Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS)

FOMO AND GEN Z INVESTMENT BEHAVIOR: A QUALITATIVE STUDY ON EMOTIONAL BIAS IN FINANCE Faris Ramadhan; Etty Sri Wahyuni; Adnan Suhardis; Robin; Sumantri
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): September
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i5.4011

Abstract

This qualitative study investigates how Fear of Missing Out (FOMO) influences Generation Z investment behavior and emotional bias in financial decision-making processes. The research employed an interpretive phenomenological approach with in-depth semi-structured interviews conducted among Generation Z investors in Indonesia to understand the psychological mechanisms underlying FOMO-driven investment decisions. Systematic thematic analysis revealed three primary themes: FOMO as an emotional investment driver, social media influence creating information asymmetry, and financial literacy functioning as a complex moderating factor. The findings demonstrate that FOMO operates as a powerful emotional compulsion that systematically overrides rational decision-making processes, with social media exposure to peers' investment success serving as the most potent trigger for impulsive investment behavior. A significant "information paradox" emerged where participants heavily rely on low-credibility sources such as financial influencers while underutilizing high-credibility alternatives like official company reports, prioritizing accessibility over accuracy. The relationship between financial literacy and FOMO vulnerability proved non-linear, with medium literacy levels paradoxically increasing overconfidence bias while high literacy enabled sophisticated rationalization of emotional decisions. These findings contribute to behavioral finance theory by revealing how digital-social contexts amplify emotional biases beyond traditional market psychology models, suggesting that conventional financial education approaches may be insufficient for addressing emotionally-driven decision-making among digital-native generations.
THE EFFECT OF ACCOUNTABILITY, TRANSPARENCY OF FINANCIAL REPORTING AND QUALITY OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION ON THE LEVEL OF RECEIVING ZAKAT FUNDS WITH ACCESTABILITY AS A MODERATION VARIABLE AT BAZNAS IN BATAM CITY Afrinanda; Chabullah Wibisono; Robin; Bambang Satriawan; Muammar Khaddafi
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): January
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v3i1.598

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and provide empirical evidence about the effect of accountability, transparency of financial reporting and quality of accounting information on the level of acceptance of zakat funds with accessibility as a moderating variable. The population of this research is the muzakki who pay their zakat directly to BAZNAS Batam City. The sampling technique in this study used random sampling. This study used the slovin formula with an error rate of 1% so that a total of 96 samples were obtained. This study uses primary data with a quantitative approach. The primary data collection method is through a questionnaire which is measured using a Likert scale. The data analysis method uses Partial Least Square (PLS) with the SmartPLS application. The test results show that accountability has a significant effect on the level of acceptance of zakat with a P-Value of 0.000 <0.05, transparency has an insignificant positive effect on the level of acceptance of zakat with a P-Value of 0.172 <0.05, and the quality of accounting information has a significant effect on financial supervision with a P-Value of 0.000 <0.05 but accessibility has no significant negative effect on the level of zakat acceptance. Meanwhile, accessibility does not moderate the relationship between accountability, transparency and quality of accounting information on the level of zakat acceptance. This moderating effect is called predictor moderation. Transparency has a not significant positive effect on the level of zakat acceptance with a P-Value of 0.172 <0.05, and the quality of accounting information has a significant effect on financial supervision with a P-Value of 0.000 <0.05 however accessibility has an insignificant negative effect on the level of zakat acceptance . Meanwhile, accessibility does not moderate the relationship between accountability, transparency and quality of accounting information on the level of zakat acceptance. This moderating effect is called predictor moderation. Transparency has a not significant positive effect on the level of zakat acceptance with a P-Value of 0.172 <0.05, and the quality of accounting information has a significant effect on financial supervision with a P-Value of 0.000 <0.05 however accessibility has an insignificant negative effect on the level of zakat acceptance . Meanwhile, accessibility does not moderate the relationship between accountability, transparency and quality of accounting information on the level of zakat acceptance. This moderating effect is called predictor moderation. accessibility does not moderate the relationship between accountability, transparency and quality of accounting information on the level of zakat acceptance. This moderating effect is called predictor moderation. accessibility does not moderate the relationship between accountability, transparency and quality of accounting information on the level of zakat acceptance. This moderating effect is called predictor moderation.