Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PERSPEKTIF KOMPARATIF SUNNI–SYIAH: Identifikasi Perbedaan Kunci dan Ruang Kerjasama Nurhayati Selvi; Abdullah Abdullah; Muh. Natsir Siola; Wahyullah Alannasir
AT-TAJDID Vol 10 No 1 (2026): JANUARI-JUNI 2026
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Metro

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini menyajikan kajian komparatif mengenai perbedaan dan titik kesamaan utama antara Islam Sunni dan Syiah untuk merespons berbagai kesalahpahaman yang masih memicu ketegangan sektarian. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah memperjelas perbedaan teologis, historis, dan sosial-politik yang mendasar, sekaligus mengidentifikasi prinsip bersama yang membuka peluang kerja sama konstruktif. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif-komparatif, analisis dilakukan melalui telaah tekstual terhadap sumber-sumber klasik Islam, literatur akademik kontemporer, serta inisiatif dialog antar-sekte yang telah terdokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perbedaan signifikan tetap ada, terutama terkait isu suksesi, otoritas keagamaan, dan interpretasi hukum. Namun demikian, kedua tradisi memiliki komitmen yang sama terhadap tauhid, tuntunan kenabian, perilaku etis, dan kemaslahatan sosial. Temuan juga menunjukkan bahwa kolaborasi semakin mungkin dilakukan dalam bidang pendidikan, pembangunan sosial, dan upaya perdamaian, di mana nilai-nilai bersama menyediakan landasan praktis bagi keterlibatan bersama. Secara keseluruhan, penelitian ini menegaskan bahwa harmonisasi tidak menuntut penyatuan doktrin, tetapi dapat dicapai melalui pengakuan timbal balik, pemahaman yang lebih terinformasi, serta kerja sama pada isu-isu yang menjadi kepentingan bersama. Penguatan literasi antar-sekte dan perluasan pertukaran akademik muncul sebagai langkah strategis untuk membangun hubungan yang lebih konstruktif dan berkelanjutan. This study offers a comparative examination of the principal differences and shared elements between Sunni and Shia Islam to address the persistent misunderstandings that often fuel sectarian tensions. The research aims to clarify the core theological, historical, and sociopolitical distinctions while identifying common principles that open opportunities for constructive cooperation. Using a qualitative–comparative approach, the analysis draws on classical Islamic texts, contemporary scholarly literature, and documented initiatives of inter-sect dialogue. The findings indicate that substantial differences remain, particularly in matters of succession, religious authority, and legal interpretation. However, both traditions uphold shared commitments to monotheism, prophetic guidance, ethical conduct, and communal welfare. The results further show that collaboration is increasingly feasible in sectors such as education, social development, and peacebuilding, where these shared values create a practical foundation for joint engagement. Overall, the study demonstrates that harmonization is attainable not through doctrinal convergence but through mutual recognition, informed understanding, and cooperation in areas of shared concern. Strengthening inter-sect literacy and promoting scholarly exchange emerge as strategic pathways for fostering more constructive and sustainable relations.
The influence of the Jarimatika-assisted CLIS model on motivation and mathematics learning outcomes Nurhayati Selvi; Ulfiani Rahman; Wahyullah Alannasir; Juan Astuti
Journal Focus Action of Research Mathematic (Factor M) Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): June 2026
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Syekh Wasil Kediri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30762/f_m.v9i1.8396

Abstract

Mathematics learning at SDN Inpres Wadu Wani, which remains teacher-centered, has resulted in low student motivation, conceptual understanding, and classroom activity. Without more innovative and student-centered approaches, this condition may hinder the development of mathematical thinking skills and the achievement of optimal learning outcomes. This study aimed to analyze the improvement of students’ motivation and mathematics learning outcomes after implementing the CLIS model assisted by Jarimatika. The study employed a quantitative approach with a one-group pretest–posttest experimental design. The sample consisted of 18 third-grade students in the even semester of the 2024–2025 academic year selected through saturated sampling. Data were collected using validated and reliable motivation questionnaires and learning outcome tests. Data analysis included normality testing, t-test, Wilcoxon test, N-Gain analysis, and effect size calculation to determine the significance and magnitude of improvement after treatment. The findings showed that the average motivation score increased from 35.78 (SD = 8.71) to 43.06 (SD = 5.51), with significant differences (t = -8.438; p < 0.001), an N-Gain of 0.512, and an effect size of 1.99. Learning outcomes also improved from 60.00 (SD = 21.42) to 78.33 (SD = 17.24), with significant differences (Z = -3.796; p < 0.001), an N-Gain of 0.458, and an effect size of 0.895. These results indicate that integrating Jarimatika-based calculation techniques supports students' active participation and conceptual understanding. This study contributes to the development of innovative elementary mathematics learning strategies by implementing the Jarimatika-assisted CLIS model to enhance students’ motivation and learning outcomes.