Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.747
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Dwi Putri Lestarika
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 20 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 20 Documents
Search

 1   2 
ANALISIS PENGARUH KESENJANGAN GENDER DALAM DUNIA KETENAGAKERJAAN DI INDONESIA Martiadi Juanda; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 7 No. 5 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v7i5.6890

Abstract

Terjadinya ketimpangan gender khususnya di indonesia dalam dunia ketenagakerjaan dapat dibuktikan dengan rendahnya partisipasi perempuan terhadap pasar kerja. Untuk mendukung peningkatan ekonomi maka dibutuhkan adanya kesempatan yang dibuka sebesar- besarnya dalam dunia ketenagakerjaan bagi perempuan maupun laki-laki. Ada banyak faktor yang menjadi alasan mengapa perempuan selalu termarginalkan dan tersubordinasi. Teknik yang penelitian deskriptif di mana memiliki tujuan untuk mengungkapkan fenomena sosial yang terjadi di kalangan masyarakat perempuan Indonesia khususnya berkaitan dengan ketenagakerjaan TPAK Perempuan di Indonesia Kesetaraan gender dalam bidang pekerjaan kesetaraan gender akan terwujud apabila tidak ada diskriminasi gender. Penanaman sikap pekerja keras harus ditanamkan kepada laki-laki maupun perempuan. Sebab, perempuan tidak dapat bergantung selamanya kepada laki-laki. Perempuan juga harus belajar untuk bekerja demi memenuhi kebutuhan hidupnya.
MEMBEDAH KESENJANGAN GENDER: PERSPEKTIF TEORITIS DAN ANALISIS KEBIJAKAN DI ERA MODERN Rafflie Julio Marcelino; Ihsan Rahmat Haqiqi; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 7 No. 6 (2024): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v7i6.6936

Abstract

Kesenjangan gender tetap menjadi isu penting di berbagai aspek kehidupan sosial, ekonomi, dan politik di era modern. Jurnal ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji kesenjangan gender melalui perspektif teoritis dan analisis kebijakan yang ada. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan multidimensional, penelitian ini mengeksplorasi berbagai teori gender, termasuk feminisme, konstruktivisme sosial, dan teori peran, untuk memahami akar penyebab kesenjangan tersebut. Selain itu, analisis kebijakan dilakukan untuk mengevaluasi efektivitas program-program yang dirancang untuk mengurangi kesenjangan gender, serta tantangan yang dihadapi dalam implementasinya. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun ada kemajuan dalam beberapa aspek, kesenjangan gender masih terwujud dalam berbagai bentuk, seperti ketidaksetaraan upah dan akses terhadap pendidikan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pendekatan yang lebih holistik dan kolaboratif dalam merumuskan kebijakan yang inklusif dan responsif terhadap kebutuhan gender. Jurnal ini diharapkan dapat memberikan wawasan baru dan rekomendasi bagi pembuat kebijakan serta peneliti untuk mengatasi kesenjangan gender di masyarakat modern
Implementasi Perlindungan Data Pribadi Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2020 Aulia Alayna Suvil; Firdaus Firdaus; M. Arif Ramadhan; Wanda Darma Putra; Dwi Putri Lestarika
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 3 No. 4 (2024): Desember: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL (JHPIS)
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v3i4.4235

Abstract

The protection of personal data is becoming increasingly important in today's digital era, where information and communication technology is rapidly advancing. This raises the risk of data breaches that can have negative impacts, ranging from identity theft to harassment. The personal data protection law has become crucial for regulating the management and protection of such data, with the aim of providing a clear legal framework. Personal data protection includes the definition and scope of personal data as well as fundamental principles such as transparency, limitation of use, and data security. The regulation of personal data protection in Indonesia has evolved over time, with Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Information and Electronic Transactions serving as a more comprehensive legal foundation. This research employs a descriptive approach, document analysis, and previous studies. Data analysis is conducted qualitatively to describe the implementation of the Personal Data Protection Law in Indonesia as well as the factors influencing it. The implementation of this law faces challenges, such as the gap between policy formulation and its execution, a lack of public awareness, and inadequate infrastructure. However, supporting factors like public campaigns and infrastructure improvements can strengthen the implementation of the law. Despite the challenges, the implementation of the Personal Data Protection Law in Indonesia can be improved through increased public awareness, investment in infrastructure, and collaboration among stakeholders. This recommendation is expected to effectively strengthen personal data protection in Indonesia. 
MODEL PENYELESAIAN PIDANA ADAT MENURUT HUKUM YANG HIDUP DALAM MASYARAKAT DI KOTA BENGKULU Susi Ramadhani; Asep Suherman; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Vol 34 No 1 (2025)
Publisher : UNIB Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33369/jsh.34.1.90-108

Abstract

The promulgation of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the national Criminal Code (KUHP), replacing the Dutch Criminal Code, is a fundamental reform of Indonesian criminal law because of the recognition of laws that live in society. The purpose of this study is to find out and describe the position of customary criminal settlement in Indonesian laws and regulations and the process of resolving customary crimes according to the law that lives in the community in Bengkulu City. In Bengkulu City, the customs used are the Lembak custom, the Malay custom, the Serawai custom, and the Rejang custom. The enforcement of Bengkulu City customs was confirmed with the issuance of Regional Regulation Number 29 of 2003 concerning the Enforcement of Bengkulu City Customs.   The method used in this study is an empirical legal research method, where data is obtained directly from the community. This research is important because there is no uniformity in the process of resolving customary crimes that occur in Bengkulu City. The contribution given will benefit law enforcement officials in resolving customary crimes in accordance with the laws that live in the community, especially in Bengkulu City as an effort to enforce the law.
Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Komando dalam Konflik Bosnia Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Internasional: Studi Yurisprudensi ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia) Tenti Ayu; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9672

Abstract

The principle of command responsibility is an important doctrine in international criminal law that allows military commanders to be held accountable for crimes committed by subordinates under their control. This doctrine is grounded in the concept of hierarchical accountability, namely the obligation of superiors to prevent, supervise, and take action against violations of international humanitarian law. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and application of the principle of command responsibility in the Bosnia conflict of 1992–1995 based on the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), as well as to assess its conformity with the principle of legality and the principle of culpability in international criminal law. This study employed a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results show that the main elements of command responsibility include the superior-subordinate relationship, effective control, and the knowledge element (knew or should have known), all of which must be proven factually. The ICTY affirmed that responsibility does not arise automatically from formal position, but rather from the actual ability to control and prevent crimes. Although there is debate regarding the limits of the interpretation of effective control and the should have known standard, the application of this doctrine in the Bosnia cases generally remained within the framework of the principles of nullum crimen sine lege and nulla poena sine culpa. These findings indicate that the principle of command responsibility in ICTY jurisprudence is consistent with the fundamental principles of international criminal law and strengthens the legitimacy of this doctrine in enforcing command criminal accountability.
Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional terhadap Kejahatan Perang dalam Konflik Rusia dan Ukraina Berdasarkan Statuta Roma 1998 Amelia Suci Rahmadani; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9673

Abstract

The armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has given rise to various allegations of war crimes that have attracted the attention of the international community, particularly regarding the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement. Although Russia is not a state party to the 1998 Rome Statute, the International Criminal Court (ICC) still has an important role in prosecuting perpetrators of international crimes. This study aims to analyze the application of ICC jurisdiction to alleged war crimes in the Russia–Ukraine conflict even though Russia is not a state party to the Rome Statute, as well as to identify the juridical and political challenges in the enforcement of international criminal law. This study employed a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that the ICC still has a basis for jurisdiction through the territorial principle based on Ukraine’s ad hoc declaration pursuant to Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, as well as through the principle of complementarity, which places the ICC as the last resort when a state is unable or unwilling to enforce the law effectively. However, the implementation of such jurisdiction faces various challenges, including jurisdictional limitations over non-state parties, dependence on international cooperation, issues of immunity of state officials, global political dynamics, evidentiary constraints in situations of armed conflict, as well as the not yet optimal universalization of the Rome Statute. These findings indicate that the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement in the Russia–Ukraine conflict depends not only on the ICC’s normative legitimacy, but also on political support and the commitment of the international community to preventing impunity for war crimes.
Selektivitas Penuntutan Kejahatan Internasional dalam Praktik Peradilan Global: Studi Kasus Penanganan Kejahatan Perang oleh International Criminal Court Anisah Friti Anjelia; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9689

Abstract

The issue of selectivity in the prosecution of international crimes remains a crucial problem in the global criminal justice system. The establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) through the Rome Statute aims to enforce accountability and eliminate impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes, particularly war crimes, but in its implementation the ICC is often considered not to have applied law enforcement evenly. This study aims to examine the characteristics of selectivity in the prosecution of war crimes by the ICC, the factors that influence it, and its impact on the legitimacy of global justice. This study employed a normative legal method with statutory and case analysis approaches. The results of the study show that selectivity in prosecution is influenced by limitations in jurisdictional authority, the application of the principle of complementarity, the ICC’s dependence on state cooperation, and international political dynamics, especially those related to the role of the United Nations Security Council. These conditions are reflected in the tendency for case handling to focus on certain regions and countries, while similar alleged violations involving countries with major political influence are rarely processed to the prosecution stage. These findings indicate that selectivity in prosecution has implications for declining trust in the ICC and has the potential to weaken the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement. Thus, this study affirms that the legitimacy of global criminal justice depends greatly on consistency, independence, and equality in the enforcement of international law.
Analisis Unsur Meluas dan Sistematis dalam Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan Berdasarkan Pasal 7 Statuta Roma Yulia Tri Wahyuni; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9871

Abstract

Crimes against humanity constitute one of the most serious forms of violations of international law because they attack human dignity and the principle of protection for civilian populations. This study aimed to analyze the contextual element of “widespread or systematic” in crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the 1998 Rome Statute and its evidentiary standards in the judicial practice of the International Criminal Court (ICC). This study used a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach through the examination of doctrine, jurisprudence, and relevant international legal documents. The results showed that the element of “widespread or systematic” is a central contextual element that distinguishes crimes against humanity from ordinary criminal offenses. The “widespread” element relates to the scale and impact of attacks against many victims or a broad area, whereas the “systematic” element emphasizes the existence of an organized, planned, and coordinated pattern of conduct. In practice, the ICC assesses this element through quantitative evidence concerning the number of victims, qualitative evidence regarding patterns of planning and logistical coordination, and contextual assessment of the state policy or organization of the perpetrators. These findings also confirm the relationship between crimes against humanity and command responsibility, particularly in assessing the liability of planners or leaders for the acts of their subordinates. The conclusion of this study indicates that proving the element of “widespread or systematic” requires a combination of quantitative, qualitative, and contextual evidence so that only acts that meet the criteria of crimes against humanity can be prosecuted under international criminal law. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of contextual elements in strengthening legal protection for civilian populations and upholding the principles of individual and command accountability.
Sanksi terhadap Lembaga Peradilan Internasional sebagai Bentuk Obstruction of Justice dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Nabila Inkha Putri; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9901

Abstract

The increasing practice of unilateral sanctions imposed by states against the International Criminal Court (ICC) has the potential to disrupt the independence and effectiveness of international judicial institutions. From the perspective of international criminal law, such actions raise serious issues because they may be qualified as obstruction of justice, namely acts that impede judicial proceedings. This study aims to analyze whether sanctions against the ICC can be qualified as obstruction of justice and to examine the mechanisms of legal accountability for such actions within the framework of international law. This study used a normative legal method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used included the 1998 Rome Statute, the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), and various relevant international legal literature. The results showed that the concept of obstruction of justice in international criminal law has been regulated through provisions that criminalize acts interfering with the administration of justice. Sanctions against the ICC meet the three elements of obstruction of justice, namely causing delays in legal proceedings by paralyzing court operations, being carried out with full knowledge of the impact of such actions, and aiming to interfere with the administration of justice to protect citizens from criminal accountability. This action violates the principle of judicial independence, creates impunity, and leaves victims without access to justice. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of strengthening protection for international justice through the activation of blocking statutes and the solidarity of States Parties in order to safeguard the independence, effectiveness, and legitimacy of the International Criminal Court.
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Genosida dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Vallent Margaretha; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9940

Abstract

The crime of genocide is one of the most serious international crimes because it threatens the survival of human groups and the stability of global peace, as regulated in the 1948 Genocide Convention and strengthened through the existence of the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the 1998 Rome Statute as a permanent judicial institution for prosecuting individual criminal responsibility. This study aimed to analyze the mechanisms of law enforcement against the crime of genocide from the perspective of international criminal law, identify the obstacles encountered, and assess its effectiveness in realizing global justice. This study used a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through an examination of international legal instruments, expert doctrines, and international judicial practice. The results showed that although the international legal framework is normatively quite comprehensive in regulating the prosecution of genocide, its implementation still faces various obstacles, including the limited jurisdiction of the ICC, which is not yet universal, the application of the principle of complementarity that depends on the willingness of states, and dependence on international cooperation in the law enforcement process. In addition, global political dynamics, including the influence of major powers and the role of the United Nations Security Council, also affect the prosecution process, thereby potentially creating selectivity in law enforcement. Thus, this study confirms the existence of a gap between ideal legal norms and the reality of international criminal law enforcement practice, which affects the effectiveness of handling the crime of genocide and the level of trust of the international community in the global justice system.
Co-Authors Adillah Dwi Rahmadani Amelia Suci Rahmadani Ana Ilmadan Sari Anisah Friti Anjelia Asep Suherman Asep Suherman Aulia Alayna Suvil Dendi Saputra Devina Qhosani Deyan Ajian Putra Elsa Ramadhana Fatur Rahman Hadi Firdaus Firdaus Ihsan Rahmat Haqiqi Indah Salsabilla Putri M. Arif Ramadhan Martiadi Juanda Muhammad Vazriyansyah Mutiara Deja Saputri Nabila Inkha Putri Olivia Sugiarti Rafflie Julio Marcelino Rego Bangkito Sela Monika Selpa Rosa Lenda Susi Ramadhani Sutra Oktaviani Tenti Ayu Vallent Margaretha Wanda Darma Putra Yulia Tri Wahyuni