Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Yustitia

AKIBAT HUKUM TERHADAP KREDITUR DALAM PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 37 TAHUN 2004 TENTANG KEPAILITAN DAN PENUNDAAN KEWAJIBAN PEMBAYARAN UTANG Jas, Rezki Saputra; Triana, Yeni; Afrita, Indra
Yustitia Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v11i1.320

Abstract

The Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) filed by a creditor is a legal mechanism that allows a creditor to file a PKPU petition against a debtor suspected of experiencing financial difficulties and failing to meet their debt payment obligations on time. The purpose of this study is to examine the legal consequences for creditors in the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations based on Law Number 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and the Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations and the judges’ considerations in deciding on the PKPU petition. This study employs a normative legal research method. The data sources are derived from secondary data, categorized into three types: primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. The data collection technique used is documentary study or literature review. The conclusion of this research indicates that the legal consequences of a judge rejecting a PKPU petition include: First, the rejection of the petition means that no Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is granted to the debtor. Second, if a creditor wishes to sue the debtor again regarding debt fulfillment, the creditor can file a civil lawsuit for default. The judge’s considerations in rejecting the PKPU petition are based on the fact that the debtor does not have more than one creditor because other creditors lack valid power of attorney. Furthermore, in cases where the amount of debt is insignificant and insufficient to trigger bankruptcy if the peace plan under the PKPU fails to materialize, this also influences the court’s decision. The study recommends that there should be clearer regulations concerning the position of other creditors and the minimum debt amount in the Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations Law. Legal considerations should also adopt a dimension of fairness, strict legal protection, and substantive legal breakthroughs to ensure the enforcement of law that is beneficial for human needs.
KEPASTIAN HUKUM PEMEGANG SERTIPIKAT HAK PAKAI ATAS TANAH NEGARA TERHADAP PEMEGANG SURAT KETERANGAN GANTI RUGI DALAM GUGATAN PERDATA Jasril, Jasril; Afrita, Indra; Triana, Yeni
Yustitia Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v11i1.323

Abstract

The human need for land today is increasing. This is due to the increasing number of population, while on the other hand, the land area does not increase. For this reason, the rights and authorities of the parties are regulated in the Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA) Number 5 of 1960. This study is a normative legal research that aims to (1) Analyze the legal arrangements for holders of state land use right certificates against SKGR according to the provisions of Indonesian civil law; (2) Analyze the legal certainty for the holder of the right to use the certificate on state land against the holder of the SKGR in a Civil Lawsuit. This research approach consists of a case approach, a legislative approach, and a conceptual approach. Case Approach based on case analysis of court decision No. 83/PDT. G/2009/PN. PBR, No. 75/PDT. G/2007/PN. PBR, and also decision No. 46/PDT. G/2011/PN. PBR. This study concludes that the legal certainty of the holder of the certificate of right to use state land against the SKGR in a civil lawsuit before the court has powerful legal force based on one of the provisions in Article 16 of the UUPA. The next conclusion is that the legal consequences of the holder of the right to use SKGR state land in a civil lawsuit in front of the court can be measured through the legal arrangement of proof in the civil procedure law.