Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.412
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI WAJAH HUKUM JISIP: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Pendidikan Aksara: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Nonformal Community Development Journal: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Multicience INTELEKTIVA International Journal of Health, Economics, and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Jurnal Hukum dan HAM Wara Sains The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research West Science Law and Human Rights Jurnal Kabar Masyarakat Karunia: Jurnal Hasil Pengabdian Masyarakat Indonesia Public Service And Governance Journal Mimbar Administrasi Celebes Journal of Community Services Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum
Putra, Irman
Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Militer AHM-PTHM
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 61 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Multicience

 1 
RESPONSIBILITY OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES (BUMN) AS MANAGEMENT OF STATE PROPERTY AND AS PROFIT-BASED BUSINESS MANAGEMENT IRMAN PUTRA; ARIEF FAHMI LUBIS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTI SCIENCE Vol. 1 No. 09 (2020): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTISCIENCE - DECEMBER EDITION
Publisher : CV KULTURA DIGITAL MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Directors often face dilemmas in making business decisions in buying and or selling assets, shares, investment, expansion because they have two sides of supervision. If they are always restrained by fear and fear in making decisions, the business movement will definitely be hampered. The approach method used in this research is a sociological juridical approach using secondary data and reinforced by primary data. Secondary data was obtained from laws and regulations and interviews with informants, and questionnaires who had served as Directors in BUMN, while secondary data was obtained from the statute approach and conceptual approach. The data obtained from this study were then analyzed qualitatively to answer the problems in this study. The results of this study indicate that the decision of the Board of Directors in business if it is based on good faith cannot be blamed, either civilly or criminally. However, if the Board of Directors is guilty (schuld) and/or negligent (culpoos), the members of the Board of Directors are fully responsible personally and jointly and severally (Article 97 paragraph (3), (4) and (5) of the Company Law). The Board of Directors personally can also be bankrupt so that it is not only PT that is obliged to pay its obligations, the Board of Directors must also be responsible for paying debts.
THE INVESTIGATION AUTHORITY OF CRIMINAL ACTION MONEY LAUNDERING (AML) FOR JUSTISIABLE OF MILITARY JUSTICE IRMAN PUTRA; ARIEF FAHMI LUBIS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTI SCIENCE Vol. 1 No. 01 (2020): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTISCIENCE -APRIL EDITION
Publisher : CV KULTURA DIGITAL MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Investigators of predicate crimes who are authorized to conduct ML investigations have determined in a limited manner, namely only appointing investigators from the State Police agency Republic of Indonesia, Attorney General's Office, Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), National Narcotics Agency (BNN) and the Directorate General of Taxes and the Directorate of Customs and Excise of the Ministry of Finance Republic of Indonesia, meanwhile a TNI soldier, TNI Investigator is not on the list as an investigator for predicate crimes. The purpose of this study is to analyze the authority TNI investigators in conducting an investigation of money laundering offenses allegedly committed by Justisiabel Military Courts are still a problem, on the other hand there should be no omission of every act that violates the law in the pursuit of justice and legal certainty. Method The approach used in this research is a sociological juridical approach with using secondary data and reinforced by primary data. Secondary data obtained from interviews with resource persons, and questionnaires distributed to nurses in the District Sidoarjo, while secondary data were obtained from the statute approach and conceptual approach. The sampling method chosen is the purposive sampling method which is considered to be able to represent the population. The data obtained from this study were then analyzed qualitatively to answer the problems in this research. The results of this study indicate that according to the applicable procedural law within the Military Courts which are authorized to conduct an investigation into a criminal act allegedly committed by a Judicial Justicia he military is a TNI Investigator, it turns out that it can't be applied immediately in the process ML investigation because the Law (UU TPPU) has determined otherwise, in providing ML investigation authority.
THE STATUS OF EVIDENCE PROCEEDS OF CRIME IN GENERAL AND MILITARY CRIMES IRMAN PUTRA; ARIEF FAHMI LUBIS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTI SCIENCE Vol. 1 No. 06 (2020): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTISCIENCE -SEPTEMBER EDITION
Publisher : CV KULTURA DIGITAL MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Determination of the status of evidence of crimes in military courts has the same legal implications as in general courts. Based on the provisions of Article 191 of Law 31 of 1997 concerning Military Courts, it is stated that "In the case of a sentencing decision or being free from all charges or acquittal from all legal charges, the Court stipulates that the confiscated evidence be handed over to the party most entitled to receive it back whose names are listed in the the decision, except if according to the provisions of the legislation, the evidence must be confiscated for the benefit of the state or destroyed or damaged so that it cannot be used anymore", but when the court decides that the evidence is returned to the rightful person, it often issues a decision that raises the question of who is entitled to it. . The purpose of this study is to analyze using the approach method used in this study is a juridical approach by conducting a comprehensive study based on laws and regulations and also empirical juridical research, namely conducting an assessment based on observations of several court decisions which until now have not been able to return of evidence to the rightful person. The results of this study indicate that according to the procedural law applicable in the Military Courts and general courts, it is necessary for the judge to confirm in the court's decision by stating who has the right so that there is legal certainty.
DYNAMICS OF IMPLEMENTATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF CODE OF ETHICS AND GUIDELINES FOR JUDGES' CONDUCT FOR MILITARY JUDGES PARLUHUTAN SAGALA; IRMAN PUTRA; ARIEF FAHMI LUBIS
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTI SCIENCE Vol. 4 No. 03 (2024): INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTISCIENCE - EDITION SEPTEMBER - DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : CV KULTURA DIGITAL MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

It is reasonable to expect good judges to render decisions that uphold the law and demonstrate a sense of justice. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how, if the Code of Ethics for Guidelines for Judges' Conduct (KEPPH) is followed in carrying out these responsibilities and in other contexts, both directly and indirectly, the perceptions and expectations of justice seekers will ultimately change. restored in the realization of military justice. noble, not cloudy, and free from sinful beliefs and actions. In qualitative research, data were collected methodically, factually, and quickly using descriptive methodology in accordance with the description at the time of the study. The findings of this study indicate that openness, participation, accountability, placing the right person in the right place, and objectivity must be prioritized in the recruitment and selection process to produce competent Military Judges. Although the recruitment and selection process has succeeded in producing Military Judges who uphold the principles of KEPPH and become God's representatives on earth, Military Judges are also human beings and therefore prone to error. Therefore, they require continuous education and training.
Co-Authors Agustinus F. Paskalino Dadi Agustono Agustono Ani Maryani, Ani Apriliyanto, Teguh Arief Fahmi Lubis Bambang Iriawan Bram B Baan Dian Kemala Dewi Edy Sony Firdaus, Firdaus Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara Grenaldo Ginting Hafizh Idri Purbajati Heri Budianto Ica Karina Indah Susilowati Judijanto, Loso Karolus Charlaes Bego M. Aslam Fadli Miharja, Marjan Muhammadong Munip, Al Na'afi , Septiana Nugraha, Muhammad Valiant Arsi Parluhutan Sagala Polii, Johanis L. S. S. Ramlani Lina Sinaulan Salmon, Harly Clifford Jonas Solapari, Nuryati Sumarni Sumarni Suwarna, A. Idun Zainol Hasan