Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Politics and Democracy

Analisis Pelanggaran Kode Etik Anggota KPPS pada Pilgub Sumbar Tahun 2020 Sumarni, Sumarni; Zetra, Aidinil; Putri, Indah Adi
Journal of Politics and Democracy Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Politics and Democracy (September)
Publisher : Indonesian Democracy Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61183/polikrasi.v3i1.22

Abstract

The phenomenon of voting ballots with a pen carried out by voters at TPS 1 in Salak Village, Sawahlunto City, in the 2020 West Sumatra Governor Election caused problems with the performance of KPPS officers. KPPS members were declared to have violated the code of ethics and received a written warning from the KPU of Sawahlunto City. This study aims to describe the process by which members of the KPPS violated the code of ethics at TPS 1 Salak Village and analyze the causal factors. Data analysis uses the theories of election fraud and election malpractice. This research uses a qualitative descriptive approach with a case study method. The results showed that the KPPS violated the code of ethics at TPS 1 in Salak Village due to: The KPPS members' non-compliance with the rules, namely, "preparing TPS" before starting the voting process. Violations occurred due to the negligence of KPPS officers in providing voting tools in the voting booth. The lack of knowledge of voters regarding the correct regulation of ballot voting procedures Factors causing violations of the code of ethics of KPPS members at TPS 1 in Salak Village: The violation occurred because the KPPS was unable to work professionally. KPPS's human resources are poor at understanding regulations. PTPS supervision is weak. The lack of coordination between KPPS officers and PTPS, PPS, and PPK. Limited resources and training for KPPS.
Analisis Fungsi Komisi Pemilihan Umum Kabupaten Bengkulu Utara dalam Sosialisasi Pemilihan Bupati dan Wakil Bupati Tahun 2020 Jayanti, Hevi Dwi; Zetra, Aidinil; Asrinaldi, Asrinaldi
Journal of Politics and Democracy Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Journal of Politics and Democracy (September)
Publisher : Indonesian Democracy Research Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61183/polikrasi.v3i1.23

Abstract

The election of the Regent and Deputy Regent in 2020 in the midst of a pandemic which resulted in socialization activities being delayed and there were several obstacles to delays in the implementation of the socialization, namely the PSBB which made it difficult for the KPU to gather the community to carry out election socialization. And what's more, in North Bengkulu Regency, there are many areas that are isolated and have poor infrastructure. Responding to this obstacle, North Bengkulu Regency KPU took quick steps to add a mode of implementation of the socialization, namely Door to Door socialization, which was carried out within 14 (fourteen) days before the D-day of the voting. The socialization was carried out by the Adhoc agency which only used assignment letters from the KPU without any SK from the KPU. This study aims to describe in detail the process of implementing community outreach by the KPU of North Bengkulu Regency in the midst of a pandemic; knowing the effectiveness of Door to Door socialization as a form of the effectiveness of the institution's function in the socialization function, this mode will be used as a new solutive mode in the socialization stage. The research method used is qualitative, in the form of a case study research type. Data collection techniques are in-depth interviews, as well as documentation. Selection of research informants using purposive sampling technique. The theory used is Institutional Effectiveness according to Christopher C Hood. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of socialization by North Bengkulu Regency KPU is effective only on participation tools, while 3 other tools namely regulations, incentives and law enforcement show ineffective results. Implementation of Door to Door socialization which is used as a new method, also gives ineffective results from the factor of resource capacity as seen from the culture of the system; and accountability factors as seen from the executive report