Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

تنفيذ عقد الوكالة بالأجرة في المعاملات التجارية الرقمية: Execution of Agent Contracts in Return in Digital Trading Transactions Naufal, Fadlurrahman; Isman, Isman
Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity) 2025: Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the importance of agent contracts in exchange in trading transactions in the digital age. This study uses a qualitative approach through literature studies as a research method, with data sources consisting of publications and literature references. The type of data used is descriptive data in the form of text and documents taken from published sources. Data is collected by tracing and studying the source of those libraries, while analytical descriptive analysis is used to process the data. The results of the study show that agent contracts in exchange are one type of contract that can be accepted as a sharia solution in trade transactions in the digital era, because it makes it possible to avoid trade transactions that fall into the elements of riba and gharar. An agent-for-reward contract is defined as a power of attorney contract in which a person authorizes another person to perform a specific job or transaction in exchange or an agreed wage. Based on this concept, the existence of rewards or wages related to the payment process in transactions or as compensation for certain work is considered valid in Islamic economics, and does not fall under the category of usury, but is considered a legitimate wage (salary).
Murabahah Default Dispute From the Perspective of Maqashid Syariah (Case Study Decision No. 01/Pdt.G.S/2021/PA. Kph) Isman, Isman; Rosyidah, Atania Saida El
Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity) 2025: Proceeding ISETH (International Summit on Science, Technology, and Humanity)
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The verdict of the Kepahiang Religious Court, Case Number 01/Pdt.G.S/2021/PA.Kph, reflects a tension between the formalistic application of positive law and the values of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, which emphasize justice and preventive benefit in resolving Islamic economic disputes. This study aims to analyze the legal considerations and the construction of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah in a murābaḥah contract default case by examining the consistency between the judge’s legal reasoning and the principles of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah, namely ḥifẓ al-māl (protection of wealth), ḥifẓ al-‘aqd (protection of contract), and ḥifẓ al-‘adl (protection of justice). Employing a normative-juridical method with a case-conceptual approach and content analysis of the Compilation of Sharia Economic Law (KHES), the Indonesian Civil Code (KUHPerdata), and DSN-MUI Fatwas, the study finds that the judge adopted systematic and grammatical interpretation through legal logic techniques such as subsumption, exclusion, derogation, and non-contradiction. However, the ruling remains curative and mechanistic in nature, as it primarily focuses on punitive measures for contractual breach. These findings reveal an epistemic disparity between the formal rationality of positive law and the preventive, benefit-oriented rationality of sharīʿah. This research contributes by proposing a maqāṣidic legal reasoning framework as an integrative paradigm to reconcile the rationality of positive law with the ethical rationality of maqāṣid al-sharīʿah in the practice of Islamic economic adjudication in Indonesia.
ANALISIS EKONOMI HUKUM TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI (KAJIAN PUTUSAN MA TENTANG KORUPSI BLBI) isman, isman
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 8 No. 2 (2019): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v8i2.434

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui tinjauan ekonomi hukum terhadap pertimbangan Mahkamah Agung dalam Putusan No. 1555.K/PID.SUS/2019 dan tinjauan ekonomi hukum terhadap perbuatan hukum pejabat publik yang beririsan dengan hukum perdata atau administrasi negara dihubungkan dengan kebijakan penegakan hukum pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini merupakan kajian filosofis terhadap kebijakan penegakan hukum yang dilakukan melalui pendekatan studi kasus dan pendekatan konseptual.  Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan analisis ekonomi hukum putusan Mahkamah Agung tersebut dapat dibenarkan karena penerbitan SKL berdasarkan dilakukan berdasarkan perjanjian MSAA dan Akta notaris. Model penafsiran yang digunakan Mahkamah Agung dalam memutus perkara ini adalah perpaduan model logike deontologis yang berbasis mazhab hukum positivsitk dengan logika utilitarian yang bercorak teleologis Pertimbangan hukum Mahkamah Agung tersebut di atas menjelaskan adanya pergeseran perspektif terkait dengan adanya irisan antara hukum pidana, perdata dan administrasi negara. Menurut Mahkamah Agung penerbitan SKL adalah ranah administrasi negara dan hukum perdata sehingga kesalahan dalam penerbitan SKL tidak dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai tindak pidana.Kata Kunci: Etika utilitarian; Ekonomi hukum; PenafsiranAbstract:The purpose of this study is to find out the legal, economic review of the Supreme Court's considerations in Decision No. 1555.K / PID.SUS / 2019 and legal, financial analysis of the legal actions of public officials that intersect with civil law and administration law when connected with enforcement policies to eradicate corruption. This research is a philosophical study of law enforcement policies carried out through a case study approach and conceptual approach. The results showed that based on legal, economic analysis of the Supreme Court decision could be justified because SKL issued was based on an MSAA and notarial deed. The interpretation model used by the Supreme Court in deciding this case is a mix of a deontological model based on positive schools of law with teleological-style form utilitarian logic. The Supreme Court's legal considerations above explain the shift in perspective related to the incision between criminal law, civil law, and state administration. According to the Supreme Court, SKL issued is the domain of administrative law or public law, so a fault in publishing SKL cannot be qualified as criminal acts.Keywords: Interpretation; Legal economy; Utilitarian ethics