Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.402
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence (IJ-AI) International Journal of Advances in Applied Sciences International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) IJCCS (Indonesian Journal of Computing and Cybernetics Systems) Jurnal Pendidikan Vokasi Cakrawala Pendidikan Jurnal Kependidikan: Penelitian Inovasi Pembelajaran Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pengajaran Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Jurnal Pendidikan Teknologi dan Kejuruan KARMAPATI (Kumpulan Artikel Mahasiswa Pendidikan Teknik Informatika) ISSN: 2252-9063 Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Elkom: Jurnal Elektronika dan Komputer TELKOMNIKA (Telecommunication Computing Electronics and Control) Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer Jurnal Edukasi dan Penelitian Informatika (JEPIN) Jurnal Sistem dan Informatika Proceedings Konferensi Nasional Sistem dan Informatika (KNS&I) Register: Jurnal Ilmiah Teknologi Sistem Informasi Jurnal Elemen Jurnal RESTI (Rekayasa Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi) Emerging Science Journal Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Jurnal Eksplora Informatika Abdimas Dewantara SINTECH (Science and Information Technology) Journal Sebatik Technomedia Journal JSiI (Jurnal Sistem Informasi) Lectura : Jurnal Pendidikan WIDYA LAKSANA International Journal of Natural Science and Engineering Journal of Psychology and Instructions Jurnal Ilmiah Sekolah Dasar Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Teknik Informatika (JANAPATI) Jurnal EDUTECH Undiksha Psychology, Evaluation, and Technology in Educational Research Jurnal Mantik Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Terapan (J-TIT) JURNAL ILMU KOMPUTER INDONESIA Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Multimedia Jurnal Paedagogy Jurnal Pedagogi dan Pembelajaran Indonesian Values and Character Education Journal Journal of Computer Networks, Architecture and High Performance Computing Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial (JMPIS) Journal of Applied Data Sciences INSERT: Information System and Emerging Technology Journal Journal of Applied Computer Science and Technology (JACOST) Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi KLIK: Kajian Ilmiah Informatika dan Komputer Indonesian Journal of Educational Development (IJED) Edukasia: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Jurnal Indonesia : Manajemen Informatika dan Komunikasi Modem : Jurnal Informatika dan Sains Teknologi
Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana, Dewa Gede Hendra
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 180 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 5 Documents
Search
Journal : Emerging Science Journal

 1 
Design of Tat Twam Asi-Discrepancy Evaluation Model Based on TOPSIS in Determining the Improvement Priority Aspect Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana; Agus Adiarta; P. Wayan Arta Suyasa
Emerging Science Journal Vol 5, No 3 (2021): June
Publisher : Ital Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021-01285

Abstract

This research aimed to provide information about the existence of the new evaluation model in the field of education. The intended evaluation model is called the Tat Twam Asi-Discrepancy evaluation model based on TOPSIS. This model serves to determine the dominant aspects become improvement priority, so later it can trigger the effectiveness of blended learning implementation. The method was used in this research was a development method using the Borg and Gall model, which only focused on the design development stage. Subjects were involved in the initial trials of the evaluation model design were four experts and 30 respondents to conducted simulation trials of TOPSIS calculation. The tools were used to conducted preliminary trials toward the evaluation model design and simulation trials of calculations were questionnaires. Analysis of the initial trial results toward the model design was done by comparing the quality percentage of the test results with the percentage of quality standards that refer to the eleven’s scale. Analysis of the simulation test results of the TOPSIScalculation was done by comparing the effectiveness percentage of the test results with the percentage of effectiveness standards that refer to the five’s scale. The results of this research indicate this evaluation model is highly qualified and effective is used to determine the most dominant evaluation aspect to become an improvement priority to realize the effectiveness of blended learning implementation. Doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-01285 Full Text: PDF
Design of New Evaluation Model Based on Discrepancy Daiwi Asuri Sampad Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana; I Putu Wisna Ariawan; Agus Adiarta
Emerging Science Journal Vol 6, No 1 (2022): February
Publisher : Ital Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-01-013

Abstract

The effectiveness of flipped learning can be realized if the dominant aspects that become positive and negative inequalities are known from the beginning. Positive inequality is used to indicate aspects that support the successful flipped learning implementation. Negative inequality is used to indicate aspects that need attention for improvement in a better direction. The reality is very difficult to determine the aspects that are included in the positive and negative inequalities. Therefore, an innovation of the IT education evaluation model is needed to be able to solve those problems. The DIVAYANA model that is modified with the Discrepancy model and integrated with the Daiwi Sampad and Asuri Sampad concepts can be used as an innovation in the field of IT education evaluation. The main objective of this research was to show the design quality of the new evaluation model integrated with Balinese local wisdom. It is called the DIVAYANA model based on the Discrepancy Daiwi Asuri Sampad which can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of flipped learning implementation at IT vocational schools. This research was carried out by following the stages of the Borg and Gall development model. This research only focused on five stages from a total of ten development stages. Those stages included: 1) research and field data collection, 2) planning, 3) design development, 4) initial trials, and 5) revision of initial trials. The subjects involved in collecting field data were six people. The subjects involved in planning and designing of evaluation model were three people. The subjects involved in the initial trials were 44 people. Subjects involved in the revision of initial trial results were three people. Questionnaires were used to collect field data and conduct preliminary trials. The results of data collection from the initial trial results were analyzed using quantitative descriptive analysis techniques by percentage descriptive calculations. The results showed that the quality level of the DIVAYANA model design based on the Discrepancy Daiwi Asuri Sampadwas 88.25%. So that the design was included in the good category and can be used to determine the dominant aspects that become the positive and negative inequalities in flipped learning implementation. The contribution of this research to the field of education is to show the existence of a new evaluation model in the IT education field which can be used to determine the dominant aspects that become positive and negative inequalities in supporting the successful flipped learning implementation at IT vocational schools. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-01-013 Full Text: PDF
Modification of CSE-UCLA and Discrepancy as a New Evaluation Model in Education P. Wayan Arta Suyasa; Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana
Emerging Science Journal Vol 5, No 6 (2021): December
Publisher : Ital Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021-01321

Abstract

The absence of an evaluation model that can be used to evaluate the effectiveness of educational activities at vocational universities in the view of six domains causes the need to find innovations in an evaluation model. The six domains, included: context, input, socialization process, implementation process, results, and imbalances that occur in the learning implementation. An evaluation model innovation was initiated through this research in the form of a modification of two educational evaluation models. Those models are CSE-UCLA and Discrepancy. Based on those conditions, the main objective of this research was to demonstrate the existence of a new evaluation model design in education which was a modification of the CSE-UCLA evaluation model and the Discrepancy evaluation model. Specifically, this evaluation model design can be used to determine the effectiveness of the one education activity namely the synchronous learning implementation at vocational universities. The research method used to achieve the objectives of this research was the development method by the Borg and Gall model development design. Five stages of development become the focus of this research, included: research and field data collection, research planning, design development, initial trials, and main product revision. The location of this research was conducted in several vocational universities in the North Bali area (Indonesia). Subjects involved in the initial trials toward this evaluation model design were 20 people. The tools used to conduct the initial trials were questionnaires. The technique used to analyze the data of initial trial results was descriptive quantitative by comparing the percentage of the initial trial results with the standard percentage of the effectiveness level of modified model design. This research results indicate that the evaluation model design was categorized as effective by an effectiveness level was 81.93%. The implication of this research results was the existence of a new design of the educational evaluation model. This design combines two evaluation models to produce good functionality integration in determining the effectiveness level of the synchronouslearning implementation in all universities generally and in vocational universities in Bali particularly. Doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-01321 Full Text: PDF
Utilization of Alkin-WP-Based Digital Library Evaluation Software as Evaluation Tool of Digital Library Effectiveness Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana; I Putu Wisna Ariawan; I Made Ardana; P. Wayan Arta Suyasa
Emerging Science Journal Vol 5, No 5 (2021): October
Publisher : Ital Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/esj-2021-01308

Abstract

One source of learning in universities is a digital library. In the era of industry 4.0, most universities have implemented digital libraries in supporting the learning process. However, the reality shows that digital library management is still ineffective. Therefore, the implementation of digital libraries needs to be evaluated for determining the digital library effectiveness used as learning resources in supporting the learning process in universities. Many evaluation tools are used to evaluate the effectiveness of digital libraries but have not provided accurate recommendation results to support decision-making. This research presents an innovation in the form of an evaluation tool that can be used to evaluate the digital library effectiveness in universities. That evaluation tool is called the Alkin-WP-based digital library evaluation software. This software is a desktop platform that contains aspects of measuring the digital library effectiveness by referring to the components of the Alkin evaluation model and the WP (Weighted Product) method. This research aimed to show the effectiveness level of the utilization of Alkin-WP-based digital library evaluation software. This research method was R & D (Research & Development) which refers to the ten development stages of the Borg and Gall model. In this research, development was focused only on a few stages, included: usage trials, final product revision, dissemination, and implementation. The subjects involved in assessing the implementation/utilization of the Alkin-WP-based digital library evaluation software were 35 people, in the usage trials were six people, in product revision were three people, and at the stage of dissemination were 15 people. The tools used to collect data were questionnaires and interview guidelines. The data analysis technique used was descriptive quantitative. The effectiveness level of utilizing the Alkin-WP-based digital library evaluation software was 88.34%. It showed that the evaluation software had effective. The impact of this research results on the scientific field of educational evaluation is being able to show the existence of a new evaluation tool based on educational evaluation and artificial intelligence. That evaluation tool can easier for library heads to make policies for revamping digital library services based on accurate recommendations. Doi: 10.28991/esj-2021-01308 Full Text: PDF
Design of Formative-Summative Evaluation Model Based on Tri Pramana-Weighted Product I Putu Wisna Ariawan; Wayan Sugandini; I Made Ardana; I Made Suwastika Dharma Arta; Dewa Gede Hendra Divayana
Emerging Science Journal Vol 6, No 6 (2022): December
Publisher : Ital Publication

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-06-016

Abstract

Quality in the implementation of e-learning in health universities can be measured both during the learning process and after the learning ends. Measurement can be performed through evaluation activities. The evaluation model needed was an innovative evaluation model that can look for the dominant aspects that determined the quality of e-learning implementation. One breakthrough evaluation model produced in this research to answer this need was the Formative-Summative evaluation model based on the Tri Pramana-Weighted Product. The main objective of this research was to show the quality of the Formative-Summative evaluation model design based on the Tri Pramana-Weighted Product. This research approach was based on the Borg & Gall development model, which focused on the design development stage. The subjects involved in conducting trials of the evaluation model design were 34 respondents. The technique for determining the subject was carried out using a purposive sampling technique. In addition, the tool used to conduct the trial was a questionnaire. The location for filling out the questionnaire was in health universities and colleges in the province of Bali. The technique used to analyze the data from the test results was descriptive quantitative by comparing the average percentage of the quality of the test results with the percentage of quality that refers to the five-scale categorization. The results showed that the percentage of the design quality of the Formative-Summative evaluation model based on the Tri Pramana-Weighted Productof 88.02%. This means that the quality of the evaluation model design was included in the good category. The impact of the results of this research on the field of education was to present an innovation in evaluation activities that made it easier for educational evaluators to measure the quality of e-learning, especially in health universities and colleges. Doi: 10.28991/ESJ-2022-06-06-016 Full Text: PDF
Co-Authors ., Alif Satria Egar Santosa ., EKA SEPHARMI PUTRI ., Erlan A Simarmata ., Gede Taruna Saputra ., I Kadek Suteja Putra ., I Ketut Adhi Krisnayana ., I Kt Bento Suartawan ., I Nengah Agus Arimbawa Dwijayadi ., I Putu Ngurah Mertayasa ., Luh Putu Harta Widiyanti ., Ni Komang Yesiati ., Ni Made Krisnamurti Udayani ., Pande Komang Saputra ., Putu Yuni Prema Santi ., Wahyu Restu Aji Ade Prayoga, I Made Adie Wahyudi Oktavia Gama Afriani, Desak Agus Adiarta,ST,MT . Alif Satria Egar Santosa . Anak Agung Gede Agung Anak Agung Gede Agung, Anak Agung Gede Ananta Wijaya, Gde Indra Andayani, Made Susi Lissia Anop Sudiatmika Antara Kesiman, Made Wisnu Ariawan, Ketut Sinda Ariyadi, David Juli arsini, kadek budi Arso, Norsa Yudhi Arta Suyasa, P. Wayan Arya Udayana, Ngurah Nyoman Aryani, Ketut Arlin Biantara, I Gede Dody Okta Budiarta, I Kadek Edi Dedi Suardika, I Made Desak Afriani Dewa, I Dewa Gede Darma Permana Diatmika, Ni Luh Emi Dr. I Made Sugiarta, M.Si. . Dwi Sandyika EKA SEPHARMI PUTRI . Erlan A Simarmata . Gede Aditra Pradnyana Gede Indrawan Gede Rasben Dantes Gede Saindra Santyadiputra Gede Saindra Santyadiputra, Gede Saindra Gede Saindra Santyadiputra, S.T., M.Cs . Gede Taruna Saputra . Gede Yogi Wiryawan Gili Pratama P. Gusti Ayu Putu Achintya Dewi Gusti Ayu Putu Budi Aryati Gusti Komang Pradhana Hariana, Made Satya Heni Pujiastuti I Gde Wawan Sudatha I Gede Aris Gunadi I Gede Hendrayana I Gede Kembar Arthayasa I Gede Mahendra Darmawiguna I Gede Margunayasa I Gede Ratnaya I Gede Satya Mulyawan I Gede Sudirtha I Gst Ngr Nyoman Gde Suadnyana I Gusti Ngurah Triyana I Kadek Edi Budiarta I Kadek Suteja Putra . I Ketut Adhi Krisnayana . I Ketut Resika Arthana I Komang Priatna I Kt Bento Suartawan . I Made Ardana I Made Ardwi Pradnyana I Made Candiasa I Made Gede Sunarya I Made Mudiartana I Made Putrama I Made Suwastika Dharma Arta I Made Tegeh I Made Yudana I Nengah Agus Arimbawa Dwijayadi . I Nyoman Natajaya I Nyoman Pasek Nugraha I Nyoman Sukajaya I Putu Darmayasa I Putu Ngurah Mertayasa . I Putu Okta Priyana I Putu Wisna Ariawan I Wayan Aries Agetia I Wayan Gede Suweca Antara I Wayan Sudiarta I Wayan Sukra Warpala Ida Ayu Mahadewi Ida Bagus Gede Surya Abadi Indrawan, Gede Indrawan Intan Pebriyanti Januharsa, Agus Jaya, I Nyoman Surya kadek budi arsini Kadek Yota Ernanda Aryanto Ketut Agustini Ketut Arlin Aryani Ketut Gede Turangga Ketut Sinda Ariawan Komang Agus Deny Sukma Komang Ary Sudewa Komang Setemen Luh Joni Erawati Dewi Luh Putu Harta Widiyanti . M.Cs ., Gede Saindra Santyadiputra, S.T., M.Cs M.Cs S.Kom I Made Agus Wirawan . M.Or. S.Pd. Gede Eka Budi Darmawan . M.Pd S.T. S.Pd. I Gde Wawan Sudatha . Made Kevin Ihza Mahendra Made Kurnia Widiastuti Giri Made Satya Hariana Made Winardana, Made Winardana Made Windu Antara Kesiman Mahendra, Made Kevin Ihza Meiliana, Komang Gita Mutiara Rushita Adi, Luh Putu Ngurah Nyoman Arya Udayana Ni Kadek Winda Patrianingsih Ni Ketut Agustini Ni Ketut Widiartini Ni Komang Theda Febrina Subagia Ni Komang Yanti Suartini Ni Komang Yesiati . Ni Made Asri Sasmita Ni Made Ayu Juli Astari Ni Made Dwi Antari NI MADE DWI ANTARI Ni Made Krisnamurti Udayani . Ni Nyoman Parwati Ni Nyoman Sugihartini Ni Wayan Nursarita Prasistayanti Ni Wayan Rena Mariani Nita Rianadewi Nyoman Jaya Wardhana Nyoman Santiyadnya Oka Mahendra, Ida Bagus Oktavia Fairy, Siluh Nyoman Princes P. WAYAN ARTA SUYASA P., Gili Pratama Pande Komang Saputra . Parwata, I Ketut Pebriyanti, Intan Prasistayanti, Ni Wayan Nursarita Priatna, I Komang Putu Yuni Prema Santi . Rianadewi, Nita Rizki Anom Raharjo S.Pd. M Kes I Ketut Sudiana . Sadewa, I Gusti Bagus Bogi Sandyika, Dwi Sasmita, Ade Seftian Rusditya seftian rusditya Setiarini, Ni Nyoman Sindu, I Gede Partha Sri Utami, Luh Putu Suadnyana, I Gst Ngr Nyoman Gde Sudewa, Komang Ary Sudiatmika, Anop Sugiharni, Gusti Ayu Dessy Sukawijana, I Komang Gede Sukayana, I Wayan Sukma, Komang Agus Deny Sunarya, I Made Arisetiawan Sunarya, I Made Arisetiawan Suratmin Suweca Antara, I Wayan Gede Turangga, Ketut Gede Wahyu Restu Aji . Wardhana, Nyoman Jaya Wayan Subagiarta Wayan Sugandini Wiguna, I Kadek Arta Wiradika, I Nyoman Indhi Yudi Purnawan, I Komang Yuliana Dharmayani, Ni Ketut