Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.662
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal AGASTYA: JURNAL SEJARAH DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA International Journal of Law Reconstruction ASRO JOURNAL - STTAL Jurnal Pertahanan : Media Informasi tentang Kajian dan Strategi Pertahanan yang Mengedepankan Identity, Nasionalism dan Integrity JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Praksis dan Dedikasi Sosial Publica: Jurnal Pemikiran Administrasi Negara Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian JOURNAL SCIENTIFIC OF MANDALIKA (JSM) Al-MIKRAJ: Jurnal studi Islam dan Humaniora Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA) LEBAH Indonesian Journal of Applied and Industrial Sciences (ESA) Jurnal Elektrosista Indonesian Journal of Banking and Financial Technology (FINTECH) Journal of Social Work and Science Education
Widjayanto, Joni
Universitas Pertahanan
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
Indonesia's National Defense Strategy in Facing the Threat of Changes in the Strategic Environment Wahid, Muhamad Hasanuddin; Banyu Perwita, Anak Agung; Thamrin, Suyono; Widjayanto, Joni
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4246

Abstract

Received: 2023-11-16Revised: 2024-02-12Accepted: 2024-03-19 Keywords:Global and Regional Environmental Strategy; Security Vulnerabilities and Threats; International Cooperation;Arms Race;Sustainable Development and National SecurityThe aim of this research is how Indonesia responds to changes in environmental strategy, in building protection capabilities for the implementation of national development. For this reason, it is necessary to identify weaknesses and vulnerabilities that can be exploited by the state or the external sector to achieve goals. The research method used is a qualitative method, while for threat analysis used is the Means, Ways, and method, namely, how to understand, disseminate and formulate existing threat strategies. This method consists of three parts that are interconnected with each other. The research results show. Global and regional environmental developments are marked by the emergence of several new problems that will have a significant impact on human development in the future. During long- standing problems and conflicts, international cooperation is the only option that offers hope for international peace and stability. The role of large countries and their dominant influence remains the main feature of global and regional environmental strategy. Opportunities for developing countries to increase their economic competitiveness and bargaining power are limited due to the increasing economic, political, defense and security power of several countries in various regions. In this context, new breakthroughs in prioritizing the environment, increasing national damage, and implementing sustainable development are urgently needed. The proliferation of nuclear weapons and nuclear nuclear development programs by several countries, such as North Korea and Iran, poses a threat to global security and the potential use of nuclear weapons in a war between Russia and Ukraine. Strengthening global and regional political and security policies in the future when many countries will emerge with economic and military strength. The arms race is intensifying, of strategic importance to countries around the world.                                                      Indonesia needs to have close relations with several    countries such as Australia, Russia, China, and the United States. Efforts to build mutually beneficial relationships need to be prioritized to realize Indonesia's strategic interests in the medium and long term. On the other hand, Indonesia has and will face several vulnerabilities and even threats. Problems related to energy supply, population, environment, economy, separatism, and many transnational security issues need to be addressed immediately with sustainable action. To overcome these problems, it is necessary to adjust strategies, improve the ideological, political, economic, socio-cultural and security conditions for preserving Indonesia, as well as maintaining the integrity of the state and the sovereignty of the Republic of Indonesia. continue to increase national capacity. Security of Indonesian citizens.
Perang total dan mobilisasi sumber daya nasional dalam Perang Dunia II: Pembelajaran strategis bagi ketahanan nasional Indonesia Widjayanto, Joni; Susetyo, Eko; Ghazalie, Ghazalie; Leonardo, Vande
Jurnal Praksis dan Dedikasi Sosial Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um022v8i22025p441-451

Abstract

Total war and the mobilization of national resources during World War II: Strategic insights for Indonesia’s national resilience This study highlights the importance of transforming Indonesia's national resilience in the face of contemporary threats such as cyberattacks, disinformation, ecological disasters, and geopolitical dynamics. Employing a qualitative approach with an intrinsic case study design, data were collected through policy analysis, interviews, and participatory observation. The findings reveal institutional fragmentation, weak intersectoral coordination, limited public participation, and threat literacy. The study proposes a conceptual model of national resilience comprising five dimensions: institutional structure, sectoral integration, adaptive capacity, public awareness, and geopolitical orientation. It emphasizes that without synergy among these elements, the resilience system remains vulnerable. Therefore, a new paradigm is needed more adaptive and participatory focusing on institutional reform, community empowerment, and a sharper geopolitical strategy in the Indo-Pacific region. Penelitian ini menyoroti pentingnya transformasi ketahanan nasional Indonesia dalam menghadapi ancaman kontemporer seperti serangan siber, disinformasi, bencana ekologis, dan dinamika geopolitik. Menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan desain studi kasus intrinsik, data dikumpulkan melalui analisis kebijakan, wawancara, dan observasi partisipatif. Hasil menunjukkan adanya fragmentasi kelembagaan, lemahnya koordinasi antar sektor, serta minimnya partisipasi masyarakat dan literasi ancaman. Studi ini mengembangkan model konseptual ketahanan nasional yang terdiri atas lima dimensi: struktur kelembagaan, integrasi sektor, kapasitas adaptif, kesadaran masyarakat, dan orientasi geopolitik. Ditekankan bahwa tanpa sinergi antar elemen tersebut, sistem ketahanan akan tetap rentan. Oleh karena itu, dibutuhkan paradigma baru yang lebih adaptif dan partisipatif, dengan fokus pada reformasi institusional, penguatan peran masyarakat, dan strategi geopolitik yang lebih tajam di kawasan Indo-Pasifik.
Studi sejarah perang sebagai basis pengembangan doktrin pertahanan Indonesia: Analisis teoretis dan perbandingan global Animus Grahadi; Akhmad Zulfikar; Joni Widjayanto
Jurnal Praksis dan Dedikasi Sosial Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um022v9i12026p43-52

Abstract

Historical study of warfare as a basis for the development of Indonesia’s defense doctrine: A theoretical analysis and global comparison The study of war history in defense studies is often viewed as a descriptive narrative or a supplement to historiography, so its role in shaping modern defense doctrine has not yet been actively explored. This article analyzes how historical war experience can serve as a source of strategic learning in the development of Indonesia’s defense doctrine. The research uses a qualitative approach, drawing on a literature review and comparing Indonesia’s experiences with those of other countries. The findings show that war history functions not only as a record of events but also as a strategic testing ground that helps identify patterns of doctrinal adaptation to shifts in threats. In the Indonesian context, the experience of the War of Independence not only gave rise to the concept of Total Defense but also shaped a defense logic rooted in community involvement, which remains relevant for addressing hybrid and asymmetric threats. This study highlights that integrating the philosophical, cultural, and practical dimensions of war history strengthens the conceptual basis for developing a national defense doctrine that is flexible and context sensitive. Studi sejarah perang dalam kajian pertahanan kerap ditempatkan sebagai narasi deskriptif atau pelengkap historiografi, sehingga kontribusinya terhadap perumusan doktrin pertahanan kontemporer belum dikaji secara konseptual. Artikel ini bertujuan menganalisis bagaimana sejarah perang dapat diposisikan sebagai sumber pembelajaran strategis dalam pengembangan doktrin pertahanan Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif melalui analisis literatur dan perbandingan historis antara pengalaman Indonesia dan beberapa negara lain. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa sejarah perang berfungsi tidak hanya sebagai rekaman peristiwa, tetapi sebagai laboratorium strategis yang memungkinkan identifikasi pola adaptasi doktrin terhadap perubahan karakter ancaman. Dalam konteks Indonesia, pengalaman Perang Kemerdekaan tidak sekadar melahirkan konsep Pertahanan Semesta, tetapi juga membentuk logika pertahanan berbasis keterlibatan masyarakat yang relevan untuk menghadapi ancaman hibrida dan asimetris. Studi ini menegaskan bahwa integrasi dimensi filosofis, kultural, dan praktis dalam sejarah perang memperkaya landasan konseptual pengembangan doktrin pertahanan nasional yang adaptif dan kontekstual.
A historical study of Mongols: The relevance of genghis khan’s leadership in the modern era Chandra Kusumawardhani; Arnold Hiras Simorangkir; Joni Widjayanto; S Sutanto; Guntur Eko Saputro
AGASTYA: JURNAL SEJARAH DAN PEMBELAJARANNYA Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : UNIVERITAS PGRI MADIUN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25273/ajsp.v16i1.23890

Abstract

Contemporary leadership is generally based on the context of modern organizations and does not conduct much research on historical leadership models that once shaped large-scale government systems. This study was conducted in an effort to fill this gap by analyzing the leadership of Genghis Khan, which has often been reduced to narratives of conquest and violence, without being analyzed as a structured leadership system. The study aims to analyze the principles of Genghis Khan's leadership and assess its relevance to modern leadership and management paradigms. This study uses a systematic literature review method by synthesizing 22 selected scientific sources consisting of classical historical texts and reputable journal articles with a thematic analysis approach. The results of the study identify five main themes, namely the historical context of Mongolia, leadership theory, meritocracy and organizational justice, servant leadership and social empathy, and value-based leadership. These findings show that Genghis Khan's leadership was a crucial factor in the success of the Mongol Empire, which was characterized by merit-based governance, adaptive organizational structures, strategic intelligence, and moral accountability. These leadership principles remain relevant and applicable in facing the complex and dynamic challenges of contemporary leadership and organizations.
Co-Authors Adi Bandono Adnan Majid Agung Tresnadi Agus Setiadji Agustinus Eko Susetyo Akhmad Zulfikar Almuchalif Suryo Anak Agung Banyu Perwita Animus Grahadi Antonius Widodo Arnold Hiras Simorangkir Avando Bastari Bayu Hartono Benny Sukandari Budi Sumaryono Chandra Kusumawardhani Dani Hutabarat Deni Dadang Didit Herdiawan Djoko Purwanto, Ignatius Eko GHAZALIE, GHAZALIE Guntur Eko Saputro Harefa, Faonaso Hendra, Afrizal I Made Jiwa Astika Ivan Yulivan Kurniawan Firmuzi Syarifuddin Leonardo, Vande Mahroza, Jonni Midhio, I Wayan Muhamad Hasanuddin Wahid Muhammad Hadianto Muhammad Ikmal Setiadi Nanto Nurhuda Nurbantoro, Endro Octaviana, Shoraya Lolyta Okol Sri Suharyo Prakoso, Lukman Yudho Prakoso, Lukman Yudo Priyanto Priyanto Priyanto Priyanto Purwanto, Ignatius Eko Djoko Rifki Najib Risman, Helda S Sutanto Samuel Lumban Toruan Setiadi, Muhammad Ikmal Suadnyana, I Nyoman Suyono Thamrin Syarif Hidayatullah Talik, Krisaldi Gusti Pratama Thamrin, Suyono Toni, Toni Wahid, Muhamad Hasanuddin Yahya, Yudhi