Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA

Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills on Science Subject Using Liveworksheet Argumentative Through Discovery Learning Hasnunidah, Neni; Amanda, Dhea Olivia; Meriza, Nadya; Lengkana, Dewi; Dewi, Pramita Sylvia
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 25, No 1 (2024): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Analysis of Students’ Higher Order Thinking Skills on Science Subject Using Liveworksheet Argumentative Through Discovery Learning. Objective: This research aims to analyze students HOTS on the Classification of Living Creatures material using Liveworksheet argumentative worksheets through the Discovery Learning model at SMP Negeri 1 Natar. Methods: This research is a quasi-experiment with a non-equivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The research subjects were 69 class VII students sampled from a population of 384 people using simple random sampling techniques. Cognitive tests (C4, C5, & C6) were analyzed using the Independent sample t-test. Data on student responses were collected using a questionnaire and analyzed descriptively. Findings: The results of the research show that there is a significant difference in the N-gain value (P<0.05) between learning using the Discovery Learning model and discovery-model based argumentative liveworksheet. The high scores in the experimental class were the evaluate skills (N-gain 0.63) and analyze skills (N-gain 0.62), while in the control class the three HOTS indicators were low. Based on the results of the student response questionnaire, it was found that almost all students (82.25%) gave very positive responses to the use of argumentative lifeworksheets. Conclusion: The liveworksheet effectively improve students' HOTS.        Keywords: HOTS, classification of living things, liveworksheet argumentative worksheet, discovery learning model.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v25i1.pp351-372
Development and Validation of ADI-STEM-Based Biotechnology e-Liveworksheets to Enhance Student Argumentation Skills Hasnunidah, Neni; Fadiawati, Noor; Herlina, Kartini; Dewi, Pramita Sylvia
Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Vol 26, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA
Publisher : FKIP Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23960/jpmipa.v26i4.pp2224-2245

Abstract

Development and Validation of ADI-STEM-Based Biotechnology e-Liveworksheets to Enhance Student Argumentation Skills. Objectives: Despite its enormous potential, ADI-STEM-based electronic worksheets are still rarely used. In the face of the challenge of integrating STEM, ADI-based worksheets should be centered on authentic engineering issues. Designing real-world, challenging, yet still solvable problems for students with digital tools (Technology & Math) and relevant Science concepts. The purpose of this study is to fill this gap by developing and validating a reliable teaching material called the ADI-STEM-Based Biotechnology e-Liveworksheets (ASBL), which is intended to train the argumentation skills of Indonesian junior high school students. Methods: The research employed a development method using the Thiagarajan 4-D model, which includes the stages of Define, Design, and Develop, without the Disseminate stage. The ASBL underwent rigorous validation by experts and field testing in junior high school students in Indonesia. The Sampson & Clark framework is used to measure students' argumentative skills. Two biology education experts reviewed the content to ensure its validity. Two media experts reviewed the content to ensure its validity, and a senior teacher assessed the feasibility and practicality of ASBL. Researchers got real-world data for descriptive-quantitative analysis from 30 9th-grade students at a junior high school in Lampung, Indonesia. This data demonstrates the practicality of teaching materials, as evidenced by the increase in the average value of argumentation skills between before and after learning, as well as the responses of educators and students to the learning process. Data were collected using validated questionnaires and written tests. Findings: The results of the study showed that the ASBL was stated as very high validity (93%) by material experts, high validity (87%) by media experts, very practical to uses in learning by students (98%), with in improving students’ argumentation skills with N-gain in the high cateogry of claim (0,82), evidence (0,78), and reasoning (0,79). The majority of students (over 85%) found ASBL easy to use, engaging, and helpful in guiding their learning process. Teachers reported that the platform enabled efficient progress tracking and assessment of students’ argument construction at each learning phase. Conclusion: This research develops valuable and valid teaching materials to train students' argumentation skills. As a teaching material that aligns with the Independent Curriculum, ASBL is quite useful for Indonesian teachers. This encourages a shift from memorizing things by rote to understanding them more deeply and learning how to conduct science. Future research could explore scaling this model across different science topics, educational levels, or through longitudinal studies to assess retention and transfer of argumentation skills.     Keywords: biotechnology, liveworksheets, argumentation, argument-driven inquiry, STEM.