Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : BIOEDUSCIENCE

Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik pada Jenjang SMA dengan Tingkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda di Lampung Utara Anitia Fadhila Bumay; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 6 No 3 (2022): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (347.81 KB) | DOI: 10.22236/jbes/639047

Abstract

Background: Argumentation skill is a crucial ability to be possessed by students. Argumentation skills can be trained by applying a scientific approach during learning. The implementation of the scientific approach in schools can vary; it is suspected that one of the causes is the accreditation rating. The study aimed to determine the differences in the argumentation skill of high school students based on their accreditation rating. Methods: The research design used is the Ex-post Facto design. The sample in this study was sampled using the purposive sampling technique. Results:  There are differences in students' argumentation abilities between accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. Conclusions: Students' argumentation skill differs between high school students with accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. The difference in students' argumentation skills is caused by differences in the application of the scientific approach applied by teachers in each school.
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik pada Jenjang SMA dengan Tingkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda di Lampung Utara Anitia Fadhila Bumay; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 6 No 3 (2022): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/jbes/639047

Abstract

Background: Argumentation skill is a crucial ability to be possessed by students. Argumentation skills can be trained by applying a scientific approach during learning. The implementation of the scientific approach in schools can vary; it is suspected that one of the causes is the accreditation rating. The study aimed to determine the differences in the argumentation skill of high school students based on their accreditation rating. Methods: The research design used is the Ex-post Facto design. The sample in this study was sampled using the purposive sampling technique. Results:  There are differences in students' argumentation abilities between accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. Conclusions: Students' argumentation skill differs between high school students with accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. The difference in students' argumentation skills is caused by differences in the application of the scientific approach applied by teachers in each school.
Kemampuan Berargumentasi Siswa Melalui Pendekatan Saintifik pada Jenjang SMA dengan Tingkat Akreditasi yang Berbeda di Lampung Utara Anitia Fadhila Bumay; Neni Hasnunidah; Dina Maulina
BIOEDUSCIENCE Vol 6 No 3 (2022): BIOEDUSCIENCE
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Prof. Dr. Hamka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22236/jbes/639047

Abstract

Background: Argumentation skill is a crucial ability to be possessed by students. Argumentation skills can be trained by applying a scientific approach during learning. The implementation of the scientific approach in schools can vary; it is suspected that one of the causes is the accreditation rating. The study aimed to determine the differences in the argumentation skill of high school students based on their accreditation rating. Methods: The research design used is the Ex-post Facto design. The sample in this study was sampled using the purposive sampling technique. Results:  There are differences in students' argumentation abilities between accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. Conclusions: Students' argumentation skill differs between high school students with accreditation ratings of A, B, and C. The difference in students' argumentation skills is caused by differences in the application of the scientific approach applied by teachers in each school.
Co-Authors Abdurahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Abdurrahman Agus Suyatna Aini, Nur Rohmatul Amanda, Dhea Olivia Anitia Fadhila Bumay Arwin Achmad Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Arwin Surbakti Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Berti Yolida Budiasih, Yuli Chansyanah Diawati Dani Jaya Putra Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Darlen Sikumbang Devi Andriani Devi Andriani Dewi Lengkana Dewi Lengkana Dewie Permata Dian Aulya Dina Maulina Dina Maulina Een Yayah Haenilah Eko Suyanto Erlis Miarti Fadhila, Sherly Fadila Nurhusna Fitria, Ade Rizka Hadi Suwono Hayatun Nufus Hedi Sutomo Herawati Susilo Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Herlina, Kartini Hermi Yanzi I Wayan Distrik Inas Nuha Afifa Indriyani Indriyani Intan Kamila Zahara Ismi Rakhmawati Ismi Rakhmawati Kartini Helina Kartini Herlina Laya Nazila Lengkana, Dewi Likita, Egy Razka Lismawati Lismawati* Lulu’Atul Farida Median Agus Priadi Meriza, Nadya Mimien H. Irawati Mimien Henie Irawati Nadya, Meriza Nawang Yudhianingrum Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Nina Kadaritna Ninda Ningtyas Noor Fadiawati Noor Fadiawati Nur Rohmatul Aini Nurfitha Kusumaningtyas Nurhusna, Fadila Nurul Cahyani Pangestuti, Dini Aji Pramita Sylvia Dewi Puput Agustin Pertiwi Rakhmawati, Ismi Restanti, Mida Ayu Ria Afrilia Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Rini Rita T. Marpaung Risti Amalia Sari Safira, Cherry Acerola Samantha Tiara Putri Selvina Annis Fajriani Setiawati, Santy Sri Hastuti Noer Susi Ulfah Suwandi, Tri Tajudin Afgani Tantri Dewantari Tirta Sari Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Jalmo Tri Suwandi Tri Utami Uji Yoga Prastio Umi Nurkhasanah Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Undang Rosidin Utari, Dartia Uun Febriyani Wahyu Dwi Lestari Widya Hendriyani Wisnu Juli Wiono WISNU JULI WIONO, WISNU JULI Yesi Yosinta Yuli Budiasih Zahra Mila Putri Zevi Octasari