Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

TINJAUAN BUDAYA HUKUM MENGENAI TEKNIK PENYELIDIKAN DALAM RUMUSAN PASAL 75 (HURUF J) NOMOR 35 TAHUN 2009 TENTANG NARKOTIKA Sari, Elsi Kartika; Umboh, Giovani Phalden; Rajasa, Ahimsa Prima
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 8, No 2 (2026): Vol. 8 No. 2 Edisi 1 Januari 2026
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v8i2.3615

Abstract

-
BUDAYA HUKUM DEBITOR DAN KREDITOR TERHADAP ASAS ITIKAD BAIK DALAM PELAKSANAAN HOMOLOGASI Perdana, Mochamad Roland; Feisal, Azwar; Sari, Elsi Kartika
Ensiklopedia of Journal Vol 8, No 1 (2025): Vol. 8 No. 1 Edisi 3 Oktober 2025
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan Hasil Penelitian Ensiklopedia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33559/eoj.v8i1.3480

Abstract

This study aims to analyze in depth the legal culture of debtors and creditors based on good faith in implementing the PKPU peace agreement. How the regulation of the principle of good faith in the peace agreement in the process of Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) based on UUK - PKPU and How the legal culture of business actors (debtors and creditors) influences the implementation of the principle of good faith in the implementation of the PKPU peace agreement is the main problem. This study is a normative study to examine in depth related to the legal culture regarding the implementation of good faith in the results of the agreement in PKPU. The statute approach and case study approach are the approaches used. The data used are primary data in the form of regulations related to UUK - PKPU and secondary data used are previous research and related information data. The results of this study indicate that the principle of good faith in the implementation of the peace agreement or homologation in PKPU is very important to ensure economic certainty and legal certainty for creditors and debtors. Cancellation of homologation is generally due to the debtor's default in fulfilling the terms of the homologation agreement, which can result in the homologation being revoked, automatically declaring the debtor bankrupt. Keywords: Legal Culture; Homologation; Good Faith
The Overlooking of Substantive Justice: A Progressive Legal Examination of the PT Timah Tbk Corruption Ruling: Keadilan Substantif yang Terabaikan: Telaah Hukum Progresif atas Putusan Kasus Korupsi PT Timah Tbk Intan Amara Dewi, Adinda; Gabriella Bridget Tarandung, Helena; Tira Varany, Yacinta; Kartika Sari, Elsi
Mendapo: Journal of Administrative Law Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/mendapo.v6i3.51057

Abstract

Corruption in the natural resources sector, particularly in the tin mining industry, constitutes a crime that not only causes significant losses to state finances but also reflects structural failures in state governance in fulfilling its constitutional mandate as stipulated under Article 33 paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. This article aims to critically examine the role of the government and the judiciary in the PT Timah Tbk corruption case through an analysis of the Corruption Court Decision Number 70/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN.Jkt.Pst, employing the perspectives of substantive justice, progressive law, and administrative law. This study adopts a normative legal research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The findings reveal that although the court decision formally satisfies law enforcement requirements through criminal sanctions and the recovery of state financial losses, judicial reasoning remains predominantly legal-positivistic and focuses on individual criminal liability. The dimensions of the state’s structural responsibility, governance failures in the mining sector, and the systemic impacts of corruption on public interests have not been adequately articulated in the ratio decidendi of the decision. As a result, substantive justice is reduced to mere procedural justice. This article argues that the judiciary holds a strategic position as the guardian of public interest and an agent of social transformation in corruption cases classified as extraordinary crimes. Therefore, strengthening judicial reasoning is essential to ensure that court decisions function not only as instruments of punishment, but also as mechanisms for correcting public policy failures and promoting governance reform.
Peran Budaya Hukum Dalam Menghadapi Fenomena Korupsi di Indonesia Putri, Batari Abdi; Azzahra, Sri Rezeki; Sari, Elsi Kartika
Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Vol 4 No 8 (2025): November
Publisher : LOCUS MEDIA PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56128/ljoalr.v4i8.783

Abstract

Penelitian ini membahas pergeseran budaya hukum di Indonesia dan pengaruhnya terhadap maraknya praktik korupsi dengan menggunakan teori sistem hukum Lawrence M. Friedman yang meliputi tiga elemen utama: struktur hukum, substansi hukum, dan budaya hukum. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa korupsi di Indonesia tidak hanya disebabkan oleh lemahnya regulasi atau penegakan hukum, tetapi terutama oleh budaya hukum yang tidak berfungsi sebagai kekuatan moral dalam masyarakat. Analisis terhadap kasus korupsi dana bansos, ekspor benih lobster, proyek E-KTP, dan pengesahan RUU Perampasan Aset menunjukkan bahwa ketidakseimbangan antara struktur dan budaya hukum mengakibatkan hukum kehilangan daya kendali sosial. Oleh karena itu, penguatan budaya hukum berbasis nilai kejujuran, akuntabilitas, dan keadilan menjadi keharusan untuk membangun sistem hukum yang berintegritas dan efektif dalam memberantas korupsi di Indonesia.
PEMBATALAN EKSEKUSI HAK TANGGUNGAN BERDASARKAN PERATURAN PERUNDANG-UNDANGAN Zafira, Syarifa; Kartika Sari, Elsi
AMICUS CURIAE Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Amicus Curiae
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/amicus.v3i1.25592

Abstract

Pembatalan Pra Lelang Eksekusi Hak Tanggungan merupakan persoalan hukum yang relevan dalam praktik perbankan dan jaminan kebendaan. Hak tanggungan sebagai lembaga jaminan atas tanah memiliki kekuatan eksekutorial yang dapat dieksekusi melalui pelelangan umum berdasarkan Pasal 6 jo Pasal 20 Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996. Dalam praktiknya, pelaksanaan eksekusi hak tanggungan melalui mekanisme pelelangan umum sering mengalami pembatalan pada tahap pra lelang, baik karena alasan administratif maupun karena adanya permohonan dari debitur atau putusan pengadilan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis akibat hukum dari pembatalan pra lelang eksekusi hak tanggungan. Hasil kajian menunjukkan bahwa berdasarkan Pasal 36 dan 39 Peraturan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 213/PMK.06/2020, tidak terpenuhinya syarat pelaksanaan pra lelang membuat lelang dinyatakan batal dan tidak dapat dilanjutkan. Tetapi pembatalan pra lelang tidak menghapus hak kreditur sebagai pemegang hak tanggungan, melainkan hanya menunda pelaksanaan eksekusi. Objek yang batal dilelang tetap menjadi jaminan utang dan kreditur tetap memiliki hak menagih berdasarkan perjanjian kredit. Namun, ketidaksesuaian antara norma administratif dan praktik pengadilan dapat menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan kejelasan regulasi dan sinkronisasi antara otoritas lelang dan lembaga peradilan agar hak-hak semua pihak tetap terlindungi secara adil dan proporsional.
Legal Framework Governing Foreign Property Ownership in Indonesia’s Special Economic Zones Elsi Kartika Sari; Ninuk Wijiningsih; Ahmad Sabirin
ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Vol. 20 No. 1 (2026): ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/adliya.v20i1.46366

Abstract

This study aims to examine the tension between the principle of nationality in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) which limits the ownership of land rights to Indonesian citizens and the new policy providing access to property ownership for foreign nationals in Special Economic Zones (SEZs) through the Job Creation Law, Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021, and Decree of the Minister of ATR/BPN Number 1241 of 2022. Even though various studies have discussed the regulation of property ownership by foreign nationals, few studies analyse the constitutional implications and normative consequences of extending rights on the basis of nationality as the foundation of Indonesian agrarian law. Normative legal methods are used through legislative and conceptual approaches, with qualitative analysis of primary and secondary materials. The novelty of this study lies in the use of Progressive Law theory, combined with the perspectives of legal certainty and constitutional identity, to interpret the relationship between the UUPA and the post-Job Creation Law regulations. Furthermore, expanding access to property ownership for foreign nationals does not necessarily alter the principle of nationality; rather, it represents a limited reinterpretation to support investment and economic development goals. The results show that the current regulations allow foreign nationals to own landed houses and flats in SEZs, subject to certain requirements, such as minimum price limits, land area, ownership limits, and legal immigration status. However, various limitations remain in place, including restrictions on the type of land rights, location of ownership, and surveillance mechanisms to prevent speculation and safeguard state sovereignty. In this context, regulatory harmonisation is needed to ensure legal certainty while maintaining Indonesia's constitutional identity in agrarian governance amid the demands of global investment liberalisation.