Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

Protection of Corporate Whistleblowers in the Digital Age: A Critical Analysis of Current Indonesian Frameworks Tantimin Tantimin; Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk; David Tan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i03.p11.

Abstract

Corporate whistleblowing plays a key role in ensuring transparency in Indonesian businesses. While the advent of digital technology can help improve the mechanism of corporate whistleblowing, this development still brings its own risks, particularly regarding the privacy of whistleblowers, which can significantly heighten risk of retaliations. This research aims to address the legal adequacy of Indonesia in ensuring the protection of corporate whistleblowers in the digital age, using normative legal research method and statutory approach. Findings of this research highlights the normative uncertainties and disharmony in the realm of witness protection, such as the lack of direct acknowledgement of corporate whistleblowers and the lack of supportive mechanism of digital corporate whistleblowing. In the digital context, there is a lack of mechanisms and compliance to address unique challenges that could arise in digital corporate whistleblowing, in the realm of data privacy. This research proposes a model of legal development consisting of key normative aspects that can be utilized to improve the relevant legal frameworks in Indonesia.
Political Rights of Ex-Corruptors vis a vis Electoral Integrity in Indonesia Rusdiana, Shelvi; Hotmaulana Hutauruk, Rufinus; Fitri, Winda; Jaya, Febri
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i01.p13

Abstract

This study investigates the normative inconsistency vis a vis the political rights of ex-corruption convicts and the principle of electoral integrity within the framework of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 16, in Indonesia. The problem addressed centers on whether allowing individuals convicted of corruption to participate as election candidates aligns with democratic values and sustainable governance. While inclusivity is a key component of both democracy and SDG 16, this research critically examines the extent to which such inclusivity may conflict with the imperative of maintaining public trust and ethical standards in political leadership. Employing a normative legal research method supported by a statutory approach, the study analyzes Indonesian legal instruments. The research identifies a significant legal paradox: integrity is mandated for election officials but not for legislative or presidential candidates. This discrepancy raises critical questions regarding the consistency and credibility of Indonesia’s democratic processes. Findings indicate that allowing ex-corruption convicts to run for office undermines public confidence, hampers political regeneration, and dilutes the ethical foundation of electoral integrity. The analysis also reveals that an uncritical application of SDG 16 as a justification for political inclusivity may inadvertently legitimize impunity and erode democratic accountability. The study calls for urgent legal reforms to align candidacy requirements with broader democratic and developmental objectives. By reinforcing integrity as a universal qualification for public office, Indonesia can uphold the principles of justice, restore electoral legitimacy, and promote sustainable political development.