Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 32 Documents
Search

Reconstructing Civic Education in the Context of National Identity and Cultural Pluralism: A Conceptual Study Bambang Afriadi; Fitri Fitri
International Education Trend Issue Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): International Education Trend Issue (January–June)
Publisher : PT. BATARI EDU CALYA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ieti.v3i1.1052

Abstract

This article discusses efforts to reconstruct civic education within the multicultural, democratic, and dynamic context of Indonesia. Using a qualitative approach with a literature study method, this study traces the development of citizenship concepts from a legal-formal dimension toward a paradigm of active, critical, and transformative citizenship. The research analyzes various theories of citizenship, character education, and multiculturalism relevant to the reform needs of civic education in the global era. The findings indicate that civic education in Indonesia needs to be reconstructed from an indoctrination model to a reflective and contextual learning model. This process includes strengthening Pancasila values, fostering critical awareness, developing global citizenship competencies, and managing cultural pluralism inclusively. Thus, civic education can serve as a strategic vehicle in shaping intelligent, democratic, tolerant citizens who care about national and humanitarian life.
Generative AI as a Learning Scaffold for Indonesia’s National Criminal Code Fitri Fitri; Bambang Afriadi
PERFECT EDUCATION FAIRY Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): PERFECT EDUCATION FAIRY (on progres)
Publisher : PT. Batari Edu Calya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/pef.v4i3.1587

Abstract

Indonesia’s National Criminal Code (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana, KUHP), enacted through Law No. 1 of 2023, became effective on 2 January 2026, creating a new learning environment in which students must master recently operative statutory rules while generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is already embedded in everyday academic practice. This study examines the perceived pedagogical utility of GenAI for learning the KUHP among 82 university students studying in Jakarta who were surveyed during January-February 2026. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design combined ten five-point Likert items with three open-ended questions. Seven items measured AI-supported learning utility, two measured source-verification literacy, and one measured overall perceived effectiveness. The seven-item learning-utility scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = .943) and a mean of 3.68 (SD = .76, 95% CI [3.51, 3.85]). Students rated AI most positively for explaining previously difficult KUHP provisions (M = 3.84), while ratings were lower for identifying the legally relevant provision in a case (M = 3.56) and strengthening legal argumentation (M = 3.57). Learning utility correlated strongly with overall perceived effectiveness (Spearman rho = .721, p < .001), as did verification literacy (rho = .755, p < .001). In an exploratory ordered-logit model, both standardized learning utility (OR = 6.54, p < .001) and verification literacy (OR = 8.84, p < .001) independently predicted higher overall effectiveness ratings after adjustment for semester group. Open-ended responses emphasized simplified understanding, case application, and faster information access, but also indicated the need for official-source verification. The findings support a bounded pedagogical role for GenAI: it is most defensible as a scaffold for explanation, examples, and formative feedback, not as a substitute for statutory reading or independent legal judgment.