Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Arena Hukum

THE COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FIQH SIYASAH WITH THE GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF GOOD GOVERNMENT IN INDONESIA Prawitra Thalib; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto
Arena Hukum Vol. 12 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2019.01202.1

Abstract

Abstrak Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik saat ini menjadi salah satu dasar penilaian bagi hakim di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara untuk menguji suatu tindak pemerintah tersebut mengandung unsur kerugian bagi masyarakat atau tidak. Adanya UU 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan telah memperluas kompetensi Peradilan Tata Usaha negara dimana obyek gugatan dalam PTUN tidak hanya KTUN (beschikking) akan tetapi juga tindakan faktual dari pejabat atau badan tata usaha negara. Dengan adanya perubahan UU No. 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara yaitu UU No. 9 Tahun 2004 dan UU No. 51 Tahun 2009 mempertegas keberadaan Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik sebagai alasan menggugat di PTUN. Tidak bisa dipungkiri saat ini konsep hukum Islam banyak dipakai dan diterapkan dalam tindakan-tindakan hukum, baik dalam ranah hukum bisnis atau privat maupun hukum publik. Oleh karena itu maka konsep pemerintahan yang baik menurut Islam perlu dikaji secara mendalam, sering disebut dengan konsep fiqh siyasah. Penelitian ini ditujukan untuk meneliti perbandingan antara konsep Asas-Asas Umum Pemerintahan yang Baik di satu sisi dengan konsep fiqh siyasah di sisi yang lain. Abstract The General Principles of Good Government are currently one of the assessment bases for the judges in the Administrative Court to examine whether or not actions of the government contains the elements of harm for the community. The existence of Law No.30 of 2014 on Government Administration has expanded the competence of The Administrative Court (PTUN) in which the object of lawsuit in the Administrative Court is not only the Decisions of Administrative (beschikking) but also factual action from official or administrative institutions. With the amendment of Law No.5 of 1986 on the Administrative Court namely Law No. 9 of 2004 and Law No.51 of 2009 affirms the existence of The General Principles of Good Government as one of reasons to sue in the Administrative Court. It is inevitable today that the concept of Islamic law is widely used and applied in legal actions, whether in the realm of business law, private law or public law. Therefore, the concept of good government according to Islam needs to be studied further, often referred to as the concept of fiqh siyasah. This study is aimed to examine the comparison between the concept of The General Principles of Good Government with the concept of fiqh siyasah.
THE URGENCE REGULATION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITIES ON ISLAMIC MICROFINANCE INSTITUTION ACCORDING LAW NO. 1 YEAR 2013 OF MICROFINANCE INSTITUTIONS Prawitra Thalib; Sri Hajati; Faizal Kurniawan; Komari Aldiansyah
Arena Hukum Vol. 14 No. 2 (2021)
Publisher : Arena Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2021.01402.1

Abstract

AbstractMicrofinance Institutions (hereinafter referred to as MFIs) are financial institutions that function as intermediary institutions that aim not only to seek profit, but have another goal, namely social goals whose activities are more community development. MFIs in conducting business activities can be carried out conventionally or based on Sharia Principles. The business activities carried out by MFIs include trading activities, namely in the service sector. In carrying out Shariah MFI business activities, it must be based on Sharia Principles. The method used in writing this article is normative research with a statutory and conceptual approach. The results of the study show that the Sharia Principles in this context are guided by the basic principles of Muamalah. The important objective in this research is the regulation in the laws and regulations regarding this matter whether it is in accordance with sharia principles. Harmonization between legislation as positive law in Indonesia with sharia principles sourced from the Qur'an and Hadith as the main legal sources of Islamic law is absolutely necessary to ensure legal certainty.AbstrakLembaga Keuangan Mikro (selanjutnya disebut LKM) merupakan lembaga keuangan yang berfungsi sebagai lembaga intermediary yang bertujuan tidak hanya semata-mata mencari keuntungan (profit motive) saja, tetapi mempunyai tujuan lain yakni tujuan sosial (social motive) yang kegiatannya lebih bersifat community development.  LKM dalam melakukan kegiatan usaha bisa dilakukan secara konvensional atau berbasis pada Prinsip Syariah. Kegiatan usaha yang dilakukan LKM termasuk dalam kegiatan perdagangan yakni dalam bidang jasa. Dalam menjalankan kegiatan usahanya LKM Syariah harus berdasarkan Prinsip Syariah. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan artikel ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan Prinsip Syariah dalam konteks ini berpedoman pada Prinsip dasar Muamalah. Tujuan dalam penelitian ini yang penting yaitu pengaturan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan terkait hal ini apakah sudah sesuai dengan prinsip syariah. Harmonisasi antara peraturan perundang-undangan sebagai hukum positif di Indonesia dengan prinsip-prinsip syariah yang bersumber pada Al-quran dan Hadist sebagai sumber hokum utama hokum islam mutlak diperlukan adanya untuk menjamin kepastian hukum. 
PRINSIP MASLAHAT AL-MURSALAH DALAM PRAKTIK PENGELOLAAN WAKAF PADA NAZHIR UNIVERSITAS AIRLANGGA Thalib, Prawitra; Wisudanto, Wisudanto; Kurniawan, Faizal; Kholiq, Mohamad Nur
Arena Hukum Vol. 16 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.arenahukum.2023.01602.3

Abstract

This paper aims tp discuss the legitimacy of AIW at Nazhir Airlangga University from the perspective of the waqf law and whether it has complied with the principle of maslahah mursalah, considering that various cases of waqf property do not run optimally, are productive, are not used or are transferred to third parties. There is an interesting phenomenon, namely that at Nazhir, Airlangga University is the only one and the first time an Indonesian State University has received a Nazhir certificate to manage and develop waqf. In this case, it is interesting to discuss the practice of waqf at Nazhir Airlangga University according to the Waqf Law. This normative research uses statute approach and the conceptual approach. The results show that in practice Nazhir Universitas Airlangga in carrying out his waqf pledge practice does not use AIW un-authentic. That is, Nazhir Airlangga University in carrying out his waqf practice in terms of his pledge deed is in accordance with the procedures in accordance with Law Number 41 of 2004 concerning Waqf.