Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
12.453
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika SELAPARANG: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Berkemajuan Halu Oleo Law Review Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Jurnal Ius Constituendum Journal of Dedicators Community Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum JUSTISI UNTAG Law Review MAGISTRA Law Review Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Indonesia Private Law Review KADARKUM: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal La Edusci Journal Justiciabelen (JJ) Semarang Law Review Journal of Law Justice Policy Brief Pertanian, Kelautan, dan Biosains Tropika Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia SASI Vifada Assumption Journal of Law Journal Juridisch
Zaenal Arifin
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 106 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 106 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Governance Strategy for Free Nutritious Food Procurement: An Administrative Law Perspective Zaenal Arifin; Miftah Arifin
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 9 No 2 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The Free Nutritious Food Program (MBG) is a strategic government policy to improve the quality of human resources; however, its procurement governance still raises juridical concerns that create discrepancies between das sollen and das sein. This study aims to analyze the governance of MBG procurement from the perspective of Administrative Law and to formulate procurement strategies in line with the principles of good governance. The research employs a normative juridical method with statute approach and case approaches, using primary legal materials such as Presidential Regulation No. 16 of 2018 and Presidential Regulation No. 83 of 2024, and is qualitatively analyzed. The findings reveal practices of large provider dominance, limited MSME access to the e-catalog, and weak oversight, which contradict the principles of legality, justice, and accountability. The novelty of this research lies in its assertion that MBG procurement is an administrative act (bestuursdaad) that must be examined within the framework of Administrative Law to ensure the program’s legitimacy, fairness, and sustainability.
Perlindungan Hukum Pencipta-Penampil dalam Royalti dan Lisensi Konser Komersial: Legal Protection of Creator-Performers in Commercial Concert Royalty and Licensing Rendy Setyo Prakoso; Zaenal Arifin; Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno
Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani Vol. 16 No. 1 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/humani.v16i1.14421

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal framework governing licensing and royalty arrangements for songs created and performed by creator-performers in commercial concerts, as well as to examine the forms of legal protection afforded to creator-performers under Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. The research is motivated by the increasing number of copyright disputes in commercial performances, which reveal normative ambiguities between the obligation to obtain direct authorization from creators and the royalty payment mechanism administered through Collective Management Organizations (CMOs). This study employs a normative legal research method using statutory and conceptual approaches through the analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and contemporary practices within the Indonesian music industry. The findings demonstrate that the Copyright Law and Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 have not explicitly differentiated the legal position of creator-performers from non-performing creators, thereby creating legal uncertainty in the practice of commercial concerts. The novelty of this research lies in its normative argument concerning the necessity of differentiated legal protection between creator-performers and non-performing creators based on their moral, artistic, and economic attachment to musical works. The theoretical contribution of this study strengthens the development of copyright law discourse based on the characteristics of creators within the modern music industry, while its practical contribution provides recommendations for regulatory reform concerning licensing mechanisms, royalty management, and the exclusive rights of creator-performers in order to establish greater legal certainty and more proportionate legal protection within Indonesia’s music industry.   Abstrak Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis pengaturan perizinan dan pembayaran royalti atas penggunaan lagu yang diciptakan sekaligus dibawakan oleh penampil dalam konser komersial serta mengkaji bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap pencipta-penampil berdasarkan Undang-Undang Hak Cipta. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh meningkatnya sengketa penggunaan lagu dalam pertunjukan komersial yang menunjukkan adanya ambiguitas norma antara kewajiban memperoleh izin langsung dari pencipta dan mekanisme pembayaran royalti melalui Lembaga Manajemen Kolektif (LMK). Penelitian menggunakan metode hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual melalui analisis terhadap peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin, serta praktik hukum yang berkembang dalam industri musik Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan dalam Undang-Undang Hak Cipta dan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 56 Tahun 2021 belum secara tegas membedakan kedudukan pencipta lagu yang sekaligus merupakan penampil dengan pencipta non-penampil, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dalam praktik konser komersial. Kebaruan (novelty) penelitian ini terletak pada pengembangan argumentasi normatif mengenai perlunya diferensiasi perlindungan hukum antara pencipta-penampil dan pencipta non-penampil berdasarkan keterikatan moral, artistik, dan ekonomi terhadap karya yang dipertunjukkan. Kontribusi penelitian ini secara teoretis memperkuat pengembangan kajian hukum hak cipta berbasis karakteristik subjek pencipta dalam industri musik modern, sedangkan secara praktis memberikan rekomendasi reformulasi regulasi mengenai mekanisme lisensi, royalti, dan hak eksklusif pencipta-penampil guna mewujudkan kepastian hukum dan perlindungan yang lebih proporsional dalam industri musik Indonesia.
The influence of the Business Judgment Rule on the accountability of the Board of Directors for their errors or negligence based on Eisenberg's theory of Director's Accountability Miftah Arifin; Zaenal Arifin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4208

Abstract

In the business world, the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) is a legal principle that provides protection to directors when making risky business decisions, as long as those decisions are made in good faith, with sufficient care, and without personal interest. Although BJR is not explicitly regulated in Indonesian law, this principle is reflected in the Limited Liability Company Law and considered in the theory of director liability proposed by Melvin Aron Eisenberg. The purpose of this research is to analyze the application of the Business Judgment Rule principle in Indonesian corporate law to protect directors from liability for their mistakes or negligence, and to evaluate its influence on Eisenberg's theory of director liability. This study uses a normative legal research method that examines legal norms to analyze and interpret legal provisions related to the application of the Business Judgment Rule and director liability in Indonesia, as well as examining the influence of Eisenberg's theory on that doctrine. A conceptual approach is used to study the concept of the Business Judgment Rule and Eisenberg's theory of director liability in depth. The research results show that the Limited Liability Company Law in Indonesia regulates the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR), which provides protection to directors from liability for risky business decisions as long as they meet the requirements of good faith, due care, no conflict of interest, and efforts to prevent loss. However, BJR protection is not absolute, and directors can be held accountable if they violate corporate governance principles. Melvin A. Eisenberg's theory of director liability provides clearer boundaries, where directors can lose BJR protection if they violate the duty of care, duty of loyalty, duty of good faith, and duty of candor, making them accountable for their mistakes or negligence in business decision-making.
The legal policy of implementing automatic exchange of information (aeoi) in indonesia: what and how? Diah Sulistyani Ratna Sediati; Zaenal Arifin
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4532

Abstract

The Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) is a scheme for the automatic exchange of financial information between countries to combat tax evasion and money laundering. Indonesia has established AEOI through Law Number 9 of 2017 and Minister of Finance Regulation Number 60/PMK.03/2017, taking into account various economic, social, and political interests in its legal political process. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal politics behind the establishment of the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) in Indonesia and to formulate effective and efficient implementation strategies in the government's efforts to combat tax evasion and money laundering through the scheme of automatic exchange of financial information between countries. This research uses normative legal research methods, focusing on examining and analyzing the applicable legal norms. The sources of legal materials used in this research consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, with data collection techniques in the form of literature studies and data analysis conducted qualitatively. The research results reveal that the legal politics behind the establishment of the Automatic Exchange of Information (AEOI) in Indonesia are based on efforts to align with international standards in combating cross-border tax evasion and money laundering, enhancing fiscal transparency, strengthening law enforcement in the field of taxation, and increasing state revenue from the tax sector. The implementation of AEOI can be carried out effectively and efficiently by ensuring a strong legal framework, developing reliable information technology infrastructure, enhancing human resource capacity, building cooperation and coordination with financial service institutions and partner countries, conducting monitoring and evaluation, and raising public awareness and education about the importance of AEOI in combating cross-border tax evasion and money laundering.
Meninjau Kembali Penegakan Hukum Hak Cipta terhadap Karya Musik pada Platform Streaming Digital di Indonesia Ade Irma Srimurni Ati; Zaenal Arifin; Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno; Arifin Arifin; Endang Setyowati
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13484

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum terhadap karya musik pada platform streaming digital serta efektivitas sanksi terhadap pelanggaran hak cipta melalui penggunaan, pengunggahan ulang, dan pendistribusian karya tanpa izin pencipta. Kehadiran platform streaming digital telah memperluas distribusi dan konsumsi karya musik, tetapi pada saat yang sama menciptakan ruang baru bagi penggunaan karya tanpa izin yang berpotensi merugikan hak ekonomi pencipta. Perkembangan praktik digital menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara perlindungan yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta dan kemampuan hukum dalam menangani pelanggaran pada platform streaming digital. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, dan pendekatan perbandingan. Bahan hukum yang dianalisis meliputi peraturan perundang-undangan, doktrin hukum, putusan pengadilan, dan penelitian terdahulu yang berkaitan dengan perlindungan serta penegakan hak cipta dalam lingkungan digital. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 telah memberikan perlindungan melalui pengakuan hak moral dan hak ekonomi, pengaturan lisensi dan royalti, serta pemberian sanksi perdata, pidana, dan administratif. Namun, perlindungan hukum belum mampu memberikan hasil yang optimal ketika pihak lain menggunakan atau mendistribusikan karya musik tanpa izin melalui platform streaming digital. Keterbatasan pengawasan dan penindakan menyebabkan aparat penegak hukum menghadapi kesulitan dalam mengidentifikasi pelanggaran, menghentikan penggunaan karya tanpa izin, dan memastikan pemenuhan hak ekonomi pencipta. Penelitian terdahulu lebih banyak membahas perlindungan hak cipta, bentuk pelanggaran digital, atau sanksi hukum secara terpisah sehingga belum mengkaji hubungan antara bentuk pelanggaran, perlindungan hukum, dan efektivitas sanksi dalam satu kerangka analisis. Penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa perlindungan hak cipta pada platform streaming digital memerlukan mekanisme penegakan hukum yang mampu mendeteksi pelanggaran, menghentikan penggunaan karya tanpa izin, dan memastikan pemenuhan hak ekonomi pencipta, selain memberikan sanksi terhadap pelaku. Penguatan pengawasan digital dan penyesuaian mekanisme penegakan hukum dengan karakteristik platform streaming diperlukan untuk meningkatkan kepastian hukum dan memberikan perlindungan yang efektif bagi pencipta karya musik.   This study aims to analyze the legal protection of musical works on digital streaming platforms and the effectiveness of sanctions for copyright infringement involving unauthorized use, re-uploading, and distribution. Digital streaming platforms have expanded the distribution and consumption of musical works while creating opportunities for unauthorized use that may undermine creators’ economic rights. This development reveals a gap between the copyright protection provided under Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright and the capacity of the existing legal framework to address infringement in digital environments. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The analysis examines legislation, legal doctrines, judicial decisions, and previous studies concerning copyright protection and enforcement. The findings demonstrate that Law Number 28 of 2014 protects creators through moral and economic rights, licensing and royalty mechanisms, and civil, criminal, and administrative sanctions. However, protection remains suboptimal because monitoring and enforcement mechanisms face difficulties in identifying infringements, preventing unauthorized use, and ensuring the fulfillment of creators’ economic rights. Previous studies have predominantly examined copyright protection, digital infringement, or legal sanctions separately, leaving insufficient analysis of the relationship between infringement patterns, legal protection, and sanction effectiveness on digital streaming platforms. This study argues that effective copyright protection requires enforcement mechanisms capable of detecting infringement, preventing unauthorized use, ensuring creators’ economic rights, and imposing appropriate sanctions on infringers. Strengthening digital monitoring and adapting enforcement mechanisms to the characteristics of streaming platforms are necessary to enhance legal certainty and provide effective protection for musical creators.
Problematika dalam Transparansi Proses Lelang Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintah sebagai Faktor Terjadinya Persekongkolan Tender Nur Khikmatus Saidah; Zaenal Arifin; Cita Tsaabiethah Agustria Sasti; Nurfitriawati; Teguh Hadi Prayitno
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13612

Abstract

Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Pemerintpah (PBJ) merupakan sektor strategis yang menggunakan dana publik dan menuntut penerapan prinsip good governance, khususnya transparansi dan akuntabilitas, guna mencegah praktik persaingan usaha tidak sehat. Meskipun secara normatif Peraturan Presiden Nomor 12 Tahun 2021 dan Penerapan Sistem Pengadaan Secara Elektronik (SPSE) dirancang untuk menjamin transparansi proses lelang, dalam praktiknya masih ditemukan berbagai penyimpangan berupa persekongkolan tender. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada masih tingginya kasus persekongkolan dalam PBJ meskipun telah diterapkan sistem elektronik, yang menunjukkan adanya kesenjangan antara regulasi dan implementasi. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif. Spesifikasi penelitian bersifat deskriptif analitis. Jenis dan sumber data menggunakan data sekunder. Metode pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan. Analisis data dilakukan secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa transparansi dalam proses lelang PBJ masih bersifat administratif dan belum menyentuh keterbukaan substansial pada tahap evaluasi penawaran, sehingga membuka ruang terjadinya persekongkolan baik secara horizontal maupun vertikal, termasuk keterlibatan penyelenggara pengadaan. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penekanan transparansi tahap penawaran dan evaluasi sebagai faktor kunci terjadinya persekongkolan tender yang sebelumnya dikaji secara spesifik dalam penelitian terdahulu, sehingga dapat menjadi dasar penguatan pengawasan dan perbaikan regulasi PBJ.
Rekonstruksi Pengaturan Hukum Lelang di Indonesia dalam Perspektif Kepastian hukum dan Keadilan Hukum Laksita Anggrarini; Zaenal Arifin; Endah Pujiastuti; Miftah Arifin
Journal Juridisch Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): JULY
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jj.v4i2.13619

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk merekonstruksi pengaturan hukum lelang di Indonesia dalam perspektif kepastian dan keadilan hukum. Lelang memiliki peran strategis dalam peralihan hak, pelaksanaan eksekusi, serta penyelesaian kewajiban hukum, namun pengaturannya masih tersebar dalam berbagai peraturan sektoral dan sebagian bertumpu pada regulasi lama, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan lemahnya perlindungan bagi para pihak, khususnya pemenang lelang yang beritikad baik. Kondisi tersebut berimplikasi pada meningkatnya sengketa lelang dan menurunnya kepercayaan publik terhadap mekanisme lelang. Urgensi penulisan ini terletak pada kebutuhan akan sistem hukum lelang yang lebih harmonis, komprehensif, dan adaptif terhadap dinamika praktik hukum. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada perumusan konsep rekonstruksi pengaturan hukum lelang yang mengintegrasikan kepastian hukum prosedural dengan keadilan substantif serta perlindungan hukum yang seimbang bagi seluruh pihak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa harmonisasi regulasi, penegasan kewenangan pejabat lelang, dan penguatan perlindungan hukum merupakan elemen kunci dalam mewujudkan sistem lelang yang adil dan pasti.
Regulasi Pelaksana Pajak Karbon dalam MendukungTarget Nationally Determined Contribution Indonesia Hamonangan Sitanggang; Zaenal Arifin; Endah Pujiastuti; Amri Panahatan Sihotang
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i3.14172

Abstract

This study examines the urgency of establishing and implementing regulations for carbon taxation in Indonesia and formulates an ideal regulatory model to support the achievement of Indonesia’s Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) targets. Although carbon taxation has been legally recognized under the Harmonization of Tax Regulations Law and Presidential Regulation on Carbon Economic Value, its implementation remains ineffective due to the absence of comprehensive implementing regulations governing emission measurement and verification, tariff calculation, tax collection, supervision, and incentive mechanisms. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches by analyzing carbon tax regulations in Indonesia, Singapore, Finland, and India. The findings demonstrate that the lack of operational legal instruments has created legal uncertainty and hindered the effectiveness of carbon taxation as an environmental fiscal policy instrument. This study further argues that a Government Regulation is required to operationalize Article 13 of the Harmonization of Tax Regulations Law and provide legal certainty for stakeholders. The novelty of this research lies in its integrative analysis linking the absence of implementing regulations with the obstacles to achieving Indonesia’s NDC targets, while proposing a comparative and adaptive regulatory framework suited to Indonesia’s legal and economic conditions. The study contributes theoretically to the development of environmental tax law and practically to the formulation of a more effective, equitable, and sustainable carbon tax policy in Indonesia.   Penelitian ini menganalisis urgensi pembentukan regulasi pelaksana pajak karbon di Indonesia serta merumuskan model pengaturan yang ideal guna mendukung pencapaian target Nationally Determined Contribution (NDC) Indonesia. Meskipun pajak karbon telah memiliki dasar hukum melalui Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan dan Peraturan Presiden tentang Nilai Ekonomi Karbon, implementasinya belum berjalan optimal akibat belum adanya regulasi pelaksana yang mengatur secara komprehensif mekanisme pengukuran dan verifikasi emisi, penetapan tarif, pemungutan, pengawasan, dan pemberian insentif. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan melalui analisis pengaturan pajak karbon di Indonesia, Singapura, Finlandia, dan India. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kekosongan instrumen hukum operasional telah menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan menghambat efektivitas pajak karbon sebagai instrumen kebijakan fiskal lingkungan. Penelitian ini berpendapat bahwa peraturan pemerintah diperlukan untuk mengoperasionalkan Pasal 13 Undang-Undang Harmonisasi Peraturan Perpajakan dan memberikan kepastian hukum bagi para pihak. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis integratif mengenai hubungan antara kekosongan regulasi pelaksana dan hambatan pencapaian target NDC Indonesia, sekaligus menawarkan model regulasi komparatif dan adaptif yang sesuai dengan sistem hukum serta kondisi ekonomi nasional. Kontribusi penelitian ini memberikan penguatan teoretis dalam pengembangan hukum pajak lingkungan dan kontribusi praktis bagi pembentukan kebijakan pajak karbon yang lebih efektif, berkeadilan, dan berkelanjutan di Indonesia.    
Penyelesaian Sengketa Hak Cipta Lagu Nuansa Bening Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta Achmad Fuad Achwani; Ahmad Dwi Nuryanto; Agus Saiful Abib; Zaenal Arifin; Putri Haliza Yuniar
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 3 (2026): SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i3.14297

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dispute resolution mechanism of the copyright case concerning the song Nuansa Bening and the legal consequences arising under Law Number 28 of 2014 on Copyright. The background of this research is based on the increasing number of copyright violations in the digital era, particularly in the music industry, marked by unauthorized use of works and unclear royalty distribution. The urgency of this study lies in providing legal certainty and protection of both moral and economic rights of song creators in dispute resolution practices. This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory and conceptual approaches through the analysis of primary and secondary legal materials. The novelty of this study lies in the use of a specific case study of the song Nuansa Bening to examine the effectiveness of dispute resolution mechanisms and their legal implications, which have rarely been explored in previous studies. The results indicate that dispute resolution can be pursued through both non-litigation and litigation mechanisms; however, in practice, the lawsuit was declared inadmissible due to formal defects, particularly the absence of necessary parties. Consequently, substantive legal protection could not be applied, highlighting that the effectiveness of copyright enforcement depends not only on the substance of violations but also on procedural accuracy.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa hak cipta lagu Nuansa Bening serta akibat hukum yang timbul berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Latar belakang penelitian ini didasarkan pada meningkatnya pelanggaran hak cipta di era digital, khususnya dalam industri musik, yang ditandai dengan penggunaan karya tanpa izin dan ketidakjelasan pembagian royalti. Urgensi penelitian ini terletak pada pentingnya memberikan kepastian hukum serta perlindungan terhadap hak moral dan hak ekonomi pencipta lagu dalam praktik penyelesaian sengketa. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan Perundang-Undangan dan konseptual melalui analisis bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada penggunaan studi kasus konkret lagu Nuansa Bening untuk mengkaji efektivitas mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa serta implikasi hukum yang timbul, yang selama ini masih jarang dianalisis secara spesifik dalam penelitian sebelumnya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa penyelesaian sengketa dapat ditempuh melalui jalur non-litigasi dan litigasi, namun dalam praktiknya gugatan yang diajukan dinyatakan tidak dapat diterima akibat cacat formil berupa kurang pihak. Akibatnya, perlindungan hukum secara substantif tidak dapat diterapkan, sehingga menegaskan bahwa keberhasilan penegakan hak cipta tidak hanya bergantung pada substansi pelanggaran, tetapi juga pada ketepatan prosedur hukum. 
Implementing Living Law under Article 2 of the Indonesian Criminal Code : The Maya Indigenous Community in Raja Ampat Wahab Aznul Hidaya; Zaenal Arifin; Rajab Lestaluhu; Cintia Dwi Puspita
Vifada Assumption Journal of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): July - December
Publisher : Yayasan Vifada Cendikia Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70184/nwzphm18

Abstract

Purpose: This study examines the implementation of Article 2 of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Indonesian Criminal Code in resolving disputes within the Maya Indigenous Community in Raja Ampat and evaluates whether the normative recognition of living law has been actualized in criminal justice practice. Research Design and Methodology: This study uses a socio-legal approach combining normative legal analysis and empirical field research. Primary data were obtained through semi-structured interviews with the Chair of the Ambel Waigeo Indigenous Community Institution and field observations in Raja Ampat. Secondary data were drawn from statutory regulations, legal literature, journal articles, and previous studies. Findings and Discussion: The findings show that customary deliberation, genealogical verification, and customary oaths remain socially legitimate mechanisms for resolving customary disputes. However, Article 2 has not yet created an institutional mechanism connecting customary settlement with investigation, prosecution, and court proceedings. This creates a Normative Recognition Empirical Actualization Gap. The model offers a conceptual bridge for institutional implementation. Implications: The study recommends implementing regulations on institutional coordination, procedural standards, recognition of customary law, and constitutional safeguards based on human rights, Pancasila, the 1945 Constitution, legality, and legal certainty. Future comparative socio-legal research is needed to test the Integrated Living Law Justice Model.
Co-Authors Abib, Agus Saiful Abidin Abidin Achmad Fuad Achwani Ade Irawan Ade Irma Srimurni Ati Agung Kristyanto Nababan Ahmad Dwi Nuryanto Ahmad Dwi Nuryanto Ahmad Samudra Aisyah Nurhalizah Albertus Heru Nuswanto Ali Lubab Alvian Octo Risty Amri Panahatan Sihotang Andi Asri Angreinni Angreinni Ani Triwati Anna Widiastuti Annisa Rachmasari Apul Oloan Sipahutar Arief Rizal Arief Slamet Karyadi Arif Hidayat Arifin Arifin Atok Dadyo Utomo Aulia Uyun Asalina B. Rini Heryanti Bambang Sadono Bayu Wishnu Buana Callesta Aydelwais De Fila Asmara Casnoyo Casnoyo Christina Diah Wijayanti Cintia Dwi Puspita Cita Tsaabiethah Agustria Sasti Cita Tsaabiethah Agustria Sasti Cristhananta Sindoro David Maharya Ardyantara Dewi Tuti Muriyati Dharu Triasih Dhian Indah Astanti, Dhian Indah Di Angelo Fellest Hyaning Sabda Diah Sulistyani Diah Sulistyani Ratna Sediati Diah Sulistyani Ratna Sediati Diah Sulistyani RS Difa Ayu Putrisetia Djuhandhani Rahadjo Puro Doddy Kridasaksana Endah Pujiastuti Endang Setyowati Endang Supriyanti Erik Eko Nugroho Ezenduka, Uzodinma Yurriens Fahroni Nur Fahruddin Mubarok Anwar Fenny Cahyani Fransiska Intan Cahyaningrum Giang, Vu Le Gita Novita Sari Gunawan Meidianto Hadi Ismanto Haliza Yuniar, Putri Hamonangan Sitanggang Hendri Susilo Henry Januar Saputra Herwin Haryadi Basoeki Ika Nurwulandari Ika Widyasari Rifki Imanuel Kurniawan Arif Soetedjo Inayatul Muamaroh Irfatul Chasanah Junaidi, Muhammad Kukuh Sudarmanto Kukuh Sudarmanto Kuswardani Kuswardani Laksita Anggrarini Lestari, Rohmini Indah Mac Thi Hoai Thuong Mahendra Hakim Mangaraja Manurung Mariani Agnestasia Soeitoe Maruf Rian Ardiansyah Massayu Dian Widuri Mat Dadi Miftah Arifin Miftah Arifin Miftah Arifin Miftah Arifin Miko Jaya Nanda Pratama Misbakhul Munir Moehamad Nindyarto Laksmana Praja Moh Harir Moh Thamsir Muchammad Choirihi Muhammad Agus Prasetyo Muhammad Amirullah Muhammad Anam Muhammad Arif Maulana Muhammad Fakhrul Haq Muhammad Iftar Aryaputra, Muhammad Iftar Muhammad Iqbal Muhammad Isro Wahyudin Muhammad Junaidi Muhammad Nahdhodin Muhammad Nawir Muhammad Nur Aflah Muhammad Sibaweh Muamar Muhammad Zul Efendi Manurung Musfiratul Ilmi Nabila Setya Laksana Nadia Aurynnisa Prihandini Nadya Dhea Fristianti Ni Nyoman Tri Partini Niken Astuti Nikmatul Wachidah Novelia Christina Nugroho Novieyan Yahya Nur Aisah Nur Khikmatus Saidah Nurfitriawati Nurkholis Nurkholis Nuswanto, A Heru Olivia Grasera, Brenda Panjaitan, Bahmid Putri Haliza Yuniar Putri Haliza Yuniar R.S. Rakia, A. Sakti Rahajeng Wulandari Rajab Lestaluhu Rati Riana Reiska Hendristianto Rendy Setyo Prakoso Rezza Aldi Ferdiansa Rizky Syahputra Rizqi Purnama Puteri Roy Albi Winata Saifudin Saifudin Saiful Amar Sa’ro Fitriani A. Rohma Septiandani, Dian Setiya Pramana Shonia Hugeng Purnama Simanjuntak, Kristi W Siti Fatimah Soegianto Soegianto Soegianto Soegianto Soegianto, Soegianto Sonny Hendraprasanto Sucihatiningsih Dian Wisika Prajanti Sudarmanto, Kukuh Sukarna, Kadi sukarna, kadi Sukrisno, Wijayono Hadi Sungkowo Edy Mulyono Supriyadi - Supriyadi Supriyadi Supriyanto Supriyanto Sutikno Wijaya Syafran Sofyan Teguh Hadi Prayitno Thalita Rahmabilla Alvaroneta Theresia Eni Prasetyorini Tirsa Tatara Tri Nugroho Tri Wibowo Unggul Basoeky Wahab Aznul Hidaya Wahyu Mahendra Wahyu Nugroho Wasino Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno Wijayono Hadi Sukrisno Wiwin Setyorini Wiwit Mulyanto Yogi Prasetiono