Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.928
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Legalitas Lentera Hukum Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Jurnal Media Hukum Jurnal Hukum Novelty PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) JURISDICTIE Jurnal Hukum dan Syariah Unram Law Review Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies MLJ Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Unes Law Review Jambura Law Review Kosmik Hukum ADLIYA: Jurnal Hukum dan Kemanusiaan Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Journal of Business and Applied Management Prosiding National Conference for Community Service Project Journal of Law and Policy Transformation Eksekusi : Journal Of Law Legal Spirit Jurnal Supremasi LEGAL BRIEF Supremasi Hukum Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Journal of Judicial Review UNES Journal of Swara Justisia Jurnal Ilmiah Raflesia Akuntansi Jurnal Hukum Malahayati Jurnal Fundamental Justice Hang Tuah Law Journal Syiah Kuala Law Journal Mimbar Hukum Jurnal Legisia Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Legal Protection for the Partnership Agreement Parties Conference on Management, Business, Innovation, Education and Social Sciences (CoMBInES) Conference on Community Engagement Project (Concept) Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntansi dan Perpajakan International Law Discourse in Southeast Asia Jurnal Jurisprudence
Tan, David
Batam International University
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 90 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA

 1 
Protection of Corporate Whistleblowers in the Digital Age: A Critical Analysis of Current Indonesian Frameworks Tantimin Tantimin; Rufinus Hotmaulana Hutauruk; David Tan
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 13 No 3 (2024)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2024.v13.i03.p11.

Abstract

Corporate whistleblowing plays a key role in ensuring transparency in Indonesian businesses. While the advent of digital technology can help improve the mechanism of corporate whistleblowing, this development still brings its own risks, particularly regarding the privacy of whistleblowers, which can significantly heighten risk of retaliations. This research aims to address the legal adequacy of Indonesia in ensuring the protection of corporate whistleblowers in the digital age, using normative legal research method and statutory approach. Findings of this research highlights the normative uncertainties and disharmony in the realm of witness protection, such as the lack of direct acknowledgement of corporate whistleblowers and the lack of supportive mechanism of digital corporate whistleblowing. In the digital context, there is a lack of mechanisms and compliance to address unique challenges that could arise in digital corporate whistleblowing, in the realm of data privacy. This research proposes a model of legal development consisting of key normative aspects that can be utilized to improve the relevant legal frameworks in Indonesia.
Perlindungan Whistleblower sebagai Pilar Penegakan Hukum Anti-Korupsi: Studi Perbandingan Indonesia, Filipina, dan Australia Alhakim, Abdurrakhman; Tan, David
Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) Vol 14 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : University of Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/JMHU.2025.v14.i02.p12

Abstract

Legal protection for whistleblowers constitutes a crucial element in efforts to combat corruption. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the legal frameworks in Indonesia, the Philippines, and Australia in providing protection for whistleblowers. A normative legal research method and a comparative approach were employed. The study examined key regulations and complementary legal instruments in each country. The findings reveal that Australia has the most comprehensive and structured legal framework for whistleblower protection. Indonesia possesses an adequate normative foundation but lacks a consistent and integrated system. The Philippines, meanwhile, does not yet have explicit legal provisions safeguarding whistleblowers. These findings highlight that all three countries continue to face various challenges in ensuring adequate legal protection. The study recommends strengthening regulatory systems and enhancing institutional support to ensure that the courage of whistleblowers does not lead to vulnerability, but rather becomes an integral part of the social control mechanism in law enforcement. Perlindungan hukum terhadap whistleblower menjadi bagian penting dalam upaya pemberantasan tindak pidana korupsi. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis efektivitas kerangka hukum di Indonesia, Filipina, dan Australia dalam memberikan perlindungan terhadap whistleblower. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dan pendekatan komparatif. Kajian dilakukan terhadap regulasi utama dan perangkat hukum pelengkap yang berlaku di masing-masing negara. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Australia memiliki sistem perlindungan paling menyeluruh dan terstruktur dalam peraturan perundang-undangannya. Indonesia telah memiliki dasar normatif yang cukup, tetapi belum membentuk sistem yang konsisten dan terintegrasi. Filipina belum memiliki pengaturan hukum yang secara eksplisit melindungi whistleblower. Temuan ini menegaskan bahwa ketiga negara masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan dalam memastikan perlindungan hukum yang memadai. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penguatan sistem regulasi dan dukungan kelembagaan yang lebih responsif, agar keberanian pelapor tidak berujung pada kerentanan, melainkan menjadi bagian penting dari mekanisme kontrol sosial dalam penegakan hukum.
Co-Authors ., Jane Afriyadi Afriyadi Agus Susanto Agustianto Agustianto, Agustianto Agustin, Indri Ceria Agustini, Shenti Aini Feriska Sumandya Alhakim, Abdurrakhman Angel, Vanessa Billy Marbiyanov Bodhi, Surya Chutia, Upankar Debby Amellya Zahdjuki Della Aprianingrum Dian Sari, Eva Disemadi, Hari Sutra Dwinta Sugandi Edison Edison Elza Syarief, Elza Febriyani, Emiliya Ferdinand Jason Fiorentine, Jasisca Fitri, Winda Gia Phuc, Dao Girsang, Junimart Hieu, Le Ho Trung Hutauruk, Rufinus Hotmaulana Illya Firna Febriyanti Irvanaries Irvanaries Jason, Ferdinand Jaya, Febri Jayanto, Wen Joseline, Joseline Kang, Cindy Kelvin Kelvin Lau, Jonathan Lu Sudirman Lu Sudirman Meliana Meliana Metta - Tjia Michelle Alice Stania Muhammad Naufal Fitrah Nadia Salsabilla Mareta Modjo Nanda Jala Sena Neisdy Lee Nellcy Desvia Nur Laily Nurlaily Nurviani, Nanny Octa Villa Oryza Sativa MY Pambayun, Cindy Fatika Dewi Prakasa, Satria Unggul Wicaksana Quentin, Pinsolle-Dubourg Rahmadani, Aini Ricky Sandi Permana Roy Mangitua Manurung Rusdiana, Shelvi Sari Wahyuni, Lily Sudhartio, Selviana, Devi Shane Edwin Shendy Devendra Armaya Silviani, Ninne Zahara Silvy Pricilia Fernanda Siti Aisyah Rukmana Situmeang, Ampuan Sovia Sovia Sovina Sovina Surya Bodhi Sylvia Putri Sylvia Putri Tan, Winsherly Tania, Stephanie Taniady, Vicko Tantimin Tantimin Tantimin Tantimin Tantimin, Tantimin Triana Dewi Seroja Viona Puspita Wibowo, Tony Windi Afdal, Windi Wulandari, Aura Yenny Permata Liegestu Yoma Arda Wiratama Zulhairi Zulhairi