Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 66 Documents
Search
Journal : USU LAW JOURNAL

ANALISIS YURIDIS KEDUDUKAN BADAN PENGAWAS PASAR MODAL (BAPEPAM) SETELAH BERLAKUNYA UNDANG-UNDANG NO. 21 TAHUN 2011 TENTANG OTORITAS JASA KEUANGAN Susi Muliyanti; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmul Siregar; Utary Maharany Barus
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 1, No 2 (2013)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (552.016 KB)

Abstract

The roles of Capital Market Supervisory Agency (Badan Pengawas Pasar Modal – Bapepam) are to guide, rule and supervise capital market. The issuance of Law on Financial Service Authority takes over the authorities of the Capital Market Supervisory. The establishment of Financial Service Authority is mandated by Article 34 of Law on Bank Indonesia as an independent institution which regulates and supervises all financial service sectors by applying an unified supervisory model which separates the regulating and supervising tasks. Prior to the issuance of Law on Financial Service Authority, financial service sectors in capital market are supervised by Capital Market Supervisory Agency which is structurally still under the coordination of Ministry of Finance so that its authorities are still limited and result in the high number of cases of capital market which cannot be addressed effectively. Since Capital Market Supervisory Agency needs to be independent, it prefers to transform and merge into Financial Service Authority. It is suggested that laws related to banking, capital market, the Deposit Insurance Agency (Lembaga Penjamin Simpanan – LPS) need to be harmonized to prevent overlapping in their authorities. Therefore, Draft Bill on UUPM needs to be passed immediately because Capital Market Supervisory Agency has emerged into Financial Service Authority while UUPM still regulates the authorities of Capital Market Supervisory Agency. Financial Service Authority has to make regulations related to investigative authorities to address cases of capital market properly.
PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PERPAJAKAN MELALUI PENERAPAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 8 TAHUN 2010 TENTANG PENCEGAHAN DAN PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA PENCUCIAN UANG Suranta Ramses Tarigan; Syafruddin Kalo; Bismar Nasution; Sunarmi Sunarmi
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (457.305 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Tax is the biggest revenue resources for a country. Tax criminal act results in inflicting loss to the country itself. Law on tax has been amended for three times until the enactment of Law No.28/2007 as the Third Amendment of Law No.6/1983 on General Provision and Taxation Procedures. The other law that can be applied as the form of seriousness in preventing and eradicating tax crimes is through the application of Law No.8/2010 on Money Laundering Perevention and Eradication as the policy of government to prevent and eradicate the criminals especially the tax criminals that they cannot practice money launderinh anymore. Keywords: Tax Criminal Act,  Money Laundering Criminal Act
ANALISIS HUKUM TERHADAP INVESTOR INSTITUSIONAL SEBAGAI SALAH SATU PENENTU FAKTA MATERIL DALAM PRINSIP KETERBUKAAN DI PASAR MODAL Efendi Tambunan; Bismar Nasution; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmul Siregar
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 2 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (453.038 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT   Capital market  is one part of the financial market, that are important for national development in general , especially for the development of the business as an alternative source of external financing by company. The stock market will always have ups and downs , as indicated by the signs of bullish or bearish , which is influenced by  information or material facts. There are three principles that must be adhered to in the capital market , namely disclosure ( transparency ) , fairness ( honesty ) , investors protection. The results of the study led to the conclusion that material information under the Capital Market Law  are, first, information or  relevant facts regarding the events.  Second , the fact that can affect the price of securities  and or decisions of investors. Other conclusion is information about the entry of institutional investors to trade in the stock market is a material fact , because it can affect the price (which is reflected in the rise and fall of Composite Index) , and also affects other investors to trade . Key words : Investor Institutional , Material Fact, Principle of  Transparency
ANALISIS PERMOHONAN PAILIT TERHADAP PERSEROAN TERBATAS OLEH TENAGA KERJA (STUDI PUTUSAN PENGADILAN DALAM PERKARA ANTARA ROHANI,DKK MELAWAN PT. INDAH PONTJAN) Manambus Pasaribu; Bismar Nasution; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmul Siregar
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (390.187 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The result of this research show that Legally binding verdict of  Industrial Dispute Settlement Court penalized employers to pay workers' basic rights / labor is debt in a broad sense. Legally binding verdict of  Industrial Dispute Settlement Court but remains unimplemented can be submitted as the basis of request for bankruptcy and it  is not a premature request as well as does not violate nebis in idem. Legal consideration of judges was appropriate based on the legal facts, definition of debt, the maturity of debt, the presence of two or more creditors and the implementation of simple evidentiary principle. Meanwhile, Supreme Court both in Cassation and the Reconsideration did not refer to the definition of debt in a broader sense, the debt has matured, the presence of two or more creditors and implementation of a simple evidence. Judges of the Supreme Court both in Cassation and Reconsideration was very subjective, tends to formality matters, as well as was not substantive  in making of verdict.
PELAKSANAAN RESTRUKTURISASI KREDIT MACET BERDASARKAN PERATURAN BANK INDONESIA DAN HAMBATANNYA PADA PT BANK RAKYAT INDONESIA CABANG BINJAI Novrilanimisy Novrilanimisy; Tan Kamello; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Dedi Harianto
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (423.102 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Bank Indonesia through the Regulation of Bank Indonesia No. 14/15/PBI/2012 on the Assessment on the Asset Quality of Commercial Bank. Credit restructuring is an attempt of a Bank to handle debtors who get difficulty in paying off their debts by decreasing interest rate, extending credit term, reducing the arrears of bank interest, reducing bank main arrears, increasing credit facility, and/or conversing credit to temporary equity. Bank Rakyat Indonesia also issued guidelines for handling credit through credit restructuring,based on the Circulation Letter of PT Bank Rakyat Indonesia No. S.12-DIR/ADK/5/2013. The parameter for determining non-performing credit which is worthy of getting restructuring is the debtors who get difficulty in paying off principal or credit interest and they should have good business prospect and are able to pay off their debt after it has been restructured. Some obstacles faced by Bank Rakyat Indonesia Cabang Binjai are as follows: debtors are difficult to cooperate, debtors are not transparent in conducting negotiation, Bank gets difficulty in approaching debtors since they are not cooperative, the content of the restructuring is not complied according to what has been agreed, credit restructuring is not supported by the information about the complete document about debtors’ businesses, and Bank finds it difficult to directly control debtors’ businesses. Keywords : Credit restructuring, Bank, non-performing credit
PERAN AUDITOR INDEPENDEN DALAM MELAKUKAN PEMERIKSAAN LAPORAN KEUANGAN PERSEROAN SEBAGAI UPAYA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMEGANG SAHAM DARI ITIKAD BURUK DIREKSI Omar Akbar Aldian Pinem; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Keizerina Devi Azwar; Mahmul Siregar
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (343.947 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Board of directors has an obligation to make an annual report and financial report as the responsibility of the board of directors to stock holders. The audit on financial report functions to guarantee the content of the reports which have been presented properly and in accordance with the general accountancy principle. The presentation of correct financial report is an attempt to protect the interest of stock holders of a certain company. The legal provisions have regulated the implementation of audit on financial report of a company in Indonesia which is an attempt to guarantee the naturalness of the report. An Auditor is a professional who provides his service to gather auditing evidence as the support in expressing his idea on the naturalness of a financial report. An auditor is responsible for his profession, criminal law, administration, and civil law on what he says when it harms other people. The presentation of accurate and true financial statement is a good will of direction in manage the company while manipulation of content of financial statement that cause the loss to the shareholder is a bad will of direction in manage the company that can be prevented by auditing on financial statement. Auditor has a role to appraise the presented financial statement by fulfill the transparancy and accountability as protection to be interest of shareholder especially on the interest or oppeness of material information and in order obtain the accurate statement.. Keywords: Financial Report, Audit, and Protection for Stock Holders
PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN TERHADAP NASABAH ATAS PENYIMPANAN BARANG DI SAFE DEPOSIT BOX (STUDI PADA PT. BANK PANIN CABANG PEMBANTU TEBING TINGGI) Wahyu Simon Tampubolon; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Hasim Purba; Utari Maharany Barus
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 2, No 3 (2014)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (477.413 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Safe Deposit Box Service is a kind of services of lending a storage box for property orsecurities which is specifically designed from the materials steel and placed in a space that is sturdy and fireproof for maintaining the security of the things and providing a sense of security for its users. Generally, the items that are stored in a safe deposit box has a high material value and very important for the customers of safe deposit box. Since the interest of people to use the safe deposit boxis high, it is a need to have any rules that protects the customers of safe deposit boxagainst the losses in case of lost or destruction of things stored in the safe deposit box. The bank must provide liability related to the lost or destructions of the thingsstored in the safe deposit box offered by the bank, and also it is a needed to have a special ruleswhich regulating the safe deposit box facilities as well as the resolving disputes related to the used of safe deposit box facilities, so there is a legal form of protection which can be a legal umbrella for the customer and the bank since both parties have a balanced position. Therefore there will be no aggrieved parties associated to the storage agreement of safe deposit box.
PELAKSANAANEKSEKUSIPUTUSAN PENGADILANDALAMPERKARA PERDATA TERHADAP ASET BUMN Charles Silalahi; Bismar Nasution; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Mahmul Siregar
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (514.427 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT   State Owned Enterprises (SOE) is a business entity wholly or largely owned by the state capital through direct investments from sovereign wealth pengaturanya separated and regulated in Law No. 19 Year 2003 on SOEs and the Law No. 40 Year 2007 About the Company Limited. But there are many cases of failure by not executed a civil suit over the object of wealth owned by the Court was interpreting SOE’s property is state property that is subject to the law of the State Treasury. Regulation of Wealth Owned Enterprises as a form of wealth separated state regulated in Law Number 19 Year 2003 regarding SOEs and Law No. 40 of 2007 on Limited Liability Companies. Wealth Enterprises is the object Civil Lawsuit Case. When the state capital in the form of shares included in the Persero of wealth separated state, for the sake of intellectual property law becomes Persero. No longer the nation's wealth. This is based on Article 1 (1) and figure (2) jis Article 1 (10) and Article 4 paragraph (1) of state-owned enterprises, as well as Article 1 (1) in conjunction with Article 7, paragraph (7) letter a of Law PT also principles of law 'separate legal entity', wealth separated state and are included as capital assets Persero Persero. Consequently all the wealth obtained either through the inclusion of the country as well as those derived from business activities Persero, by law, a wealth Persero itself. Analysis of the Supreme Court delayed the execution of the provisions referring to Law. 1 of 2004 on State Treasury, Article 1 number 10, 11 and 50 then there is a conflict of laws (antinomie) the rule of law. This is an issue that the Supreme Court ruling execution can not be carried out above. To complete the 'antinomie' rule of law courts should use a "preference principle of law ', namely: (1) Lex superiority derogat legi inferiori (legislation higher higher level defeating legislation below), (2) Lex posteriori derogat legi priori (new legislation which beat the old legislation), and (3) Lex derogat legi generali specialist (special legislation defeated general legislation). There are several related attitudes 'antinomie', namely: (1) denial (disavowal), (2) reinterpretation, (3) revocation (invalidation), and (4) recovery (remedy).   Key Words: Execution, Civil Case, SOE Assets
HAK DAN KEWAJIBAN KURATOR PASCA PUTUSAN PEMBATALAN PAILIT PADA TINGKAT KASASI OLEH MAHKAMAH AGUNG (STUDI KASUS KEPAILITAN PT. TELKOMSEL VS PT. PRIMA JAYA INFORMATIKA) Sukses M. P. Siburian; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Utary Maharany Barus; Jelly Leviza
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 1 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (549.239 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT The Ruling of the Supreme Court on the case of PT. Telkomsel, the Supreme Court does not specify the compensation for the curator, whereas it has stipulated by the panel of judges of the Supreme Court. The objective of the research was to answer the problems about the right and obligation of a curator, the regulation on the compensation for a curator, and the right and obligation of a curator after the Ruling on the cancelation of bankruptcy in the cassation level by the Supreme Court on the case of PT. Telkomsel vs. PT. Prima Jaya Informatika was stipulated. Curator’s task is to manage and/or to settle bankruptcy property, while his right is to get compensation for his service through a judge’s verdict. According to UUKPKPU, the compensation for a curator’s service is charged to the petitioner and the debtor of the bankruptcy; but, according to Kepmen No. M.09-HT.05.10/1998, it is charged to a debtor. According to Permenkumham No. 1/2013, it is charged to the petitioner of the bankruptcy.  After the ruling on the cancellation of bankruptcy in the cassation level on the case of PT. Telkomsel is specified, the obligation of the curator was to announce the ruling in the cassation in the news of the Republic of Indonesia, at least in two daily newspapers. Under the law, a curator’s right should be specified in a judge’s verdict; but, in reality it is not stipulated in the Supreme Court’s Ruling. Keywords: Right, Obligation, Curator, Bankruptcy
ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NO: 124K/ TUN/2013, TENTANG TERBITNYA IZIN MENDIRIKAN BANGUNAN DI ATAS TANAH YANG MASIH DALAM SENGKETA DI PENGADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA MEDAN Deliana Simanjuntak; Budiman Ginting; Sunarmi Sunarmi; Jusmadi Sikumbang
USU LAW JOURNAL Vol 3, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Universitas Sumatera Utara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (541.479 KB)

Abstract

ABSTRACT Building permits rising over disputed land in State Administrative Court Medan. Before the building permit is issued, Plaintiff reported to the local office of spatial and building code field on the status of the land is still in the process of law (debatable), but the Agency for Spatial and building overlook the claimant report, which should Spatial Agency and the building had to postpone publication Building permit because there are reports plaintiff. Then Building permit issuance is not in accordance with the Decree Mayor of Medan No. 34/2002 junto Regional Regulation of Medan No. 5/2012 about Retribution Building permits, Article 13, point (b) Issuance of Building Permit may be delayed if there are complaints about land disputes or no legal proceedings in the building or land, either in written form or orally. The judges made a different decision: Administrative Court of Medan to cancel the building permit, and the State Administrative High Court of Medan supports the decision  the Administrative Court of Medan, but the verdict of the Supreme Court rejected the verdict Administrative High Court of Medan rejected the lawsuit and the Plaintiff. The verdict difference need to be analyzed and researched to find the correct legal value. Keywords: Issuance of Building Permit on a Disputed Land
Co-Authors Aben Bintang Manondang Situmorang Ade Nona Halawa Ade Yuliany Siahaan Adi Saputra Adji Suryapranata Agnest Elga Margareth Agung Anugrah Lubis Agusmidah Agusmidah Aida Nur Hasanah Alemina Alemina Aloysius Supriyadi Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Alvi Syahrin Amanda Serena Andreas Iriando Napitupulu Anthonius Ginting Arfin Fachreza Ashri Azhari Baeha Aulia Annisa Bagus Firman Wibowo Balqis Siagian Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution Bismar Nasution BUDIMAN GINTING Chandra Purnama Charles Silalahi Citra Valentina Nainggolan Dara Qurratu’ Aini Yusuf Dede Aquari Irawan Surbakti Dedi Harianto Delfani Febryana Lubis Deliana Simanjuntak Dezky Muji Setyo Diah Ayu Oktriningsih Dwi Putri Rezky Sihite Edi Yunara Ediwarman Ediwarman Edy Ikhsan Edy Suranta Tarigan Edy Yunara Efendi Tambunan Ekaputra Ekaputra Ekaputra, Mohammad Endame Suranta Ginting Eri Lukmanul Hakim Pulungan Faisal Akbar Faisal Akbar Nasution Faisal Anshari Dwana Fatimah Islamy Nasution Ferawati Br.Tarigan Fernando Enrico Fermi Partahi Finita Serena Hutabarat Fitri Yanni Dewi Siregar Frans B.S. Siagian Frengky Manurung Gusfen Alextron Simangunsong Hady Saputra Siagian Hanifah Azizah Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasim Purba Hasyim Purba Hendra Adiwijaya Hendra Eko Triyulianto Hermoko Febriyanto Ilham Rohjadina Iman Rahmat Gulo Imastian Chairandy Siregar Indah Chairani Saragih Indra Sakti Iqbal Ramadhan Satria Prawira Ismawansa Ismawansa Ivan Jovi Hutauruk Jelly Leviza Jenda Riahta Silaban Jhordy M.H. Nainggolan Jimmy Donovan Joharlan Hutagalung Juni Kristian Telaumbanua Jusmadi Sikumbang Kamaluddin Pane Keizerina Devi Keizerina Devi Azwar Kristi Emelia Pasaribu Kuo Bratakusuma Laurentia Ayu Kartika Putri Lisa Andriansyah Rizal M Febriyandri Satria M Yamin Lubis M. Adityo Andri Cahyo Prabowo M. Ekaputra M. Hamdan M. Hamdan M. Ichsan Rouyas Sitorus M. Ulul Azmi Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Madiasa Ablisar Mahmud Mulyadi MAHMUL SIREGAR Manambus Pasaribu Maranatha Purba Marlina Marlina Marlina, Marlina Martuasah Tobing Mayanti Mandasari Sitorus Melati Fitri Mhd Edwin Prananta Surbakti Mirza Nasution Muhammad Aulia Rizki Agsa Muhammad Ekaputra Muhammad Firdaus Muhammad Hamdan Muhammad Haris Muhammad Hendra Razak Muhammad Husairi Muhammad Iqbal Muhammad Ridwanta Tarigan Muhammad Syarif Muhammad Zhafran Nanda Lucya Gultom Nanin Aprilia Fitriani Novrilanimisy Novrilanimisy Nur Istiono Nurjannah Siregar O.K Saidin Omar Akbar Aldian Pinem Prayogo Hindrawan Putra Rizki Akbar Rachmat Aribowo Rahmat Anshar Hasibuan Ridho Ansari Simanjuntak Rina Alamanda Nasution Robert, Robert Ruben Tambunan Rudi Haposan Siahaan Rudy Rudy Rumondang Hotmayuliance N Runtung Runtung Selatieli Zendrato Sheila Miranda Hasibuan Simon Simon Sinulingga, Tommy Aditia Sondy Raharjanto Sri Endhayani Ginting Suka Sudarma Setiawan Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhaidi Suhdi Maulana Nst Suherman Nasution Sukarja, Detania Sukses M. P. Siburian, Sukses M. P. Sumurung P Simaremare Suranta Ramses Tarigan Surtan Harista Muda Hasibuan Surya Ari Wibowo Susi Muliyanti Sutan Sinomba Parlaungan Harahap Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Sutiarnoto Syafruddin Kalo Syafruddin Sulung Hasibuan T Keizerina Devi Azwar T. Devi Keizerina Azwar T. Keizerina Devi Azwar Tamiarisa Amanda Fasa Rambe Tan Kamello Taryono Raharja Taufik Taufik Tedi Franggoes Andri Siburian Tengku Keizerina Devi Teuku Fathir Mustafa Tri Murti Lubis Tumpal Utrecht Napitupulu Tunggul Yohannes Ucox Pratua Nugraha Utari Maharany Barus Utary Maharani Barus Utary Maharany Barus Venia Utami Keliat Vina Trinanda Dewi Wahyu Simon Tampubolon Widodo Ramadhana Yahya Ziqra Zam Zam Jamilah Zulkarnain Zulkarnain