Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.525
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Jurnal Media Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Adi Widya : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) Unes Law Review Jurnal Yudisial PROGRESIF: Jurnal Hukum Media Iuris Unri Conference Series: Community Engagement Verstek Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Ipso Jure
Muhammad Rustamaji
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS) Solo Jalan Ir. Sutami 36A Ken Ɵ ngan Jebres Surakarta
Religion Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 58 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 58 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
KAJIAN PENYIARAN PERSIDANGAN SECARA LIVE DALAM PERLINDUNGAN ANAK DAN PRINSIP PERSIDANGAN TERBUKA UNTUK UMUM Mulyani, Dita; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71885

Abstract

This article was created to analyze the practice of the live broadcast of the trial. The existence of this practice means that everyone from all ages can participate in witnessing the live broadcast without any restriction, including minors. This article aims to find out the legal principle about the live broadcast of the trial in the child protection concept and the open court principle and to find out the limititations of open court principle on a live broadcast of the trial. This is a normative legal research using conceptual approach. This research shows that the live broadcast of the trials in child protection is carried out by ensuring child protection through the dissemination of useful information and educational materials from the social, cultural, educational, religious, and health aspests and pay attention to child’s importance. The obligations of the television media is to make sure that live broadcast of the trial include on clasification D for audience over the age of 18 years old. The limitation of the live broadcast of the trials is entirely on the role of the judges to determining the open court mechanism by pay attention to the characteristic of the case and to priority the litigants. Meanwhile the interests of broadcasting institution are accesoir after the limitation of the broadcasting law, KPI regulation, and law of criminal procedure.Keywords: Child Protection; Live Broadcast; Open Court principle; Television.
DISHARMONI KEADILAN RESTORATIF PADA PRODUK HUKUM NOMOKRASI Salsabila, Putri Balqis; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96314

Abstract

Observing at Perpol No. 08/2021, Perja No. 15/2020, and Perma No. 01/2024, reveals a number of significant problems that require comprehensive evaluation. Although the three regulations are expected to be an instrument for the transformation of the criminal justice system towards a more humane, responsive, and just approach, a critical study shows that there is an urgent need to conduct a comprehensive review. The main focus of the review includes aspects of definitions, principles, criminal punishment limitations, loss assessment, and criminal offence exceptions. The normative research conducted using primary and secondary legal materials thus uses a conceptual approach that focuses on examining the concept of restorative justice and its disharmony in each legal product. Through deductive syllogism analysis, the research identified disharmony in the implementation of the concept of restorative justice. Fundamental differences are clearly visible in terms of definitions, requirements, and the scope of criminal offences that can be resolved through restorative justice mechanisms.
PEMBUKTIAN YANG DILAKUKAN PENUNTUT UMUM DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PERSETUBUHAN DENGAN ANAK Christya, Giovanny Andreana; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 9, No 4 (2021): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72261

Abstract

This study aims to analyze whether the evidence by the public prosecutor in the criminal case of sexual intercourse with a child based on Decision Number 37/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Krg is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is included in normative or doctrinal legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This study uses a case approach. In order to collect legal materials in this study, literature study techniques were used by collecting written information from legal materials, which consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. After obtaining the legal material, an analysis is carried out using the deductive syllogism method. The results of this study indicate that the evidence carried out by the public prosecutor is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it has submitted valid evidence according to law, namely witness statements, letters, statements of the defendant accompanied by supporting evidence to prove that the defendant is guilty of committing the crime of sexual intercourse with a child . This study aims to analyze whether the evidence by the public prosecutor in the criminal case of sexual intercourse with a child based on Decision Number 37/Pid.Sus/2022/Pn.Krg is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is included in normative or doctrinal legal research that is prescriptive and applied. This study uses a case approach. In order to collect legal materials in this study, literature study techniques were used by collecting written information from legal materials, which consisted of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. After obtaining the legal material, an analysis is carried out using the deductive syllogism method. The results of this study indicate that the evidence carried out by the public prosecutor is in accordance with Article 184 of the Criminal Procedure Code because it has submitted valid evidence according to law, namely witness statements, letters, statements of the defendant accompanied by supporting evidence to prove that the defendant is guilty of committing the crime of sexual intercourse with a child.Keywords: evidence, child intercourse
PEMAHAMAN MENGENAI PEMIDANAAN TERHADAP TERDAKWA ANAK DI BAWAH UMUR (Studi Putusan Nomor 1/Pid.Sus-Anak/2019/PN Trg.) Adistyputri, Meirizka Orchidiva; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 10, No 1 (2022): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v10i1.63945

Abstract

ABSTRAK: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertimbangan hukum hakim serta bagaimana pemahaman terkait menjatuhkan pidana penjara terhadap terdakwa yang masih di bawah umur. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum yang digunakan adalah studi kepustakaan. Jenis dan sumber bahan hukumnya meliputi bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Pendekatan dalam penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus (case study). Selanjutnya, teknik analisis bahan hukum ini menggunakan metode deduktif. Dengan begitu berdasarkan penelitian yang telah Penulis lakukan, dapat diambil kesimpulan bahwa Pelaku Anak yang terkena tindak pidana pencurian menurut pertimbangan hukum hakim si Anak tersebut di jatuhkan pidana penjara yang berarti masih banyak penanganan mengenai perkara anak masih disamakan dengan perkara orang dewasa tanpa mempertimbangkan mengenai psikologis anak serta kepentingan dan juga kesejahteraan masa depan anak tersebut. Sedangkan Anak yang Bermasalah dengan Hukum (ABH) itu sendiri dan seringkali anak itu tidak mengerti dengan apa yang sudah diperbuat, dan ia pun harus diarahkan serta diberikan bentuk pembinaan khusus terhadapnya. Alangkah lebih baik jika seorang Hakim dapat memberikan keringanan hukuman atau biasa disebut dengan Diskresi (Peringanan Hukuman), sehingga bisa menjadi jalan keluar untuk para Anak Di Bawah Umur yang terkena tindak pidana.Kata Kunci: Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim, Anak Dibawah Umur, Tindak Pidana Pencurian, Penjatuhan Pidana Penjara.ABSTRACT: This study aims to obtain how the judges' legal considerations and in the form of understanding how to impose a prison sentence against underage defendants. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research. The legal material collection technique used is literature study. Types and sources of legal materials include primary and secondary legal materials. The approach in this research uses a case study approach. Furthermore, this legal material analysis technique uses the deductive method. Therefore, based on the research that the author has done, it can be concluded that the perpetrators of children who have been subjected to criminal acts of theft according to the legal considerations of the judge of the child were sentenced to imprisonment, which means that there is still a lot of handling regarding cases of children that are still equated with adult cases without considering the psychological aspects of children. as well as the interests and future well-being of the child. Whereas the Child Troubled with Law (ABH) itself and often the child does not understand what has been done, and he must be directed and given a special form of guidance for him. It would be better if a Judge can provide leniency or commonly referred to as Discretion, so that it can be a way out for Minors who are exposed to crime.Keywords: Judicial Legal Considerations, Underage Children, Theft of Crimes, Imprisonment of Prisons.
ANALISIS DISPARITAS DALAM PENJATUHAN PUTUSAN BAGI PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA “MAIN HAKIM SENDIRI” (EIGENRICHTING). Nuriana, Adhinda Ratih; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 11, No 4 (2023): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i4.73825

Abstract

This study aims to explain the legal considerations of judges in imposing criminal penalties on perpetrators of "eigenrichting" and to analyze the disparities contained in Decision Number 235/Pid.B/2017/PN.Brb and Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN .snt. This research is a normative legal research with a prescriptive nature of research and uses a case approach. This research shows that the basis of the judge's legal considerations in the two decisions both considered the elements in Article 170 paragraph (2) 3 of the Criminal Code, all of the defendants have been proven to fulfill the elements of the article. However, in legal considerations, the judge considers juridical aspects such as the indictment, elements of the articles charged, charges and pledoi, as well as non-juridical aspects such as the facts found in the trial. Apart from that, based on the judge's legal argument, what gave rise to the disparity in the two decisions was found in the judge's considerations, namely: 1. The aggravating and mitigating circumstances of the defendant; 2. The background of the defendant's actions; 3. As a result of the defendant's actions; and 4. Purpose of sentencing. Apart from that, other factors that cause disparity are the forgiveness of Decision Number 84/Pid.B/2017/PN.Snt and the provision of condolence money to the victim's family.Keywords : Disparity, Legal Considerations
KEBIJAKAN PAJAK PROGRESIF BEA PEROLEHAN HAK ATAS TANAH DAN BANGUNAN (BPHTB) DALAM PERSPEKTIF KEADILAN PAJAK DAN POTENSI SENGKETA DI PERADILAN PAJAK ) El Asith, Hilma Syita; Rustamaji, Muhammad; Husodo, Jadmiko Anom
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.110762

Abstract

Progressive BPHTB taxation constitutes a regional fiscal policy that functions not only as a revenue-raising (budgetary) instrument but also as a regulatory (regulerend) mechanism aimed at realizing social justice through a more equitable and fair distribution of land ownership. This study seeks to analyze the progressive taxation rules applicable to BPHTB from the perspective of tax justice and to identify potential disputes that may arise, as well as the role of the Tax Court in their resolution.The method employed in this study is a normative-juridical approach with a qualitative orientation. Its application relies on secondary data, encompassing primary legal materials in the form of statutory regulations and secondary legal materials in the form of books and scholarly journals. The discussion demonstrates that, philosophically, progressive taxation on BPHTB represents Aristotle’s concept of distributive justice, John Rawls’s difference principle, and modern theories of tax justice based on the ability-to-pay principle. All three emphasize proportional tax burdens according to individual capacity. The resulting tax revenues are subsequently utilized to enhance public welfare, particularly for groups considered less advantaged.Nevertheless, in practice, there is potential for disputes arising from disharmony between norms and their implementation, such as differences in the interpretation of the Tax Object Acquisition Value (NPOP), variations in Non-Taxable Acquisition Value (NOPTKP) policies among regions, and the perception that the application of progressive BPHTB taxation is disproportionate. The Tax Court plays a crucial role as a corrective mechanism to regional fiscal policies through objection, appeal, and judicial review procedures, ensuring that progressive BPHTB taxation remains within the legal framework and adheres to the principles of tax justice. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, transparency in determining NPOP, and the strengthening of the Tax Court are necessary to achieve a fair and sustainable regional taxation system.
ANALISIS KEKUATAN PEMBUKTIAN KETERANGAN SAKSI TESTIMONIUM DE AUDITU DALAM KASUS EKSPLOITASI SEKSUAL PADA ANAK Haryanto, Rinjani Avivah Ayusiwi; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i1.86578

Abstract

Artikel ini menganalisis hukum acara pidana terkait dengan konstruksi pembuktian dalam perkara tindak pidana eksploitasi seksual yang dilakukan terhadap anak. Tujuan artikel ini adlaah untuk mengetahui kekuatan pembuktian dari keterangan saksi testimonium de auditu dalam Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Gunung Sugih Nomor 114/PID.SUS/2020/PN GNS setelah dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 65/PUU-VIII/2010. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yang bersifat preskriptif dan terapan. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kasus (case approach). Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum menggunakan studi kepustakaan dengan bahan hukum primer dan bahan hukum sekunder. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dan pembahasan ditemukan bahwa keterangan saksi testimonium de auditu setelah dikeluarkannya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 65/PUU-VIII/2010 sah untuk dijadikan sebagai alat bukti. Akan tetapi, apabila keterangan testimonium de auditu tersebut didapatkan dari keterangan saksi yang tidak diberikan di bawah sumpah, maka hakim dapat menggunakan konsep pembuktian yang ada pada Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga (UU PKDRT) serta Rancangan Undang-Undang tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan Seksual.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN NOTARIS TERHADAP VERIFIKASI MATERIIL ATAS PEMBATALAN AKTA KETERANGAN HAK WARIS DAN AKIBAT HUKUMNYA TERHADAP KEABSAHAN AKTA Fathurrahman, Muhammad Aldi; Muryanto, Yudho Taruno; Rustamaji, Muhammad
Verstek Vol 14, No 2 (2026): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/jv.v14i2.115574

Abstract

Notaris sebagai pejabat umum memiliki kewenangan atribusi dari undang-undang untuk membuat akta autentik yang menjamin kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi masyarakat. Salah satu akta yang memiliki peran penting dalam praktik kenotariatan adalah Akta Keterangan Hak Waris, yang menjadi dasar penetapan ahli waris dan peralihan hak atas harta peninggalan. Dalam praktik, pembatalan Akta Keterangan Hak Waris kerap terjadi akibat kelalaian notaris dalam melakukan verifikasi materiil terhadap identitas ahli waris dan dokumen pendukung, sehingga menimbulkan persoalan mengenai pertanggungjawaban hukum notaris serta akibat hukumnya terhadap keabsahan akta. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan dan kualifikasi pembatalan Akta Keterangan Hak Waris yang tidak mencantumkan seluruh ahli waris yang berhak, serta mengkaji bentuk dan batas pertanggungjawaban notaris atas kelalaian dalam verifikasi materiil yang berujung pada pembatalan akta. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kelalaian verifikasi materiil dapat mengakibatkan akta kehilangan keotentikannya serta menimbulkan pertanggungjawaban perdata, administratif, dan etik bagi notaris. Oleh karena itu, penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian dan verifikasi materiil yang komprehensif menjadi keharusan untuk menjamin keabsahan akta dan perlindungan hukum bagi para pihak.
Co-Authors ., Soehartono Adistyputri, Meirizka Orchidiva Adkia, Tauba Zaka Agape, Jelita Kristi Al Islami, Silvia Meilani Aldyan, Arsyad Anggara, Naufal Zharif Anisa Rahmawati Annisa , Intan Baretta Nur Ardelia, Ivana Gisela Assidiqi, Rafli Ayu Ramadhany, Panca Rizky Bahapasca, Danam Isyafara Bambang Santoso Christya, Giovanny Andreana Darwis, Gusti Putu Astasidi Ahmad Dewi Gunawati El Asith, Hilma Syita Fahmi, Muhammad Nur Faisal Faisal Farhan, Mochamad Fathurrahman, Muhammad Aldi Fawwaz, Prabu Lingga Wijaya Firnanda, Tesalonika Gunawan, Matthew Marcellinno Gusti, Kinanthi Ing Hafiya, Aqila Hapsari, Annisa Nur Hapsari, Duwi Hartiwiningsih Hartiwiningsih Haryanto, Rinjani Avivah Ayusiwi Herin Saputri, Fani Fadila Hertanto, Iwan Heryadi, Seno Satrio Hidayat, Adimas Wisnu Husodo, Jadmiko Anom ITOK DWI KURNIAWAN Jingga, Lintang Antarikza Kasetyaning Putri, Adeline Dyah Kedaton, ⁠Prameswari Bunga Khoiruddin, Aldi Rizki Kovalaski, Katherine Kuncoroyakti, Damar Aji Kurniawan, Itok Maghfiroh, Lailil Maharani, Mutiara Marheni, Bela Maskyur Alkhuseri, Muchamad Maulana, Rafif Nabil Muhammad Abdillah Mulyani, Dita Nuriana, Adhinda Ratih Paramadaru, Rakyan Abhirama Permadi, Muhammad Wildan Dimas Permana, Mohammad Raif Prasetiya, Rio Dwi Putri, Dhestiani Amara Rachmayanti, Maya Arum Rahmawati, Rahmawati Ramadhan, Della Amanda Ramadhani, Safitri Rysca Indreswari Saefudin, Yusuf Safitri, Diana Lutfia Nur Sagala, Dave Abiel Salsabila, Kharisma Salsabila, Putri Balqis Santos, Jose Gama Sarasvati, Nadhia Ayu Sawitri, Ika Septiansyah, Dwi Wahyu Septiningsih, Ismawati Setiawan, Frendi Sitompul, Shalih Mangara Sulistiyanta, Sulistiyanta Suparto, Supanto Sylviadianti, Alvina Tambun, Joel Christofel Hinsa Tarigan, Daniel Milano Tarigan, Fransisco Trengginas, Surya Wardani, Ersya Ananda Kusuma Wibawa, Aurelia Neyshanda Dascha Wijaya, Hizkia Andhitya Yudho Taruno Muryanto Zakki Adhliyati, Zakki