p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.856
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Politika: Jurnal Ilmu Politik Sosiohumaniora Insignia: Journal of International Relations JUPIIS: Jurnal Pendidikan Ilmu-ilmu Sosial Jurnal Ilmiah HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL Jurnal Ketahanan Nasional Jurnal Transformasi Global Global Strategis Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Al-Ijtima`i: International Journal of Government and Social Science Indonesian Perspective Cosmogov: Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan JISPO (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik) Sosioglobal : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Sosiologi Verity: Jurnal Ilmiah Hubungan Internasional (International Relations Journal) JWP (Jurnal Wacana Politik) JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora Jurnal Asia Pacific Studies Mandala: Jurnal Ilmu Hubungan Internasional TRANSBORDERS: International Relations Journal Andalas Journal of International Studies Gema Keadilan Sospol : Jurnal Sosial Politik Polinter Indonesian Journal of International Relations Media Iuris PERSPEKTIF Global Political Studies Journal Journal of Political Issues Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Responsive: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Administrasi, Sosial, Humaniora dan Kebijakan Publik Padjadjaran Journal of International Relations Jurnal Kolaborasi Resolusi Konflik Resolusi: Jurnal Sosial Politik Jurnal Ekologi, Masyarakat dan Sains Ilomata International Journal of Social Science GOVERNANCE: Jurnal Ilmiah Kajian Politik Lokal dan Pembangunan Arus Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC) Papua Journal Of Diplomacy And International Relations BUANA GENDER : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Intermestic: Journal of International Studies Indonesian Perspective Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Journal of Public Representative and Society Provision Bhuvana: Journal of Global Studies Aliansi : Jurnal Politik, Keamanan Dan Hubungan Internasional Sunan Ampel International Conference of Political and Social Sciences Indonesian Governance Journal : Kajian Politik-Pemerintahan Mores: Jurnal Pendidikan Hukum, Politik dan Kewarganegaran Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

ANALISIS BIBLIOMETRIK PERKEMBANGAN PENELITIAN BIDANG ILMU KEWARGANEGARAAN Darmana, Feni; Sudirman, Arfin; Yomi Romlah, Oom; Trihastuti, Meiwatizal; Bachrudin, Achmad
Mores: Jurnal Pendidikan Hukum, Politik, dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): PPKn dan Ilmu Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : STKIP Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37742/mores.v5i2.104

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan perkembangan penelitian bidang Ilmu Kewarganegaraan(Civics) dalam periode 2019-2023, secara spesifik dalam hal: 1) perkembangan publikasi internasionalpada periode tersebut, (2) analisis perkembangan Ilmu Kewarnegaraan kaitannya dalam bidang ilmulain, (3) analisis kerjasama antara peneneliti (co-author analysis), (4) analisis perkembangan publikasiinternasional dengan banyaknya kutipan (citation analysis), dan (5) analisis teks-teks dalam abstrakyang berkaitan dengan Ilmu Kewarnegaraan (Co-words analysis) Analisis bibliometrik digunakan dalammencapai tujuan tersebut melalui database publikasi Dimensions pada perode 2019-2023, dan perangkatlunak Vosviewer. Hasil penelitian ini berupa datameta dalam bentuk tabel, chart, dan pemetaan.
Confrontation Analysis as an Alternative Model in International Relations: From Chinese Civil War to Korean War Manuhutu, Khrisna Ariyanto; Sudirman, Arfin; Setiabudi, Widya; Hakiki, Falhan
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 11, No 2 (2022): Published in November 2022
Publisher : Andalas Institute of International Studies UNAND

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.11.2.166-181.2022

Abstract

In analyzing confrontation, academic studies in the field of International Relation are highly associated with conventional narrative approaches. Unfortunately, exclusive and excessive use of an approach in the field may hinder the academic development in the field. Earlier studies show that cross-fertilization internal and external approaches can promote scientific progress in the field. This study aims to promote the use of confrontation analysis, an analysis tool that is considered as external to the field of international relations. There are some studies in the field of international relations that utilize confrontation analysis in conflict modelling. Nonetheless, these studies are limited only to the cases of western hemisphere. This study focuses on the implementation of confrontation analysis in the conflict in East Asia region, i.e. Chinese civil war and Korean war. These cases are selected due to the abundant available information on these conflicts and the knowledge on these conflicts has matured. This study shows that confrontation analysis is able to explain the increase of escalation and its downturn during the conflict.
Regional Security Complex in ASEAN: Neutrality and Centrality at Brink in the South China Sea Issue Sudirman, Arfin
Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities Vol. 7 No. 1 (2017): Journal of Indonesian Social Sciences and Humanities
Publisher : RMPI-BRIN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The South China Sea conflict has been a highly sensitive issue for the last 5 years in ASEAN. China and the US have been using the South China Sea as the “New Cold War Arena” of power and military hegemonic competition in the South East Asia region. This has been a major challenge for ASEAN as the only regional organization in the South East Asia region that has direct in the area must take major role in managing and resolving the dispute peacefully even though ASEAN has no defense pact like NATO. This paper argues that ASEAN, at this moment, must maintain its role as a mediator and independent-negotiator in the region but at the same time apply its principle of gradually adapting with the new international system. This article also suggests that in the future, ASEAN can take a major role in the governance of the South China Sea and the South East Asia region.
The Role of The Humanist Approach to Inter-Korean Diplomatic Relations During the DPRK’s Nuclear Crisis Sopia, Siti; Djumala, Darmansjah; Sudirman, Arfin
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July 2025
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v6i3.1716

Abstract

Relations between inter-Korean have worsened as tensions from the DPRK nuclear crisis have continued to escalate. Amidst the existing tensions, some of the Republic of Korea regimes have taken a humanist approach in dealing with the DPRK, which has resulted in improving relations between both countries. The author uses Samuel P. Huntington's political order theory to explore a stable and effective political system in managing conflict and making decisions. This study uses qualitative methods with secondary sources from journals, books, reports, official documents, and official websites. The results of this study indicate that the humanist approach is more effective in dealing with the DPRK through meetings held by the leaders of the two countries to build cooperative relations such as the construction of the Kaesong Industrial Complex, economic aid worth hundreds of billions of Won to prevent North Korea's nuclear development, and dialogue conducted through state meetings. In addition, policies made by the Republic of Korea, such as the Sunshine Policy, are able to embrace the DPRK and prioritize dialogue when the DPRK violates the agreement in cooperation without unilaterally terminating the cooperative relationship as was done by the Lee Myung-bak and Park Geun-hye regimes with their conservative approaches. Political institutions also play an important role in making foreign policies that have an impact on the security stability of the Republic of Korea.
Memahami Dinamika Kerjasama Industri Pertahanan dalam Kerangka Indonesia Australia Defence Security Dialogue Sudirman, Arfin; Djuyandi, Yusa; Pratama, Fajri Syahal Guna
Journal of Political Issues Vol 4 No 2 (2023): Journal of Political Issues
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Politik Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/jpi.v4i2.82

Abstract

Industri pertahanan menjadi salah satu agenda penting dan menjadi perhatian, dimulai pada saat kabinet Indonesia Bersatu I dibawah Presiden Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dan menjadikannya sebagai prioritas pembangunan dan memberi peluang besar bagi keterlibatan pihak swasta dalam kegiatan industri pertahanan salah satunya melalui agenda kerja sama yang dijalin oleh Indonesia dengan Australia dalam satu agenda dialog Indonesia – Australia Defense Security Dialogue (IADSD) yang telah dijalin dan disahkan oleh Lombok Treaty pada tahun 2006, yang mana Indonesia dalam hal ini memiliki kepentingan untuk meningkatkan kapabilitas serta kemandirian Industri pertahanan nasional. Maka dari itu penelitiaan ini memiliki tujuan untuk mencari permasalahan agar mencapai tujuan penelitiaan, dengan menggunakan konsep Military Industrial Complex (MIC) dan juga teori Iron Triangle. Hubungan tersebut terkait pada kontribusi politik, persetujuan politik akan belanja militer, lobi-lobi untuk mendukung birokrasi, dan industri. Ketiga badan tersebut, yang pada saat ini lebih sering disebut kongres/parlemen, departemen pertahanan, dan industri pertahanan, kemudian disebut sebagai segitiga besi pertahanan. Yang mana keterlibatan tersebut dikerucutkan Kembali kepada focus matra darat dalam pelaksanaannya ini, PT. Pindad dan juga end-user Tentara Nasional Indoensia Angkatan Darat (TNI AD) demi mengurangi ketergantuangan pada produk luar dan lebih meningkatkan kemandirian industry pertahanan nasional.
Analisis Hubungan Sipil-Militer di Indonesia Pasca Reformasi 1998 Djuyandi, Yusa; Sudirman, Arfin; Suryana, Nanang
Journal of Political Issues Vol 7 No 1 (2025): Journal of Political Issues
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Politik Universitas Bangka Belitung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33019/jpi.v7i1.337

Abstract

Dalam hubungan sipil-militer pada suatu negara demokrasi itu harus memiliki faktor keseimbangan kekuatan antara instrumen militer dengan instrumen non-militer. Indonesia sendiri tentunya memiliki sejarah perjalanan reformasi militer yang cukup panjang dan penuh akan hambatan berat, yang sumbernya itu sendiri biasanya berasal dari pemerintah atau rezim yang sedang berkuasa pada suatu negara. Setelah turunnya rezim tirani pada tahun 1998 tentunya menjadi langkah awal dari kebangkitan reformasi militer serta menuju arah pembentukan demokratisasi yang lebih baik di Indonesia. Seiring berjalannya waktu Indonesia semakin menunjukan indikasi positif dalam perjalanannya menuju ke arah demokrasi. reformasi TNI dan kontrol sipil di Indonesia sebenarnya dapat dikatakan belum sepenuhnya terwujud dan masih dalam proses transisi menuju ke civil society yang diharapkan. Sehingga, Indonesia harus tetap berhati-hati dan mawas diri dalam mensiasati dinamika yang mungkin saja terjadi dikemudian hari, karena potensi terjadinya konflik yang menciderai hubungan sipil-militer itu mungkin saja tetap ada dan akan terjadi. Penyusunan artikel penelitian ini dibuat berdasarkan penggunaan metode kualitatif berdasarkan pengumpulan data studi pustaka dengan menghasilkan analisis deskriptif. Hasil penelitian yang ditemukan adalah bagaiamana reformasi militer saat ini di Indonesia, kemudian kebijakan politik dan lembaga terkait apa saja dalam kontrol militer pasca reformasi, dan penjelasan penilaian peneliti dalam hubungan sipil-militer di Indonesia.
SEKURITISASI INDONESIA TERHADAP KELOMPOK KEKERASAN BERSENJATA DALAM KONFLIK PAPUA DI MASA KEPRESIDENAN JOKO WIDODO Muzaffar, Eiji; Sudirman, Arfin; Djuyandi, Yusa
Aliansi Vol 2, No 3 (2023): Aliansi : Jurnal Politik, Keamanan Dan Hubungan Internasional
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/aliansi.v2i3.51753

Abstract

Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membuktikan adanya proses sekuritisasi dalam konflik Papua di era Kepresidenan Joko Widodo (terutama 2014-2018). Fokus utama penelitian ini adalah pendekatan keamanan yang didominasi oleh Indonesia terhadap permasalahan Papua, khususnya perubahan kebijakan dalam menangani KKB di Papua pasca-Reformasi melalui kerangka pikir sekuritisasi. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif, artikel ini menunjukkan perubahan yang signifikan secara yuridis, terutama dalam penggunaan aparatus keamanan negara dalam menangani KKB di Papua saat ini. Namun demikian, penerapan kebijakan baru juga menunjukkan tumpang tindih dan kontradiktif, menjadikan situasi konflik di Papua hingga kini masih tidak pasti. This article aims to demonstrate the securitization processes within the Papua conflict during the presidency of Joko Widodo, particularly focusing on the years 2014-2018. The primary focus of this research is Indonesia's security-oriented approach to the Papua issue, specifically examining policy changes in addressing the Free Papua Movement (KKB) post-Reformasi through the securitization framework. Utilizing a qualitative method, the article illustrates significant juridical changes, especially in the use of state security apparatus in handling the current KKB situation in Papua. However, the implementation of new policies also shows overlap and contradiction, leaving the conflict situation in Papua uncertain to this day.
Identity and Border: Comparative Case of “Re-Bordering and De-Bordering” in Myanmar and Indonesia Pratisti, Siti Aliyuna; Sudirman, Arfin; lanti, Irman G.; Zahid, Ali
Proceedings of Sunan Ampel International Conference of Political and Social Sciences Vol. 2 (2024): Proceedings of the SAICoPSS
Publisher : Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15642/saicopss.2024.2..283-292

Abstract

Identity, as a symbolic system to interpret the world, plays a significant role in shaping human understanding, including social and political structures. Reid (2010) listed key identity markers, including religion, language, bounded sovereign space, censuses, and names. Ethnicity and religion retain a critical point as identity makers since they precede the nationalist identity–and may as well outlast them. In line with Reid’s argument, Farzana (2017) notes the danger of the process of “us” and “other-ing” in Myanmar as an example of how identity is prone to be manipulated to assist the needs and aspirations of the dominant elites, while at the same time, politically excluded the non-dominant ethnics and communities. This article explores how material ideas of borders connect to immaterial structures. Two formations of borders–Myanmar and Indonesia–are compared with focused on scrutinizing similarities and differences in the formation of the immaterial border between the two countries. Despite showing a palpable hypothesis–Indonesia being a successful case of identity construction, while Myanmar is quite the opposite–, revisiting and reconsidering the concept of ‘Re-bordering and De-bordering’ of the two countries are relevant to add new perspectives on the formation of national identity
IMPLEMENTASI DEFENCE DIPLOMACY MILITER INDONESIA DALAM UPAYA PERDAMAIAN KONFLIK LEBANON Wibawa, Satriya; Sudirman, Arfin; Selian, Hanan Tasmika; Hakiki, Falhan; Hapsari, Karina Erdian; Djuyandi, Yusa
Aliansi Vol 4, No 3 (2025): Aliansi : Jurnal Politik, Keamanan Dan Hubungan Internasional
Publisher : Universitas Padjadjaran

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24198/aliansi.v4i3.67801

Abstract

Perang saudara Lebanon yang belum terselesaikan menimbulkan konflik baru antara Israel dan Lebanon pada tahun 2006. Berdasarkan Resolusi DK PBB 1701 dan Undang-undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia 1945, Indonesia diperbolehkan mengirimkan pasukan penjaga perdamaian di bawah United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) untuk rekonsiliasi di Lebanon. Konsekuensinya, peran Indonesia dalam defence diplomacy menjadi penting untuk menyelesaikan konflik Lebanon. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan data sekunder dari studi literatur, jurnal, berita, dan sumber daring yang berkaitan dengan implementasi defence diplomacy militer Indonesia dalam upaya perdamaian konflik Lebanon. Data-data tersebut kemudian divalidasi dengan triangulasi data lewat mencocokan kesesuaian data dari peacekeepers Indonesia, Kementerian Pertahanan, dan Kementerian Luar Negeri Republik Indonesia, serta juga membandingkannya terhadap berbagai sumber data sekunder lainnya. Penelitian ini menemukan bahwa sampai batas tertentu, Indonesia telah berhasil melakukan tujuan defence diplomacy melalui misi Civil-Military Coordination (CIMIC). Selain itu, militer Indonesia telah membangun kembali citra masa lalunya di mata dunia internasional dan memperkuat Confidece Building Measures (CBM) di antara negara-negara yang terlibat dalam misi perdamaian di Lebanon maupun negara-negara pendonor. Dengan keberhasilan kegiatan defence diplomacy, Indonesia membuka jalan untuk menjalin kerja sama baru dengan aktor negara atau non-negara di bidang pertahanan dan lainnya. The unresolved Lebanese Civil War precipitated a new conflict between Israel and Lebanon in 2006. In accordance with UN Security Council Resolution 1701 and the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, Indonesia was authorized to deploy peacekeeping forces under the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL) to support reconciliation efforts. Consequently, Indonesia's role in defense diplomacy became pivotal in resolving the conflict. This study employs a qualitative method utilizing secondary data derived from literature reviews, academic journals, news reports, and online sources pertaining to the implementation of Indonesian military defence diplomacy in peace efforts for the Lebanon conflict. The collected data were subsequently validated through triangulation by cross-referencing information from Indonesian peacekeepers, the Ministry of Defence, and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Indonesia, as well as comparing it with various secondary sources. The findings reveal that, to a certain extent, Indonesia has successfully achieved its defense diplomacy objectives through the Civil-Military Coordination (CIMIC) mission. Furthermore, the Indonesian military has restored its international reputation and strengthened Confidence Building Measures (CBM) among nations involved in the peacekeeping mission as well as donor countries. Through the success of these defense diplomacy activities, Indonesia has paved the way for establishing new cooperation with state and non-state actors in the defense sector and beyond.
The Portability of Ideas in Global Data Governance: A Coxian Reading of ‘Data Free Flow with Trust’ Journey to the UN Global Digital Compact Dasnita, M. Nur Rahman; Sudirman, Arfin; Wibawa, Satriya
Ilomata International Journal of Social Science Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): January 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Ilomata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61194/ijss.v7i1.1922

Abstract

This article investigates the institutionalization of “trusted cross-border data flows” and “interoperability” within the UN Global Digital Compact. Employing a Coxian framework of ideas, material capabilities, and institutions, it argues this outcome was not passive diffusion. Instead, it was the product of a historic bloc that aligned U.S. policy with the interests of major technology firms. Through a directed content analysis of key diplomatic texts from the G20, OECD, and UN, the study traces the genealogical journey of this conceptual pairing. The analysis reveals how this highly portable formula was progressively embedded and proceduralized in the GDC's final text. The article also demonstrates that the success of this ideational project is underwritten by material power: the concentrated structure of global cloud infrastructure, which makes this governance settlement the most feasible option. The research illuminates how hegemonic consensus in digital governance is achieved through a mutually reinforcing alignment of adaptable ideas, strategic institutionalization, and the realities of material capabilities.
Co-Authors Achmad Bachrudin Achmad Gusman Siswandi, Achmad Gusman Affabile Rifawan, Affabile Afiya, Nadien Akim Akim Alifia Putri Rahmadewi Animbyo Cahya Putra Anshori, Muhammad Fikry Audrea Denneisha Bachrudin, Achmad Bimbi Rianda Clara Uli Rebecca Darmana, Feni Darmawan, Lucky Janitra Priyai Dasnita, M. Nur Rahman Deasy Silvya Sari Dina Yulianti Djumala, Darmansjah EKO ARI WIBOWO Fadel, Mohamad Fadilah, Edta Muhammad Fadly Achmad Falhan Hakiki Falhan Hakiki Feniawati Darnana Firohmatillah, Zulvyanie Pilgrimmy Francesca Klarensia Angela Gilang Nur Alam Gouw, Safina Al Shifa Chandra Greaty Fitraharani Gumilang, Mugi Hakiki, Falhan Hapsari, Karina Erdian Herdiansyah, Ari Ganjar Huala Adolf Ibrahim, Muhamad Rizal Idris Idris Idris Idris, Idpianto Imanuel, Josafath Jafar Alkadrie Januar Aditya Pratama Junov Siregar Kamil, Fadly Muhammad Lanti, Irman G. Lanti, Irman Gurmilang Mahestu, I Maiko Manuhutu, Khrisna Ariyanto Manullang, Abel Josafat Mas Halimah Maulana, Mursal Mauly Dini Budiyanti Meiwatizal Trihastuti Muhammad Fauzan Malufti Muhammad Harry Riana Nugraha Muhammad Ridho Muradi - Muzaffar, Eiji Nathania Dwi Marietta Naura Nabila Haryanto Nguyen, Tri Minh Nugraha, Muhammad Harry Riana Nugraha, Muhammad Harry Riana Nur Salsabila, Fairuz Nadhira Pradipta Nindyan Saputra Pratama, Fajri Syahal Guna Pratama, Januar Aditya Prisilla Octaviani Winarto Putra, Animbyo Cahya R, Satrio Gumilar R. Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata Rafidha Dinda Putri Rahim, Arifa Rayhan Indy Razani Ridha Aditya Nugraha Rizaldy, Robby RMT Nurhasan Affandi Santoso, Rizal Budi Satriya Wibawa, I Made Selian, Hanan Tasmika Siti Aliyuna Pratisti Sopia, Siti Sulaeman, Dina Y Suryana, Nanang Taufik Hidayat Taufik Rachmat Nugraha Tiara Firdaus Jafar Tumpal Silitonga Tumulo, Lukman Jusuf Wawan Darmawan Wibowo, Eko Ari Wicaksono, Raden AP Windy Dermawan Wowor, Harvardry Gerald Abraham Yanyan Mochamad Yani Yanyan Muhammad Yani Yaries Mahardika Putro Yasmin Prisella Rabbani Yomi Romlah, Oom Yusa Djuyandi Yusuf Fadillah Tirta K Zahid, Ali Zulvyanie Pilgrimmy Firohmatillah