Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

Pengembalian Aset Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Berdasarkan Keadilan Islam Susanto, Wahyu Agus; Holijah, Holijah
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 7, No 01 (2026): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v7i01.6996

Corruption is recognized as a global phenomenon and classified as an extraordinary crime both nationally and internationally. Therefore, it requires equally extraordinary approaches to address it. This research focuses on the issue of justice in corruption cases, particularly for perpetrators who have returned misappropriated assets. Many suspects or defendants have returned such assets but still face criminal punishment, even though their involvement may have been limited to an accessory role rather than that of a principal actor. This situation highlights the need for a legal justice principle that provides adequate protection. In Islamic law, the imposition of compensation payments in corruption crimes is referred to as ‘Uqubah Taba’iyah, a form of ta'zir punishment involving property. This punishment must be proportional to the amount embezzled and paid to the authorized authorities. The payment of compensation is classified as an additional criminal sanction that may be imposed on perpetrators of corruption. This study aims to examine and understand the concept of punishment in corruption cases in the context of asset recovery, legal justice, and equitable legal systems, as well as how Islamic justice offers legal protection to those who return stolen assets in the formation of a fair legal system in Indonesia. To identify and analyze the issues, this research employs critical academic thinking, conceptual approaches, statutory analysis, case studies, and comparative legal methods. The findings reveal that in several rulings—particularly at the Corruption Court of the Palembang District Court—judges have imposed criminal sanctions on individuals who had already returned state losses. This is due to limitations in current regulations, which state that returning state losses does not exempt one from criminal liability. The imposition of compensation payments on corruption offenders is based on the financial or economic harm caused to the state, with the amount required to be paid being equivalent to the gains obtained from the corruption. Under Islamic criminal law, compensation payments are considered a form of additional punishment (‘Uqubah Taba’iyah) that follows the primary ruling without requiring a separate judgment. Such payments are categorized as ta’zir punishments in the form of property, and offenders are obligated to return any assets obtained through corruption once a legal ruling has been issued by a judge.

Perkembangan Penerapan Sumpah Mubahalah Dalam Hukum Pidana Di Indonesia Akhmadi, Khoiri; Holijah, Holijah
MAGISTRA Law Review Vol 7, No 01 (2026): MAGISTRA Law Review
Publisher : PSHPM Untag Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56444/malrev.v7i01.7061

The Mubahalah Oath and Corruption are interrelated issues that require a comprehensive and collaborative response from all sectors of society. The concept of the Mubahalah Oath serves as a powerful reminder of the consequences of corruption and criminal acts. Eradicating corruption and promoting transparency and accountability are believed to create a more just and equal society for all. By dismantling the systems that perpetuate corruption, we can build a society based on integrity, justice, and respect for all individuals. This paper discusses a literature review on the Mubahalah Oath and corruption in the development of criminal law in Indonesia. The Extended Systematic Literature Review approach, namely a systematic search for references based on scientific research and expanded with public information, is used in searching for related references to be analyzed. The results show that the Mubahalah Oath can play an important role in eradicating corruption in Indonesia. Implementing the Mubahalah Oath, moral pressure for corruptors, and a tool to strengthen transparency and accountability in government and organizations. The implementation of the Mubahalah Oath can have a positive impact on eradicating corruption and creating better governance in Indonesia. Promoting a culture of honesty and accountability as a first step in eradicating corruption can pave the way for a brighter future for law enforcement in the future

Analisis Yurisdis Kebijakan Pemidanaan Bagi Korban pada Perkara Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga di Indonesia Holijah Holijah; M. Rizal
Khazanah Multidisiplin Vol. 4 No. 2 (2023): Khazanah Multidisiplin
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kl.v4i2.26054

Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT)sebagaimana tertuang dalam Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia NomorÂ 23 tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (UU-PKDRT) sebagai payung hukum yang mampu menghentikan budaya kekerasan yang ada di masyarakat. Akan tetapi, belum mampu menyingkirkan pola-pola tindakan agresif terhadap kekerasan menjadi tindak pidanaÂ yang terjadi dalam rumah tangga. Tulisan ini merupakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif yang menggunakan data sekunder sebagai data utama, berupa bahan hukum sekunder bersumber pada peraturan-peraturan, buku, artikel dan lain sebagainya yang berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang diteliti. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian bahwa tindak pidana tangga adalah harus memenuhi unsur subyektif dan obyektif sebagai perbuatan pidana dengan konsep perlindungan bagi korban serta penindakan terhadap pelaku dengan upaya tetap menjaga keutuhan dan keharmonisan rumah tangga. Demikian diharapkan mampu mengembangkan nilai-nilai kasih sayang, kesetaraan dan kesederajatan, keperdulian satu sama lain.

Strengthening the Institutional Structure of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia: The Urgency of Revising Law Number 37 of 2008 from the Perspective of Fiqh Siyasah Sari, Vidya Nirmala; Holijah, Holijah
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i2.19585

This research examines the weakened oversight function of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia in public service delivery as a consequence of three fundamental deficiencies within Law Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. First, the absence of executive enforcement authority over the Ombudsman’s recommendations results in its operation merely as a magistrature of influence, unlike its counterparts in developed jurisdictions. Second, the Ombudsman’s institutional position remains ambiguous and marginal within the state structure, as it is neither explicitly nor implicitly regulated in the 1945 Constitution. Third, budgetary and human resource constraints inevitably follow from such limited authority, while maladministration practices continue to rise, totaling 81,432 reports over the past two decades. The findings conclude that institutionally, the Ombudsman functions as a state auxiliary organ and, functionally, as part of the fourth branch of government. However, it currently exercises only a magistrature of influence, necessitating a legal transformation into a magistrature of sanction. From the perspective of fiqih siyasah (Islamic political jurisprudence), strengthening the Ombudsman is imperative, as it aligns with the principle of al-amr bi al-ma’ruf wa al-nahy ‘an al-munkar (commanding right and forbidding wrong), the concept of wilayat al-hisbah (public accountability institution), and the objectives of maqashid al-shariah. The proposed institutional strengthening model through legal revision comprises four simultaneous measures: (1) establishing binding executive authority for recommendations; (2) optimizing preventive and educational functions based on the Fiqh Anti-Maladministration framework; (3) strengthening an integrated complaint reporting system with whistleblower protection; and (4) internalizing fiqih siyasah values (trustworthiness, justice, public interest, accountability) into positive law. This research recommends that the revision of Law Number 37 of 2008 accommodate all four measures concurrently, thereby transforming the Ombudsman into a strong, independent supervisory institution capable of performing the hisbah function within a modern constitutional state.

Strengthening the Institutional Structure of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia: The Urgency of Revising Law Number 37 of 2008 from the Perspective of Fiqh Siyasah Sari, Vidya Nirmala; Holijah, Holijah
Jurnal El-Thawalib Vol 7, No 2 (2026)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/el-thawalib.v7i2.19585

This research examines the weakened oversight function of the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia in public service delivery as a consequence of three fundamental deficiencies within Law Number 37 of 2008 concerning the Ombudsman of the Republic of Indonesia. First, the absence of executive enforcement authority over the Ombudsman’s recommendations results in its operation merely as a magistrature of influence, unlike its counterparts in developed jurisdictions. Second, the Ombudsman’s institutional position remains ambiguous and marginal within the state structure, as it is neither explicitly nor implicitly regulated in the 1945 Constitution. Third, budgetary and human resource constraints inevitably follow from such limited authority, while maladministration practices continue to rise, totaling 81,432 reports over the past two decades. The findings conclude that institutionally, the Ombudsman functions as a state auxiliary organ and, functionally, as part of the fourth branch of government. However, it currently exercises only a magistrature of influence, necessitating a legal transformation into a magistrature of sanction. From the perspective of fiqih siyasah (Islamic political jurisprudence), strengthening the Ombudsman is imperative, as it aligns with the principle of al-amr bi al-ma’ruf wa al-nahy ‘an al-munkar (commanding right and forbidding wrong), the concept of wilayat al-hisbah (public accountability institution), and the objectives of maqashid al-shariah. The proposed institutional strengthening model through legal revision comprises four simultaneous measures: (1) establishing binding executive authority for recommendations; (2) optimizing preventive and educational functions based on the Fiqh Anti-Maladministration framework; (3) strengthening an integrated complaint reporting system with whistleblower protection; and (4) internalizing fiqih siyasah values (trustworthiness, justice, public interest, accountability) into positive law. This research recommends that the revision of Law Number 37 of 2008 accommodate all four measures concurrently, thereby transforming the Ombudsman into a strong, independent supervisory institution capable of performing the hisbah function within a modern constitutional state.

Kepastian Hukum Putusan Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Komersial Di Indonesia (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Periode 2015-2023) Enjelita Berliana; Rehan, Rehan; Akhmad fajri; Puput Putriani; Melysa diah lestari; Holijah, Holijah
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Januari-Juni
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/wdnn6971

Legal Certainty of Arbitration Awards in Commercial Dispute Resolution in Indonesia is a crucial issue amid rapid economic growth, with investment realization reaching IDR 1,186 trillion in 2022. This study aims to analyze the regulation, practice, and obstacles to the legal certainty of arbitration awards under Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution (Arbitration Law). Employing a normative juridical approach with statutory, conceptual, and case study analysis of Supreme Court decisions from 2015-2023, the research finds that although the Arbitration Law adopts the UNCITRAL Model Law and limits annulment grounds (Article 70), court practices often involve judicial overreach through expansive public policy interpretations, resulting in 28% of annulment petitions being granted. Key obstacles include inconsistent jurisprudence and lack of harmonization with the 1958 New York Convention. Compared to Singapore, Indonesia lags in minimizing judicial intervention. The conclusion states that legal certainty of arbitration awards is suboptimal, necessitating amendments to the Arbitration Law to strengthen finality and restrict annulment grounds. Recommendations include establishing a public policy expert panel and judicial training. This study contributes to enhancing Indonesia's investment climate.

Title

Found 36 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 36 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 36 Documents
Search