p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.711
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Legalitas Lentera Hukum Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Unram Law Review Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies MLJ Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Kosmik Hukum ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Journal of Business and Applied Management Prosiding National Conference for Community Service Project Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Legal Spirit Jurnal Supremasi LEGAL BRIEF Supremasi Hukum Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Journal of Judicial Review UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Jurnal Ilmiah Raflesia Akuntansi Jurnal Hukum Malahayati Hang Tuah Law Journal Syiah Kuala Law Journal Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Legisia Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences (CoMBInES) Conference on Community Engagement Project (Concept) Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Perpajakan International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Jurnal Jurisprudence
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Legal Spirit

The Urgency to Renew Bankruptcy Law Requirements and Summary Proof in Indonesia Tan, David; Sudirman, Lu; Fiorentine, Jasisca
Legal Spirit Vol 8, No 1 (2024): Legal Spirit
Publisher : Pascasarjana Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Widya Gama Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31328/ls.v8i1.5081

Abstract

The provisions pertaining to bankruptcy and summary proof in Law Number 37 of 2004 present various drawbacks in their application, particularly impacting debtors. Debtors can be declared bankrupt with relative ease, and the requirement for declaring bankruptcy does not directly indicate the debtor’s insolvency. This can present difficulties for other creditors, as the leniency in bankruptcy requirements for debtors is viewed as means to accelerate debt resolution, even though not all face the same circumstances. This research will focus on the issues regarding the urgency of revising Law Number 37 of 2004, specifically with regard to the conditions for bankruptcy and summary proof. The method used in this research is the doctrinal legal research method, which entails scrutinizing literary sources, legal theories or principles, research journals, and legislative regulations to analyze the subject of the research. Furthermore, a comparative approach is adopted to evaluate the development of Indonesian law by examining the bankruptcy legal frameworks in France and the Netherlands. The study concludes that the pressing need for amendments to the conditions for bankruptcy and summary proof in Law Number 37 of 2004 necessitates a responsive legal system. This can be achieved through a comprehensive review of problematic regulations. Therefore, the incorporation of additional measures, such as an insolvency test and a proactive approach by judges, establishes a regulatory mechanism that can be viewed as a responsive outcome in the future.