Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.784
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Jurnal HAM JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Mulawarman Law Review Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Uti Possidetis: Journal of International Law Indonesian Community Journal CONSEN: Indonesian Journal of Community Services and Engagement Amal Ilmiah: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Grizelda Grizelda
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mulawarman
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 11 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 11 Documents
Search

 1   2 
DIVERSI SEBAGAI MEKANISME PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PIDANA ANAK: STUDI PERBANDINGAN INDONESIA DAN SINGAPURA Rizqullah, Kharis Tegar; Apriyani, Rini; grizelda, Grizelda
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6853

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the implementation of diversion as a mechanism for resolving juvenile criminal cases within the juvenile justice systems of Indonesia and Singapore. The research employs a doctrinal method using a statutory approach combined with a comparative approach. The analysis focuses on differences in regulatory frameworks, implementation mechanisms, and the roles of law enforcement authorities in applying diversion in both countries. The findings reveal that although Indonesia and Singapore both recognize diversion as an alternative to formal criminal proceedings for children, significant differences exist in terms of normative regulation, procedural implementation, and institutional support. Singapore demonstrates a more integrated diversion model, supported by strong institutional infrastructure, while Indonesia continues to face challenges related to coordination, consistency in application, and the effective realization of child protection objectives. This study concludes that Singapore’s diversion practices offer valuable insights for strengthening and reforming diversion policies in Indonesia, particularly to enhance their effectiveness, align them with the best interests of the child, and reinforce the principles of restorative justice.Keywords: Diversion; Juvenile Justice System; Juvenile Criminal Cases; Comparative Study; Restorative Justice
Co-Authors Agustina Wati Al Hidayah, Rahmawati Alfian Alfian Alfian Amsari Damanik Aqilza Alyaflah Aristya Windiana Pamuncak Aryo Subroto Asufie, Khairunnisa Noor Atriani, Dewi Emilda Kuspraningrum Erna Susanti Esti Handayani Hardi Gama, Noviyanty Indjar Gama, Sabaniah Indjar Haris Retno Susmiyati Harry Setya Nugraha Helmi Mahendra Putra Kurnia Nur Arifudin Nurul Puspita Palupi Orin Gusta Andini Reza Pramasta Gegana Rika Erawaty Rika Erawaty Rini Apriyani Rita Diana Rizqullah, Kharis Tegar Rustam, Olivia Alvionita Sofwan Rizko Ramadoni Sulung Nugroho Warkhatun Najidah Wiwik Harjanti