Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 39 Documents
Search

Penerapan Sistem Pemerintahan Berbasis Elektronik (SPBE) Pada Dinas Komunikasi, Informatika dan Statistik Provinsi Lampung Dengan Prinsip Good Governance Aulia Fitri, Anisa; Ridlwan, Zulkarnain; Natamiharja, Rudi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 3 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1749

Abstract

The aim of this research is to analyze the implementation of SPBE in the Lampung Province Communication, Informatics and Statistics Service and analyze the suitability of the SPBE implementation in the Lampung Province Communication, Informatics and Statistics Service with the principles of good governance. This type of research is normative-empirical legal research, using primary data and secondary data. The research approach uses a statutory-regulatory approach (legislative approach) and a contextual approach (conceptual approach). The results of this research show that the implementation of SPBE in the Communication, Informatics and Statistics Service of Lampung Province obtained an index of 3.37 or was included in the good predicate according to data from evaluation results by the Ministry of State Apparatus Empowerment and Bureaucratic Reform in 2023. In detail, namely the policy domain with an index of 4.70, the governance domain manage with an index of 3.30, management domain with an index of 1.64, and service domain with an index of 3.63. This is in accordance with William Chamblis and Robert B. Seidman's Law Writing Theory, namely that the Lampung Provincial Government is the law-making institution that applies the Lampung Governor's Regulation on SPBE. The operation of the law in accordance with this regulation concerns the existence of other forces (parties) outside the provincial government, namely SPBE users from central agencies, State Civil Service employees, individuals, communities, business actors and other parties. The implementation of SPBE in Lampung Province is in line with 8 (eight) principles of good governance and in accordance with the Good Governance Theory, namely the implementation of SPBE meets legal certainty based on regulations at both the central and regional levels, the implementation of SPBE fulfills the principle of benefit for its users, impartiality in the implementation of the Lampung Governor's Regulation on SPBE, the SPBE application providing careful services to its users, regional officials not abusing their authority in the SPBE application, openness/transparency in the implementation of SPBE, containing the public interest, and good service to the community. The implementation of SPBE in Lampung Province is still faced with obstacles, namely the management domain which is still in the deficient category, there is still a lack of public understanding about SPBE and the uneven distribution of SPBE to all State Civil Apparatus (ASN) in Regional Apparatus Organizations (OPD) within the Lampung Provincial Government.
Discourse Enterprise in Natural Resource Management for the Common Heritage of Mankind Syofyan, Ahmad; Natamiharja, Rudi; Aida, Melly; Aini, Desy Churul; Daryanti, Daryanti; Januarti, Rasti Putri
Indonesian Journal of International Law
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Common Heritage of Mankind (CHM) is a principle in which all entities can manage the natural resources that exist in the world and must share the benefits of their exploitation with other entities for the common good. However, the principle of CHM has not been structurally and legally regulated in space. The enthusiasm about ‘infinite natural wealth’ that space and seabed mining can produce, particularly in developing countries, means that they can benefit from the activities carried out in order for their regional and mineral resources to be declared as the heritage of mankind. The hypothesis obtained from this research will explore the principles of rules for the management of exploration and exploitation in general of natural resources by international enterprise within the CHM regime and analyze the need to establish management enterprise and international authorities/ organization to manage natural resource exploitation activities as a common heritage. Finding and formulating the urgency of the formation of a business entity and finding a suitable formulation of principles for managing the results of natural resource exploitation activities with international organizations in CHM for international enterprise as business actors who are obliged to have ideas about the mechanisms and procedures in managing Space that has brought out for the exploration and exploitation of the common heritage of mankind. The idea in the International Statute could be the basis for adding a new norm in international law.
Mapping International Laws on Human Rights in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia Natamiharja, Rudi; Rasya, Al Gizca; Sabatira, Febryani
JASSP Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jassp.v1i1.26

Abstract

Human rights are granted by all people regardless of discriminatory differences. In this sense, human rights must be respected, guarded, and protected by individuals, broad society, and the State. Generally, human rights are outlined in several international instruments such as Universal Declaration on Human Rights (UDHR), International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), and International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) 1976. From a national perspective, Indonesia has played its roles in addressing and combating human rights violations by adopting some international provisions into the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia (Article 28) and ratifying several international instruments on human rights. Recognizing the correlation between international and national law, the study intends to examine to what extent Indonesia has adopted human rights material in international provisions into its constitution. The result of this study shows that almost all contents on human rights in article 28 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic Indonesia are also contained in the Universal Declaration on Human Rights 1948. Several provisions on the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR) and International Covenant on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights (ICESCR) 1976 seem very similar to provided contents on the UDHR 1948. Therefore, it is undebatable that ICCPR and ICESCR also influence the inclusion of human rights contents in the 1945 Constitution on the second amendment in 2000.
PENINGKATAN KESADARAN MASYARAKAT TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM HAK LINGKUNGAN YANG BAIK DAN SEHAT Natamiharja, Rudi; Rudy, Rudy; Putri, Ria Wierma; Sabatira, Febryani
Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Sakai Sambayan Vol. 6 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jss.v6i2.353

Abstract

Lingkungan yang baik dan sehat merupakan hak dasar (fundamental rights) bagi setiap manusia yang harus diciptakan oleh setiap negara, pemerintah dan berbagai pemangku kepentingan. Hukum nasional mengatur hak atas lingkungan yang layak pada Undang- Undang Dasar 1945 Pasal 28 ayat (1) menyebutkan bahwa setiap orang berhak hidup sejahtera lahir batin, bertempat tinggal dan mendapatkan lingkungan hidup yang baik dan sehat serta berhak memperoleh pelayanan kesehatan. Masyarakat sasaran berada di RT 02 yang merupakan area pemukiman dengan tingkat kepadatan tinggi dengan akses mobilitas yang buruk, sehingga siklus pengelolaan sampah tidak berjalan efektif. Minimnya tingkat pendidikan masyarakat Kampung Baru Tiga berbanding lurus dengan kurangnya pengetahuan terkait hak dasar mereka atas lingkungan yang baik dan sehat, serta dampak langsung pencemaran lingkungan terhadap kehidupan bermasyarakat. Pengabdian dilaksanakan melalui rangkaian kegiatan sosialisasi hukum dan aksi bersama masyarakat untuk meningkatkan kesadaran mereka terkait peran penting masyarakat dalam mewujudkan lingkungan yang baik dan sehat. Maka dari itu, PKM Unggulan ini diharapkan dapat memberikan kontribusi berupa pengetahuan hukum, pemahaman dampak lingkungan, dan pelatihan pengelolaan sampah mandiri.
Konflik Normatif Antara Non-Refoulement Dan Kedaulatan Negara: Tinjauan Filosofis Dan Hukum Dalam Kasus Pengungsi Rohingya Dari Bangladesh Putri, Nabila Riana; Natamiharja, Rudi; Sujadmiko, Bayu
JUSTICIA SAINS - Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 10, No 2 (2025): JUSTICIA SAINS: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Sang Bumi Ruwa Jurai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24967/jcs.v10i2.4078

Abstract

State sovereignty as the exclusive right to regulate domestic affairs often clashes with international obligations to respect the principle of non-refoulement in refugee protection, especially Rohingya refugees. The conflict between sovereignty and international legal obligations poses a complex normative dilemma, where the state must balance national interests, security, and the protection of human rights. Restrictions on the application of the principle of non-refoulement can be done proportionally and in accordance with international legal norms and universal moral principles in natural law theory. International cooperation and strengthening domestic laws are key in managing such restrictions so as not to violate refugee rights. With a wise and harmonious approach, states can ensure the protection of refugees without compromising national stability, security and sovereignty, thus creating a more responsive and humane international legal system.
The Victim's Best Interest Principle in Islamic Law: An Examination of the Substance of Sexual Violence in Muslim Majority Countries in the Contemporary Era Elfa Murdiana; Nunung Rodliyah; Rudi Natamiharja; M. Nur Fathoni; Gautam Kumar Jha
MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): MilRev: Metro Islamic Law Review
Publisher : Faculty of Sharia, UIN Jurai Siwo Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32332/milrev.v5i1.10654

Abstract

This article examines the extent to which the principle of the best interests of victims is accommodated within the legal frameworks for protecting victims of sexual violence in Muslim-majority countries. It critically explores the normative and practical gap between Islamic legal principles—particularly the protection of life (ḥifẓ al-nafs) and honor (ḥifẓ al-‘irḍ)—and the operation of positive law in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Egypt. The central questions addressed are how victim protection is conceptualized and regulated within the legal systems of these three countries, and whether the best interests of victims have been established as the primary normative and policy orientation. This study employs a normative juridical method, utilizing comparative and conceptual approaches, and analyzes statutory regulations, legal doctrines, court decisions, and relevant academic literature. The findings reveal that, despite recent legal reforms, existing regulatory frameworks remain predominantly perpetrator-oriented. Victim protection is often treated as supplementary rather than foundational, resulting in limited access to justice, insufficient recovery mechanisms, and weak institutional responsiveness to victims’ needs. Building on a Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah perspective, this article proposes a legal reconstruction that re-centers the protection of victims as a core objective of Islamic and national legal systems. It argues that the principle of the best interests of victims is not only compatible with Islamic law but is inherently embedded within its ethical and purposive framework. Accordingly, the study recommends strengthening substantive legal norms, procedural safeguards, institutional coordination, and legal culture to ensure holistic and equitable victim protection. The academic contribution of this article lies in its integration of Maqāṣid al-Sharī‘ah with comparative victimology, offering a normative framework that bridges Islamic legal theory and contemporary human rights discourse. It advances the discussion on victim-centered justice by providing a contextualized Islamic legal justification for prioritizing victims’ interests within modern legal systems.
Legal Protection of Personal Data Against Phishing in Indonesia: A Pancasila-Based Approach Gunsu Nurmansyah; Rudi Natamiharja; Ikhsan Setiawan
Pancasila and Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/plr.v6i1.4138

Abstract

Phishing in Indonesia presents significant risks to privacy and data security. This study employs a normative juridical approach to analyze the protection of personal data, with attention to both preventive and repressive legal mechanisms. It assesses the effectiveness of Law No. 27 of 2022 on Personal Data Protection in combating phishing, alongside measures of digital literacy and law enforcement. The findings indicate notable progress but highlight persistent challenges in enforcement capacity, public awareness, and international cooperation. The study recommends strengthening enforcement, expanding cybersecurity education, and enhancing cross-border collaboration to advance data protection.
Asset Recoveryin in the Criminal Act of Corruption in ASEAN Rinaldy Amrullah; Rudi Natamiharja
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 27 NOMOR 1, JUNI 2020
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v27i1.805

Abstract

The eradication of corruption is not only limited to imprisonment for perpetrators, but also optimally recaptures what has been taken by corruptors (asset recovery). This action needs to be done in order to create a deterrent effect for corruptors and return the state property. Corruption eradication in Southeast Asia, especially by ASEAN member countries, has not shown seriousness. This fact shown from Transparency International report. The majority of ASEAN country member have not been optimal in the orientation of asset recovery in handling corruption cases. How could ASEAN countries eradicate corruption through asset recovery efforts? This study uses a normative comparative method through a qualitative approach. Based on the results of the study found that the level of corruption in Southeast Asia is not the worst, but also not in a safe condition from the threat of corruption and is still classified as an area of concern. Brunei Darussalam, the Philippines, Indonesia and Singapore are among the countries that have succeeded in increasing corruption eradication scores. Indonesia and Thailand become countries that struggle hard to eradicate corruption while Vietnam and Laos are considered to be countries that are still lacking in fighting corruption. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the recovery of corruption assets is still a matter of little concern by the majority of countries except Singapore and Malaysia. In eradicating corruption, particularly in asset recovery, ASEAN needs to have a political will determined and become a law in conducting multilateral cooperation. The agreement must be set forth in the form of regional cooperation that has a strong tie so that this can help efforts to eradicate corruption in ASEAN.
When Peace is Personalized: The Clash between the BoP Charter and Indonesia’s Free and Active Foreign Policy Natamiharja, Rudi; Kurniawan, Robi Cahyadi; Kpanya, Ovide Egide Manzanga; Ablin, Rainnade Geojona
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 7 No 1 (2026): Februari
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v7i1.53260

Abstract

Background: This article critically examines the legal and constitutional implications of Indonesia’s engagement with the "Board of Peace" (BoP), an emerging ad hoc entity in global peace governance. It highlights the systemic tension between established multilateral frameworks and the BoP’s "Chairman-centric" model, which represents a shift from rule-based to person-based international authority. Methodology: This study employs a normative legal research method to compare the BoP Charter, the United Nations Charter, and Indonesia’s domestic legal framework. Objectives: The research, aims to evaluate the compatibility of the BoP’s centralized governance with the principles of sovereign equality, modern multilateralism, and Indonesia’s constitutional mandate of a "Bebas Aktif" (free and active) foreign policy. Findings: The analysis reveals that the BoP’s institutional design—characterized by unfettered discretionary power vested in a single office—breaks the "chain of democratic delegation" required by Article 1 of the 1945 Indonesian Constitution. Furthermore, it risks creating "functional subordination" that undermines Law No. 37 of 1999 on Foreign Relations. Conclusion: Consequently, the study argues that Indonesia should utilize the period prior to ratification as a "constitutional firewall" to protect its strategic autonomy and domestic legal integrity. Novelty: This research provides a pioneering analysis of the BoP Charter through the lens of Indonesian constitutionalism, offering a critical perspective on how middle powers in the Global South should navigate ad hoc governance initiatives that bypass traditional UN-centric multilateralism.