Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.116
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Mizan (e-Journal) Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Society: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat DAS SEIN: Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum dan Humaniora Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara JUSTITIABLE - Jurnal Hukum Universitas Bojonegoro Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Pelayanan Masyarakat Journal of Strafvodering Indonesian Lex Scientia Law Review Journal of Strafvordering Indonesian Journal of Law, Human Rights, Immigration, and Corrections
Ramadhan Usman
Universitas Negeri Gorontalo
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 14 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

 1   2 
International Legal Regulations on Coastal Conservation of Coastal Boundary Lands Across National Borders in the Digital Era Dolot Alhasni Bakung; Zainal Abdul A. Hadju; Yassine Chami; Sri Nanang Meiske; Ramadhan Usman
Lex Scientia Law Review Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): November, 2025: Law, Policy, and Governance in Contemporary Socio-Economic Tran
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/lslr.v9i2.12719

Abstract

The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) provides a comprehensive legal framework for protecting and preserving the marine environment, including coastal areas. This study examines the application of international legal regulations regarding coastal conservation and jurisdictional management of coastal lands between Indonesia and Malaysia in the digital era. Employing a normative and qualitative approach, the research analyzes secondary data from legal materials of both countries, using a comparative method to identify similarities, differences, and points of convergence between their legal systems. In Indonesia, digital transformation by the Ministry of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning/National Land Agency has enhanced transparency and efficiency in land management; however, policy adjustments are still needed for effective coastal ecosystem protection. Meanwhile, Malaysia, with its long and erosion-prone coastline, has implemented various laws and policies, including Coastal Zone Management (CZM), to address issues such as erosion and pollution. Although both countries face similar challenges and opportunities, their approaches differ. Indonesia needs to optimize its policies to effectively protect coastal ecosystems, while Malaysia requires adjustments in implementing its existing laws and policies. Challenges such as overlapping jurisdictional authority, funding limitations, and the need for stakeholder involvement remain significant obstacles. Therefore, successful coastal land management in both countries requires better integration of legal policies, environmental conservation efforts, and digital technology to achieve sustainable outcomes.
Education Assistance and Legal Consultation Related to Community Legal Protection in Digital Transactions Kurniawan, Heru; Dungga, Weny Almorafid; Muhamad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir; Apripari; Elfikri, Nurul Fazri; Amrain, Fitran; Usman, Ramadhan; Daud, Akbar Hidayatullah
Society : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): Mei
Publisher : Edumedia Solution

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55824/0f5y7z02

Abstract

The development of digital technology has encouraged the increasing use of electronic transactions in various walks of life, including in rural areas. However, the rapid utilization of digital transactions has not been balanced with an adequate level of public understanding of the law, causing various legal risks such as online fraud, misuse of personal data, and legal uncertainty in electronic agreements. This community service activity aims to improve the legal literacy of the community through educational assistance and legal consultation related to legal protection in digital transactions. The method used is in the form of legal counseling and direct consultation held in Mekar Jaya village, Duhiadaa District, Pohuwato Regency, involving village officials and the general public. The results of the activities show that the public has been actively using digital transaction services, but still has a limited understanding of the legal rights and obligations as digital consumers. Through practical and contextual education, people are beginning to understand the importance of personal data protection, the validity of electronic agreements, and dispute resolution mechanisms in digital transactions. This legal assistance and consultation proved to be effective in increasing the legal awareness of the public and strengthening their position in facing the risks of digital transactions. This activity is expected to contribute to creating a secure, fair, and equitable digital transaction ecosystem, as well as being a model for sustainable legal service in the era of digital transformation.
The Practice Of Deligitimization Decisions Court Due to The Intersection Of Judicial Review in Indonesia Supriyadi A Arief; Sofyan Piyo; Ramadhan Usman; Janwar Hippy; Irlan Puluhulawa
Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Vol 9 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jlpt.v9i2.10120

Abstract

The Post-Decision Intersection Between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in Indonesia. The Constitutional Court Decision No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024 and the Supreme Court Decision No. 23/P/HUM/2024, both addressing the age eligibility requirements for candidacy in the 2024 simultaneous regional elections, have reignited tensions between two branches of judicial power. This tension is further exacerbated by the decision of the House of Representatives (DPR), through a Working Committee meeting, to favor the Supreme Court’s ruling. This study aims to analyze the extent of the intersection between the Supreme Court (MA) and the Constitutional Court (MK) by examining their respective decisions. The analysis adopts a normative approach, relying on secondary data as the primary source, supported by statutory, case law, and conceptual approaches to address the core issues. The findings reveal that the overlap between the Supreme Court and the Constitutional Court in conducting judicial reviews of regulations has led to delegitimization between Supreme Court Decision No. 23/P/HUM/2024 and Constitutional Court Decision No. 70/PUU-XXII/2024. To address this issue, both courts must exercise judicial restraint, particularly regarding substantive matters with potential overlap between their jurisdictions. Such restraint is essential to prevent external parties or institutions from exploiting court decisions to advance their institutional agendas, thereby avoiding unnecessary institutional conflicts.
Penguatan Pembentukan Hukum Demokratis: Analisis Kelayakan Penerapan Mekanisme Public Inquiry di Indonesia Mohamad Rivaldi Moha; Ramadhan Usman; Usman Rasyid; Dicky Andika Rauf; Muhammad Iqbal Mustapa
Eksekusi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Eksekusi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Administrasi (STIA) Yappi Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/eksekusi.v4i1.2503

Abstract

This study examines the structural weaknesses of public participation in Indonesia’s legislative process and evaluates the feasibility of adopting a public inquiry mechanism to strengthen Evidence-Based lawmaking. Although the 1945 Constitution and Law Number 13 of 2022 formally guarantee public involvement, existing parliamentary hearings and public consultations remain largely procedural and fail to meet deliberative democratic standards. This condition raises urgent concerns regarding legislative legitimacy, transparency, and the substantive use of public input. The research employs a normative-comparative approach combined with juridical-empirical analysis. It analyzes Indonesia’s participatory legal framework and compares it with public inquiry models in the United Kingdom, Australia, and New Zealand, focusing on institutional independence, transparency, and investigative authority. Empirical assessment of legislative practices reveals a persistent gap between normative guarantees and practical implementation, resulting in symbolic participation with limited policy impact. Comparative findings demonstrate that public inquiry mechanisms can enhance deliberative quality and accountability through systematic evaluation of evidence. The study concludes that a hybrid public inquiry model integrating parliamentary procedures with independent expert panels is legally and institutionally feasible, provided that regulatory reform, institutional capacity building, and political safeguards are effectively implemented.
Co-Authors Agung Prayuda Yahya Agung Prayuda Yahya Ainurrafiqa Pelupessy Akbar Hidayatullah Daud Akbar Hidayatullah Daud Akbar Hidayatullah Daud Apripari, Apripari Dicky Andika Rauf Dolot Alhasni Bakung Dungga, Weny Almorafid Fitran Amrain Frans Reumi Frans Reumi, Frans Hasnia Hasnia Heru Kurniawan Irlan Puluhulawa Janwar Hippy Janwar Hippy Karolus Kopong Medan Karolus Kopong Medan Mohamad Rivaldi Moha Muhamad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir Muhammad Iqbal Mustapa Muhammad Khairun Kurniawan Kadir Nur Insani Aulia Nurul Fazri Elfikri Pelupessy, Ainurrafiqa Sofyan Piyo Sri Nanang Meiske Supriyadi A Arief Supriyadi A Arief Usman Rasyid Yassine Chami Zainal Abdul A. Hadju Zainal abdul aziz hadju Zamroni Abdussamad