Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

LEGAL RESPONSIBILITY OF GOODS/SERVICES PROVIDER FOR BUILDING FAILURE Wibowo, Tulus Yudi Widodo; Hadi, Syofyan
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 3 (2023): JULY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i3.727

Abstract

Construction failure can be caused by a failure in the process of procuring goods or services, or it may occur during the construction process itself. Construction work failure refers to a condition where the results of construction work do not comply with the agreed work specifications in the construction work contract, either partially or entirely, due to the fault of the service user or service provider. The purpose of this study is to analyze the responsibility of goods/services providers in the event of a building failure and to examine the form of their responsibility in such cases. This study adopts a descriptive normative approach to answer questions regarding the responsibilities of goods/services providers in cases of building failures, as outlined in Legislation Number 18 of 1999 concerning Construction Services, which was renewed as Number 2 of 2017 Construction Services, Government Regulation Number 29 of 2000 concerning construction service providers, and regulations pertaining to the responsibilities of goods/services providers in the event of building failures, which include meeting the Standards for Security, Safety, Health, and Sustainability, undergoing inspection by a team of experts appointed directly by the Minister, and complying within a maximum period of 10 (ten) years from the final delivery of Construction Services. The responsibility of goods/services providers for building failures is based on the principle of Liability based on Fault and is administered through written warnings, administrative fines, temporary suspension of construction service activities, inclusion in the black list, and even suspension or revocation of permits.
استخدام نموذج تعلم التعاوني ترقم رأس جماعي Numbered Head Together لترقية مهارة الكلام Soma, Nara; Hadi, Syofyan; Ritonga, Mahyudin; Zuhriyah, Nurul
Al-Af'idah: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab dan Pengajarannya Vol 8 No 2 (2024): September
Publisher : Prodi Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Fakultas Tarbiyah IAI Muhammadiyah Bima

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52266/al-afidah.v8i2.3419

Abstract

يعطي نموذج التعلم التعاوني من نوع ترقم رأس جماعي (Numbered Head Together) الفرصة للتلاميذ لتبادل الأفكار والآراء في حلّ المشكلات مناسبا، حتى يستطيع أن يشكل الفصل الدراسي الناشط. أما هدف هذا البحث فهو لكشف تأثير استخدام نموذج التعلم التعاوني (Numbered Head Together) لترقية مهارة الكلام لتلاميذ في الفصل الثامن معهد القرآن حرسالكم بنجكولو. أما مدخل البحث المستخدم في هذا البحث فهو مدخل كمي بمنهج التجريبي على البحث الميداني، أدوات لجمع البيانات في هذا البحث فهي اختبار، والملاحظة، بتصميم البحث شبه التجريبي. أما نتائج البحث عن استخدام نموذج تعلم التعاوني ترقم رأس جماعي (Numbered Head Together) فهي: الأولى، كانت نتيجة المتوسطة قبل استخدام نموذج التعلم التعاوني ترقم رأس جماعي( Numbered Head Together) هي 39،10 ثم كان بعد استخدام نموذج تعلم التعاوني ترقم رأس جماعي (Numbered Head Together) هي 79،57 بتقدير مقبول
Upholding the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Through the Difference Principle Shodikin, Miftakhul; Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol 18 No 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i1.12135

Abstract

The right to work is a right for every citizen to earn a decent living for humanity. However, injustice is still often felt by people with disabilities who often face challenges in accessing this right. The difference principle asserts that inequality is only acceptable if it provides the greatest benefit to the most disadvantaged. This principle is an appropriate analytical tool to evaluate how employment policies in Indonesia have succeeded in minimizing the inequalities faced by persons with disabilities. Therefore, this research aims to explain the difference principle prioritizes the well-being of those who are most disadvantaged or marginalized. This study aims to analyze the legal issues through a normative legal lens, incorporating both statutory and conceptual analysis. Through normative analysis and deductive reasoning, the result of this research is that the regulation of the right to work for persons with disabilities is not yet optimal in accordance with the difference principle. Such as special quota policies that are not accompanied by strict sanctions, training, and job fairs that are still general and have yet to fully meet the unique requirements of individuals with disabilities. The inclusive recruitment process, which should be a must, is a phrase in the article that regulates the possibility (optional) instead of an obligation (mandatory). Meanwhile, the limited authority of the Disability Service Unit (ULD) in the employment sector and the weak institutional structure of the National Commission on Disability (KND), which is far from independent, include the barriers that individuals with disabilities encounter in accessing their right to employment.
The Authority of Regency/City Governments in Control of Alcoholic Beverage Sales Hadi, Syofyan
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 21 Nomor 1 Februari 2025
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v0i0.11508

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the authority of the Regency/City Government in controlling the sale of alcoholic beverages. This research is a normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Primary legal materials were collected by inventorying and categorizing laws and regulations, while secondary legal materials were collected through literature studies. Legal materials were analyzed using normative analysis. The results of the study found that the Regency/City Government is given attribution authority to control the sale of alcoholic beverages in the form of (1) Authority to provide SIUP-MB class B and C for retailers and direct sellers of drinks on the spot and (2) Authority to determine certain places that are permitted or restricted or prohibited from selling and distributing alcoholic beverages in accordance with regional characteristics in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (3) of Law No. 23 of 2024 and its Attachments, Article 7 of Presidential Regulation No. 74 of 2013, and Article 28 of Minister of Trade Regulation No. 20 of 2014. To implement this authority, the Regency/City Government needs to form Regional Regulations and Regional Head Regulations to provide legal certainty for the implementation of alcoholic beverage sales businesses and legal protection for the community in the region
Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu terhadap Penetapan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Dananjaya, Adhitya Arum; Hadi, Syofyan
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (April)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i1.1052

Abstract

This research discusses the legal strength of the decision of the Election Organizer Honorary Council (DKPP) regarding the determination of presidential and vice presidential candidates by the General Election Commission (KPU). DKPP is an institution tasked with enforcing the code of ethics for election organizers by issuing final and binding decisions. However, this "final and binding" nature is often questioned in the context of whether DKPP decisions are equivalent to decisions of formal judicial institutions. This research highlights the legal strength of DKPP decisions in the context of determining presidential and vice presidential candidates, especially in cases of violations of the code of ethics by the KPU. Through normative research methods that examine statutory regulations and juridical analysis, this research finds that although DKPP decisions are binding for election management institutions such as the KPU and Bawaslu, these decisions do not have permanent legal force like formal judicial decisions and can become the object of a lawsuit in court. State Administration (PTUN). The research results show that although the DKPP decision is final and binding on the relevant agencies, it is limited in nature as part of internal supervision and can become the object of a lawsuit in the state administrative court. This confirms that the DKPP does not have the same legal power as formal justice, even though its decisions must be implemented by the parties involved in holding elections.
KEWAJIBAN NEGARA DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEKERJA MIGRAN INDONESIA NON PROSEDURAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM Sutra, Heni; Hadi, Syofyan
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Jabal Ghafur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47647/jsh.v6i2.1672

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mengenai kewajiban Negara dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada Pekerja Migran Indonesia Non Prosedural. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari Pendekatan Undang – Undang dan Pendekatan konseptual. Jenis dan Sumber Bahan Hukum yang digunakan ialah bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekuder dan bahan nonhukum. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa Negara berkewajiban untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja migran Indonesia non prosedural didasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip universal HAM yang mengakui dan melindungi hak-hak dasar setiap individu, tanpa memandang status migrasi mereka. Selain itu, ada hak-hak asasi yang melekat pada diri pekerja migran Indonesia non prosedural tersebut yang juga diatur dalam instrument hukum HAM Nasional dan Internasional.Kata Kunci :     Perlindungan hukum, PMI Non Prosedural, HAM
Menelaah Problematika Kajian Semantik Historis Bahasa Arab di Era Modern Fikri alhamdi; Hadi, Syofyan; Firdaus, Salsabila
Bahtera: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): BAHTERA: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra, Volume 24 Nomor 2 Juli 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21009/bahtera.242.05

Abstract

This study examines the challenges of historical semantics research in the Arabic language in the modern era. While historical semantics investigates the evolution of word meanings over time, existing literature often overlooks the complex social, political, and religious factors influencing these changes, especially within Arabic. The gap lies in limited integration of socio-political contexts and contemporary linguistic shifts in semantic analysis. This research aims to fill that gap by analyzing semantic changes in Arabic words through both synchronic and diachronic approaches, emphasizing the socio-cultural and religious dynamics involved. A qualitative method combining document analysis and semantic theory review was employed to trace semantic shifts and identify key problematics. The study reveals that modern influences such as colonialism, digitalization, and ideological conflicts significantly affect meaning transformations, posing methodological and ethical challenges for researchers. Findings highlight that the reinterpretation of key terms often reflects broader socio-political struggles and cultural negotiations. The study concludes that a nuanced, context-aware approach is essential for accurate semantic historical analysis of Arabic, balancing respect for traditional meanings with recognition of evolving usages. This contributes to a deeper understanding of language dynamics and offers a framework for future semantic research in Arabic and other languages with rich historical backgrounds
Legal Reform of the Division of Authority for Mining Affairs: Balance between Regional Autonomy and National Interests Hadi, Syofyan; Fikri, Sultoni; Riqiey, Baharuddin; Rustambekov, Islambek
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.20947

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and find the legal reform of the division of authority for mineral and coal mining affairs between the Central Government and Regional Governments, so that a regulatory model can balance the principle of regional autonomy and national interests. This research is a normative legal research with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. This study found that after Law No. 3 of 2020 and Law No. 6 of 2023, there was a centralization of mineral and coal mining affairs, which led to the creation of injustice and legal uncertainty for autonomous regions. These regulations, from the perspective of balancing the principle of regional autonomy and the principle of national interests, need to be reformed trough the division of mineral and mining affairs between the Central Government and the autonomous regions based on the principle of justice by using the principles of externality, accountability, and efficiency. Meanwhile, the Central Government can use the principle of national strategic interests for several mineral and coal mining sub-affairs. In Addition, the delegation authority model should be removed and Article 18 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia needs to be amended, so that the division of government affairs provides justice and legal certainty for autonomous regions.
Reformulasi Konsep Pengampuan Melalui Penguatan Pengawasan oleh Pengampu Pengawas Fouziah, Resti; Hadi, Syofyan
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1301

Abstract

The concept of guardianship in the Civil Code (KUH Perdata) has so far contained a discriminatory approach towards people with mental and/or intellectual disabilities. This is reflected in the use of terms such as "stupid", "brain disease", and "dark eyes", as well as the provisions of Article 433 of the Civil Code which require the determination of guardianship without considering individual capacity. Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-XX/2022 is present as a constitutional correction that encourages a change in approach, from a generalized guardianship model to an assessment based on personal capacity. This study aims to analyze the urgency of reformulating the concept of guardianship so that it is in line with the principles of non-discrimination and respect for the rights of people with disabilities as regulated in Law Number 8 of 2016 and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Through a normative legal approach, this article recommends strengthening the role of supervisory guardians in guardianship institutions consisting of various professional elements to realize protection for people under guardianship/ curandus. The results of this study indicate that the concept of guardianship, as regulated by the laws and regulations in Indonesia, still has weaknesses in terms of oversight of the actions and policies taken by guardians toward the individuals under their care. The absence of a strong supervisory mechanism opens opportunities for abuse of authority, both administratively and financially, which can harm the interests of the protected individuals.
Open Legal Policy: Testing Practices and Limitations by the Constitutional Court Riqiey, Baharuddin; Hadi, Syofyan; Sukardi, Sukardi; Hikam, Reza Maulana
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v8i2.131863

Abstract

The Constitutional Court in its various decisions has not granted a petition on the grounds of open legal policy. Open legal policy is always identical to numbers, for example, term of office, parliamentary threshold, etc. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the practice of testing legal norms that are open legal policy by the Constitutional Court and to examine and analyze the limitations of testing legal norms that are open legal policy by the Constitutional Court. The research method used in this study is legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of this study indicate that the practice of testing legal norms that are open legal policy has been going on since the Constitutional Court was established. The provisions of legal norms that are open legal policy are essentially the absolute domain of the legislators so that other state institutions cannot change these provisions. However, under certain conditions the Constitutional Court can change these provisions as long as the norms clearly violate morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice; exceed the authority of the legislators; are part of the abuse of authority; cause institutional problems and lead to legal deadlock; are contrary to political rights; and are contrary to the principle of people's sovereignty.