Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 14 Documents
Search

ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP PERLINDUNGAN HAK ATAS ANAK YANG TERLIBAT DALAM PROSES HUKUM PIDANA AKIBAT KENAKALAN REMAJA MENURUT UNDANG-UNDANG NO 11 TAHUN 2012 DI KABUPATEN LAMONGAN Permata Sari, Irma; Sari, Irma Permata; Abd. Hadi; Nursalim
The Republic : Journal of Constitutional Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): THE REPUBLIC : Journal of Constitutional Law
Publisher : Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan diterbitkan oleh Program Studi Hukum Tata Negara dan Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LP2M) Universitas Sunan Drajat Lamongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55352/htn.v4i1.2709

Abstract

Tujuan dilakukannya penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana sistem pengawasan pidana anak dan bagaimana proses penanganan perlindungan pidana anak. Dengan menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif, maka penelitian ini dapat disimpulkan: 1. Tinjauan yuridis terhadap Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak yang telah diatur dalam Undang-undang No. 2. Proses Perlindungan anak harus melihat tujuan yaitu untuk mengutamakan kesehatan anak. Penanganan anak dalam proses hukumnya memerlukan pendekatan, pelayanan, perlakuan, perawatan, serta perlindungan yang khusus bagi anak yang bermasalah dengan hukum. 
KONTROVERSI POLITIK HUKUM DALAM KEBIJAKAN PEMBATASAN IMPOR KOMODITAS STRATEGIS PERSPEKTIF KEDAULATAN EKONOMI Rahmat Giling; Mustofa Kamil; Dany Wahyu; Nursalim; Mahmuddin
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Berajah Journal
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i2.433

Abstract

Policies restricting imports of strategic commodities are an important instrument in achieving a nation’s economic sovereignty. In Indonesia, these policies face a range of complex political and legal controversies, particularly in the context of global economic integration and international trade obligations. This paper analyses the political and legal controversies surrounding policies restricting imports of strategic commodities from the perspective of economic sovereignty, using a normative legal research method supplemented by historical, conceptual and comparative legal approaches. The research findings indicate that there is a tension between the interests of protecting national economic sovereignty and the obligations of international trade liberalisation as stipulated in the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade/World Trade Organisation. This legal-political controversy is reflected in the dynamics of legislative drafting, which is often ambivalent, inconsistent policy implementation, and selective law enforcement. This paper recommends the need for a reconstruction of legal policy that integrates the principle of economic sovereignty into the framework of international trade law through the utilisation of safeguard mechanisms, general exceptions, and industrial policies consistent with international trade commitments.
KAJIAN YURIDIS DAMPAK TEKNOLOGI DIGITAL TERHADAP KEPASTIAN HUKUM DALAM TRANSAKSI BISNIS Rahmat Giling; Pandri Zulfikar; Mahmuddin; Dany Wahyu; Nursalim
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Berajah Journal
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i2.463

Abstract

The development of digital technology has brought about a fundamental transformation in the conduct of modern business transactions. The emergence of blockchain technology, smart contracts, electronic signatures and e-commerce platforms has changed the conventional paradigm of conducting transactions. However, this digital transformation poses significant challenges to legal certainty in business transactions, particularly in relation to legal validity, consumer protection, dispute resolution and jurisdiction. This study aims to analyse the impact of digital technology on legal certainty in business transactions from a legal perspective using a normative legal research method. The results of the study indicate that digital technology has a two-sided impact on legal certainty: on the one hand, it enhances the efficiency and transparency of transactions; on the other hand, it creates legal uncertainty due to regulations that have not yet been able to keep pace with technological developments. This study recommends the need to harmonise national regulations with international standards, as well as the establishment of a specific legal framework for digital transactions to ensure optimal legal certainty.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN HUKUM FINTECH LENDING ATAS KREDIT MACET DALAM PERJANJIAN ELEKTRONIK Rahmat Giling; Hasnah Aziz; Nursalim; Mahmuddin; Dany Wahyu
Berajah Journal Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): Berajah Journal
Publisher : CV. Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/bj.v6i3.502

Abstract

The development of financial technology lending (fintech lending) in Indonesia has transformed the financing landscape by introducing electronic agreements as the primary legal instrument in creditor-debtor relationships. However, the increasing volume of non-performing loans in this sector raises fundamental questions regarding the legal accountability of fintech lending providers. This article aims to analyze juridically the legal accountability of fintech lending for non-performing loans arising from electronic agreements. The research method used is qualitative with a normative-empirical legal approach. Data was collected through studies of legislation, court decisions, Financial Services Authority reports, and scientific literature studies. The results show that the legal accountability of fintech lending for non-performing loans involves three crucial aspects: first, the legal status of fintech lending as an intermediary versus a party to the credit agreement; second, the distribution of responsibility among fintech lending, partner banks, and investors in the peer-to-peer lending financing structure; and third, the mechanism for resolving non-performing loans that fulfills the principle of substantive justice. This article recommends the need for clarification of the legal status of fintech lending in legislation, harmonization of obligations among parties in electronic agreements, and development of a proportional non-performing loan resolution mechanism.