Hukum - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum Vol 17, No 1 (2019)
Publisher : Faculty of Law - Tarumanagara University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24912/erahukum.v17i1.5976

Abstract

In carrying out a lease agreement, Article 1570 and 1571 KUHPer regulates the termination of the lease agreement. Although the provisions regarding the existence of an element at a certain time in a lease have been strictly regulated in the KUHPer, in practice there are still many problems in the lease agreement. The problem raised by the author is how the position of the land tenant in the lease agreement without a period of time according to the Supreme Court Decision Number 534 K / PDT / 2016 and how the legal protection of landowners and tenants in the lease agreement rent without time period?. The author examines the problem by using normative legal research methods with the law approach and case approach. The research data shows that the tenant named Maman Kurniawan is not acting in good faith, namely indirectly wanting to take over ownership of other people's property and not returning the goods to others here entering into the main form of illegal acts in the form of illegally possessing objects belonging to another person and the position of Maman Kurniawan in this case is limited to tenants not owners. Then Article 1571 KUHPer is an article that protects the party who rents out in the case of land leasing agreements without a period of time and protection for tenants in the term agreement, namely requesting compensation for land and / or buildings and a certain grace period for tenants to look for other rental places.
MENGKRITISI DISKRIMINASI PEMILIKAN TANAH DI PROVINSI DAERAH ISTIMEWA YOGYAKARTA Endang Pandamdari
Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 1 (2018): Hukum Pidana dan Pembangunan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (63.72 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/hpph.v1i1.3576

Abstract

Hak milik atas tanah merupakan hak atas tanah yang turun temurun, terkuat, dan terpenuh. Menurut Undang Undang No 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok Pokok Agraria (UUPA), subyek hak milik adalah WNI dan badan hukum yang ditunjuk PP Nomor 38 Tahun 1963 yaitu bank negara, badan sosial, badan keagamaan, dan koperasi pertanian. Rumusan masalah yang diteliti adalah bagaimana pemilikan tanah di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta? Metode penelitian yang digunakan ialah penelitian hukum normatif dengan menggunakan data sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa implementasi pemilikan tanah di Provinsi Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta berbeda dengan UUPA, sebagaimana terbukti dengan diberlakukannya Instruksi Wakil Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta No. K. 898/I/A/1975, tentang penyeragaman policy pemberian hak atas tanah kepada WNI non pribumi, sehingga dalam praktek hak milik atas tanah tidak dapat diberikan kepada WNI non-pribumi. Diskriminasi pemilikan tanah tersebut bertentangan dengan Undang Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945, Undang Undang Pokok Agraria dan UU No. 40 Tahun 2008 tentang Penghapusan Diskriminasi Ras dan Etnis, oleh karena itu Instruksi Wakil Gubernur Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta tersebut perlu segera dicabut.Kata kunci: Hak Milik,  Diskriminasi.