Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Juridical Impact of the Misuse of Casual Daily Worker (CDW) Status on the Protection of Workers’ Normative Rights in the Coal Transportation Sector in Jambi Yudistira, Primus; Budhiartie, Arrie; Dewi, Ratna; Nofanda, Syurpana
Mandalika Law Journal Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025): Mandalika Law Journal
Publisher : Yayasan Baru Haji Samsudin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59613/mlj.v3i2.5978

Abstract

This study analyzes the juridical impact of the misuse of Daily Casual Worker (DCW) status on the protection of workers’ normative rights in the coal transportation sector in Jambi Province. In practice, DCW status is frequently applied to workers who perform permanent and continuous work, resulting in legal uncertainty and weakened protection of workers’ rights. This research employs a normative legal research method by examining labor regulations, legal doctrines, and relevant scholarly literature. The findings indicate that the misuse of DCW status contradicts the principles of protection in labor law and leads to the loss of workers’ normative rights, including minimum wage entitlements, social security coverage, occupational safety, and certainty of employment relations. Weak supervision and law enforcement further exacerbate workers’ vulnerability. Therefore, strengthening regulations and oversight is necessary to ensure fair legal protection for workers in the coal transportation sector.
Reformulasi Kebijakan Izin Trayek dan Izin Jalan bagi Angkutan untuk Mewujudkan Transportasi Berkelanjutan Togatorop, Jein Lusiana; Budhiartie, Arrie; Ruswandi, Melia Rizkika
RIGGS: Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Vol. 5 No. 1 (2026): Februari - April
Publisher : Prodi Bisnis Digital Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/riggs.v5i1.7287

Abstract

Route permit and road permit policies in coal transportation constitute an important part of transportation governance and sustainable development in Indonesia. Sustainable development emphasizes a balance between economic, social, environmental, as well as legal and governance aspects, as reflected in Article 33 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution. In practice, coal transportation management still faces various challenges, such as environmental pollution, road infrastructure damage, and weak supervision and compliance with licensing regulations. This study aims to analyze the legal basis, government supervision, and the role of licensing policies in achieving sustainable transportation. The method used is a normative juridical approach by examining laws and regulations, including Law Number 22 of 2009 on Road Traffic and Transportation, Presidential Regulation Number 95 of 2018 on Electronic-Based Government Systems, and Government Regulation Number 96 of 2021. The results show that route permits function as an instrument for controlling transportation operations; however, their implementation still faces internal and external obstacles, such as limited supervision and low public participation. Furthermore, the application of digital technology through electronic-based government systems and participatory approaches in policymaking can enhance the effectiveness of supervision and policy legitimacy. Therefore, strengthening regulations, improving supervision, and integrating sustainable development principles in coal transportation management are necessary to create a safe, efficient, and environmentally friendly transportation system.
Beyond Collateral Damage : An Integrated Legal Framework For Civilian Protection in 2026 US-Israel-Iran Conflict Budhiartie, Arrie; Pradhan, David H.; Dutta, Aruna; Panigrahi, Chandan; Asuhaimi, Farhanin binti Abdullah
Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Vol 7 No 2 (2026): Juni
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/up.v7i2.55099

Abstract

Background: The 2026 armed conflict involving the United States, Israel and Iran raises difficult questions about civilian protection, particularly in relation to schools, hospitals, dual-use infrastructure, maritime passage, cyber disruption and nuclear-related facilities. Methodology: This article adopts normative legal research using statutory, conceptual and case-law approaches. It examines treaty law, customary international humanitarian law, international criminal law and state responsibility with reference to authoritative institutional materials from United Nations bodies, the ICRC, WHO, IAEA and IMO. Objectives: The article asks whether existing international legal rules provide adequate standards for assessing civilian harm in a technologically complex interstate conflict, and how those standards apply to protected institutions, dual-use infrastructure, maritime chokepoints and digital civilian dependency. Findings: The study finds that the principal difficulty is not normative absence, but the evidentiary and institutional fragility of applying distinction, proportionality, precautions, medical protection, humanitarian access and accountability under conditions of contested facts and restricted access. Originality/Novelty: The article contributes by treating civilian protection as an integrated legal architecture across attack, deprivation, movement, information infrastructure and responsibility.