Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.141
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Abdimas Talenta : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JURNAL MUQODDIMAH : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hummaniora JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Jurnal Review Pendidikan dan Pengajaran (JRPP) ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum JUNCTO: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum International Journal Reglement & Society (IJRS) NOMOI Law Review JURNAL RECTUM: Tinjauan Yuridis Penanganan Tindak Pidana Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Sibatik Journal : Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Locus Journal of Academic Literature Review Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan JURNAL GOVERNANCE OPINION Jurnal Hukum Bisnis JURNAL RETENTUM Acta Law Journal Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia
Trisna, Wessy
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Veterinary Other

Published : 41 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 41 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
KEWENANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENILAI KEABSAHAN DAN KEKUATAN BUKTI ELEKTRONIK DALAM PEMBUKTIAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI DI INDONESIA BERDASARKAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NO. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 (Studi Pengadilan Negeri Medan) Situmorang, Winda; Trisna, Wessy; Arifiyanto, Joiverdia
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 9, No 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5883

Abstract

Abstract: The development of information technology has given rise to electronic evidence, which now plays a crucial role in proving criminal cases, particularly corruption. However, the differences in the nature of electronic evidence compared to written evidence pose challenges for judges in assessing its validity and strength. Electronic evidence is regulated in Law Number 19 of 2016 concerning amendments to Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning Electronic Information and Transactions. This study uses an empirical juridical method with data collection through literature studies and interviews with judges at the Medan District Court. The results show that although the Criminal Procedure Code has not explicitly regulated electronic evidence, the existence of the ITE Law, the Corruption Law, and the Constitutional Court Decision No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 confirms the position of electronic evidence as valid evidence. Electronic evidence has strong evidentiary power, but must undergo strict authentication procedures and be supported by digital forensic expertise. The main obstacles faced are limited infrastructure, differences in legal interpretation, and the vulnerability of evidence to manipulation. Therefore, it is necessary to increase the capacity of law enforcement and harmonize regulations so that electronic evidence can provide legal certainty and justice. Keywords: validity, proof, electronics, corruption. Abstrak: Perkembangan teknologi informasi melahirkan alat bukti elektronik yang kini memegang peranan penting dalam pembuktian perkara pidana, khususnya tindak pidana korupsi. Namun, perbedaan sifat bukti elektronik dengan bukti tertulis menimbulkan tantangan bagi hakim dalam menilai keabsahan dan kekuatannya. Bukti elektronik diatur dalam Undang-undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang perubahan atas Undang-undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 Tentang Informasi dan Transaksi elektronik adalah Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pengumpulan data melalui studi kepustakaan dan wawancara dengan hakim di Pengadilan Negeri Medan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun KUHAP belum secara eksplisit mengatur bukti elektronik, keberadaan Undang-Undang ITE, UU Tipikor, serta Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 20/PUU-XIV/2016 menegaskan kedudukan bukti elektronik sebagai alat bukti yang sah. Bukti elektronik memiliki kekuatan pembuktian yang kuat, namun harus melalui prosedur autentikasi yang ketat serta didukung keahlian forensik digital. Hambatan utama yang dihadapi ialah keterbatasan infrastruktur, perbedaan penafsiran yuridis, serta kerentanan bukti terhadap manipulasi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan peningkatan kapasitas penegak hukum dan harmonisasi regulasi agar bukti elektronik dapat memberikan kepastian hukum dan keadilan. Kata Kunci : keabsahan, pembuktian, elektronik, korupsi.
Co-Authors ABDUL AZIS ALSA Abdul Aziz Alsa, Abdul Aziz Alvi Syahrin Andreas Lingga, Masdo Andrianti, Syarifah Lisa Anwar, Sher Muhammad Arifiyanto, Joiverdia Atmaja, Agus Adi Cantika, Gebby Delfiandi, Delfiandi Edi Yunara Ediwarman Ediwarman, Ediwarman Edy Ikhsan Ekaputra, M Ekaputra, M. Ekaputra, Mohammad Fareza, Muhammad Iqbal Gaol, Yulinda Regina C. Lumban Gayatri, Ratih Intan Ginting, Gamaliel H. I. H, ferdinan Hasibuan, Uli Vaniar Lubis, Ivan Ghani Magda, Marianne Mahendra Butar-Butar, Muhammad Yusril Mahmud Mulyadi MAHMUL SIREGAR Manihuruk, Erick Jeremi Manurung, Eva Valentina Mark Sihombing, Esthon Marlina Marlina Marsella, Marsella Meliani Sitepu, Artanta Nasution, Rezeki Angelia Nurhalija, Nadia Parinduri, Hamdani Pasaribu, Amalia Syamsyah Prayudati, Yulia Martha Purba, Andika Temanta Qonitah, Parwila Ridho Mubarak Rosmalinda, Rosmalinda Siahaan, Alvin Adianto Sihombing, Bastian Sihombing, Grace Prima Apriani SIHOMBING, RICKY MARTIN Silaban, Robby Adeputra Silvana Silalahi, Ririn Simamora, Tri Putri Simaremare, Yoseanna Anastasya Sinabutar, Sartika Domuria Silalahi Sirait, Berkat Muliady Sitepu, Faradila Yulistari Sitohang, Edi Santro Sitompul, Cristina Natalia Situmorang, Winda Srg, Bryan Ray Suhatrizal, Suhatrizal Sunarmi Sunarmi Syahrir, Alvi Syarifah Lisa Andriati Tarigan, Pristina Sari Ananda Yati Sharfina Desiandri Zaidar, Zaidar