Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 23 Documents
Search

PENGHENTIAN PERKARA BERDASARKAN KEADILAN RESTORATIF DI KEJAKSAAN NEGERI GOWA: (Studi Siyasah Syar'iyyah) Nurpaidah; Jafar, Usman; Mustarin, Basyirah
Siyasatuna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Siyasah Syar'iyyah Vol 5 No 2 (2024): SIYASATUNA
Publisher : Prodi Hukum Tata Negara (Siyasah Syariyyah) Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to find out how the concept of Case Termination Based on Restorative Justice at the Gowa District Attorney's Office (Siyasah Syar'iyyah Study). The main problem is divided into several sub-problems, namely: How to stop cases based on restorative justice at the Gowa State Prosecutor's Office, What are the forms of cases related to restorative justice, and what is the siyasa syariyyah perspective on ending cases based on restorative justice. The research method used is data collection in the form of observation, interviews, documentation and reference tracing. The results of this study indicate that the implementation of restorative justice focuses more on conditions for creating justice and balance for the perpetrators of criminal acts and their victims themselves, and the perpetrators of criminal acts do not need to be sentenced to death but can be carried out with restorative justice efforts, in order to reduce the excess capacity of correctional institutions. or state prisons, restorative justice can also eliminate grudges for potential perpetrators of crimes so that they will not repeat their actions and can embrace and provide an understanding to the wider community about the dangers of committing a crime. In the perspective of siyasa syar'iyyah, termination of cases based on restorative justice can be carried out using the method of forgiving and paying diyat and law enforcers are not justified in acting arbitrarily in resolving cases, but must uphold justice in accordance with the regulations.
Keberlangsungan Pemikiran Islam Dan Perkembangan Mu’tazilah Dalam Dunia Islam Bramantyo, Fauzan Delasta; Jafar, Usman; Rijal, Tabhan Syamsu
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v4i5.14950

Abstract

Terlaksananya penelitian ini ditujukan untuk mendalami dan memahami lebih lanjut tentang Pemikiran dan Perkembangan Mu’tazilah dalam dunia Islam yang mana memiliki pengaruh cukup luas dalam dunia Islam. Adapun metode yang diimplementasikan dalam penelitian untuk menelaah dan mendalami tentang tokoh-tokoh penting dalam pemikiran Mu’tazilah serta pengaruhnya dalam dunia Islam yaitu metode kualitatif deskriptif. Penelitian ini berjenis library research yaitu peneliti melakukan pengumpulan data dan mengevaluasi materi dari artikel, buku, maupun sumber relevan lainnya yang selaras dengan tema penelitian. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa aliran Mu’tazilah memiliki sederet tokoh yang sangat berpengaruh dalam keberlangsungan aliran Mu’tazilah Adapun tokoh-tokoh yang mempengaruhi dalam perkembangan aliran Mu’tazilah yaitu, Abu Ali Muhammad ibn Ali al-Jubba’i, Abul al-Huzail al-Allaf, Jarullah Abul Qasim Muhammad bin Umar, Ibrahim bin Syyar an-Nazza, Bisyir ibn al-Mu’tamir, Abu Musa al-Mudrar, Washil bin Atha’ al-Ghazzal, dan Abul Hasan Abdul Jabbar ibn Ahmad ibn Abdullah al-Hamazani al-Asadi, Hisyam bin Amr al-Fuwati dan juga pengaruh aliran Mu’tazilah dalam dunia Islam yaki pengaruh teologis, adanya Kontroversi dan Perdebatan, Pengaruh pada hukum dan etika, perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan serta adanya penerimaan dan penolakan atas aliran Mu’tazilah.
The Nature of God: Theological Debate and Implications of the Tauhid’s Sentences Saenong, M. Kafrawy; Santalia, Indo; Jafar, Usman; Irmawati, Irmawati; Huda, Khairul
Journal Corner of Education, Linguistics, and Literature Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): August
Publisher : CV. Tripe Konsultan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54012/jcell.v4i1.313

Abstract

The research aims to discuss the debate between the Asy'ariyah and Mu'tazilah about the nature of God. The method used literature study from various sources. The results of this research show that there are the differences between Mu`tazilites  and al-Ash`ari   in Divine Aspects in Theology. First, The Nature of God. The Mu`tazilites stated that Allah is All-Knowing with His substance, not with knowledge, power and life because all of these are qualities while nature is something outside of substance. Meanwhile, the Asy` believe that God has attributes. Second, The God's Justice, the Mu`tazilites elive that all of God's actions are good, God does not do bad, and does not forget what He must do. On the other hand al-Ash`ari they are not realized by humans themselves, but are created by God. Three, God's Absolute Power and Will , the Mu`tazilah argued that God's power is actually no longer absolute. On the other side, the Asy'ariyah were unable to reach the depth of monotheism fi'li while the Mu'tazilah were unable to resolve issues of justice in the right way.