Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Urgensi Reformulasi Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik terhadap Penyalahgunaan Kecerdasan Buatan Deepfake dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Akbar, Bintang muhammad; Rena Yulia; Muhamad Romdoni
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora (In Press)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i2.1849

Abstract

The rapid advancement of artificial intelligence, particularly deepfake technology, has generated complex challenges for criminal law enforcement in Indonesia. Deepfake technology enables highly realistic manipulation of audio-visual content, increasing the risk of defamation, fraud, disinformation, identity misuse, and other forms of cybercrime. Although the Indonesian Law on Electronic Information and Transactions (ITE Law) regulates electronic information and data manipulation, its provisions remain general and have not explicitly addressed the specific characteristics, risks, and legal implications of AI-generated synthetic content. This normative gap has led to legal uncertainty, difficulties in criminal qualification, challenges in digital evidence verification, and ambiguity in determining criminal liability, especially in cases involving deepfake-based hoaxes. Through a normative juridical analysis supported by statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this article highlights the limitations of the current ITE Law framework in responding to the evolving nature of deepfake misuse. Comparative insights from the European Union’s AI Act and China’s Deep Synthesis Provisions demonstrate more adaptive, risk-based, and preventive regulatory models. The findings underline the urgency of reformulating the ITE Law to explicitly regulate deepfake content, strengthen legal certainty, integrate preventive mechanisms such as transparency and platform responsibility, and align criminal law policy with technological developments. Such reformulation is essential to ensure effective law enforcement, protect fundamental rights, and maintain public trust in the digital ecosystem..
Penerapan Penyelesaian Diversi di Kepolisian Sektor yang Tidak Memiliki Unit Pelayanan Perempuan dan Anak Rakha Arfitama Putra; Rena Yulia; Muhamad Romdoni
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora (In Press)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Syariah Nurul Qarnain Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v4i2.1850

Abstract

The implementation of diversion for children in conflict with the law constitutes a fundamental component of the juvenile criminal justice system in Indonesia, particularly as an effort to prioritize restorative justice and the protection of children’s rights. In practice, however, diversion at the Sector Police level faces structural challenges, especially in police units that do not have a Women and Children Protection Unit. The handling of diversion cases at the Taman Sari Sector Police illustrates this condition, where diversion is conducted without institutional coordination with the Protection Unit at the District Police level and instead involves external companion institutions. Qualitative juridical-normative analysis supported by interviews reveals that although diversion procedures are formally carried out, their implementation tends to emphasize procedural completion rather than substantive recovery for victims. Case settlements that result solely in apologies, without compensation or other restorative measures, demonstrate insufficient fulfillment of victims’ physical and psychological recovery. This practice reflects a structural gap between normative regulations and institutional capacity at the Sector Police level. The findings indicate that the absence of specialized child investigators and clear coordination mechanisms weakens the quality of legal protection for both child offenders and victims. Strengthening institutional arrangements through the establishment of Protection Units at the Sector Police level or the assignment of trained child investigators, along with clearer regulatory guidance on victim compensation in diversion, is essential to ensure proportional recovery and the realization of restorative justice principles.