Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
2.374
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia REPERTORIUM Jurnal Privat Law Privat Law JURNAL PENDIDIKAN TAMBUSAI Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Transformasi dan Inovasi : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Multidisplin Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Jurnal Medika: Medika Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik
Diana Tantri Cahyaningsih
Faculty of Law, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta Center for Regional Policy and Institutional, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Computer Science & IT Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 24 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 24 Documents
Search

 1   2   3 
KOMPARASI HAK ASUH DAN HAK NAFKAH ANAK DALAM PUTUSAN- PUTUSAN PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN NEGERI DAN PENGADILAN AGAMA KOTA SURAKARTA Nugraheni, Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri; Luthfiyah, Zeni
Yustisia Vol 2, No 3: December 2013
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v2i3.10158

Abstract

AbstractThe high number of divorce in every year creates concern toward the children’s rights whose have parents divorce. Therefore, the writers did the research in order to identify the legal protection of children’s rights post parents divorce either for rights to rearing and rights to basic necessities. The research is involved into sociological research. The primary data was obtained through interview and the secondary data was coming from literature study from judge’s verdict in District court of Surakarta (either for general District court or religion District court). Technical analysis uses qualitative data specially using deductive method. This research shows that most of all the verdicts (judge’s decision), more than 75%, does not have any substantial decision regarding rights to rearing and rights to basic necessities (in both district court-general District court and religion District court). Based on this result, it means that the legal protection for the children’s who experience parents divorce is at very minimum legal protection for their rights.  The differences of legal protection, research by the writers between both district court, are in religion District court, the underwriter for rearing is given to the mother if the children are below 12 years old (mumayiz) and beyond 12 years old, the children could choose the underwriter is (until he or she is in the mature age-21 years old). Meanwhile, in general District court, there are no clauses regarding what and who are the underwriter, there is no mumayiz term including the differences uses of mature age between 18 years old or 21 years old.Keywords: divorce, rights to rearing, rights to basic necessities, age limit.AbstrakSemakin tingginya angka perceraian setiap tahunmemunculkan keprihatinan penulis tentang nasib anak- anak yang orangtuanya mengalami perceraian.Oleh karena itu penulis melakukan penelitian dengan tujuanmengidentifikasi perlindungan hukum terhadap hak-hak anak pasca perceraian kedua orangtuanya baik hak asuh maupun hak nafkah anak. Penelitian ini termasuk penelitian sosiologis.Data primer diperoleh melalui wawancara dan data sekunder diperoleh melalui studi pustaka putusan-putusan hakim di PN dan PA Kota Surakarta.Teknik analisis menggunakan analisis data kualitatif khususnya dengan metode deduktif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan sebagian besar putusan (+75%) tidak mengandung amar putusan tentang hak asuh dan hak nafkah anak baik putusan perceraian di PN maupun PA.Hal ini berarti masih kurangnya perlindungan hokum terhadap hak-hak anak pasca perceraian kedua orangtuanya.Perbedaan perlindungan hukum yang diidentifikasi penulisantara di PA dan PN ialah jika di PA, kuasa hak asuh diseyogyakan adalah ibu jika anak belum berumur 12 tahun (mumayiz) dan setelah berumur lebih dari 12 tahun, anak dapat memilih siapa yang memegang hak asuh atas dirinya serta umur kedewasaan adalah 21 tahun. Sementara di PN, tidak ada ketentuan yang jelas siapa kuasa hak asuh, tidak dikenal istilah mumayyiz dan umur kedewasaan ada yang menganggap sampai berumur 18 tahun tapi ada juga yang sampai berumur 21 tahun .Kata kunci: Perceraian, hak asuh anak, hak nafkah anak, batas umur.
PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN PIHAK BANK DALAM KASUS KEBOCORAN DATA PRIBADI YANG MENGAKIBATKAN KERUGIAN BAGI NASABAH Sulistyaningsih, Rahayu; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 14, No 1 (2026): JANUARI - JUNI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v14i1.59694

Abstract

This article examines the liability of the bank in cases of personal data leakage that results in losses for customers. This research uses normative legal research. The research approach used is the Legislative Approach and the conceptual approach. The types and sources of legal materials used are primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials used is the study of documents or library materials. The technique of analyzing legal materials uses the deduction method. The results of research and discussion show that the implementation of Personal Data Protection in banking activities until now there is no regulation that codifies it into one law and Leakage of personal data poses various risks including information being stolen and then sold to the Darkweb so that customers are worried about legal uncertainty regarding legal protection. of his personal data and the current regulation that describes the protection of personal data is still sectoral and partial. The form of bank accountability for cases of personal data leakage by replacing customer losses and Banks need to apply legal protection to customer personal data based on Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 7/6/PBI/2005 concerning product transparency, especially internet banking services by providing correct and honest information to customers.
INTELECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THEORY OF ECONOMICS ANALYSIS OF LAW PERSPECTIVE Sudarwanto, AL Sentot; Sulistiyono, Adi; Asrori S, M. Hudi; Suryono, Arief; Muryanto, Yudho Taruno; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri; Kharisma, Dona Budi
Jurnal Privat Law Vol 11, No 2 (2023): JULI - DESEMBER
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/privat.v11i2.77462

Abstract

This article aims to describe the relevance of the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR) in the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law. The approach used is a historical approach (historical approach) using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The data collection technique used is the literature study technique. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that so far the focus of traditional economic analysts has only highlighted that inventors or holders of exclusive IPR are entitled to incentives or rewards for their findings. Apart from that, giving incentives is also to encourage people to make discoveries that are beneficial to human life. However, they did not highlight the high cost of accessing or using their findings. Even the cost of accessing IP exceeds the cost of the production margin of IP itself. In the perspective of the theory of economic analysis of law, the condition of unbalanced margins can cause injustice.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM ANAK LUAR PERKAWINAN PASCA PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 46/PUU-VIII/2010 TERHADAP PUTUSAN NOMOR 109/PDT/2022/PT BTN Kusumawati, Erlinda Yan; Cahyaningsih, Diana Tantri
Res Publica: Jurnal Hukum Kebijakan Publik Vol 9, No 3 (2025): Desember
Publisher : Department of the Constitutional Law, Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/respublica.v9i3.70784

Abstract

AbstractThis article aimed to explain and review about the legal protection of non-marital children after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010 against the Court Decision Number 109/PDT/2022/PT BTN. This article is a normative legal research. Sources of data are primary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal material is a library research. The approaches are statutory approach and conceptual approach. The legal material analysis technique uses qualitative analysis and syllogisms methodes using a deductive mindset. The result is that the legal protection of non-marital children before the Constitutional Court Decision 46/PUU-VIII/2010 was through the ratification and registration of the marital status of the child’s parents and child's birth, while after the Constitutional Court Decision Number was not based on the recording and ratification, but it has provided certainty and legal protection for non-marital children even though the validity of the marriage of the parents is still uncertain. In Court Decision Number 109/PDT/2022/PT BTN the Judge has violated and did not apply the Constitutional Court Decision according to the substance, so there is no legal certainty regarding the protection of non-marital children.AbstrakArtikel ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mengkaji terkait perlindungan hukum anak luar perkawinan pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010 terhadap Putusan Nomor 109/PDT/2022/PT BTN.  Artikel ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif. Sumber data berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Teknik pengumpulan bahan hukum berupa teknik studi kepustakaan. Pendekatan dalam artikel ini adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Metode berpikir menggunakan analisis metode kualitatif dan penalaran (silogisme) dengan menggunakan pola pikir deduktif. Hasil dari artikel ini ialah bahwa perlindungan hukum anak luar perkawinan sebelum adanya Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi 46/PUU-VIII/2010 ialah melalui pengesahan dan pencatatan status perkawinan orang tua dan kelahiran anak, lalu pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor bukan didasarkan pada pencatatan dan pengesahan tersebut melainkan memberikan kepastian dan perlindungan hukum bagi anak luar perkawinan walaupun keabsahan dari perkawinan orang tuanya masih belum pasti. Pada Putusan Nomor 109/PDT/2022/PT BTN hakim melanggar dan tidak menerapkan Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi sesuai substansinya, sehingga tidak ada kepastian hukum pada perlindungan anak luar perkawinan.
Co-Authors Adi Sulistiyono Agnjana, Goldwina Aphroditerri Al Sentot Sudarwanto Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus Sentot Anjar Sri Ciptorukmi Nugraheni Arief Suryono Asep Yudha Wirajaya Atik Catur Budiati Budiono, Fathimah Azzahra Christi, Gladys Azalia Dona Budi Kharisma, Dona Budi Eko Hariyanti, Eko Handayani, Wiwid Putri Heri Hartanto Kuncoro, Guritno Tri Kusumawati, Erlinda Yan Larasati, Florentina Anggita Tiara Leny Noviani Lestari, Novi Sri M. Hudi Asrori S Maharani, Dhea Swasti Maharani, Dhea Swasti Rahmawati, Galih Saptanti, Noor Sari, Iftah Kurnia Sari, Nurdiani Yusnita Setyawan, Adam Azis Rachma Setyawan, Adam Azis Rachma Setyowati, Kristina Siti Khoiriyah Sudarsana Sulistyaningsih, Rahayu Supanto Supanto Supriyadi Tuhana Tuhana Tuhana Wicaksono, Ashari Imam Wicaksono, Ashari Imam Widagdo, Reza Wahyu Widagdo, Reza Wahyu Wijaya, Antonius Ivananda Dias Yudho Taruno Muryanto Yudi Rinanto Zeni Luthfiyah