Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Eduscience (JES)

COMPARISON OF LEARNING OUTCOMES AND STUDENT LEARNING STYLES: A STUDY ON TRIGONOMETRIC COMPARISON OF RIGHT TRIANGLES Palinussa, Anderson Leonardo; Tamalene, Hanisa; Lawalata, Edith Merlin
JURNAL EDUSCIENCE Vol 11, No 3 (2024): Jurnal Eduscience (JES), (Authors from Hungary, South Africa, Malaysia, and Ind
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jes.v11i3.6473

Abstract

Poor knowledge of mathematical concepts leads to poor math learning outcomes among students. Good reasoning will equip students to explain and argue mathematically. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to determine the comparison of learning outcomes and learning styles of students on trigonometric comparison material in right triangles. The variables in this study are visual learning style, auditorial learning style, and kinesthetic learning style (VAK) as independent variables and math learning outcomes as dependent variables. The participants in this study amounted to 77 people who came from the tenth grade, majoring in mathematics and natural sciences. The data used in this research is quantitative. Quantitative data is data in the form of numbers obtained from the results of a questionnaire consisting of 21 questions and mathematics learning outcomes received after working on a description question with as many as 3 numbers. The data analysis technique in this study is using the Mann Whitney-U test. The results of the survey obtained 23 or 29.9% of students with visual learning styles, 41 or 53.2% of students with auditory learning styles, and 13 or 16.9% of students with kinesthetic learning styles. The average learning outcome of students with a visual learning style is 70.09, students with an auditorial learning style are 71.72, and students with a kinesthetic learning style are 69.29. Based on the results of the analysis using SPSS 26.0, the significance value of each paired group of learning styles is more than the significance level α = 0.05. Therefore, there is no difference in math learning outcomes between students whose learning styles are visual, auditory, and kinesthetic.
Co-Authors Abda Abda Andy Sunder Keer Dahoklory Ayal, Carolina S Ayal, Carolina Selfisina Ayu S Tuarita Batlolona, John Rafafy Bella G Saiselar Chasy M Nusamara Christina Martha Laamena Christopher Makapuan Darma Andreas Ngilawajan, Darma Andreas Efilina Kissiya * Fanuela Paunno Filsia Yunita Muskitta Gaspersz, Magy Hanisa Tamalene Huwaa, Novalin C Huwaa, Novalin Calasin Ipakit, Ayuni Irfan Ely Isrianti, Nadillah J S Molle JAMALUDIN Jeinne Mumu Jen Frisilia Tato Johanis Stefanus Lakusa Johannis Takaria Jozua Sabandar Juliana Molle Juliana Selvina Molle Kaitjily, Jemima La Moma La Moma Laimeheriwa, Susanty Lakusa, Johanis Stefanus Lawalata, Edith Merlin Lelapary, Willyam Lepertery, Marselina Elizabeth Letelay, Maria M Limehuwey, Jean Magy Gaspersz Makaruku, Niel Makaruku, Yulian H Makaruku, Yulian Hanny Marlan Marlan, Marlan Marleny Leasa Marlin Blandy Mananggel Maulota, Lydia Megi Gazpers Meylani J A Pattinama Molle, Juliana S Molle, Juliana Selvina Mudumi, Delvy Mulyaningsih Ngilamele, Maria Novalin C Huwaa Novalin C Huwaa Novalin C Huwaa Nur Aini Pattiasina, Natasya Pieter Zakarias Tupamahu R. H. Yanti Silitonga R.H. Yanti Silitonga Ratumanan, Tanwey Gerson Rumalean, Muhammad S Sayang, Arien Shella N Rupiassa Silitonga, R H Yanti T. G. Ratumanan Tamalene, H Tamalene, Hanisa Taufan Talib Thaib, Abdullah Tharob, Max James Thelessy, Reynaldo Decaprio theresia laurens, theresia Thobita Dias Tronanawowoy, Dina Inggrid Vederico Pitsalitz Sabandar Wattimena, Sharon F Welmintje Mataheru Wihinda, Aprisa Wolontery, Elsinta K Yandry Niak