Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Perlindungan Konsumen Terhadap Penyebaran Informasi Menyesatkan Yang Disampaikan Melalui Iklan Aulia, Elvita Septavianty; Sanggup Leonard Agustian; Fajar Sugianto
Progressive Law Review Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): APRIL 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law-Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/prolev.v7i1.262

Abstract

Advertising is a form of communication delivered by business actors to fulfill marketing functions. Advertising is one of the most effective communication mediums to promote a product, so that the product has a high selling value. However, many business actors promise advantages from excessive product use. Often the information conveyed does not match the actual condition of the product. Information conveyed through electronic media, print media and other promotional media must comply with the provisions of the Indonesian advertising code of ethics which emphasizes that information conveyed through advertising must be true, clear, honest and appropriate and imbued with a sense of healthy competition, and not excessive and meet other methods. However, these provisions are often ignored by business actors who want to make large profits through advertising and cause losses to consumers. The problems in this study are: (1) How is the regulation of responsibility for the dissemination of misleading information reviewed from Indonesian laws and regulations? (2) How are the efforts to resolve consumer disputes carried out by business actors over the spread of misleading information conveyed through advertising? By using normative research methods and legal approaches, it is known that: (1) The regulation of the responsibility of business actors for the suitability between the information conveyed through advertisements and the specifications and conditions of the products being traded has weaknesses. Laws and Regulations in Indonesia have not regulated the responsibility of business actors for the spread of misleading information conveyed through advertisements with the condition of the product received by consumers; and (2) Dispute resolution can be divided into two, namely outside the court and in court and there has been no certainty and legal justice for consumers in trusting product information conveyed through advertising.
LEGAL PROTECTION FOR THE PARTIES AS A PREVENTIVE AFFORT AGAINST DISPUTES IN HEALTH INSURANCE CLAIMS Wibowo, Denny Ardhi; Sugianto, Fajar; Agustian, Sanggup Leonard
PRANATA HUKUM Vol. 20 No. 2 (2025): Juli
Publisher : Law Faculty of Universitas Bandar Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36448/pranatahukum.v20i2.403

Abstract

The central idea of this research is to propose an ius constituendum for legal protection of the parties involved in order to prevent disputes in health insurance claim settlements. This study is a normative legal research, employing both conceptual and statutory approaches, with the urgency of legal protection and the ius constituendum of legal protection in health insurance agreements serving as the primary legal issues. The findings reveal that the frequent occurrence of disputes, coupled with the fact that health insurance agreements are often adhesion contracts prone to abuse of circumstances, highlights the urgency of strengthening legal protection. Such protection should be enhanced particularly in the form of preventive legal measures, including regulations that prohibit unfair standard clauses in health insurance contracts and the establishment of a mandatory pre-contractual assessment before the insured signs the agreement. These elements can be regulated through Financial Services Authority Regulations (POJK).
The Judge’s Role in the Effectiveness of Anti-Corruption Enforcement in Indonesia: A Juridical Analysis Behuku, Jitro Gianfranco; Kusuma, Jevine Ilonesia; Chasanah, Nabila Uswatun; Sugianto, Fajar; Indradewi, Astrid Athina
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.464

Abstract

The effectiveness of anti-corruption law enforcement in Indonesia is facing a severe legitimacy crisis. This condition is characterized by a paradox between a robust legal framework on paper and its inadequate implementation in practice, thereby eroding public trust. This research aims to critically analyze the central role of judges in determining this effectiveness, with an analytical focus on the problematic interpretation of legal norms and the systemic challenges that impede judicial performance. Through a normative legal approach fortified by a case study, this research employs qualitative content analysis to dissect the legal reasoning in two key 2024 decisions from the Corruption Crimes Court. The findings reveal a diametrically different legal treatment of defendants. On one hand, the court was capable of convicting an individual defendant (a rogue judge) through a procedural application of the law. On the other hand, the court acquitted five large corporations of all legal charges in a corruption case that resulted in significant state economic losses. This acquittal was based on the legalistic argument that the proven act did not constitute a criminal offense. This dualism confirms that law enforcement effectiveness remains sporadic, undermined by a disparity in the professional capacity of judges to interpret the element of “unlawful act,” particularly in complex corporate crimes. It is concluded that without systemic judicial reform to standardize legal interpretation and strengthen accountability, anti-corruption law enforcement will remain blunted when confronting powerful economic actors.
Justice Collaborator at a Legal Crossroads: An Analysis of the Tension between Substantive Justice and Legal Certainty Firmansyah, Rizqy Adi; Widjaja, Matthew; Kusumawardani, Cesilia Elok; Sugianto, Fajar; Indradewi, Astrid Athina
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 1: April - September 2025
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i1.479

Abstract

This research examines the tension between substantive justice and legal certainty within the Indonesian criminal justice system, which arises from the legal ambiguity surrounding the Justice Collaborator. The case study focuses on the Justice Collaborator verdict in the premeditated murder case involving Irjen FS. Utilizing a normative juridical research method through statute, case, and conceptual approaches, this study aims to analyze how the legal vacuum regarding the Justice Collaborator in the Penal Code is addressed through judicial adaptation. The findings indicate that the Panel of Judges constructed a “parallel penal track” to grant a reward to Bharada E as the Justice Collaborator. This track refers to sectoral legal instruments such as Law Number 13 of 2006 and Supreme Court Circular Number 4 of 2011. Although this practice successfully realized substantive justice, it inherently creates a systemic implication in the form of tension between judicial discretion and the principle of legal certainty, a pillar of the civil law system. It is concluded that the absence of a codified norm for the Justice Collaborator potentially threatens the consistency and predictability of criminal law, which, if not promptly addressed through reform, could risk the systemic delegitimization of the criminal justice system in the future. Therefore, this research recommends the urgent need for a comprehensive codification of the Justice Collaborator doctrine into the Penal Code and Law Number 8 of 1981 to align the needs of law enforcement with the maintenance of the principle of legality.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Korporasi dalam Tindak Pidana Kejahatan Luar Biasa di Bidang Ekonomi sugianto, Fajar; Herawati, Ellyana; Mustopa, Hadi; Sander, Metty; Fujianti, Putri Jecika
Jurnal Sosial Teknologi Vol. 5 No. 7 (2025): Jurnal Sosial dan Teknologi
Publisher : CV. Green Publisher Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59188/jurnalsostech.v5i7.32225

Abstract

Kejahatan luar biasa di bidang ekonomi menjadi tantangan besar bagi sistem hukum pidana di Indonesia, mengingat dampak yang sangat luas terhadap ekonomi, sosial, dan politik negara. Kejahatan ini melibatkan pelaku dengan akses kekuasaan besar, serta teknologi canggih yang membuatnya sulit diungkap. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis karakteristik kejahatan luar biasa di bidang ekonomi, perbedaannya dengan kejahatan ekonomi biasa, dan bentuk pertanggungjawaban pidana korporasi dalam tindak pidana tersebut menurut KUHP 2023. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kejahatan luar biasa, seperti korupsi dan pencucian uang, sering kali dilakukan secara terorganisir dan melibatkan korporasi sebagai pelaku utama. Korporasi kini diakui sebagai subjek hukum pidana, dan dapat dikenai pertanggungjawaban atas tindak pidana yang dilakukan oleh pengurusnya. Meskipun regulasi hukum sudah mengakomodasi hal ini, tantangan dalam penegakan hukum masih ada, terutama dalam pembuktian dan koordinasi antar lembaga. Oleh karena itu, penegakan hukum terhadap korporasi harus lebih efektif untuk menjaga stabilitas ekonomi dan keadilan sosial di Indonesia.
Criminalizing Corporations In Environmental Crimes : Memidanakan Korporasi Dalam Kejahatan Lingkungan Hidup Agustian, Sanggup Leonard; Sugianto, Fajar; Michael, Tomy
Rechtsidee Vol. 7 (2020): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.2020.7.697

Abstract

The research objective is to find out how criminal law against the environment accommodates criminal acts committed by corporations and to find out the practice of settlement through criminal law instruments in terms of corporate criminal liability in the environmental sector. The research method used is a normative juridical research method. There is the existence of criminal law as a part of 3 law enforcement regimes (state administrative law and civil law). then the involvement of criminal law in the settlement in the environmental sector regulates the existence of corporate criminal liability (business entity) as a subject of criminal law. The corporate criminal responsibility used by the UUPPLH is strict liability according to the law.
The Legal Advantages Of Blockchain Technology For Notary Protocol Archives Kridawidyani, Widya; Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Sugianto, Fajar; Michael, Tomy
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 8 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This paper discusses the legal advantages of using blockchain technology for notary protocol archives in Indonesia. This research is normative legal research. It uses primary and secondary legal materials to analyze the blockchain technology for notary protocol archives. With the development of information technology, notary services are inevitably shifting to electronic services, known as cyber notaries. The Notary Protocol is considered a state document and must be treated as such, stored, and kept authentic according to Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 30 of 2004 concerning Notary. Even if the notary who owns the protocol is on leave or dies, the protocol is categorized as a State Archive and is subject to Law of Republic of Indonesia Number 43 of 2009 concerning Archives. Blockchain technology offers a decentralized way of digital archiving.
Urgensi Menjadikan Hasil Analisis (HA)/Hasil Pemeriksaan (HP) PPATK Sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Perkara TPPU dan TPPT di Indonesia Sugianto, Fajar; Irawan, Joshua Evandeo
AML/CFT Journal : The Journal Of Anti Money Laundering And Countering The Financing Of Terrorism Vol 2 No 2 (2024): Produk Intelijen Keuangan Menjawab Tantangan Pengungkapan Pidana Pencucian Uang
Publisher : Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan (PPATK)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59593/amlcft.2024.v2i2.153

Abstract

The Indonesian Financial Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre (Indonesian: Pusat Pelaporan dan Analisis Transaksi Keuangan, or PPATK) has made several efforts to prevent and combat money laundering and terrorism financing. The main outputs of PPATK are financial intelligence reports known as Analysis Results and Examination Results. To date, these financial intelligence reports cannot be categorized as evidence that can be used by law enforcement officers in investigations or prosecutions. This study uses the Normative Juridical Dogmatic research method, aiming to provide legal arguments regarding the importance of the status of PPATK's financial intelligence reports in investigations/prosecutions as evidence. The novelty of this research lies in how the author attempts to prove that financial intelligence reports can be used as evidence in criminal cases, whereas previous studies have only stated that financial intelligence reports cannot be used as evidence in criminal cases. The findings of this study indicate that PPATK's financial intelligence reports should be admissible as evidence in handling criminal cases, but this is currently hindered by the existing laws on money laundering and terrorism financing. These regulations need to be revised promptly to strengthen the role of PPATK, particularly in the status of financial intelligence reports in supporting criminal cases.
False Transaction vs Wash Trading: Addressing the Gap to Rebuild Market Confidence (Legal Implication in Indonesia and United States Capital Market Law) Sugianto, Fajar; Tokuyama, Shintaro
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Global Issues on Law Reform, Legal Certainty, and Justice
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.vol5i1.2094

Abstract

This paper is evidently about the legal comparison between Indonesia and the U.S on their views on market manipulation. There are several similarities between the Capital Market Law and SEA 1934, not only in terms but also in the elements. Articles 91 and 92 of Capital Market Law seem to mimic Section 9(a) (1) and (2) of SEA 1934. As both statues states similar prohibition in creating a misleading trading appearance and the purpose of inducing sales. This means that elements and tests applicable in the U.S. should also be applicable in Indonesia. Section 10(b) of SEA 1934 and SEC Rule 10b-5 serves to further supplement the application of Section 9 with its broad anti-manipulation provisions. Articles 91 and 92 of Capital Market Law cover the sales and purchase of stocks affected by the alleged manipulation that occurs only in the securities exchange as evident by the wording “on a/the Securities Exchange”. This is also observed in Section 9(a) (1) and (2) of SEA 1934 wherein the scope is limited to transactions in the “national securities exchange”. What this implies is that over-the-counter and block sales transactions are not protected under the statutes mentioned above. This issue is not addressed under the Capital Market Law, however Section 10(b) of SEA 1934 and its implementing regulation SEC Rule 10b-5 addresses this issue. Section 10(b) of SEA 1934 allows for broader authority of law enforcement as it includes “any security registered on a national securities exchange or any security not so registered”. This implies protection for a wider scope of securities transactions.
The Legal Status of Testaments That Eliminate the Inheritance Rights for the Longest-Living Marital Spouse Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Achmad, Andyna Susiawati; Sugianto, Fajar
Jurnal Ius Constituendum Vol. 9 No. 2 (2024): JUNE
Publisher : Magister Hukum Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/jic.v9i2.8881

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the legal standing of testaments that forgo a spouse's right to inherit in the event of their death. This study is necessary because, while everyone has the right to draft a testament according to their desires, this does not absolve the contents of the testament from being based on applicable laws and regulations. This study was carried out utilizing a doctrinal and statutory method in a normative juridical manner. The study concludes that a testator's intentions are free to be included in a will; nonetheless, the Indonesian Civil Code governs the legitimacy of Legitieme Portie. Thus, if a testament is written by a spouse whose marriage has entered into a marital agreement to separate assets, and its contents eliminate the longest-living spouse's inheritance rights, then that will not violate the rights of the longest-living spouse because it is based on Article 914 of the Indonesian Civil Code that the husband or wife does not have Legitime Portie. In the meantime, a testament written by a spouse whose marriage did not result in a marital agreement that separates assets only applies to the portion of the maker's assets; in other words, the longest-living spouse still receives a share as part of the joint assets in marriage.