Articles
<![CDATA[SARUSUN BERDASARKAN PPJB DENGAN PELAKU PEMBANGUNAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 91/PDT/2020/PT YYK) ]]>
<![CDATA[Wiwin Sumartini]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 3 No. 4 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (399.01 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i2.13612
<![CDATA[Actors in the construction of flats can sell to buyers by marketing them first through the Binding Sale and Purchase Agreement (PPJB) system. In practice, development actors often do not comply with or violate the agreement of what was agreed in the PPJB. According to Law Number 20 of 2011 concerning Flats and what are the legal consequences of the Yogyakarta High Court decision Number 91/PDT/2020/PT YYK on control of flats based on PPJB, a study using normative juridical methods, the nature of the research is descriptive then the data used is secondary data, data analysis is done by qualitative analysis and conclusions are done deductively. This research resulted in an answer to the formulation of the problem, that is, to transfer ownership rights to an apartment unit, it must be carried out through a sale and purchase deed as the basis for the transfer of HMSRS in accordance with article 44 paragraph (1) of the Flats Law. The legal consequence of the Yogyakarta High Court Decision Number 91/PDT/2020 PT YYK is that the ownership rights to the Flats have not transferred ownership to the buyer.]]>
<![CDATA[TINJAUAN YURIDIS SAHNYA JUAL BELI ATAS SEBIDANG TANAH YANG BELUM DIBAGI WARIS ]]>
<![CDATA[Karmila Amalia Pesa]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 2 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (337.112 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i4.14101
<![CDATA[Every country's territory or land is a valuable resource. Problem formulation: Under Muara Bulian Court Decision No. 11/Pdt.G/2019/PN, how will legally sell land that has previously been bagged by Waris and how much will the judge's considerations be in compliance with valid legal requirements? A desk-style writing script that is based on second-by-second data is used in the writing process, which is a sort of juridical normative writing. Survey results are objectively assessed and used to support important conclusions with strong reasons. According to the investigation's findings, defendants I and II engaged in a transaction to buy and sell a plot of land, but because this transaction involved the sale of a plot of land, it was not legal transaction; none of the heirs responsible for the inheritance made any requests.]]>
<![CDATA[PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMEGANG TANAH HAK ADAT ]]>
<![CDATA[Benyamin Tomas Setiawan]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 4 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (199.576 KB)
|
DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i6.15295
<![CDATA[As Lahat Regency's Indigenous Peoples, the Dalian have inherited land from their ancestors. The land belongs to the late Maijah binti Jamun, and according to the customary certificate with the number 038/P/TS/2018/1994, she had the status of having customary land rights. By entering into an agreement and a contract with the late Maijah Binti Jamun, Arta Prigel has control over the customary land that is owned by Dalian as the plaintiff and the land certificate has been issued as a Cultivation Right. However, the agreement was not paid for until a lawsuit was filed by Dalian as well as one of the heirs. The issue is whether DALIAN as successors' possession of land with customary ownership rights complies with national land law according to certificate of traditional land rights 038/P/TS/1994. Based on SUPREME COURT DECISION 3173 K/Pdt/2019 by PT. Artha Prigel, how is the legal protection of owners of traditional property rights in connection to land tenure. This style of legal study is descriptive normative. Secondary data is what was used.]]>
<![CDATA[PEMBERIAN GANTI KERUGIAN PEMBANGUNAN JALAN TOL DI KABUPATEN OGAN ILIR ]]>
<![CDATA[Azarine Nuratna Shafa]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 1 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i1.15423
<![CDATA[In order to implement the supply of fair and appropriate compensation during land acquisition for the public benefit, the implementation of compensation must be founded on land acquisition principles. The question being addressed is whether or not the compensation being granted for the construction of Phase I of the Simpang Indralaya-Muara Enim Toll Road in Ogan Ilir Regency is appropriate or not in light of the principles of land acquisition, as well as whether the provisions of the cassation decision No. 701 K/Pdt/2021 regarding the compensation being granted are appropriate or not in light of those principles. Normative legal research is the research method used to address the issues in the study, and analytical descriptive, secondary data kinds are the research's nature and making judgments based on deductive reasoning. The study's findings demonstrate that the provision of compensation for the Phase I Simpang Indralaya-Muara Enim Toll Road in Ogan Ilir Regency is not in accordance with the principles of agreement and openness, and the contents of the appeal decision number 701 K/Pdt/2021 regarding the provision of compensation strengthen the decision of the Kayuagung district court number 39/Pdt.G/2020/PN Kag which is not in accordance with the principles of agreement on land acquisition.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS PENANGKAPAN IKAN OLEH KAPAL ASING YANG MENANGKAP IKAN DI INDONESIA ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdullah Rafi]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 5 No. 3 (2023): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25105/refor.v5i3.16500
<![CDATA[The main motivation behind this study is the great majority of foreign-flagged ships operating fishing operations in Indonesian seas without SIPI. The issue is how the Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries is authorized to enforce SIPI for foreign-flagged vessels conducting fishing operations in Indonesian waters, as well as how the Ministry is authorized to enforce SIPI for foreign-flagged vessels lacking SIPI, according to Court Decision No. 10/Pid.Sus/2018/Pn Tpg. The Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries will issue SIPI directives to the Director General of Fisheries for foreign-flagged vessels fishing in Indonesian seas. In this work, normative research methods, qualitative secondary data, and the Ministry of Maritime's authority were used. The finding is that the defendant lacks a license to engage in fishing activities in Indonesian waters and that the Minister entrusted to the Director General of Fisheries the authority to issue SIPI and amend Law No. 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries.]]>
<![CDATA[Does Batak Toba Widower Get the Wife’s Family’s Inheritance? ]]>
<![CDATA[Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 23, No 3 (2021): Vol. 23, No. 3, December 2021 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24815/kanun.v23i3.21787
<![CDATA[The problem that will be discussed in this article is about the inheritance rights of a widower according to the customary inheritance of the Batak Toba, whether the widower according to the customary inheritance law of the Batak Toba gets an inheritance from his wife's family. The type of normative legal research used in this article is supported by references or secondary data as the basic material for research related to the issues discussed, that is the rights of the inheritance of widowers in Batak Toba. The data sources used are primary data and secondary data. The data from the results of this study will be analyzed with a qualitative approach, then will be described descriptively. The conclusion obtained from this study is that a Toba Batak widower, in the customary inheritance law of the Batak Toba does not inherit from his wife's family because the wife is a family member of the husband (honest marriage), because the wife herself does not also get an inheritance fromhis parents, because in Batak Toba community, only sons (his wife's brother) get a share of the inheritance and become the heirs of the wife's parents.]]>
<![CDATA[PELAKSANAAN REDISTRIBUSI TANAH DALAM RANGKA REFORMA AGRARIA DI KABUPATEN KUBU RAYA : Implementation of Land Redistribution in The Framework of Agrarian Reform in Kubu Raya District ]]>
<![CDATA[Deviana Putri]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 1 No. 1 (2024): Amicus Curiae ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v1i1.19608
<![CDATA[The agrarian reform program launched by the government basically aims to improve the welfare of the people, especially landless farmers. Through Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018 concerning Agrarian Reform, the government is trying to redistribute land for farmers, including those carried out in Kubu Raya Regency. However, in practice the land redistribution program carried out by the government isn’t in accordance with the procedures stipulated in Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018. Of the 10 access arrangement activities as stated in Presidential Regulation Number 86 of 2018, only 2 activities were carried out by Kubu Raya District Land Office. Before carrying out the implementation of land redistribution, the Land Office must first make a plan which is preceded by the preparation of operational instructions. Counseling on land redistribution activities should be carried out at the planning stage. In practice, the Kubu Raya Land Office doesn’t go through established mechanisms or procedures and directly conducts counseling at the implementation stage of activities that should have been carried out at the planning stage. In addition, the Land Office doesn’t control land whose area exceeds the maximum land ownership limit, which the government wants to control through the agrarian reform program. ]]>
<![CDATA[PENGELOLAAN ROYALTI KARYA CIPTA LAGU DAN/ATAU MUSIK ATAS CIPTAAN YANG TIDAK DIKETAHUI PENCIPTANYA (ORPHAN WORKS) ]]>
<![CDATA[Agung Damarsasongko]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Volume 1, Nomor 2, September 2023 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25105/ferenda.v1i2.18279
<![CDATA[Pengelolaan royalti atas Ciptaan yang tidak Dalam Pasal 39 Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta telah mengatur bahwa Ciptaan yang tidak diketahui Penciptanya maka Hak Cipta atas Ciptaan tersebut dipegang oleh Negara untuk kepentingan Pencipta, namun untuk ketentuan teknis tentang implementasi dari negara memegang Ciptaan untuk kepentingan Pencipta belum terdapat pengaturannya sehingga karya cipta lagu dan/atau musik masih tetap bebas digunakan untuk kepentingan komersial oleh semua pihak tanpa ditarik royalti. Pengelolaan Hak Ekonomi atas suatu Ciptaan merupakan hak eksklusif bagi Pencipta untuk mendapatkan keuntungan ekonomi atas pemanfaatan karya ciptanya, Lalu bagaimana dengan suatu ciptaan yang tidak diketahui Penciptanya dalam pengelolaan hak ekonominya dipegang oleh Negara. Ketentuan Pasal 39 Undang- undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta belum mengatur secara teknis dengan peraturan dibawah undang-undang sehingga belum dapat dilaksanakan. Demikian pula dengan karya cipta yang tidak diketahui Penciptanya dan merupakan ekspresi budaya tradisional (kekayaan Intelektual Komunal) atau karya cipta yang sudah habis jangka waktu pelindungan hukumnya serta dilestarikan oleh masyarakat, belum diatur secara jelas. Negara Inggris telah melakukan pengaturan tentang pemaanfaatan atas pemberian izin atau lisensi terhadap karya cipta yang tidak diketahui Penciptanya atau yang disebut dengan Orphan works. Karya cipta yang tidak diketahui Penciptanya atau disebut dengan Orphan work adalah karya kreatif atau pertunjukan yang tunduk pada ketentuan Hak Cipta serta mendapatkan pelindungan hukum antara lain seperti buku harian, foto, film, atau karya musik, yang penciptanya atau pemegang haknya tidak diketahui atau tidak dapat ditemukan. Kantor Hak Cipta Inggris mengelola hak cipta atas ciptaan yang tidak diketahui Penciptanya yaitu memberikan lisensi atau penggunaan izin kepada para pihak pengguna yang akan melakukan pemanfaatan atau penggunaan atas Ciptaan tersebut. Indonesia dapat belajar dari Inggris atas pengelolaan royalti atas Ciptaan yang tidak diketahui Penciptanya untuk menyusun peraturan sebagai implementasi ketentuan pasal 39 Undang-undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta]]>
<![CDATA[DISKURSUS HAK EKSKLUSIF INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS ATAS PENGHAPUSAN MEREK TERDAFTAR DALAM PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK KEKAYAAN INTELEKTUAL ]]>
<![CDATA[Kurniaman Telaumbanua]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal De Lege Ferenda Trisakti Volume 2, Nomor 1, Maret 2024 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25105/ferenda.v2i1.19698
<![CDATA[Both trademarks and geographical indications are legal instruments that govern market communication about a product. Trademarks indicate the commercial origin of goods or services, while geographical indications signify geographical origin. Both also legally provide exclusive rights to use certain words or symbols. This research finds that trademarks and geographical indications are unique, non-interchangeable tools, and it is possible for legislation to protect both simultaneously; therefore, they are not in conflict but rather seen as harmonious tools. Specifically, in the implementation of laws in Indonesia, the implementation of Geographical Indications (GI) is given a higher status than that of registered trademarks. Explicitly, the Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 20 of 2016 on Trademarks and Geographical Indications, Article 72 paragraph (7), governs the removal of registered trademarks at the initiative, one of which is based on having similarity in essence and/or in entirety with a Geographical Indication. Therefore, it is necessary to develop legal formulations that can accommodate both trademark and geographical indication holders because both possess exclusive rights.]]>
<![CDATA[ANALISIS YURIDIS USAHA PERIKANAN PASCA UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 11 TAHUN 2020 CIPTA KERJA ]]>
<![CDATA[Shandra Mellany Aldalia]]>;
<![CDATA[Endang Pandamdari]]>
<![CDATA[ Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 3 No 2 (2021): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.25105/refor.v3i2.13445
<![CDATA[In order to create jobs and increase investment, the government simplified numbers of statutory regulations commonly called the Omnibus Law. From Omnibus Law, Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation was born. It changed and deleted several articles in the law. One of them is Law Number 31 of 2004 in conjunction with Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries. The most dominant articles related to licensing simplification are integrated in UUCK. The main problems in this research are What are the factors led to the birth of UUCK which regulates Maritime Affairs and Fisheries and the similarities and differences in fishing business from Law Number 31 of 2004 Juncto Law Number 45 of 2009 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 2004 concerning Fisheries with UUCK. This research is a normative and analytical descriptive legal research by using secondary data and primary data to support secondary data. The data is analyzed qualitatively and the conclusions are drawn by using deductive methods. It can be concluded that UUCK amended that every fishing business activity must have Business Permit. This business license is made by taking the risk-based licensing process into account.]]>
