Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
3.792
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Arena Hukum Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Media Hukum Rechtsidee Tadulako Law Review JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Jurnal Konstitusi Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Constitutional Review Lex Scientia Law Review Journal of Islamic Law Journal of Community Service and Empowerment Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains JHCLS Journal of Social and Policy Issues International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Jurnal Konstitusi International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Jurnal Hukum Prioris JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies)
Aan Eko Widiarto
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 37 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 37 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Conditional Decisions as Instrument Guarding the Supremacy of the Constitution (Analysis of conditional decisions of Indonesian Constitutional Court in 2003 - 2017) Safa'at, Muchamad Ali; Eko Widiarto, Aan
Brawijaya Law Journal Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021): Contemporary Issue in Private Law
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2021.008.01.06

Abstract

The function of the Indonesian Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution is mainly conducted through the judicial review authority. From 2003 to April 2021, the Constitutional Court has received and decided 1392 petitions over judicial review. In its dictums, the Constitutional Court often declares conditionally constitutional or conditionally unconstitutional (conditional decision). The conditional decision is a decision of the Court that declares the reviewed norm conditionally constitutional or unconstitutional. The norm is constitutional if interpreted according to the Court interpretation, or the norm is unconstitutional if interpreted in specific ways. This research investigates the criteria of judicial review decisions that declare conditionally constitutional and conditionally unconstitutional according to the characteristics of norms of the law reviewed. The analysis was limited to the Court decisions from 2003 to 2017. The research result indicates that distinguishing characteristics of norms reviewed have no correlation with conditionally constitutional or conditionally unconstitutional options.  Conditionally Constitutional Decision was used by the Court before replaced by Conditionally Unconstitutional Decision due to the weakness of decision implementation. For conditionally unconstitutional decisions are connected to the substance of the decision, creating a new norm that replaces, limit, or elaborate reviewed norm. The conditional decision is still required due to the following three aspects: enforcement of the supremacy of the constitution, the presumption of validity, and strengthening the execution of Constitutional Court decisions.
Formation of Indonesian Laws Post-2022 Amendment to Law No. 12 of 2011 Usihen, Min; Anshari, Tunggul; Riyanto, R. Benny; Eko Widiarto, Aan
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 4 No 3 (2024): IJHESS DECEMBER 2024
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v4i3.1235

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the evolution of legal politics in Indonesia’s legislative framework following the amendment of Law No. 12/2011 through the enactment of Law No. 13/2022. This amendment introduced the omnibus method as an innovative approach to drafting regulations. Employing a qualitative methodology rooted in doctrinal legal research and normative analysis, the study examines legal texts, judicial decisions, and other legislative materials. The methodology emphasizes the analysis of legal principles and norms to ensure alignment with constitutional directives and international legal standards. The findings indicate that the implementation of the omnibus method enhances efficiency in the legislative process by consolidating overlapping regulations into a cohesive legal framework. This approach facilitates efforts to address regulatory overload and promotes greater legal certainty. Nevertheless, the study identifies challenges such as resistance within the legislative process and the necessity for continuous oversight to maximize the benefits of this approach. In conclusion, the enactment of Law No. 13/2022 represents a pivotal advancement toward a more responsive and efficient legislative framework in Indonesia. This research provides a valuable contribution to understanding the political dynamics of legal reform and the broader implications of adopting the omnibus method in the national legislative system.
Validity of Rental Agreement for Renting Land of Reward Between Village Head with Private Parties Who Exceed The Term of Office Village Head Agustina, Enno Sellya; Anshari, Tunggul; Widiarto, Aan Eko
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v5i1.409

Abstract

Based on the issues related to the lease of reward land between the village chief and a private party that exceeds the chief's term, this paper aims to analyze the legality of the lease agreement for reward land between the village chief and a private party that extends beyond his term of office. In this paper, the researcher uses a normative juridical method, along with a legislative and case study approach. Then, with this analysis, the researcher can address the raised issue about the legality of the lease agreement for reward land between the village chief. From these issues, it can be concluded that the legality of the lease agreement for reward land between the village chief and a private party is regulated in Permendagri Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Management of Village Assets, with the maximum lease limit for reward land being a maximum of 3 (three) years. If there is a lease agreement for reward land between the village chief and a private party that exceeds the chief's term of office, then the agreement is legally void.
THE APPLICABILITY OF LEGAL RULES ON FICTITIOUS NEGATIVE DECISIONS AND FICTITIOUS POSITIVE DECISIONS Jenrison Nainggolan; Aan Eko Widiarto; Sudarsono
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): March
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v5i2.2649

Abstract

The objective of this study is to examine the legal validity of Negative and Positive Fictitious Decisions from the perspective of state administrative law. This study uses normative legal research methods by analyzing variety of literature. The research methods is based on legislationand uses secondary data consistin primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, presented in a wualitative descriptive manner. The findings indicate that the authority of the PTUN to Adjudging disputes of positive fictitious disputes has been removed in the provisions of Article 175 of the Job Creation Law and the provisions for derogation (revocation) of the provisions of Article 3 of the Peratun Law are not regulated in the State Administration Law and the Job Creation Law, so the principle of preference lex posteriori derogat lex priori is no longer appropriate to use. Additionally, the PTUN authority standards that attempt both positive and negative fake disagreements are no longer in conflict. Since the PTUN still has the authority to attempt Negative Fictitious, Positive Fictitious essentially has the executive's complete authority. Therefore, one example of a legal safeguard for citizens against false judgments made by government officials is the requirements of Article 3 of the Peratun Law.
Legal Implications of The Regulation of Material Legal Norms in A Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Wahyu Iswantoro; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Aan Eko Widiarto
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v20i4.271

Abstract

Apart from being the authority of the DPR and the President, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia also gives authority to judicial institutions such as the Supreme Court to make or form regulations. Whereas following Article 79 Paragraph (1) of the Supreme Court Law, the authority to regulate the Supreme Court is limited to supplementing procedural law, however, in its development, several PERMAs such as PERMA 2/2012 regulate the content of material legal norms and are externally binding, which should be regulated at the level law and becomes the authority of lawmakers (legislative act). The main issue that is important to research is what are the legal implications of regulating material legal norms in a PERMA. Under the problems raised, this research is doctrinal research also known as normative research. The approaches used are a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Based on the results of this research, there are 2 (two) legal implications of regulating material legal norms in a PERMA, namely: Overlapping Material Content of Legal Norms and the Unclear Position of PERMA in the Hierarchy of Legislative Regulations. As a result of these three legal implications, law enforcement officials as a legal structure will be unsure whether to follow PERMA as a statutory regulation that is aligned with the law or whether to ignore it.
Between Revelation and Constitution: The Sovereignty Fiqh of Muhammad Yamin’s Sociopolitical Ijtihād Said, Muhtar; Fadli, Moh.; Widiarto, Aan Eko; Al-Uyun, Dhia
Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 6 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Islamic Law
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Pontianak

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24260/jil.v6i2.4220

Abstract

The crucial aspect of studying Indonesian constitutional law that is often overlooked is the dialectic between revelation (religion) and the constitution (state). This interplay significantly influences the foundational thinking of the nation’s architects and shapes constitutional law, as well as critical perspectives on colonialism. This study aims to examine the political-legal thought of Muhammad Yamin by revealing how the interaction between revelation and constitution shaped his ideas regarding the basis and sovereignty of the Indonesian state. Utilizing a textual analysis of historical documents, this research situates Yamin’s thought within the broader context of constitutional formulation as part of an intellectual resistance against colonial hegemony. The findings reveal that Yamin’s concept of sovereignty fiqh (Islamic jurisprudence), which is grounded in the Islamic principle of shūrā (deliberation), represents a sociopolitical ijtihād (independent reasoning) that systematically critiques the Netherlands-Indonesia Union. Furthermore, it clearly articulates his idea of a “pembanding” or comparator, a conceptual precursor to judicial review. Theoretically, this study expands the scope of sociopolitical fiqh within contemporary constitutional discourse. [Aspek krusial dalam kajian hukum ketatanegaraan Indonesia yang sering diabaikan adalah dialektika antara wahyu (agama) dan konstitusi (negara). Interaksi ini memiliki pengaruh yang signifikan terhadap dasar pemikiran para perumus bangsa dalam membentuk hukum konstitusi, serta memberikan perspektif kritis terhadap kolonialisme. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji pemikiran politik-hukum Muhammad Yamin dengan mengungkap bagaimana interaksi antara wahyu dan konstitusi mengonstruksi gagasannya mengenai dasar dan kedaulatan negara Indonesia. Melalui analisis tekstual terhadap dokumen-dokumen historis, penelitian ini menempatkan pemikiran Yamin dalam konteks yang lebih luas dari proses perumusan konstitusi sebagai bagian dari perlawanan intelektual terhadap hegemoni kolonial. Temuan ini mengungkap bahwa konsep fikih kedaulatan Yamin, yang berakar pada prinsip syūrā dalam Islam, merupakan suatu ijtihad sosio-politik yang secara sistematis mengkritik Uni Indonesia-Belanda. Selain itu, konsep tersebut secara jelas mengartikulasikan gagasannya tentang “pembanding”, yang merupakan cikal bakal konseptual dari uji materiil (judicial review). Secara teoretis, studi ini memperluas cakupan fikih sosio-politik dalam wacana ketatanegaraan kontemporer.]
Reevaluating the Principle of Legal Fiction: Balancing Legal Certainty and Social Justice Said, Muhtar; Fadli, Moh.; Widiarto, Aan Eko; Al-Uyun, Dhia
Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Vol. 10 No. 1 (2025): Legal Transformation and Policy Challenges in Indonesia: Navigating Technology
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jils.v10i1.13388

Abstract

The principle of legal fiction is widely recognized for its role in legitimizing laws and ensuring legal certainty. However, while it contributes to the stability and predictability of legal applications, it also has inherent weaknesses that may lead to unjust outcomes, particularly for vulnerable groups who are unaware of the law. In the context of Indonesia’s vast territory, the lack of widespread socialization and public awareness of new legal regulations exacerbates these issues. Consequently, individuals, especially from lower socioeconomic classes, may become inadvertently entangled in legal processes due to their ignorance of applicable laws, leading to potential injustices. The principle of legal fiction, therefore, may inadvertently serve as a tool of oppression, particularly when used to position suspects as defendants without adequate awareness or understanding of their legal rights. This paper argues for a re-evaluation and improvement of the principle to ensure a more just and transparent application. A more nuanced approach is needed, distinguishing between its absolute application in criminal cases and its non-absolute use in regulatory offenses. By refining the concept of legal fiction, we can enhance both its legitimacy and its capacity to uphold justice for all members of society.
Co-Authors Afrizal Mukti Wibowo Agnes Harvelian Agnes Harvelian, Agnes Agus Kusnadi Agustina, Enno Sellya Al Anwary, Muhammad Anis Zhafran Al-Uyun, Dhia Benny Riyanto Dhia Al Uyun, Dhia Esmi Warrasih Pujirahayu Fadli, Moh. Faizin Sulistio Fajar Laksono Suroso Fajar Laksono Suroso, Fajar Laksono Fathorrahman Fathor Haru Permadi Indah Dwi Qurbani Jenrison Nainggolan Mardian Wibowo Marianus Mochammad Tanzil Multazam Mohammad Fadli Muchamad Ali Safaat Muchamad Ali Safa’at Muhammad Dahlan Muhammad Dahlan Muhammad Nur Muhtar Said, Muhtar Prischa Listiningrum Putra, Marsudi Dedi Rachmad Syafa’at Rahayu, Nur Irma Ramadhan, Febriansyah Ria Casmi Arrsa Riana Susmayanti Ridha Zikri Risadde, Fahmi Rosya Rizki Akbar Safa'at, Muchammad Ali Safa’at, Muchamad Ali Setiawan Nurdayasakti Setya Negara, Tunggal Ashari Setyo Widagdo Sherlita Nurosidah, Sherlita Sholahuddin Al-Fatih Sihombing, Uli Parulian Sudarsono Syafa'at, Rachmat Thahir Luth Triya Indra Rahmawan Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara Usihen, Min Wahyu Iswantoro