Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.99
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Jurnal Asy-Syari'ah JURNAL MAHASISWA BK AN-NUR : BERBEDA, BERMAKNA, MULIA Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Cepalo JCIC: Jurnal CIC Lembaga Riset dan Konsultan Sosial Jurnal Kinerja Kependidikan (JKK) VARIA HUKUM: Jurnal Forum Studi Hukum dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Mutsla: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Keislaman dan Kemasyarakatan Healthy Journal Al-Muamalat : Jurnal Ekonomi Syariah Ius Poenale Jurnal PkM MIFTEK Jurnal Penelitian Serambi Hukum ABDIMU Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Karimah Tauhid Jurnal Novem Medika Farmasi EDUCARE: Journal of Primary Education SASI Jurnal Ilmu Hukum SIYASI: Jurnal Trias Politica Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory
Sulastri, Dewi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 25 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Lag Time dalam Transformasi Sosial Hukum; Mengapa Masyarakat Lambat Beradaptasi dengan Regulasi Baru dalam Era Reformasi Adinda, Nendena Rizqi; Sulastri, Dewi
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v3i4.1516

Abstract

This article analyzes the phenomenon of "lag time" or the temporal gap in Indonesia's socio-legal transformation post-1998 Reformation. Lag time is defined as the misalignment between the progressive ambition of law as a tool of social engineering and the reality of adaptation and internalization at the level of societal legal culture. The study employs a juridical-sociological methodology to identify the determinant factors causing the slow acceptance of new regulations. The findings indicate that lag time manifests from the failure to synchronize the structural dimension and the cultural dimension of the legal system. Structural factors include the weak capacity of law enforcement, regulatory inconsistency, and the failure of top-down socialization. Meanwhile, cultural factors encompass the legacy of authoritarian legal culture based on fear, resistance from living law, and public pragmatism. The conclusion urges the necessity of systemic reform that focuses not only on improving the substance of the law but also on transforming the legal culture through participatory education to achieve compliance rooted in ethical awareness and justice. Keywords: Lag Time, Sociology of Law, Legal Culture, Legal Reform.
Kesadaran Hukum Gender dan Transformasi Sosial; Implementasi UU KDRT dalam Mengubah Pola Relasi Domestik di Indonesia Zulfaidah, Rena; Sulastri, Dewi
Indonesian Journal of Islamic Jurisprudence, Economic and Legal Theory Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Sharia Journal and Education Center Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62976/ijijel.v4i1.1593

Abstract

This study analyzes the implementation of Law No. 23 of 2004 on the Elimination of Domestic Violence (PKDRT Law) in the context of efforts to transform domestic relations and increase gender legal awareness in Indonesia. Domestic violence (DV) is a multidimensional issue rooted in gender inequality and reinforced by a culture of silence, even though data from the National Commission on Violence Against Women shows a significant increase in reported cases (15,652 cases in the domestic sphere in 2023). Using a normative-empirical legal approach with a focus on analyzing court decisions, this study found a significant gap between the spirit of the law and its practice in the field. The PKDRT Law aims to transform DV from a private matter into a public criminal offense. However, its implementation faces strong cultural, social, and institutional challenges, including stigma against victims, pressure to reconcile for the sake of “family unity,” and a lack of holistic understanding of gender justice among law enforcement officials. Analysis of court decisions, such as Supreme Court Case No. 1583 K/Pid.Sus/2019 and Gresik District Court Case No. 139/Pid.Sus/2019/PN.Gsk, reveals a tendency for judges to impose minimal sentences or be influenced by social pressure, which ultimately distorts justice for victims and reduces the transformative power of the law. This study concludes that the existence of regulations alone is not enough; a shift in collective consciousness and gender-sensitive implementation are needed to realize equal domestic relations.
OPTIMALISASI FUNGSI WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM STRUKTUR PEMERINTAHAN: KAJIAN KOMPARATIF KONSTITUSI INDONESIA DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT Sulastri, Dewi; Sanmas, Abu; Kholik, Muhamad Abdul
AL-MUTSLA Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Jurnal Al Mutsla
Publisher : STAIN MAJENE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46870/jstain.v7i2.2059

Abstract

Kedudukan wakil presiden dalam sistem pemerintahan presidensial selama ini masih mengalami ambiguitas, terutama di Indonesia. Meski diakui sebagai pembantu presiden dalam konstitusi, scope pekerjaan dan wewenang wakil presiden tidak dijabarkan secara konkret. Fenomena ini berbeda dengan Amerika Serikat di mana posisi wakil presiden memiliki peranan yang lebih terstruktur melalui konstitusi yang lebih detail. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis optimalisasi fungsi wakil presiden melalui kajian komparatif antara sistem pemerintahan Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat. Metode penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan analisis dokumen konstitusional dan studi perbandingan hukum tata negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terdapat perbedaan signifikan dalam pengaturan fungsi wakil presiden di kedua negara. Di Indonesia, posisi wakil presiden dibatasi pada peran pembantu dan penjaga kontinuitas pemerintahan, sementara di Amerika Serikat wakil presiden memiliki peran ganda sebagai ketua senat dan sebagai calon pengganti presiden dengan mekanisme yang lebih jelas. Temuan ini mengindikasikan perlunya reformasi konstitusional dan operasional untuk mengoptimalkan fungsi wakil presiden di Indonesia agar sistem checks and balances dapat berjalan lebih efektif. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pengembangan hukum tata negara komparatif dan memberikan rekomendasi praktis bagi penyempurnaan struktur pemerintahan Indonesia.
Social Engineering Melalui Hukum Pidana: Efektivitas UU ITE Dalam Mengubah Perilaku Komunikasi Digital Masyarakat Indonesia Kholik, Muhamad Abdul; Sulastri, Dewi
Ius Poenale Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/ip.v6i2.4741

Abstract

The rapid expansion of digital communication in Indonesia, with 220 million internet users in 2025, has been accompanied by a surge in hoaxes and hate speech, including 103,000 negative contents during the 2024 election, prompting the need for adaptive criminal law as a tool of social engineering. This study examines Law No. 1 of 2024 as an instrument of social engineering in Roscoe Pound’s sense to shape digital communication behavior, using a normative legal method that integrates statutory analysis, conceptual theory, purposive cases, and comprehensive secondary data from court decisions and state reports. The findings show that revisions to key provisions of the ITE Law reduced hoaxes by 28 percent, increased verification behavior among 68 percent of users, and enabled the removal of 15,000 harmful contents, but persistent problems remain, including ambiguous norms, low digital literacy, enforcement disparities, and self-censorship. The study concludes that while the ITE Law is strategically important, it requires further reform to shift from a punitive to a transformative approach, and it recommends clearer norms, mandatory mediation, strengthened digital literacy, specialized cyber courts, and independent oversight to support a democratic and Pancasila-based digital ecosystem.
IMPLIKASI PUTUSAN MAHKAHAM KONSTITUSI SEBAGAI POSITIF LEGISLATOR TERHADAP PRINSIP CHECK AND BALANCE: Mahkamah Konstitusi sebagai Positive Legislator: Implikasi Putusan terhadap Prinsip Checks and Balances di Indonesia Sulastri, Dewi; Sanmas, Abu
LITIGASI Vol. 26 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v26i2.21999

Abstract

The Indonesian Constitutional Court has undergone a transformation from a negative legislator to a positive legislator, particularly evident in Decision No. 90/PUU-XXI/2023, which not only annulled unconstitutional norms but also created new regulations regarding age requirements for presidential candidates. This study examines the implications of Constitutional Court decisions as a positive legislator on checks and balances, practices in the United States, Germany, and South Korea, and the reformulation of Constitutional Court authority. Employing normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, case, and comparative approaches, this study analyzes Constitutional Court decisions and practices in three countries. The findings indicate that Constitutional Court decisions acting as a positive legislator tend to shift the balance of power between the judicial, legislative, and executive branches, creating legal uncertainty and institutional conflicts. Practices in the US, Germany, and South Korea reveal that the positive legislator role requires institutional dialogue mechanisms and clear authority limitations. The implications emphasize the need for reformulating Constitutional Court authority through establishing objective criteria, strengthening checks and balances mechanisms, and developing constitutional dialogue among the Constitutional Court, Parliament, and President. This study contributes by examining comparative practices (US, Germany, South Korea) and formulating reformulation guidelines not previously developed in existing scholarship.
Co-Authors A Syachruroji, A Abdullah, Mohd Kamarulnizam Adinda, Nendena Rizqi Alfianingrum, Alfianingrum Aminah, Siti Nur Aswindra, Jordy Stephano Cut Nurul Fahmi Dede Kania Djodi Setiawan Effendi, Listyani Encep Andriana Endeh Suhartini Fardiansyah, Bagas Firdaus Arifin, Firdaus Firdausa, Muhamad Arga Firzatullah, Belva Prana Giandhani, Mochammad Rizky Hadi, Muhamad Rizal Nurul Hazar Kusmayanti, Hazar Hilmayanti, Hilmayanti I Gde Pantja Astawa Ikhsan, Fachrial Indriya Fathni Jaenal, Lestari Jasmiadi Jasmiadi Jauhari, Moh. Ahsanuddin Khaerunisa, Nisrina Khairil Anwar Khoirunnisa, Saskia Fazrin Kholik, Muhamad Abdul Maarif, Ihsanul Maelani, Rega Maulana, Mochamad Dilla Maulina, Wina Senja Mubarok, Abil Miftahul Munawar, Arby Muhyi Muslim, Sarip Nandang Najmudin Neng Yani Nurhayani, Neng Yani Neni Nuraeni, Neni Nur Alim Nurahman, Zamzam Pratama, Agus Sangka Purnama, Alpin Radiyana, Aan Rajamanickam, Ramalinggam Rasimin Rasimin, Rasimin Sanmas, Abu Sidae, Siti Hartina Siti Maria Sonny Dewi Judiasih Sukma, Ersa Hermalia Sulwan Permana Suparman, Tegar Radiansyah Syahidin, Rosyad Tiara Amanda Lestari Tohar, Ahmaddin Ahmad Yusra, Affan Zaen, Adhelia Husnainy Zaman, Muhammad Badru Zulbaidah, Z Zulfaidah, Rena