Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Notary's Accountability for Non-Compliance with Covernote Issuance in Corruption Cases Raisyha Talitha; Taupiqqurrahman
Melayunesia Law Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): Melayunesia Law
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Riau

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30652/b0zg8y37

Abstract

The absence of specific legal provisions regarding the issuance of covernotes in Indonesia has created legal uncertainty and opened opportunities for misuse of notarial authority in issuing covernotes. This study aims to examine the authority of notaries in issuing covernotes based on the attributive authority granted by the state as stipulated in Article 16 paragraph 1 letter a of the Notary Law (UUJN), as well as to analyze the forms of notary liability concerning the irregularities in the issuance of covernotes in a corruption case under Decision Number 51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2022/Pn.Pbr. The results of the study indicate that the authority of notaries in issuing covernotes is still based on customary practice (living law) in the law of obligations and lacks a strong legal foundation. The liability that may be imposed on notaries for covernote irregularities can take the form of criminal, civil, and administrative liability. This research is expected to contribute by proposing a revision of the Notary Law (UUJN) to include specific provisions on covernotes and to clarify the mechanism of notary liability in issuing covernotes. Thus, it is expected that the legal regulation of covernotes will become more transparent and emphasize the principle of accountability.  
Legal Regulatory Readiness in Accommodating Non-Fungible Token as Objects of Fiduciary Collateral Aristias, Adinda; Taupiqqurrahman
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2699

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the readiness of Indonesia’s legal framework to accommodate Non-Fungible Tokens (NFTs) as fiduciary collateral objects and to identify the potential obstacles in their execution process. NFTs are digital assets based on blockchain technology that possess unique characteristics and economic value, theoretically fulfilling the criteria of intangible objects under Law Number 42 of 1999 concerning Fiduciary Collateral. However, the current legal instruments in Indonesia have not yet explicitly recognized NFTs as eligible fiduciary objects. This study employs a normative juridical method with both statutory and case approaches, supported by secondary data derived from an interview with the Direktorat Jenderal Administrasi Hukum Umum (Ditjen AHU) to enrich the legal analysis. The findings indicate that Indonesia’s regulatory readiness regarding NFTs as fiduciary collateral remains conceptual rather than operational. The absence of a registration mechanism and valuation system for digital assets creates significant legal uncertainty for both creditors and debtors. Furthermore, the execution of NFTs presents additional challenges, including the dependence on private keys, the incompatibility of automatic smart contract transfers with the due process of law principle, and the speculative volatility of NFT market values. Therefore, the study suggests the need for new legal norms and an authorized digital asset valuation institution to ensure that NFTs can be effectively and lawfully integrated into Indonesia’s fiduciary security system. Non-Fungible Token, Fiduciary Collateral, Collateral Execution, Intangible Assets
Juridical Analysis of the Determination of Abandoned Land by the Government on Land Owned by the Community Wibowo, Hanifah Fairuz; Taupiqqurrahman, Taupiqqurrahman
PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Vol 11, No 4 (2025): Volume 11, Number 4 October-Desember 2025
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/palar.v11i4.12861

Abstract

Abstract The research was conducted to legally analyze the regulations and mechanisms for determining abandoned land by the government for community-owned land and to examine the potential legal impacts arising from this policy. Land has an important position in the lives of Indonesian people, but when land is not utilized according to its intended purpose, the state has the authority to determine it as abandoned land, which is sourced from the provisions of Law Number 5 of 1960 concerning the Basic Agrarian Law, Government Regulation Number 20 of 2021, and Regulation of the Minister of ATR/BPN Number 20 of 2021. This type of research is normative legal research with data collection techniques through library research, the results obtained are that the mechanism for determining abandoned land includes the stages of inventory, evaluation, warning, and determination by the Minister of Agrarian Affairs and Spatial Planning. This policy has a positive impact in realizing equitable control and utilization of land through redistribution and agrarian reform, while supporting national development goals. However, on the other hand, there is the potential for negative impacts such as agrarian conflict, loss of land ownership rights, legal uncertainty, and social unrest if the determination procedure is carried out without regard to the principles of justice and community participation. Therefore, regulations are needed to be more clear, transparent, and equitable so that the implementation of the determination of abandoned land truly reflects legal protection and community welfare. Keywords: Abandoned Land, Property Rights, Agrarian
Urgensi Pembentukan Peraturan Daerah Terkait Sarana Air Minum dalam Mendukung Sustainable Development Goals Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman
Simbur Cahaya Volume 29 Nomor 1, Juni 2022
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v29i1.1854

Abstract

Tanggal 25 September 2015 para pemimpin dunia dari 193 negara secara resmi mengesahkan Agenda Sustainable Development Goals. Terdapat 17 tujuan SDGs, yang salahsatunya adalah tujuan 6 yaitu memastikan ketersediaan air bersih yang keberlanjutan dan sanitasi bagi semua. Sebagai negara yang ikut serta dalam keberhasilan SDGs. Indonesia sebelumnya sudah ditetapkan Universal access tahun 2019 namun belum tercapai. Di Indonesia sendiri akses sarana air minum yang layak masih belum merata antar provinsi yang satu dengan yang lain dan angka yang belum akses air minum yang layak masih tinggi. Sehingga perlu dukungan semua pihak terutama pemerintah pusat dan daerah. Baik dari anggaran maupun dalam bentuk peraturan daerah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis sejauh mana urgensi pembentukan Perda sarana air minum dalam penyediaan akses keadilan dan untuk mengetahui peran pemerintah dalam pembangunan sarana air minum untuk mendukung SDGs. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan statute approach, sosio approach dan sosio approach. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah pertama bahwa dari tahun 2016 hingga 2020 telah terjadi peningkatan akses SAM yang layak. Namun peningkatan tersebut masih sangat sedikit yaitu 3,77%. Selain dari itu masih terdapat propinsi dengan miskin terbanyak belum mendapat akses sarana air minum yang layak, serta masih sedikit daerah membentuk perda tentang sarana air minum. Kedua pemerintah sudah melaksanakan berbagai program untuk mendukung SDGs, namun program tersebut belum cukup untuk membuat akses sarana air minum yang layak 100% di Indonesia
Problematika Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum di Indonesia Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman; Siti Nurul Intan Sari Dalimunte
Simbur Cahaya Volume 30 Nomor 1, Juni 2023
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v30i1.2748

Abstract

Pengadaan tanah merupakan suatu upaya dalam pemberian akses infrastruktur untuk pembangunan di Indonesia. Berbagai regulasi yang lahir tentang pengadaan tanah. Sejak tahun 1960 sampai 2021 regulasi tersebut selalu berubah. Perubahan regulasi berdampak kepada prosedur pengadaan tanah di Indonesia dalam hal menjamin kepastian hukum terhadap pemilik hak atas tanah. Tujuan dari penelitian ini untuk mengetahui problematika pengadaan tanah di Indonesia serta prosedur pengadaan tanah ditinjau dari peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Metode penelitian dalam penulisan ini yuridis normative, pendekatan yang digunakan yaitu case approach dan statute approach. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa dalam UUPA yang mengharuskan pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum harus ditetapkan oleh undang-undang, namun dalam kenyataannya hanya ditetapkan oleh peraturan menteri. Permasalahan lain yaitu dengan adanya undang-undang tahun 1961 yang hanya mengatur tentang pembebasan tanah, namun dengan ditetapkan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 sedangkan Undang-Undang Nomor 20 tahun 1961 tidak dicabut. Sehingga menyebabkan adanya dua regulasi yang berkaitan dengan pembebasan tanah untuk kepentingan umum.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PEMILIK APARTEMEN ATAS DASAR PPJB TERHADAP PENERBITAN SHMSRS Zana Zerlina; Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 4 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i4.565-577

Abstract

Berdasarkan Pasal 47 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2011 dinyatakan yaitu Sertifikat Hak Milik Atas satuan Rumah Susun ialah tanda bukti kepemilikan atas sarusun. Adanya perlindungan hukum pemilik apartemen terhadap penerbitan SHMSRS sangat diperlukan, karena semakin banyak pengembang yang hanya mementingkan aspek keuntungan semata bagi perusahaan pengembang. Pada penelitian ini bertujuan guna mengerti faktor yang menjadikan penghambat penerbitan SHMSRS pada apartemen serta untuk mengetahui bentuk perlindungan hukum pemilik apartemen Atas Dasar PPJB terhadap penerbitan SHMSRS. Cara penelitian pada penulisan ini mengunakan metode penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan menelaah dan mengkaji data sekunder.Hasil penelitian menyimpulkan bahwasehubungan dengan faktor penghambat penerbitan SHMSRS pada apartemen merupakan tindakan melanggar hukum oleh developer, yang menyebabkan pembeli mengalami kerugian pada saat mengalihkan atau menjual apartemen Atas Dasar PPJB tanpa penerbitan SHMSRS. Adapun perlindungan hukum terhadap pemilik satuan Rumah Susun adalah : 1.) KUHPer; 2.) UU No. 20/2011 tentang Rumah Susun; dan 3.) UU No.8/1999 tentang Perlindungan Konsumen. 
The Urgency of Establishing Regulations on the Implementation of Automatic Features as a Mitigation Measure Against the Distribution of Feature Films on the TikTok Platform Esi Anindya Azzahra; Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 8, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v8i4.48786

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the urgency of establishing regulations that require digital platforms, particularly TikTok, to implement automatic features as a mitigation effort against the illegal distribution of feature films. The background of this research is based on the phenomenon of increasing copyright infringements in the digital space due to the ease of access, distribution, and replication of content through user-generated content-based social media. This condition indicates a normative gap in Indonesia’s legal system, which has not explicitly regulated the preventive responsibilities of electronic system providers concerning intellectual property rights violations. The main issues examined include the existing legal regulations in Indonesia regarding the obligation to provide copyright infringement detection features, as well as the juridical basis for the necessity of establishing specific regulations under the Ministry of Communication and Digital Affairs. This study employs a normative juridical method with a statute approach and a literature review of legislation and Constitutional Court decisions. The findings show that existing regulations, such as the Copyright Law and Ministerial Regulations, remain reactive and have not yet regulated preventive obligations or mitigation measures for digital platforms. In conclusion, the establishment of technical regulations through a Ministerial Regulation is a juridical necessity to strengthen legal certainty and the effectiveness of copyright protection in the digital sphere. This research recommends that national policy stipulate minimum technical standards for implementing automatic detection systems on digital platforms, particularly TikTok.
Advocating for Disability Voting Rights in Framework Ius Constituendum Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.3767

Abstract

Protecting and guaranteeing the rights of every citizen is the obligation of the state, but in fact there are still acts of discrimination in the rights of citizens experienced by persons with disabilities. One form of discrimination carried out is related to political rights by setting physical health requirements for prospective members of the DPR, provincial DPRD, and district/city DPRD. Although there is no definite limit to measure the level of physical health. In addition, the electoral law contradicts the law on persons with disabilities which states that persons with disabilities have political rights. The electoral law should provide an open space as a means for people with disabilities to become part of public office.  However, this will not be realized without a special quota for persons with disabilities to run as candidates for legislative members, as is the case with the quota of 30% female representation as prospective candidates for the DPR / DPRD and the determination of persons with disabilities as workers in government agencies at least 2% and 1% for private companies. Therefore, regulations should be added related to special quotas for persons with disabilities to become candidates for representation from political parties as election participants
Tanggung Jawab Perdata Terhadap Kreator Konten atas Penyebaran Komik Online di Aplikasi TikTok Kartika Eka Rilani; Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i2.7280

Abstract

This research aims to discuss the civil liability for content creators and find out about legal protection for online comic creators in the TikTok application. Current developments make modified comics into digital forms that can be accessed in various applications or websites. This makes it easier for users to read comics online. The existence of online comics also makes it easier for copyright infringers to distribute them. The method used is to spread online comics by creating content on the TikTok application by content creators without permission from the online comic owner. As a result of the dissemination of other people's copyrighted works, it causes losses to online comic creators. Therefore, there is a need for protection for comic creators whose economic rights have been violated by the content creators. This study uses a normative juridical approach to legislation that is relevant to the issues discussed. The novelty of this research is based on online comics distributed through the TikTok application which have a commercial nature and are used for the benefit of copyright infringers. The results of this study are accountability in the form of compensation and submission of lawsuits against copyright infringers to the commercial court. As for the responsibility of the Tiktok application policy, such as deleting video content and blocking or closing the content creator's account. In addition to this, the form of legal protection for online comic creators is preventive and repressive protection. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk membahas terkait tanggung jawab perdata terhadap kreator konten dan mengetahui perlindungan hukum bagi pencipta komik online di aplikasi TikTok. Perkembangaan saat ini membuat komik termodifikasi menjadi bentuk digital yang dapat mengaksesnya di berbagai aplikasi ataupun situs web. Hal ini mempermudah penggunanya dalam membaca komik secara online. Adanya komik online juga mempermudah pelaku pelanggar hak cipta dalam melakukan penyebaran. Cara yang dilakukan yaitu menyebarkan komik online dengan membuat konten di aplikasi TikTok oleh kreator konten tanpa izin dari pemilik komik online. Akibat dari penyebaran karya cipta milik orang lain menimbulkan kerugian yang dirasakan oleh pencipta komik online. Maka dari itu perlunya perlindungan bagi pencipta komik yang hak ekonominya telah dilanggar oleh kreator konten tersebut. Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan yang relevan dengan permasalahan yang dibahas. Kebaharuan penelitian ini berdasarkan komik online yang disebarkan melaui aplikasi TikTok yang memiliki sifat komersial dan digunakan demi keuntungan pelaku pelanggaran hak cipta. Hasil penelitian ini yaitu pertanggungjawaban dalam bentuk ganti rugi serta pengajuan gugatan terhadap pelanggar hak cipta ke pengadilan niaga. Adapun pertanggungjawaban dari kebijakan aplikasi Tiktok seperti penghapusan konten video serta pemblokiran atau penutupan akun kreator konten tersebut. Selain hal tersebut bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi pencipta komik online yaitu dengan perlindungan preventif dan represif.   
Akibat Hukum Undue Influence Terhadap Pembatalan Perjanjian Ditinjau Dari Asas Keseimbangan Dewa Ayu Sandira Putri; Taupiqqurrahman Taupiqqurrahman
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): AUGUST
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i2.7306

Abstract

The purpose of this writing is to further examine the juridical implications of undue influence/abuse of circumstances against the aggrieved party accompanied by a form of legal protection for canceling an agreement with a concrete case from a court decision. In making agreements, the parties often abuse the principle of freedom of contract so as to override the principle of balance and make the contents of the agreement unlimited, this results in an imbalance of bargaining position and position which results in the birth of undue influence. The research method used in this writing is normative juridical using statutory approaches, case approaches, and conceptual approaches. The novelty of this research is that it focuses on the impact of undue influence on disadvantaged parties along with case descriptions in both forms of abuse of advantage, and this writing focuses on forms of legal protection which are divided into preventive and repressive forms along with concrete cases related to the principle of balance. The results of this study show that Undue influence has not been regulated in the Civil Code but is recognized in jurisprudence. Undue influence can occur due to non-fulfillment of the principle of balance which results in abuse of circumstances which are classified as economic advantage and psychological advantage. Legal protection that can be carried out when undue influence occurs is preventive (dispute prevention) or repressive protection (dispute resolution). Repressive protection through the courts can have legal consequences by canceling the agreement, if there is a material loss experienced by one of the parties, then the cancellation of the agreement must also be accompanied by compensation. Tujuan penulisan ini yakni meneliti lebih jauh mengenai implikasi yuridis dari undue influence/penyalahgunaan keadaan terhadap pihak yang dirugikan disertai bentuk perlindungan hukum pembatalan perjanjian dengan kasus konkrit dari putusan pengadilan. Pada proses pembuatan perjanjian para pihak sering kali menyalahgunakan asas kebebasan berkontrak sehingga mengesampingkan asas keseimbangan dan membuat isi perjanjian tanpa batas, hal ini berdampak adanya ketidakseimbangan posisi tawar dan kedudukan yang berakibat lahirnya penyalahgunaan keadaan (undue influence). Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini yaitu yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan kasus, dan pendekatan konseptual. Kebaharuan penelitian ini yakni terfokus pada dampak undue influence terhadap pihak yang dirugikan disertai gambaran kasus di kedua bentuk penyalahgunaan keunggulan, serta penulisan ini terfokus pada bentuk perlindungan hukum yang terbagi dalam bentuk preventif dan represif beserta kasus konkrit yang dihubungkan dengan asas keseimbangan. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukan undue influence belum diatur dalam KUH Perdata tetapi diakui dalam yurisprudensi. Undue influence dapat terjadi karena tidak terpenuhinya asas keseimbangan yang berakibat munculnya penyalahgunaan keadaan yang digolongkan menjadi keunggulan ekonomis dan keunggulan kejiwaan. Perlindungan hukum yang dapat dilakukan ketika terjadi undue influence yaitu bersifat preventif (pencegahan sengketa) atau perlindungan dalam bentuk represif (penyelesaian sengketa). Perlindungan represif melalui pengadilan dapat berakibat hukum dengan pembatalan perjanjian, jika terdapat kerugian materiil yang dialami salah satu pihak, maka pembatalan perjanjian juga harus disertai dengan ganti kerugian.