Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.041
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) AHKAM : Jurnal Hukum Islam dan Humaniora Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik Jurnal Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan
Dwi Putri Lestarika
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 40 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 40 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Analisis Mendalam tentang Kesenjangan Gender di Indonesia: Perspektif Teori dan Kebijakan Ega Anjellika; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Juli - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/m0zpx588

Abstract

The gender gap in Indonesia remains a significant issue even though various policies have been implemented to reduce it. This article analyzes the inequality between men and women in the social, economic, educational, and political fields, and explores relevant social theories, such as Structural Functionalism, Feminism, and Institutional Economics. Based on data from the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) and other reports, the gender gap in Indonesia is still seen in low female labor force participation, inequality in access to education, and income disparities. Policies such as Law No. 13 of 2003 on Manpower and Gender Mainstreaming (PUG) have been enacted, but challenges in patriarchal culture and economic limitations still hamper efforts to achieve equality. This article recommends strengthening gender equality education, policy oversight, and inclusive economic development as strategic steps to reduce the gender gap in Indonesia.  
Efektivitas Penerapan Kesenjangan Gender Dalam Mendapatkan Perlakuan Yang Sama Di Dunia Kerja Menurut Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Grace Oktavia Nababan; Tapu Oktalina Nababan; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Juli - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/2sezsa45

Abstract

Pada era globalisasi dan kemajuan teknologi informasi, dunia kerja telah mengalami perkembangan yang pesat dalam menyediakan peluang bagi individu dari beragam latar belakang untuk mendapatkan pekerjaan. Setiap tenaga kerja, baik laki-laki maupun perempuan memiliki hak yang setara dan dilindungi dalam mendapatkan pekerjaan. Dalam Undang-Undang Ketenagakerjaan Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 dijelaskan bahwa setiap tenaga kerja memiliki kesempatan  yang  sama  tanpa  adanya diskriminasi  untuk  memperoleh  pekerjaan. Hal ini dimaksudkan   untuk   menjamin hak-hak   dasar   pekerja dan menjamin kesamaan kesempatan kerja tanpa adanya perlakuan diskriminasi untuk mewujudkan kesejahteraan para pekerja. Meski begitu, diskriminasi masih kerap terjadi, terutama terhadap pekerja perempuan. Sebagaimana yang diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan untuk memastikan bahwa pelaksanaan perlindungan kesenjangan gender harus sesuai dengan undang-undang ketenagakerjaan tersebut dimana hak antara laki-laki dan perempuan harus setara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian hukum normatif. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan kasus (case approach), pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach).
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Perempuan Yang Menjadi Korban Kekerasan Dalam Rumah  Tangga Di Kota Bengkulu Rio Andrian; Kusyati Simare Mare2; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 2 No. 1 (2024): Juli - Desember
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/0n2vrz41

Abstract

Perlindungan hukum terhadap perempuan yang menjadi korban kekerasan dalam rumah tangga di Kota Bengkulu telah diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004. Penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa tujuan utama dari undang-undang tersebut ialah untuk memberikan perlindungan dan rehabilitasi kepada korban, khususnya perempuan, dalam menghadapi kekerasan rumah tangga yang marak terjadi. Data dari Dinas Pemberdayaan Perempuan dan Perlindungan Anak Kota Bengkulu menunjukkan adanya 57 kasus kekerasan terhadap perempuan dan anak sepanjang tahun 2023. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa meskipun terdapat kerangka hukum yang jelas, pelaksanaan perlindungan hukum seringkali terkendala oleh stigma sosial, kompleksitas prosedur hukum, dan kurangnya fasilitas pendukung untuk korban. Dalam upaya meningkatkan efektivitas perlindungan hukum, diperlukan kolaborasi antara masyarakat dan pemerintah untuk menciptakan lingkungan yang aman bagi perempuan serta meningkatkan kesadaran mengenai hak-hak mereka.
Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Diferensiasi Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Kasus Penganiayaan Yang Dilakukan Secara Bersama-Sama Tiara Okta Yanti; Aldi Prasetiawan Saputra; Dea Eryan Ananda; Muhammad Armada; Dwi Putri Lestarika
Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 2 No. 1 (2025): Oktober - Desember
Publisher : GLOBAL SCIENTS PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The application of differentiated criminal liability by investigators in handling collective assault cases represents the implementation of justice and individualization principles in Indonesia’s criminal law system. This principle requires that each offender be held accountable according to their level of culpability, intent, and contribution to the offense. Juridically, the legal basis for applying this differentiation lies in Articles 55 and 56 of the Indonesian Criminal Code (KUHP) concerning participation, Article 170 KUHP concerning group assault, and Articles 1(2) and 7(1)(a) of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), which authorize investigators to assess and determine the role of each participant. Additionally, this principle is grounded in the constitutional guarantee of justice under Article 28D(1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia and the principle of proportionality as stipulated in National Police Regulation No. 6 of 2019 on Criminal Investigation. Through the implementation of differentiated criminal liability, investigators are expected to uphold law enforcement that is fair, professional, and proportional thus preventing over-criminalization and ensuring substantive justice for all individuals involved in joint assault crimes.
Analisis Yuridis Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Komando dalam Konflik Bosnia Berdasarkan Hukum Pidana Internasional: Studi Yurisprudensi ICTY (International Criminal Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia) Tenti Ayu; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9672

Abstract

The principle of command responsibility is an important doctrine in international criminal law that allows military commanders to be held accountable for crimes committed by subordinates under their control. This doctrine is grounded in the concept of hierarchical accountability, namely the obligation of superiors to prevent, supervise, and take action against violations of international humanitarian law. This study aims to analyze the normative construction and application of the principle of command responsibility in the Bosnia conflict of 1992–1995 based on the jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY), as well as to assess its conformity with the principle of legality and the principle of culpability in international criminal law. This study employed a normative juridical method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results show that the main elements of command responsibility include the superior-subordinate relationship, effective control, and the knowledge element (knew or should have known), all of which must be proven factually. The ICTY affirmed that responsibility does not arise automatically from formal position, but rather from the actual ability to control and prevent crimes. Although there is debate regarding the limits of the interpretation of effective control and the should have known standard, the application of this doctrine in the Bosnia cases generally remained within the framework of the principles of nullum crimen sine lege and nulla poena sine culpa. These findings indicate that the principle of command responsibility in ICTY jurisprudence is consistent with the fundamental principles of international criminal law and strengthens the legitimacy of this doctrine in enforcing command criminal accountability.
Penegakan Hukum Pidana Internasional terhadap Kejahatan Perang dalam Konflik Rusia dan Ukraina Berdasarkan Statuta Roma 1998 Amelia Suci Rahmadani; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9673

Abstract

The armed conflict between Russia and Ukraine has given rise to various allegations of war crimes that have attracted the attention of the international community, particularly regarding the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement. Although Russia is not a state party to the 1998 Rome Statute, the International Criminal Court (ICC) still has an important role in prosecuting perpetrators of international crimes. This study aims to analyze the application of ICC jurisdiction to alleged war crimes in the Russia–Ukraine conflict even though Russia is not a state party to the Rome Statute, as well as to identify the juridical and political challenges in the enforcement of international criminal law. This study employed a normative legal research method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The results show that the ICC still has a basis for jurisdiction through the territorial principle based on Ukraine’s ad hoc declaration pursuant to Article 12(3) of the Rome Statute, as well as through the principle of complementarity, which places the ICC as the last resort when a state is unable or unwilling to enforce the law effectively. However, the implementation of such jurisdiction faces various challenges, including jurisdictional limitations over non-state parties, dependence on international cooperation, issues of immunity of state officials, global political dynamics, evidentiary constraints in situations of armed conflict, as well as the not yet optimal universalization of the Rome Statute. These findings indicate that the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement in the Russia–Ukraine conflict depends not only on the ICC’s normative legitimacy, but also on political support and the commitment of the international community to preventing impunity for war crimes.
Selektivitas Penuntutan Kejahatan Internasional dalam Praktik Peradilan Global: Studi Kasus Penanganan Kejahatan Perang oleh International Criminal Court Anisah Friti Anjelia; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9689

Abstract

The issue of selectivity in the prosecution of international crimes remains a crucial problem in the global criminal justice system. The establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC) through the Rome Statute aims to enforce accountability and eliminate impunity for perpetrators of serious international crimes, particularly war crimes, but in its implementation the ICC is often considered not to have applied law enforcement evenly. This study aims to examine the characteristics of selectivity in the prosecution of war crimes by the ICC, the factors that influence it, and its impact on the legitimacy of global justice. This study employed a normative legal method with statutory and case analysis approaches. The results of the study show that selectivity in prosecution is influenced by limitations in jurisdictional authority, the application of the principle of complementarity, the ICC’s dependence on state cooperation, and international political dynamics, especially those related to the role of the United Nations Security Council. These conditions are reflected in the tendency for case handling to focus on certain regions and countries, while similar alleged violations involving countries with major political influence are rarely processed to the prosecution stage. These findings indicate that selectivity in prosecution has implications for declining trust in the ICC and has the potential to weaken the effectiveness of international criminal law enforcement. Thus, this study affirms that the legitimacy of global criminal justice depends greatly on consistency, independence, and equality in the enforcement of international law.
Analisis Unsur Meluas dan Sistematis dalam Kejahatan terhadap Kemanusiaan Berdasarkan Pasal 7 Statuta Roma Yulia Tri Wahyuni; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9871

Abstract

Crimes against humanity constitute one of the most serious forms of violations of international law because they attack human dignity and the principle of protection for civilian populations. This study aimed to analyze the contextual element of “widespread or systematic” in crimes against humanity under Article 7 of the 1998 Rome Statute and its evidentiary standards in the judicial practice of the International Criminal Court (ICC). This study used a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach through the examination of doctrine, jurisprudence, and relevant international legal documents. The results showed that the element of “widespread or systematic” is a central contextual element that distinguishes crimes against humanity from ordinary criminal offenses. The “widespread” element relates to the scale and impact of attacks against many victims or a broad area, whereas the “systematic” element emphasizes the existence of an organized, planned, and coordinated pattern of conduct. In practice, the ICC assesses this element through quantitative evidence concerning the number of victims, qualitative evidence regarding patterns of planning and logistical coordination, and contextual assessment of the state policy or organization of the perpetrators. These findings also confirm the relationship between crimes against humanity and command responsibility, particularly in assessing the liability of planners or leaders for the acts of their subordinates. The conclusion of this study indicates that proving the element of “widespread or systematic” requires a combination of quantitative, qualitative, and contextual evidence so that only acts that meet the criteria of crimes against humanity can be prosecuted under international criminal law. The implications of this study emphasize the importance of contextual elements in strengthening legal protection for civilian populations and upholding the principles of individual and command accountability.
Sanksi terhadap Lembaga Peradilan Internasional sebagai Bentuk Obstruction of Justice dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Nabila Inkha Putri; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9901

Abstract

The increasing practice of unilateral sanctions imposed by states against the International Criminal Court (ICC) has the potential to disrupt the independence and effectiveness of international judicial institutions. From the perspective of international criminal law, such actions raise serious issues because they may be qualified as obstruction of justice, namely acts that impede judicial proceedings. This study aims to analyze whether sanctions against the ICC can be qualified as obstruction of justice and to examine the mechanisms of legal accountability for such actions within the framework of international law. This study used a normative legal method with a statute approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used included the 1998 Rome Statute, the United Nations Convention Against Corruption (UNCAC), and various relevant international legal literature. The results showed that the concept of obstruction of justice in international criminal law has been regulated through provisions that criminalize acts interfering with the administration of justice. Sanctions against the ICC meet the three elements of obstruction of justice, namely causing delays in legal proceedings by paralyzing court operations, being carried out with full knowledge of the impact of such actions, and aiming to interfere with the administration of justice to protect citizens from criminal accountability. This action violates the principle of judicial independence, creates impunity, and leaves victims without access to justice. Thus, this study emphasizes the importance of strengthening protection for international justice through the activation of blocking statutes and the solidarity of States Parties in order to safeguard the independence, effectiveness, and legitimacy of the International Criminal Court.
Penegakan Hukum terhadap Kejahatan Genosida dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Internasional Vallent Margaretha; Dwi Putri Lestarika
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.9940

Abstract

The crime of genocide is one of the most serious international crimes because it threatens the survival of human groups and the stability of global peace, as regulated in the 1948 Genocide Convention and strengthened through the existence of the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the 1998 Rome Statute as a permanent judicial institution for prosecuting individual criminal responsibility. This study aimed to analyze the mechanisms of law enforcement against the crime of genocide from the perspective of international criminal law, identify the obstacles encountered, and assess its effectiveness in realizing global justice. This study used a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through an examination of international legal instruments, expert doctrines, and international judicial practice. The results showed that although the international legal framework is normatively quite comprehensive in regulating the prosecution of genocide, its implementation still faces various obstacles, including the limited jurisdiction of the ICC, which is not yet universal, the application of the principle of complementarity that depends on the willingness of states, and dependence on international cooperation in the law enforcement process. In addition, global political dynamics, including the influence of major powers and the role of the United Nations Security Council, also affect the prosecution process, thereby potentially creating selectivity in law enforcement. Thus, this study confirms the existence of a gap between ideal legal norms and the reality of international criminal law enforcement practice, which affects the effectiveness of handling the crime of genocide and the level of trust of the international community in the global justice system.
Co-Authors Adillah Dwi Rahmadani Ajah Mas Tati Yarti Aldi Prasetiawan Saputra Aliya Perawita Amelia Suci Rahmadani Ana Ilmadan Sari Anisah Friti Anjelia Anjar Rusadi Asep Suherman Asep Suherman Ashar Fawazy Aulia Alayna Suvil Ayu Putriyana Betrilia, Betrilia Caca Khairunnisa Cahaya Dwi Anggola Dea Eryan Ananda Dendi Saputra Devina Qhosani Deyan Ajian Putra Efti Restiana Ega Anjellika Elsa Ramadhana Faris Meode Togatorop Fatur Rahman Hadi Firanica Prawita Firdaus Firdaus Gema Fajar Fitriansyah Gibran, Raihan Malana Grace Oktavia Nababan Gun Ramajayadi Ihsan Rahmat Haqiqi Indah Salsabilla Putri Kusyati Simare Mare2 M. Arif Ramadhan Marisa Putri Martiadi Juanda Muhammad Armada Muhammad Hafizh Aziz Muhammad Vazriyansyah Mutiara Deja Saputri Nabila Inkha Putri Nadia Permata Sari Nakayla Azzahwa Noval Dwi Satria Olivia Sugiarti Praja Ganda Agung Rafflie Julio Marcelino Rego Bangkito Rio Andrian Saputra, Rifqi Daffa Sela Monika Selpa Rosa Lenda Sudirman Sitepu Susi Ramadhani Sutra Oktaviani Tapu Oktalina Nababan Tenti Ayu Tiara Okta Yanti Vallent Margaretha Wanda Darma Putra Wefy Efticha Sary Wevy Efticah Sary Wevy Efticha Sary Wevy Sari Yulia Tri Wahyuni Zalkia Salsabila