Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Extended Nature of Trading Norms Between Cryptocurrency and Crypto-asset: Evidence from Indonesia and Japan Sugianto, Fajar; Tokuyama, Shintaro
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024): Contemporary Legal Challenges and Solutions in a Global Context
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v8i1.14063

Abstract

This article is evidently about the comparison between Indonesia and Japan and their views on Crypto as a commodity. It starts with a brief elaboration on the legal standing of cryptocurrency in Indonesia and Japan. In Indonesia, Cryptocurrency is legal only as a commodity as the Ministry of Trade Regulation No. 99 of 2018 formally authorized crypto asset trading and decreed it lawful. The Indonesian Commodity Futures Trading Supervisory Authority, or BAPPEBTI, published Regulation No. 5 of 2019 to provide a thorough regulatory framework for the crypto-assets future. In Japan, there is no omnibus law regulating blockchain based coins and the legal status of tokens are determined under the uses and functions. News outlets report that there may be in talks of a law of the possibility of the seizure of crypto that has been stolen or has been illegally acquired by organized crime due to the law of the type of assets that can be seized are physical property, monetary claims, and movable assets such as machinery, vehicles, tools, and supplies, with crypto falling under none of those categories. The conclusions are, first, Indonesia has vastly improved its Cryptocurrency regulations with BAPPEBTI’s Regulation No. 8 of 2021. with the implementation of (a) licensing requirements; (b) rights and obligations; and (c) the responsibilities of key players involved in the physical crypto-asset market, such as futures exchanges, crypto asset traders, futures clearing agencies, and crypto-asset storage providers. Second, Indonesia’s regulations almost mirror itself with Japan’s behavior towards crypto, with differences only arising in the specific percentages of storage, equity, and infrastructure.
FROM PHILOSOPHY TO NORMATIVE CONFIGURATION: A SCOPING REVIEW OF INDONESIAN COPYRIGHT LAW Fajar Sugianto; Ellora Sukardi; Atsuko Yamamoto
Diponegoro Law Review Vol 10, No 2 (2025): Diponegoro Law Review October 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Diponegoro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14710/dilrev.10.2.2025.254-276

Abstract

The development of Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) is significantly shaped by John Locke’s theory of property, along with subsequent philosophical discourse, which provides a foundation for granting exclusive rights to creators and inventors. IPR aims to balance the protection of individual interests with the greater public good, while fostering innovation. In the Indonesian context, a comprehensive legal framework and effective enforcement mechanisms are crucial to maintaining this equilibrium, particularly within the domain of copyright law. This research investigates whether Indonesia’s copyright system reflects the philosophical foundations of intellectual property, examines the integration of these principles into legal norms, and evaluates their role in supporting the growth of the national creative economy. Using a scoping review methodology, the study reveals a strong alignment between philosophical principles of ownership and Indonesia’s legal framework. This alignment highlights the dual role of copyright law: protecting individual creators' rights while stimulating a thriving creative economy. Furthermore, the research underscores the importance of balancing the interests of creators, industries, and the public. The study also explores how the Indonesian government has updated copyright legislation to better protect and promote creative industries, acknowledging the significant role of copyright in economic development. Recent policy reforms, such as the restructuring of the National Collective Management Institute (LMKN) and the digitalization of royalty databases, demonstrate a commitment to harmonizing legal practices with philosophical ideals. These reforms reflect an evolving copyright system that adapts to global dynamics, addressing technological challenges while ensuring effective protection of intellectual property rights.
Peran dan Manfaat Arbitrase sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Ditinjau dari Perspektif Pelaku Usaha Indradewi, Astrid Athina; Sugianto, Fajar
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024): Mei: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i2.2798

Abstract

Every person experiences disagreements, conflicts, issues, and confrontations in their lifetime. Nobody wants to get into a disagreement with someone else. Each business actor, particularly in economic activities, should always be prepared for the possibility of disagreements that may arise at any point in the future. Here, the business actor will select the form of dispute resolution that best fits their requirements. This study employed a normative juridical research methodology that combines a doctrinal and statutory regulation approach. This study concludes that arbitration is a non-litigation dispute settlement mechanism. With its many benefits, arbitration plays a big part in settling business conflicts.
The Legal Liability of Online Lending Service Providers from the Perspective of Personal Data Protection in Indonesia Clarrance Mackinnley Filan; Fajar Sugianto
International Journal of Social Service and Research Vol. 6 No. 5 (2026): International Journal of Social Service and Research
Publisher : Ridwan Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/ijssr.v6i5.1394

Abstract

The development of online loan services in the digital economic ecosystem has increased people's access to financing, but has also raised serious problems regarding the protection of personal data in billing practices. This research aims to analyze the juridical qualifications for disseminating debtors' personal data in the online loan collection process and examine the form of legal responsibility of organizers as data controllers. This normative legal research uses a statutory and conceptual approach, analyzing primary and secondary legal materials through systematic and teleological interpretation to assess unlawful data acquisition or disclosure and corporate responsibility attribution. The research results show that the practice of accessing and disseminating personal data to third parties in the billing process has the potential to fulfill the elements of an unlawful act if it is carried out intentionally and causes harm to the data subject, because it is contrary to the principles of legality, purpose limitation and proportionality in data processing. Furthermore, if the action is carried out within the scope of business activities and for the benefit of the corporation, then responsibility can be imposed on the legal entity as the data controller, so that the practice of collecting online loans is not only a contractual issue, but also a violation of privacy rights which demands corporate accountability within the framework of the rule of law.