Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Yustitia

PUTUSAN NO (NIET ONTVANKELIJK VERKLAARD) TERHADAP PERBUATAN WANPRESTASI Suhendar
Yustitia Vol 5 No 2 (2019): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v5i2.92

Abstract

This research was conducted in Indramayu Regency, precisely in Indramayu District Court by conducting direct interview in Indramayu District Court as a basis for comparison and a basis for reference in answering research questions. In addition to the field research, the researcher also conducts literature studies by reading, analyzing, and gathering information from books, literature, laws and other supporting regulations that have relevance to the issues discussed in this study. This research used empirical juridical research method, which is based on the study of legal materials and interviews as a process to find the rule of law and legal principles, in order to answer the legal problems encountered. This study intended to determine the implementation of the award which states that the lawsuit could not be accepted as well as the basis of the judge's judgment in the decision with the lawsuit that is not accepted regarding the the case Number; 35/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Idm. concerning acts of default in the Indramayu District Court. The results obtained by the researcher through this study are (1) the implementation of the verdict with a lawsuit is not acceptable (Niet Ontvankelijk verklaard) regarding Case Number 35/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Idm. The verdict with an unacceptable lawsuit is the fault of the plaintiff in formulating the lawsuit. It is also become part of the court's negligence in implementing the mandate of Article 119 HIR/143 Rbg of the constitution which authorizes the head of the district court to give advice and assistance to the parties to prevent the imperfect claim.
PUTUSAN NO (NIET ONTVANKELIJK VERKLAARD) TERHADAP PERBUATAN WANPRESTASI Suhendar
Yustitia Vol. 5 No. 2 (2019): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v5i2.92

Abstract

This research was conducted in Indramayu Regency, precisely in Indramayu District Court by conducting direct interview in Indramayu District Court as a basis for comparison and a basis for reference in answering research questions. In addition to the field research, the researcher also conducts literature studies by reading, analyzing, and gathering information from books, literature, laws and other supporting regulations that have relevance to the issues discussed in this study. This research used empirical juridical research method, which is based on the study of legal materials and interviews as a process to find the rule of law and legal principles, in order to answer the legal problems encountered. This study intended to determine the implementation of the award which states that the lawsuit could not be accepted as well as the basis of the judge's judgment in the decision with the lawsuit that is not accepted regarding the the case Number; 35/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Idm. concerning acts of default in the Indramayu District Court. The results obtained by the researcher through this study are (1) the implementation of the verdict with a lawsuit is not acceptable (Niet Ontvankelijk verklaard) regarding Case Number 35/Pdt.G/2014/PN.Idm. The verdict with an unacceptable lawsuit is the fault of the plaintiff in formulating the lawsuit. It is also become part of the court's negligence in implementing the mandate of Article 119 HIR/143 Rbg of the constitution which authorizes the head of the district court to give advice and assistance to the parties to prevent the imperfect claim.
TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP TERHADAP MASA PENYIMPANAN LIMBAH SEMENTARA YANG MELEBIHI 90 HARI BERDASARKAN PERMEN-LHK NO. 6 TENTANG PENYIMPANAN (B3) TAHUN 2021 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PUTUSAN NO. 79/PID.B/LH/2021/PT SMG: TINDAK PIDANA LINGKUNGAN HIDUP TERHADAP MASA PENYIMPANAN LIMBAH SEMENTARA YANG MELEBIHI 90 HARI BERDASARKAN PERMEN-LHK NO. 6 TENTANG PENYIMPANAN (B3) TAHUN 2021 DIKAITKAN DENGAN PUTUSAN NO. 79/PID.B/LH/2021/PT SMG Kholik, Saeful; Suhendar; Mabruri, Muhammad Farhan
Yustitia Vol. 11 No. 2 (2025): Yustitia
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/yustitia.v11i2.345

Abstract

Permen-LHK No. 6 Tahun 2021 Tentang Tata Cara Persyaratan dan bentuk pengelolaan termasuk penyimpanan jangka waktu limbah B3. Peraturan tersebut menjadi dasar proteksi bagi pemerintah kepada subjek hukum termasuk perusahaan dalam penyimpanan limbah B3. Akan tetapi, dalam praktiknya Putusan hakim Nomor 79/Pid.B/LH/2021/PT.SMG, yaitu PT. Sinar Agung Sukses Selalu melakukan tindak pidana menghasilkan limbah bahan berbahaya dan beracun dan tidak melakukan pengelolaan serta melakukan dumping ke media lingkungan hidup tanpa izin. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis-normatif yaitu mengkaji permasalahan dari aspek peraturan baik secara horizontal dan vertikal. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian implementasi dari putusan tersebut menimbulkan ketidaksesuaian penegakan hukum sesuai dengan Permen-LHK No. 6 Tahun 2021, selain itu dalam pasal 103 Undang-Undang Nomor 32 Tahun 2009 Tentang Perlindungan Dan Pengelolaan Lingkungan Hidup seseorang yang menghasilkan limbah B3 dan tidak mengelolanya dapat di pidana kurungan 1 (satu) tahun dan paling lama 3 (tiga) tahun namun dalam putusannya tidak sesuai dengan aturan hukum yang berlaku. Dimana hakim dalam memutus perkara tersebut berpandangan bahwa berlandasakan prinsip hukum lingkungan berkelanjutan denda ada putusan pertama tidak relevan sehingga diatur dalam pengadilan tinggi akan tetapi analisis pandangan peneliti seharusnya dalam pengadilan tinggi dapat menetapkan ganti rugi lebih tinggi dan prinsip cemar lingkungan.