Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.779
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i LEGITIMASI: Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Politik Hukum Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM Jurnal Konstitusi DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JCES (Journal of Character Education Society) JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang Unes Law Review Jurnal Yuridis PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Khatulistiwa Jurnal Syntax Transformation AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Law and Border Protection Collegium Studiosum Journal Jurnal Konstitusi Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan Journal Evidence Of Law Bacarita Law Journal Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi Research Horizon Kultura: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Hakim: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Sosial Jurnal Batavia ARIMA : Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora
Taufiqurrohman Syahuri
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : journal of law and border protection

 1 
Citizenship In Immigration Perspective Yogi Prabowo; Taufiqurrohman Syahuri
Journal of Law and Border Protection Vol 4 No 2 (2022): JLBP : Journal of Law and Border Protection
Publisher : Polteknik Imigrasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52617/jlbp.v4i2.360

Abstract

Citizenship shows the relationship between the state and citizens. The right to citizenship is the basic right of every person. However, the state absolutely can determine the principles in determining citizenship. Indonesia has made arrangements for citizenship through Law Number 12 of 2006 regarding Citizenship of the Republic of Indonesia. This research uses normative legal analysis because the object of this research is the legislation which has permanent and binding legal force. Conceptually, Indonesia makes Pancasila as its own views, ideas, and ideals about ideal citizenship. In determining citizenship status, Indonesia adheres to the ius sanguinis principle and the ius soli principle to a limited extent. Basically, Indonesia applies single citizenship, but children can be given limited dual citizenship for the sake of fulfilling human rights and protection. With the regulation of citizenship both in national and international law, in fact there are still stateless people. Indonesia is also inseparable from the existence of stateless people. In line with the regulation of citizenship in Indonesia, Immigration is here to provide services and protection to the status of Indonesian citizenship, as well as to ensure the existence and activities of foreign nationals in the territory of Indonesia in order to guarantee the potential, dignity and worth of every person in accordance with human rights based on Pancasila and The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia.
JURIDICAL STUDY OF STATE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT RULING RELATED TO IMMIGRATION PREVENTION (CASE STUDY NUMBER: 219/G/2017PTUN-JKT SETYA NOVANTO VS. DIRECTOR GENERAL OF IMMIGRATION) Yogi Prabowo; Taufiqurrohman Syahuri
Journal of Law and Border Protection Vol 5 No 1 (2023): JLBP : Journal of Law and Border Protection
Publisher : Polteknik Imigrasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52617/jlbp.v5i1.417

Abstract

Prevention means temporary prohibition of person from exiting from the Territory of Indonesia based on particular Immigration reasons or others prescribed by the Law. In the case of immigration prevention against Setya Novanto ordered by the Chairman of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), a lawsuit was filed to the Administrative Court and recorded in Decision Number: 219/G/2017/PTUN-JKT. This research was conducted to answer the following questions: 1) What were the legal considerations of the Judges in issuing Decision Number: 219/G/2017/PTUN-JKT? 2) How was the analysis of the State Administrative Court Decision Number: 219/G/2017/PTUN-JKT? and 3) What were the recommendations for resolving legal issues in administrative disputes within the Directorate General of Immigration? This study used a normative legal research approach, analyzing secondary data in the form of legislation and literature. The research results concluded that the Prevention carried out by the Director General of Immigration was in accordance with the authority specified in legislation and had fulfilled the General Principles of Good Governance. Therefore, the Judges rejected the Plaintiff's lawsuit in its entirety. However, the Defendant's exception was not fully accepted by the Judges, highlighting the need for improvement in resolving administrative disputes within the Directorate General of Immigration to achieve greater quality and professionalism
REFLECTION ON VISA EXEMPTION POLICY FROM THE PERSPECTIVE OF LEGAL POLITICS OF IMMIGRATION IN INDONESIA Prabowo, Yogi; Budi Dharma, Widya Castrena; Syahuri, Taufiqurrohman
Journal of Law and Border Protection Vol 5 No 2 (2023): JLBP : Journal of Law and Border Protection
Publisher : Polteknik Imigrasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52617/jlbp.v5i2.477

Abstract

Politik hukum keimigrasian di Indonesia menganut prisnip selective policy dengan menggunakan 2 (dua) pendekatan yaitu pendekatan kesejahteraan dan pendekatan keamanan. Dalam kebijakan Bebas visa ditetapkan bahwa dalam pemberiannya harus memperhatikan asas timbal balik dan asas manfaat. Penelitian ini disusun dengan tujuan untuk menjawab rumusan masalah yakni: 1) Bagaimana dinamika perkembangan dalam kebijakan Bebas visa di Indonesia? dan 2) Bagaimana penerapan kebijakan Bebas visa dalam perspektif politik hukum keimigrasian di Indonesia? Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan penelitian hukum normatif, dengan menganalisis data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan dan pustaka. Hasil penelitian memperoleh kesimpulan bahwa kebijakan Bebas visa di Indonesia sudah diterapkan sejak tahun 1983 hingga saat ini. Berdasarkan Peraturan Nomor 21 Tahun 2016, ditetapkan bahwa Bebas visa diberikan kepada 169 negara. Namun saat ini kebijakan tersebut dilakukan penghentian sementara untuk dilakukan evaluasi. Fasilitas Bebas visa yang diberikan kepada 169 negara dipandang tidak sejalan dengan politik hukum keimigrasian di Indonesia sehingga perlu dilakukan perubahan atas kebijakan tersebut dengan lebih mempertimbangkan asas timbal balik dan asas manfaat serta dampaknya bagi Indonesia.
Co-Authors Afdhali, Dino Rizka Aji Lukman Ibrahim Arfah, Azizah Berliana Yuliyanti Wijaya Bernadin Dwi M Budi Dharma, Widya Castrena Candra, Mardi Clarita Ayu Putri S Denethia Sausan Diani Sadiawati Eka Maina Listuti Eka Putri, Rima Fahrozi, Muhammad Helmi Fattah, Akhmad Kautsar Fendy Oktavianto Fitriani, Maulida Hafansyah, Hisan Hafizar, Achmad Halim, Wahidul Halomoan, Febrian Ihsan Badruni Nasution Jaury Douglas Pardomuan Kaharuddin Kaharuddin Kaharuddin Khoyron Nasir, Tomi Lois, Ariel Loisa Merlin Tegay Maina Listuti, Eka Maula, Putri Ni'matul Muhammad Fahrudin Muhammad fauzan Muhammad Fauzan Muthia Sakti Nada Prima Dirkareshza Nafis, Abdul Haris Nana Supena Novianti Novianti Parulian, Hendra Rahardi, Andriyan Raka Haikal Anfasya Ratu Wida Widyaningsih Suhandi Rianda Dirkareshza Rima Eka Putri Rohmah Dwi Cahyaningsih Ruli Agustin, Ruli Sitio, Angel Evelin Saragih Sofyan Sauri, Sofyan Surahmad Syamsul Hadi Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin Tobing, Vania Athalia Lumban Triadi, Irwan Wicipto Setiadi Wijaya, Safira Yogi Prabowo Yogi Prabowo Yogi Prabowo Zaifa, Gilang Abi Zhafran, Dhafin