Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
9.735
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal KEADILAN PROGRESIF Jurnal Pranata Hukum Jurnal Panorama Hukum Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) YUSTISI WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Suara Keadilan Pagaruyuang Law Journal PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI UNTAG Law Review Progressive Law Review BERNAS: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Yustisi: Jurnal Hukum dan Hukum Islam JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) PERAHU (PENERANGAN HUKUM) : JURNAL ILMU HUKUM Keadilan Jurnal Res Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum MAQASIDI Shautuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Perbandingan Mazhab Case Law Jurnal Gagasan Hukum JAPHTN-HAN Audi Et AP : Jurnal Penelitian Hukum QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia LEX SUPERIOR Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ) Journal of Law, Education and Business JIM: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Sejarah Journal of Education Religion Humanities and Multidiciplinary Jurnal Pengabdian UMKM Journal of Accounting Law Communication and Technology Keadilan International Journal of Education, Vocational and Social Science SAKOLA: Journal of Sains Cooperative Learning and Law Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Journal of Health Education Law Information and Humanities
Anggalana
Universitas Bandar Lampung
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Neuroscience Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 76 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ)

 1 
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIDANA PELAKU PENGANIAYAAN SECARA BERSAMA-SAMA TERHADAP ORANG DI MUKA UMUM YANG MENYEBABKAN LUKA (Studi Perkara Nomor 6/pid.B/2018/PN Sdn Tahun 2018) andri akasi akasi; Erlina B; Anggalana Anggalana
Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ) Vol 2, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Mitra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57084/jpj.v2i2.557

Abstract

The use of violence by someone against another person is prohibited in the Criminal Law because the use of violence brings consequences in the form of injury or death. For this reason, the Criminal Code has been formulated and threatened with criminal acts in various ways and as a result of acts that use violence. The problem in this research is what are the factors that cause perpetrators of criminal acts of persecution together against people in public that cause injuries based on Case Number 6 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Sdn Year 2018, how criminal liability of perpetrators of persecution together against people in public who cause injuries based on Case Number 6 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Sdn Year 2018, how judges considerations in applying sanctions against perpetrators of persecution together against people in public who cause injuries based on Case Number 6 / Pid.B / 2018 / PN Sdn 2018. The research method uses a normative and empirical juridical approach. The type of data used is secondary data and primary data. Collecting data through library research and field research. Analysis of the data used is qualitative juridical.
PENERAPAN SANKSI PIDANA TERHADAP PELAKU TINDAK PIDANA PERCOBAAN ATAU PERMUFAKATAN JAHAT UNTUK MELAKUKAN TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA (studi putusan nomor. 17/pid.sus/2019/Gns) zainab ompu jainah; Anggalana Anggalana; Rachmad Kurniawan
Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ) Vol 3, No 1 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Mitra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57084/jpj.v3i1.560

Abstract

Based on Decision Number. 17 / Pid.Sus / 2019 / PN Gns stated that Defendant I. Supriyatno Bin Sumardi, Defendant II. Adi Wibowo Bin Kusnudin, Defendant III. Suryo Dandoko Als Koko Bin Suro and Defendant IV. Rahmad Als Towong Sanusi was legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a criminal act of jointly abusing narcotics class I for himself. The research method used normative and empirical juridical approaches. Sources of normative and empirical data. Collecting data through library research and field research. The data analysis used was qualitative juridical. The results of the research and discussion show that the factors causing the occurrence of criminal acts of trial or conspiracy to commit narcotics crime based on Decision Number: 17 / Pid.Sus / 2019 / PN Gns are due to economic factors, family environmental factors, social environmental factors and lack of understanding and appreciation and practice of religious values. The application of criminal sanctions against perpetrators of criminal trials or conspiracy to commit criminal acts of narcotics based on Decision Number: 17 / Pid.Sus / 2019 / PN Gns is to impose crimes against Defendant I. Supriyatno Bin Sumardi, Defendant II Adi Wibowo Bin Kusnudin, Defendant III. Suryo Dandoko Als Koko Bin Suro and Defendant IV. Rahmad Als Towong Sanusi, with imprisonment for 1 (one) year and 10 (ten) months respectively. The factors inhibiting the application of criminal sanctions against the perpetrators of criminal trials or conspiracy to commit the crime of narcotics are the legal factors themselves, community factors and cultural factors.
Analisis Putusan terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan (Studi Putusan Nomor 431/Pid.B/2020/PN Tjk) Yoga Saputra Alam; Erlina B; Anggalana Anggalana
Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ) Vol 2, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Universitas Mitra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57084/jpj.v2i2.732

Abstract

Abstrak Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis  pertimbangan hakim terhadap tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 431/Pid.B/2020/PN.Tjk. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwaPertimbangan hakim terhadap tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan berdasarkan Putusan Nomor: 431/Pid.B/2020/PN.Tjk terdiri atas pertimbangan yuridis, hakim mempertimbangkan bahwa perbuatan terdakwa terbukti secara sah dan meyakinkan melanggar Pasal 374 KUHP tentang tindak pidana penggelapan dalam jabatan. Pertimbangan sosiologis, hakim mempertimbangkan hal-hal yang memberatkan dan meringankan terdakwa serta peristiwa yang melatarbelakangi perbuatan pidana. Pertimbangan filosofis, hakim mempertimbangkan bahwa pemidanaan tidak hanya bertujuan untuk menimbulkan efek jera pada pelakunya tetapiKata Kunci: Putusan, Penggelapan, Jabatan
PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA PERPAJAKAN PADA KANTOR PT. JALA ENERGI PRIMA DI TELUK BETUNG UTARA KOTA BANDAR LAMPUNG Kadafi, Ahmad Ali; Siregig, I Ketut; Anggalana, Anggalana
Jurnal Pro Justitia (JPJ) Vol 5, No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Universitas Mitra Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57084/jpj.v5i2.1125

Abstract

Pajak merupakan sumber utama dalam Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja Negara. Dasar hukum pajak yang tertinggi adalah Pasal 23A Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 yang berbunyi, “pajak dan pungutan lain yang bersifat memaksa untuk keperluan negara diatur dengan undang-undang”.Pajak sendiri merupakan kontribusi wajib rakyat kepada negara yang terutang. Pajak menjadi penerimaan negara terbesar yang digunakan negara untuk membangun seluruh wilayah yang ada di Indonesia untuk itu diperlukan partisipasi warga negara dengan patuh membayar pajak agar ikut berpartisipasi dan berperan serta terhadap pembiayaan negara dan pembangunan nasional melaksanakan kewajibannya.Wajib pajak diberikan kepercayaan untuk menghitung, memperhitungkan serta melaporkan kewajiban perpajakannya sendiri sesuai dengan asas self assessment system. Negara untuk melakukan pemugutan pajak kepada wajib pajak walaupun sudah memiliki sifat memaksa yang kuat dan di sertai dengan sanksi yang tegas. Sistem pajak yang menggunakan self assessment system sebenarnya memperlunak sifat memaksa dari pajak ini, dengan harapan masyarakat akan memenuhi kewajiban perpajakannya dengan benar. 
Co-Authors . Baharudin Ahmad Badawi Ainita, Okta Aldo Chanigia Aldri Frinaldi Alfiyan, Angga Alfonsus Demitrio Jehanu Amalia Oktarina Amalia, Annisha andri akasi akasi Angga Alfiyan Angga Alfiyan Appin Purisky Redaputri Aprinisa Arya Anasta Adam S Bachri, Erlina Baharuddin Baharuddin Baharuddin Baharudin Baharudin Bahrudin Bahrudin Bambang Hartono Bambang Hartono Budhi Waskito Chandra Reformasi Dery Putra Desta Fani Acbel Dicky Janu Prasetyo Difa Tamara Putri Dimas Bahtera Setyohadi Edy, Tri Purnama Eky Sepriza Erlina B Erlina B Fathul Aziz Haliza, Siti Nur Hellenia, Shalsabila Hifiya, Ratu Diba Yolanda I Ketut Seregig I Ketut Siregig I Wayan Nanda D Irawan, Wayan Riki Irfan Maulana, Irfan Ivan Dwi Anggara Juliansa, Muhammad Raies Kabul Rahmat Taufik Kadafi, Ahmad Ali kadek dela HS karima, Nur kholan Lintje Anna Marpaung Lukmanul Hakim Luthfi Gama Albarik M. Ardiansyah M. Dheo Fortunarenza Putra Melisa Safitri Meliyana, Dina Muhamad Fadhilah Muhammad Affandi Muhammad Ardiansyah Muhammad, Balgis Nabila, Ajeng Surya Niki Agus Santoso Ningrum, Inggit Setya Octanelsha, Berlian Cikka Okta Ainita Oktarina, Amalia ongky Saputra Dewa Pasaribu, Adhisti Syifani Ponco Febri Saputra Pratiwi, Ayang Widi Putri, Kaneishia Rahmadika Putri, Tiara Susilo Rachmad Kurniawan Rinaldy, Dion Rinanda, Diandra Risti Dwi Ramasari Sadhana, Putu Sigit Pamungkas Siregig, I Ketut Sultan Ali Sabana Susilowati Susilowati Tami Rusli Tobing, Alvarian L Valen Nababan Vonny Tiara Narundana Wardhana, Yogie Kusuma Wayguna, Candra Wijaya, Aldy Avicena Wijaya, Zullya Wiryadi Wiryadi Yazhalina, Shefa Rindya Yoga Saputra Alam Yuda, Arya Dwi Yulia Hesti Zainab Ompu Jainah Zhifa, Ersha Nadhia