Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.46
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam WAJAH HUKUM Suluah Bendang: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Kordinat : Jurnal Komunikasi antar Perguruan Tinggi Agama Islam PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Humantech : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Indonesia Constitutionale Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA) Limbago: Journal of Constitutional Law JISIP UNJA (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Ilmu Politik Universitas Jambi) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bangsa Jurnal Pengabdian Sosial Joong-Ki Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Mentari Joong-Ki
Prasna, Adeb Davega
Universitas Jambi
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 25 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Constitutionale

 1 
The Reinstatement of Repealed Norms: A Paradox in Post–Constitutional Court Legislative Practice Prasna, Adeb Davega; Putri, Adelia; Yarni, Meri
Constitutionale Vol 6 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/constitutionale.v6i2.4734

Abstract

The Constitutional Court is authorized to review statutes against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia,, and its decisions are final and binding. However, the absence of an explicit prohibition against reenacting annulled norms in Law Number 12 of 2011 in conjunction with Law Number 13 of 2022 on the Formation of Legislation creates legal uncertainty and risks weakening the authority of the Court. This study analyzes the legal implications of Constitutional Court decisions for lawmakers in regulating a prohibition on reenacting revoked norms within the framework of the rule of law. Using a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the study finds that Constitutional Court decisions are erga omnes and obligate lawmakers to follow up through amendment, revocation, or normative adjustment. The absence of explicit regulation enables the recurrence of unconstitutional norms and undermines constitutional supremacy. Therefore, clear statutory provisions prohibiting the reenactment of annulled norms are necessary to strengthen legal certainty and preserve the authority of Constitutional Court decisions.
Co-Authors Abdil Azizul Furqon Alissa, Evalina Amalianita, Berru Ana Ramadhona Asmu'i Asmu'i Asmu'i, Asmu'i Atik Yuliyani Azzahrah, Shabrina Balqis, Adinda Rahma Bustanuddin . Dadi Darmadi Dhyta, Nova Bela Eka Pratiwi Erwin Erwin Furqon, Abdil Azizul Hsb, Nurul Laylan Irwandi Irwandi Irwandi Irwandi juliani, lauri Kosariza Kosariza Kosariza, Kosariza Kusaini, Utami Niki Latifah Amir M. Yogi Riyantama Isjoni Makyun Subuki Marifatur, Ezra Meri Yarni Muliono, Muliono Nababan, Simson Heskia Nafisah, Aqilah NURSARI, DELLA Nys Arfa Putri, Adelia Qodri, Muhammad Amin Rahmawati, Nurlaili Rakhmawati, Dessy Rema Syelvita Rifqi Febrian Rona Indara SAPUTRA, BENY Sari, Kiki Angela Siregar, Elizabeth Suhermi, Suhermi Tambun, Abigail Citra Tama Yetniwati Yetniwati