Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Reorganizing Indigenous Peoples' Regulations to Achieve the Sustainable Development Goals Kartiko, Nafis Dwi; Sanjaya, Niki; Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Sugianto, Fajar; Tokuyama , Shintaro
Indonesia Law Reform Journal Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): July, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22219/ilrej.v4i2.34937

Abstract

This research examines the regulation of indigenous peoples' rights within Indonesia's national legal framework and identifies gaps between sustainable development aspirations and the implementation of existing regulations. A normative juridical method is applied to analyse legal documents, as well as assess the integration of customary law in the context of national legal pluralism. Results show that while there is constitutional recognition of indigenous peoples' rights, there are inconsistencies in actual implementation, particularly in support of sustainable economic goals. It was also found that indigenous economic development initiatives are often hampered by inadequate infrastructure and access to technology. Education relevant to indigenous needs and wider market access for indigenous products need improvement. Indigenous participation in policy formation and social protection still needs to be strengthened. In conclusion, legal reforms are needed that include improved frameworks to protect and develop the rights of indigenous peoples and ensure sustainable development goals in national development). Abstrak Penelitian ini mengkaji regulasi hak-hak masyarakat adat dalam kerangka hukum nasional Indonesia dan mengidentifikasi kesenjangan antara aspirasi pembangunan berkelanjutan dan implementasi regulasi yang ada. Metode yuridis normatif diterapkan untuk menganalisis dokumen hukum, serta menilai integrasi hukum adat dalam konteks pluralisme hukum nasional. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada pengakuan konstitusional atas hak-hak masyarakat adat, terdapat inkonsistensi dalam implementasi sebenarnya, terutama dalam mendukung tujuan ekonomi berkelanjutan. Ditemukan juga bahwa inisiatif pembangunan ekonomi masyarakat adat sering terhambat oleh infrastruktur yang tidak memadai dan akses terhadap teknologi yang terbatas. Pendidikan yang relevan dengan kebutuhan masyarakat adat dan akses pasar yang lebih luas untuk produk-produk adat perlu ditingkatkan. Partisipasi masyarakat adat dalam pembentukan kebijakan dan perlindungan sosial masih perlu diperkuat. Kesimpulannya, diperlukan reformasi hukum yang mencakup kerangka kerja yang lebih baik untuk melindungi dan mengembangkan hak-hak masyarakat adat serta memastikan tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan dalam pembangunan nasional.
The Legal Advantages Of Blockchain Technology For Notary Protocol Archives Kridawidyani, Widya; Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Sugianto, Fajar; Michael, Tomy
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper discusses the legal advantages of using blockchain technology for notary protocol archives in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research. It uses primary and secondary legal materials to analyze the blockchain technology for notary protocol archives. With the development of information technology, notary services are inevitably shifting to electronic services, known as cyber notaries. The Notary Protocol is considered a state document and must be treated as such, stored, and kept authentic according to Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. Even if the notary who owns the protocol is on leave or dies, the protocol is categorized as a State Archive and is subject to Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives. Blockchain technology offers a decentralized way of digital archiving.
Peran dan Manfaat Arbitrase sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Ditinjau dari Perspektif Pelaku Usaha Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Sugianto, Fajar
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei : Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i2.2798

Abstract

Every person experiences disagreements, conflicts, issues, and confrontations in their lifetime. Nobody wants to get into a disagreement with someone else. Each business actor, particularly in economic activities, should always be prepared for the possibility of disagreements that may arise at any point in the future. Here, the business actor will select the form of dispute resolution that best fits their requirements. This study employed a normative juridical research methodology that combines a doctrinal and statutory regulation approach. This study concludes that arbitration is a non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism. With its many benefits, arbitration plays a big part in settling business conflicts.
EKSTENSI KEWENANGAN BADAN KEAMANAN LAUT INDONESIA: HARMONISASI KEWENANGAN HUKUM LAUT INDONESIA Sugianto, Fajar; Agustian, Sanggup Leonard
TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Vol 8, No 2 (2024): VOLUME 8 NUMBER 2, JULY 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Tanjungpura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26418/tlj.v8i2.76094

Abstract

AbstractThe maritime security discourse in Indonesia by the Maritime Security Agency (Bakamla) is ineffective. The main cause is the disharmony of authority in security, order, and law enforcement in Indonesia between Bakamla and other institutions. The facts show that maritime law enforcement in Indonesia still uses the Multi Agency Single Tasks paradigm; This is in contrast to Malaysia, India, Japan, and the United States which already use the Single Agency Multi Task paradigm. This normative legal research uses statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, with the main discussion relating to the implementation of single-agency multi-task and harmonization through expanding the authority of the state described. The results of the research show that for the single agency multi-tasks paradigm to be implemented, delegation of authority for security, control, and maritime law enforcement to coast guards is very necessary because this delegation is carried out by Malaysia and Japan which regulate coast guards in their regulations. Efforts to harmonize authority in securing, controlling, and enforcing maritime law in Indonesia, delegation of authority to Bakamla, confirmation of relations with related agencies after the delegation is carried out, as well as changes to the organizational structure of Bakamla, are urgent things to do.AbstrakDiskursus keamanan laut di Indonesia yang dilakukan oleh Badan Keamanan Laut (Bakamla) tidak efektif. Penyebab utama dikarenakan adanya disharmonisasi kewenangan dalam pengamanan, penertiban, dan penegakan hukum di Indonesia antara Bakamla dan institusi lainnya. Fakta menunjukkan bahwa penegakan hukum laut di Indonesia masih menggunakan paradigma Multi Agencies Single Tasks; hal ini berbanding terbalik dengan negara Malaysia, India, Jepang, dan Amerika Serikat yang sudah menggunakan paradigma Single Agency Multi Task. Penelitian hukum normatif ini menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan perbandingan, dengan pembahasan utama terkait penerapan single agency multi task berikut harmonisasi melalui perluasan kewenangan dari negara yang diuraikan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan agar paradigma single agency multi tasks dapat dijalankan pelimpahan kewenangan pengamanan, penertiban, dan penegakan hukum laut kepada coast guard sangat diperlukan, dikarenakan pelimpahan ini dilakukan oleh Malaysia dan Jepang yang mengatur coast guard dalam regulasinya. upaya harmonisasi kewenangan dalam pengamanan, penertiban, dan penegakan hukum laut di Indonesia, pelimpahan kewenangan pada Bakamla, penegasan mengenai hubungan dengan instansi terkait setelah pelimpahan dilakukan, serta perubahan terhadap struktur organisasi Bakamla menjadi urgensi untuk dilakukan.  
The Urgency of Green Banking Regulations in Indonesia in the Implementation of Sustainable Development Kartiko, Nafis Dwi; Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Sugianto, Fajar
Administrative and Environtmental Law Review Vol 5 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/aelr.v5i2.3604

Abstract

This research highlights significant gaps in Indonesia's green banking regulations, particularly the lack of stringent sanctions and clear enforcement frameworks for sustainable finance principles. While the Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 51/POJK.03/2017 addresses environmental sustainability, it fails to impose effective penalties on banks that contribute to environmental degradation. As a result, green banking in Indonesia remains largely a voluntary initiative due to insufficient regulatory measures. This research employs a normative legal research design, utilizing both conceptual and statutory approaches. It advocates for the implementation of stricter penalties and enhanced oversight to ensure compliance with sustainability standards among financial institutions, thereby facilitating the transition to a green economy. Furthermore, the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) underscore the importance of indicators related to economic, social, and environmental sustainability, which green banking can help achieve. The proposed revised regulatory framework should include stringent sanctions for violations by both banks and customers, ensuring that financial institutions actively contribute to environmental protection.
Protecting Consumers Against Defamation Claims: The Role of Common Interest in Product Reviews Kongres, Evi; Sugianto, Fajar; Setyorini, Erny Herlin; Kokpan, Bariyima Sylvester; Zhang, Sheng
Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 3 (2024): Khazanah Hukum Vol 6, No 3 December (2024)
Publisher : UIN Sunan Gunung Djati

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15575/kh.v6i3.35508

Abstract

Consumers who post negative reviews of products on social media often face defamation claims by business entities. Such lawsuits have had a chilling effect on the right to freedom of expression, which is protected by law. In adjudicating consumer cases, judges have generally failed to apply the concept of common interest as a consideration, despite the potential benefits and awareness such reviews provide to prospective consumers. The common interest concept, as stipulated in defamation laws, can serve as a form of legal protection for consumers who post reviews on social media, provided the reviews are truthful, reflect actual conditions, and are made in good faith. By implementing the common interest concept and conducting its proper assessment, legal protection can be ensured for both consumers and businesses. Consumers would be shielded from unwarranted defamation claims, while businesses would be protected from malicious reviews by bad-faith consumers that result in financial or reputational harm. This study aims to dissect the legal safeguard afforded to consumers through the prism of common interest when confronting social media-based complaints or reviews ensnared in defamation litigations instigated by corporate entities. Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research amalgamates legislative analysis with conceptual frameworks. The research findings accentuate the significance of invoking the public interest doctrine in consumer-related litigation, thereby fortifying legal defenses against defamation allegations.
State Law, Integral Economic Justice, and Better Regulatory Practices: Promoting Economic Efficiency in Indonesia Sugianto, Fajar; Lago, Yuber; Luna, Laurenzia
Global Legal Review Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): October
Publisher : Universitas Pelita Harapan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19166/glr.v3i2.6552

Abstract

Indonesia as a state based on the rule of law like any other developing countries, its society is based on patterns and economic classes, overall obedience to the law is not easy. In heterogeneous society formed of groups based on religion, race, language, and wealth, it is one of the most difficult unifying factors in terms of compliance with the law. Law deals with complex social, and conflicting societies apply law as a powerful instrument of regulation and control. Although law acts as an independent agent to facilitate their complexity, with economic approach, efficiency is an ideal model that guides legal practice. It is because most people as homo economicus (except children and the profoundly retarded) in all of their activities has one thing in common, that is the need for efficiency, perhaps efficiency is the nearest we are likely to approach to a universal secular “religion”. Efficiency in law simplifies how law works in different society, especially in heterogeneous communities. This approach does not reduce law to economics (or vice versa, for that matter), it claims simply that law and economics have a lot to learn from one another. The primacy of efficiency helps to harmonize the practice of law with social practices. When such law exists, it does function as a social tool aiming at the promotion of economic efficiency that goes well with other social practices.
Efficient Punishment for Insider Trader in Merger: Interjected Values of Economic Analysis of Law Sugianto, Fajar; Tokuyama, Shintaro
Lentera Hukum Vol. 11 No. 3 (2024): LENTERA HUKUM
Publisher : University of Jember

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/ejlh.v11i3.45295

Abstract

Corporate crime is one of the crimes that arise with the advancement of economic, technological, and trade liberalization activities. The problems with handling non-conventional crimes are due to the difficulty in determining the victims and criminal prosecution of perpetrators. Corporate liability and imposing sanctions on corporate entities are still strongly influenced by the societas delinquere non potest principle. One of the capital market crimes that may occur as a corporate crime is insider trading, which can be defined as securities trading transactions conducted by insiders utilizing insider information that has not been published. Information on a merger, a form of corporate restructuring, is categorized as material facts. When insider trading occurs in the merger process, verifying it for punishment is complicated considering the legal vacuum to convict such a crime. While closely related to financial matters, the prosecution of corporations also intersects with purposes and functions that protect society and individual offenders. Economic analysis of the law can answer the legal vacuum and determine the important aspects of proper legal practice, so that a specific and appropriate punishment can be found for the offense, considering that not all penalties can be imposed on corporations.KEYWORDS: Economic analysis of law, Punishment, Insider trading, Merger.
The Legal Advantages of Blockchain Technology For Notary Protocol Archives Widya Kridawidyani; Ginting, Yuni Priskila; Fajar Sugianto
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 8 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v8i2.1049

Abstract

The rapid progress of the development of information technology has made many changes in human life on this earth. Work and activities that used to be done manually are now shifting to using a technological approach. So far, notary services to the public are still conventional, but with the development of information technology, notary services inevitably must shift towards electronic services, which are currently known as cyber notaries. In Article 1 paragraph (13) of Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning Amendments to Law Number 30 of 2004 concerning the Position of Notary Public, it is explained that the Notary Protocol is one of the state archives, therefore the notary protocol must be treated like a state document kept and kept authentic. Therefore, the notary protocol must always be stored and maintained under any circumstances even if the notary who has the protocol is taking leave or has passed away. Because the Notary Protocol is categorized as a State Archive, the archive is also indirectly subject to Law Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives. The Archives Act recognizes the existence of electronic archives. Blockchain technology offers a way to do digital archiving that is decentralized.
Enhancing Fair Use in Protecting Appropriated Artworks: A Comparative Analysis of Safeguarding Indonesian Copyright Law Nadya Aurelia, Caitlynn; Tanaya, Velliana; Sugianto, Fajar; Yamamoto, Atsuko
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): May, 2025: Law, Technology, and Globalization: Challenges and Innovations in th
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i1.20570

Abstract

Appropriated artwork refers to the practice of using pre-existing objects or images into new works of art with little or no significant changes to the original form. This trend developed into the Pop Art movement, where one of the characteristic features was the use of images from mass media, as seen in the works of Andy Warhol, including the transformation of Campbell's soup cans into iconic works of art. Although widely appreciated, this work has drawn criticism regarding copyright infringement, raising the question: where do one artist's rights draw on another? To what extent is the appropriation of copyright protected works considered legal without violating the rights of the original creator? The research results show that the two legal systems differ significantly in the aspects of exclusive rights, moral rights, protected works, exceptions, and duration of protection. The challenge in understanding fair use lies in determining the boundaries between the rights of one artist and another. The fair use doctrine assesses four main factors: the purpose and character of the use, the nature of the original work, the proportion of the work used, and the impact on the market. Courts in the US often favor fair use if elements of transformation are identified, measuring the extent to which the appropriated work carries elements of originality or new creativity. Indonesia could consider adopting the fair use doctrine by adapting the concept through ministerial regulations or other implementing regulations.