Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : GANEC SWARA

PENYIDIKAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI TERHADAP TNI OLEH PENYIDIK KPK BAHRI YAMIN; FITRIANI AMALIA; SARUDI SARUDI; SAHRUL SAHRUL; FAHRURROZI FAHRURROZI
GANEC SWARA Vol 17, No 4 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Mahasaraswati K. Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35327/gara.v17i4.641

Abstract

Regarding the polemic regarding the determination of suspects by KPK investigators against active TNI soldiers. The central point is the issue of authority. The authority in question is related to whether or not KPK investigators may carry out investigations and determine suspects against active TNI soldiers. So the researchers proposed a problem formulation; Does the Corruption Eradication Committee have the authority to investigate criminal acts of corruption committed by active TNI while holding civilian positions? The aim to be achieved with this legal issue is to find out and provide scientific information to interested parties. This research is a type of Normative legal research. "According to Peter Mahmud Marzuki, normative legal research is a process of finding legal rules, legal principles and legal doctrines to answer the legal issues faced." The approach is Legislation (Statuta Approach). The analysis is by means of legal interpretation and analytical descriptive. The result is that in a normal view, if the TNI commits corruption while serving as TNI, then it is purely subject to the military justice law. However, if a member of the TNI commits corruption while holding a civil position, then the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) investigators have the authority to conduct an investigation based on the provisions of article 42, Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, Jo, law Number 19 of 2019 concerning the second amendment to Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission, article 1 number (4), and article 6. Because it is a connectivity court, investigative authority remains with the Corruption Eradication Commission. The Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) has the authority to coordinate and control the investigation, investigation and prosecution of criminal acts of corruption carried out jointly by persons subject to military justice and general justice.
PROBLEMATIK PASAL PENGHINAAN TERHADAP PRESIDEN/ WAKIL PRESIDEN DALAM KUHP BARU PERSPEKTIF ASAS EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW YAMIN, BAHRI; AMALIA, FITRIANI; RACHMAN, M.TAUFIK; HARUN, RINA ROHAYU; YULIANI, TIN
GANEC SWARA Vol 18, No 2 (2024): Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas Mahasaraswati K. Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35327/gara.v18i2.896

Abstract

The aim to be achieved is to find out and provide scientific information to interested parties and the public, the Government, the DPR RI and the Constitutional Court, that this new Criminal Code is still controversial and problematic, at least in relation to the article regarding insulting the President/Vice President. This research is a type of Normative legal research. Thus, the approach used to answer the legal issues studied in this research is to use a Statutory Approach. The analysis is by means of legal interpretation and analytical descriptive. After the primary legal materials and secondary legal materials have been collected, they are described systematically and methodically in order to obtain a universal picture of the legal issues raised in this research in order to determine the final conclusions. The result is the revival of the article on insulting the President/Vice President, which is contrary to the principle of equality before the law and there is discriminatory legal privilege treatment which is different from the position of the people as the highest holder of sovereignty, which is strengthened by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 013-022/PUU-IV/ 2006. At the same time it is contrary to Article 27 paragraph (1); Article 28; Article 28E paragraphs (2) and (3); Article 28J paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia