Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
4.337
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Arena Hukum Justitia et Pax Jurnal Hukum Samudra Keadilan Jurnal Humaniora : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Ekonomi dan Hukum Jurnal Public Policy Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat: Darma Bakti Teuku Umar Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan NEGREI: Academic Journal of Law and Governance MAQASIDI MEUSEURAYA : JURNAL PENGABDIAN MASYARAKAT Lok Seva: Journal of Contemporary Community Service Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum
Aulia, Eza
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
TINJAUAN PENGISIAN JABATAN JAKSA AGUNG BERDASARKAN UU NO. 16 TAHUN 2004 DALAM MEWUJUDKAN INDEPEDENSI LEMBAGA KEJAKSAAN Murtadha, Muhammad Ali; Aulia, Eza; Maulana, Jefrie
Ius Civile: Refleksi Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Prodi Ilmu Hukum, Universitas Teuku Umar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35308/jic.v9i1.11584

Abstract

This study examines the normative regulation of Article 19 of Law Number 16 of 2004 concerning the appointment and dismissal of the Attorney General in Indonesia and its implications for prosecutorial independence. The research employs a normative juridical method using a statute approach, comparative approach, and conceptual approach. The findings indicate that the President's exclusive authority to appoint and dismiss the Attorney General without an adequate checks and balances mechanism poses a significant risk to the independence of the Attorney General’s Office. While the House of Representatives (DPR) has proposed legislative involvement in the appointment process, the final agreement between the government and DPR maintained full presidential authority. This raises concerns about potential political intervention and the dependency of the Attorney General on the executive branch. A comparative analysis reveals that other countries, such as the United States and Myanmar, implement stricter selection and dismissal mechanisms to ensure prosecutorial independence. In the United States, the Attorney General is appointed by the President with Senate approval and can be removed through an impeachment process. In Myanmar, the selection process involves independent oversight to maintain prosecutorial integrity. The study highlights the importance of implementing a stronger checks and balances system in Indonesia to prevent political influence and safeguard the professionalism of the Attorney General’s Office. Strengthening legal frameworks and ensuring institutional independence are crucial for maintaining the integrity of law enforcement. This study concludes that reforms in the Attorney General’s appointment mechanism are necessary to enhance the independence and credibility of the prosecutorial system in Indonesia.
Co-Authors AA Sudharmawan, AA Adabi, Muhammad Ikhwan Adella Yuana Apri Rotin Djusfi Asmaul Husna Asmaul Husna Chandra Darusman S Chandra Darusman S. Cut Asmaul Husna Damrus, Damrus Fiandy Mauliansyah Ilka Sandela Ilka Sandela Jalaluddin Jefrie Maulana Jefrie Maulana Jhoanda, Rahmad Kemalasari, Putri Krisna, Liza Agnesta Lestari, Rachmatika M. Nahyan Zulfikar Maulana, Jefrie Muhammad Agus Muljanto Murtadha, Muhammad Ali Phoenna Ath Thariq Putri Kemala Sari Putri Kemala Sari Quthni Effida, Dara Rahmat Djowanda Rahmat Jhowanda Reni Juliani, Reni Via Susanti Via Susanti Yuhdi Fahrimal Zuhrizal Fadli